tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16639178193242392024-02-20T08:32:06.817-05:00The Lies of Scientologyas told by
L. RON HUBBARDAnonymous Suppressive Personhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05339702348371749925noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1663917819324239.post-23744389985587776362011-10-27T03:40:00.000-04:002011-10-27T03:40:29.501-04:00'We Stand Tall' - Scientology Music Video<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/BXne-DNEmLA?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
This is the full video showing the liars from the cult of Scientology singing. David Miscavige, the leader of Scientology, does not stand tall. He stands short (as seen in the video). L. Ron Hubbard is a liar and a fraud.</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
It is time for David Miscavige to answer our questions:</div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<strong>What really happened to Lisa McPherson? </strong></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<strong>Where is Shelly Miscavige? </strong></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<strong><br /></strong></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<strong>It is time for David Miscavige, the illiterate high school dropout, to lift the veil, let the prisoners of Scientology out of the hole, and be taken to task for the tragic human rights violations he has committed.</strong></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<strong><br /></strong></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<strong>We are Anonymous. We are Legion. We do not Forgive. We do not Forget.</strong></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<strong>EXPECT US.</strong></div>Anonymous Suppressive Personhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05339702348371749925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1663917819324239.post-74941297733015521312011-09-20T03:59:00.000-04:002011-09-20T10:39:07.596-04:00Operating Thetan (OT) Levels [Part 2]284 <br />
<br />
Also, as above, it is easy to mess up on TR 4 and evaluate for the solo-auditor-nowpc <br />
“clearing it up by telling him what reads on the meter” etc. <br />
<br />
OT III pre OTs got a reputation of being hard to run on Dianetics early in <br />
Dianetic re-development. <br />
<br />
Only five reasons exist for this: <br />
<br />
1. A person that high on OT grades audits fast and a comm laggy Dianetic auditor <br />
can drive him up the wall. <br />
2. Too quiet or too blurred TR 1. <br />
3. A tendency to evaluate instead of using TR 4. <br />
4. The numerousness of BT chains on the same item (The BTs being separated <br />
now) making several chains of the same item which if not all run separately leave the pc <br />
ARC Broken with the by-passed charge of unrun BTs. <br />
5. The OT II who is still an OT III and has been on it awhile probably himself <br />
has no pictures and all the pictures he has are BT pictures. <br />
The lower grade pc (before clear) reacts as a composite being all on one chain, so <br />
to speak. He is separared into himself and individual BTs and clusters of them when he <br />
gets to OT II and so “audits differently”. He easily misowns the pictures, thinking they <br />
are his. And the big Blowdowns you get on such a pc’s item indicates several BTs have <br />
it in common. <br />
<br />
If a lower grade pc ever got separated out like this, it could be that “he” has several <br />
chains of the same item, meaning he has separated BTs. If the Class VIII sees a lower <br />
grade pc whose “illness won’t recover” he need only have the same items checked that <br />
have already been run on the pc and if one gives a BD, get it run again or again and again. <br />
But this means this pc was already-chopped up in sessions in some way so that, unknown <br />
to the pc (and you don’t inform him or her) other BTs than that one run had the same <br />
somatic or emotion and only one was run on it. You just leave all items already run on the <br />
list and run them again if they read again. If really flat the item briefly F/Ns but you <br />
disregard the F/N while assessing in this case. The phenomenon is rare that a lower grade <br />
pc has to run more than one chain on the same item. <br />
<br />
A Solo III, however, will be found to have the same Item on more than one BT in <br />
many cases. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:rs <br />
Copyright (c) 1969 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstecd, Sussex <br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 JUNE, 1970 <br />
Issue II <br />
<br />
<br />
Class VIIIs <br />
OT IlI <br />
Class VIII Checksheet S E C R E T <br />
<br />
The reason for low TA is unflat OTIII phenomena . <br />
<br />
If a person has had a low TA in lower grades (see HCOB 8 June, 70, Issue 1) the keynote <br />
is take it very easy as auditor and C/S. This applies also to any auditing given on upper OT <br />
Levels. <br />
<br />
That a Pc’s TA goes below 2.0 is a certain indicator of unflat OT III. He’s still got some. <br />
<br />
When a person cannot handle OT III he is too much at effect. He cannot project his <br />
intention. And so can’t run O TIII. <br />
<br />
The new OT I and OT II, particularly OT II, are designed to increase a pc’s ability to <br />
project his intention to others. If he can’t, they overwhelm him and you get low TA or “none <br />
on III”. Harsh, overbearing auditing or life incidents have to occur, apparently to drive the <br />
TA down. <br />
<br />
Overts, disagreements expressed as obsessive agreement and other lower lovel matters <br />
are at the bottom of this in any being. <br />
<br />
But any “case of low TA” I have ever found has been: <br />
<br />
(1) Overwhelmed in life; <br />
(2) Unable to praject intention; <br />
(3) Physically inactive; <br />
(4) Loaded with BTs; <br />
(5) Tends to go out of valence easily . <br />
In all this (4) is the important point. <br />
<br />
The cure is given in HCOB 8 June, 70, Issue 1, and the only thing that this HCO B, Issue <br />
II, adds is that it IS (4) above. <br />
<br />
Endless OT III and Low TA are alike - inability to project intention, pc at effect. <br />
<br />
Remedy by lightly causing pc to come to cause, to be able to project his intention and <br />
thus flatten OTIII. <br />
<br />
That will complete and finish off low TA. <br />
<br />
LRH: dz L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1970 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
286 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATION OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 OCTOBER 1970 <br />
<br />
OT III <br />
OT IV <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
EP’S <br />
<br />
No BTs left = OT III <br />
<br />
Exterior = OT IV <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH: rr <br />
Copyright (c) 1970 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
288 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 JULY 1979 <br />
<br />
<br />
Limited <br />
Distribution <br />
NED for OTs <br />
Auditors <br />
AO Review Auditors,<br />
<br />
OT III <br />
ACS Checksheet <br />
Class XII <br />
<br />
C O N F I D E N T I A L <br />
<br />
HANDLING CORRECTION LISTS ON OTs <br />
<br />
When you get a read on a correction list on a Pre-OT who is on OT III or above, you <br />
should find out from what area it is reading. i.e. find the position in relation to the body, <br />
of the BT or cluster on whom that correction list question read. <br />
<br />
Otherwise, the reading correction list line gets assigned to all areas, when it only <br />
applied to one. This creates BPC as it gives the rest a wrong item or wrong indication, and <br />
it makes the reading question appear to be a generality, when in fact it only applied to one <br />
BT or cluster. <br />
<br />
By finding the BT or cluster that the read applied to, the auditor then clears the read <br />
on that BT or cluster. And then takes any additional steps to get it to blow and blow it. <br />
<br />
The above does not apply to cases below OT III and must never be mentioned to such <br />
a case. <br />
<br />
There is a tendency of an auditor trained on general correctlon lists to simply clear <br />
the read without finding where it is coming from and as this omission can jam up a case <br />
who is on OT III or on NOTs, such auditors when doing NOTs or actions on Pre-OTs OT <br />
III or above must learn to handle correction lists in this way. It can mean the difference <br />
between failure and success. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH: DM: kjm <br />
Copyright © 1979 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 AUGUST 1983 <br />
<br />
<br />
AOs <br />
OT Review<br />
<br />
Auditors <br />
C/Ses CONFIDENTIAL <br />
Solo OT III<br />
<br />
Course and<br />
<br />
above <br />
<br />
FLYING RUDS ON SOLO OT III AND ABOVE <br />
<br />
( Ref:HCOB 16 Aug 83 CONFIDENTIAL SOLO C/S Series <br />
No. 7 RUDS GOING OUT ON BTS <br />
HCOB 11 Aug 78 RUDIMENTS, DEFINITIONS AND <br />
PATTER ) <br />
<br />
Flying rudiments at OT III and above is a piece of tech a Solo Auditor on III must <br />
know and be able to use. At this level, when a rudiment is out the Pre OT must be able <br />
to determine whose out - rudiment it is — his own, a BT’s or that of a cluster. <br />
<br />
MISOWNERSHIP <br />
<br />
Scientology axiom 29: “ In order to cause an As - is - ness to persist, one must <br />
assign other authorship to the creation than his own. Otherwise his view of it would cause <br />
it’s vanishment.” <br />
<br />
This Axiom is especially relevant to auditing at the level of OT III and above <br />
because at this level the Pre OT is handling other being than himself ( BTs and Clusters <br />
). Axiom 29 tells us that it is necessary to establish correct ownership of charge in order <br />
to get an As - is - ness of the charge. <br />
<br />
Furthermore, incorrectly assigning charge to the wrong being can cause by-passed <br />
charge ( BPC ) as it is now misowned. <br />
<br />
Hence the instruction in the OT III materials that one must use a narrow attention <br />
span so as not to restimulate or confuse other BTs with the one being audited. <br />
<br />
Finding charge without establishing whose charge it is, and fully handling the <br />
charge for that being, can result in a generality — the idea that the charge belongs to all <br />
<br />
— when it only belongs to one being. This can cause a wrong indication to the others to <br />
whom it does not belong. <br />
Finding more than one charge without establishing whose charge it is, and fully <br />
handling that being, can result in a generality — the idea that the charge found belongs <br />
to all — when it only belongs to one being. This can cause an ARC Break or bad reaction <br />
as it acts as a wrong indication to the others to whom the charge does not belong. By <br />
correctly establishing the ownership of charge, and handling the correct charge on the <br />
being to whom it belongs, you get an As - is - ness of the charge. <br />
<br />
290 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HOW TO FLY THE RUDS <br />
<br />
<br />
The rudiments questions which contain the word “you” (i.e. “Do you have an ARC <br />
Break?”) are for use on lower level Pcs, but not at OT III or above. When the word “you” <br />
is used in a rudiments question on a Pre OT who is OT III or above, it is evaluative. It says <br />
whose charge it is. <br />
<br />
The correct wording of rudiments questions for use by the Solo Auditor on OT III <br />
or above is: <br />
<br />
“ Is there an ARC Break ?” <br />
<br />
“ Is there a present time problem ?” <br />
<br />
“ Is there a withhold ?” <br />
<br />
“ Is there an overt ?” <br />
<br />
and when full ruds are being flown: <br />
<br />
“ Is there an invalidation ?” <br />
<br />
“ Is there an evaluation ?” <br />
<br />
By using “Is there an/a ________ ?” you are not evaluating whose charge it is. <br />
<br />
Then the Solo Auditor can establish whose charge it is by asking: <br />
<br />
“ Is ( charge found ) mine? A BT’ ? A Cluster’s ? and handle which of these read. <br />
<br />
Note: Sometimes you may find that a charge can belong to and read on more than <br />
one of the above, in which case you would handle both reads, one at a time. It is also <br />
possible that an ARC Break, for example, could be shared by all present, and that it is the <br />
Pre OT’s out rud and also a BT’s or Cluster’s. The question used in this case would be <br />
“ Is it also ( mine ) ? ( a BT’s ) ? ( a cluster’s ) ?”. <br />
<br />
When one rudiment has been fully handled, using the steps above, the Solo Auditor <br />
continues on down the rudiments questions to the next reading rudiment and handles it <br />
as above. <br />
<br />
EXCEPTION <br />
<br />
Sometimes the rudiment will run and F/N and blow just on one of the first rudiment <br />
questions alone ( such as, “ Is there an ARC Break ?” or “ Is there a present time problem <br />
?”, etc. ), and without differentiating whose charge it is. <br />
<br />
It is possible that the Solo Auditor may not be able to determine whose it is. This <br />
is how rudiments run all the time on lower level cases. It just runs generally as the <br />
rudiment, without establishing whose it is. The trouble one can get into, however, is <br />
misownership, whereby you are running a charge that belongs to a BT as if it were your <br />
own ( the Pre OT’s ) charge. Or the charge of one BT is misowned as belonging to some <br />
other BT or Cluster. <br />
<br />
<br />
When misownership of charge occurs, it won’t run or as-is or blow, you can’t F/N <br />
it, and it will start turning on more mass or solidity. If you get into this sort of situation, <br />
narrow enough attention span, sort out whose it is and handle accordingly. <br />
<br />
But if when flying a rudiment, or other charge found such as a reading line on a <br />
prepared list, it just runs and blows, realize you’ve had a lucky break. Don’t interrupt this <br />
to try to find out whose it is or try to take it up again after it has blown. <br />
<br />
This is obvious enough when it happens because as soon as you get onto the reading <br />
rudiment or reading line the charge starts coming off and the whole thing F/Ns and blows. <br />
<br />
This is a special condition and if it doesn’t occur you always proceed according to <br />
the steps given under “How To Fly The Ruds”. <br />
<br />
RULE <br />
<br />
Unless you get a discharge and blow of the rudiment as described under “Exception” <br />
above, it is essential to find out if any charge found belongs really to the Pre OT himself <br />
or to a BT or a Cluster when the charge is found. <br />
<br />
Don’t fly all the ruds, for example, and then ask: “ Are all these .... ?” as that would <br />
generalize it. <br />
<br />
The rule is : ON RUDS, OR ON A PREPARED LIST, OR WHEN FINDING A <br />
CHARGE ON A CASE, AT ONCE CHECK IF THAT CHARGE BELONGS TO A BT <br />
OR CLUSTER, and if so, find where that BT or Cluster is and limit your attention to that <br />
specific area when F/Ning the read. And then take any additional steps to blow that BT <br />
or Cluster. And blow it. <br />
<br />
These rules for the Solo Auditor on OT III or above apply when putting ruds in at <br />
the start session and apply as well to ruds going out during the session. ( Ref: HCOB 16 <br />
Aug 83, CONFIDENTIAL, SOLO C/S Series No. 7, RUDS GOING OUT ON BTS. ) <br />
The handling in the later case is the same. <br />
<br />
CAUTION <br />
<br />
The ruds question : “ Is there a/an .... ?” can be asked of any case, but the remainder <br />
of the data in this HCOB does not apply to cases below OT III and must never be <br />
mentioned to such a case. <br />
<br />
SUMMARY <br />
<br />
Before you begin solo auditing on OT III get this procedure drilled until you can do <br />
it smoothly and precisely. <br />
<br />
With the principle of misownership and As - is - ness understood and the procedure <br />
well drilled, flying ruds at OT III and above is a piece of cake. <br />
<br />
Good auditing! <br />
<br />
LRH: sk L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright © 1983 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS <br />
<br />
292 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
294 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 AUGUST 1983 <br />
<br />
<br />
AOs, FSO <br />
ONLY <br />
Solo OT III <br />
C/Ses <br />
<br />
Solo OT III <br />
Course Super-CONFIDENTIAL <br />
visors <br />
<br />
Solo OT III <br />
Course <br />
<br />
LIST OF LRH HANDWRITTEN <br />
MATERIALS ON OT III COURSE <br />
<br />
<br />
The following is a list of all LRH HANDWRITTEN MATERALS which should be <br />
in all OT III Course packs. <br />
<br />
OT III students are to check their packs against this list and ensure all of these <br />
handwritten materials are there and have been studied before attesting to completion of <br />
either the Study Section or the Auditing Section of the Course. <br />
<br />
PART TWO: STUDY OF OT III DATA <br />
<br />
1. <br />
DATA, 3 pages LRH handwriting. <br />
2. <br />
2nd NOTE, INCIDENT II, 28 Oct 68, 5 pages LRH handwriting. <br />
3. <br />
1st NOTE, INCIDENT I, 28 Oct 68, 1 page LRH handwriting. <br />
4. <br />
INSTRUCTIONS ( revised 12 Aug 1969 ), 4 pages LRH Handwriting. <br />
5. <br />
SECTION III OT, ADDITIONAL SHEET, NOTES ON RUNNING, 2 pages <br />
LRH handwriting. <br />
6. <br />
3rd NOTE, RUNNING INCIDENT II, 28 Oct 68, 2 pages LRH handwriting. <br />
7. <br />
IMPORTANT NOTE SECTION III, 20 April 69, 1 page LRH handwriting. <br />
PART THREE: AUDITING SECTION <br />
<br />
1. <br />
OT III SECTION, LIST OF VOLCANOES, 1 page LRH handwriting. <br />
2. <br />
INCIDENT TWO, 1 page LRH handwriting. <br />
3. INCIDENT ONE, 1 page LRH handwriting. <br />
The above-listed materials are modified only by the data contained in HCOB 2 Nov <br />
296 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
78R, Rev. 10.12.78, CONFIDENTIAL , URGENT, IMPORTANT, DIANETICS <br />
DELETED FROM OT III MATERIALS, and HCOB 2 Oct 68R, Rev., 16 Aug 83, <br />
CONFIDENTIAL, OT III. <br />
<br />
ALL OT III Course materials must be returned to the Advanced Courses Admin at <br />
the completion of the OT III Course. <br />
<br />
Upon return of these materials, the Advanced Courses Admin must check the pack <br />
contents against the OT III Course Checksheet to ensure all materials ( LRH handwritten <br />
materials, HCOBs and HCO PLs ) have been returned. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH: pm: sk <br />
Copyright © 1983 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 2 JANUARY 1970 <br />
Class VIII <br />
OT III <br />
Study Pack <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
AUDITING BY R3R <br />
<br />
Elsewhere earlier HCOBs forbade Inc II and Inc I to be run when encountered by <br />
a Dianetic auditor an OT III student. <br />
<br />
This restriction is lifted. Experience shows they must be run if encountered by a <br />
Dianetic Auditor who must be OT III. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH; rs <br />
Copyright (c) 1970 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 3 JANUARY 1970 <br />
<br />
<br />
Issue II <br />
AOs <br />
Class VIIIs <br />
OT III <br />
Study Pack CONFIDENTIAL <br />
R6EW <br />
Study Pack <br />
SOLO & R3R <br />
<br />
DO NOT ATTEMPT TO RUN R3R as a SOLO Action. <br />
<br />
Tests show that while one occasionally can “get away with it” the practice can be <br />
dangerous. <br />
<br />
Solo Auditing is addressed to specific areas of the mind as given in the auditing <br />
materials of R6EW and upwards as issued. <br />
<br />
One can run Rudiments on oneself successfully with “Itsa earlier Itsa” meaning <br />
finding an earlier similar ARC Brk etc. <br />
<br />
But when one tries to run engrams by R3R on Solo one can run into trouble. <br />
<br />
When engrams not related to Auditing materials get in one’s way on Solo OBTAIN <br />
A DIANETICS SESSION from the org. <br />
<br />
It is also very bad in Solo to wander around the bank looking over various ideas <br />
instead of auditing the materials. <br />
<br />
No org can be responsible for somatics and case upsets occurring because one has <br />
departed from the exact regimen given in the materials for Solo Auditing. Get a Review <br />
or a Dianetic session from a Dianetic auditor who is OT III or above. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:rs <br />
Copyright (c) 1970 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
298 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 NOVEMBER 1981<br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
OT III & above<br />
<br />
ONLY <br />
AO C/Ses <br />
AO Solo C/Ses <br />
NOTs C/Ses <br />
AO Review <br />
Auditors <br />
<br />
C O N F I D E N T I A L <br />
<br />
OT III AND OT III ATTEST <br />
<br />
This issue changes the current handling of OT III and OT II: attests and the next step <br />
after OT III. We want to end off “endless III’s”. Starting now, AO C/Ses are to handle <br />
PreOTs on OT III as follows. <br />
<br />
Let the person audit on OT III as long as he wishes. But at the first slackening or <br />
abandonment or EP or if he is just going on and on into “endless III”, look for a nice win <br />
and tell him that’s it and shunt him over to Audited NOTs. <br />
<br />
An AO Review may be necessary before sending the person to attest. On an “endless <br />
III” or some of these people who have been incomplete on OT III or who have been on <br />
and off OT III for a long time, a Review would be necessary. The Review could be as short <br />
as an LDN OT III and Rehab their best win on OT III or as long as a C/S 53 to F/Ning list <br />
followed by an LDN OT III and then Rehab their best win on OT III. On some you might <br />
only need to find a nice win they had on OT III and indlcate that that was it, or get it <br />
rehabbed in session (this would mainly apply to persons currently on OT III). <br />
<br />
Some of this termination of III would depend on auditor availability for Audited <br />
NOTs, but if this is a situation the solution is to train up more NOTs auditors. <br />
<br />
The whole intention here is to take PreOTs who have “completed” OT III per the <br />
above qualification and shunt them over to Audited NOTs. <br />
<br />
Let’s start maklng OTs in VOLUME. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH: DM: kjm <br />
Copyright ( c ) 1981 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 14 JANUARY 1972 <br />
ISSUE I <br />
<br />
<br />
AO’s <br />
OT III Students <br />
For use in Advance Courses <br />
Section III and above <br />
<br />
C O N F I D E N T I A L <br />
<br />
THE GREEN GREEN FORM REVISED <br />
<br />
(Revises HCO PL 1 May, 1968 “Green Green Form”) <br />
<br />
This form is called a “Green Green Form” because it can be done over and over. <br />
It is not a Review form. It is an auditing form done on or by the student. <br />
The stable datum of awareness and reality is “Reality increase is proportional to the <br />
<br />
<br />
amount of charge taken off the case.” <br />
<br />
NAME:__________________________DATE:________________TIME: _________ <br />
Name of Auditor (if audited by another ) ____________________________________ <br />
<br />
One uses these words to see if the subject of the word is hot. Questions can be made <br />
up around the word then. Usually one realizes what it is. <br />
F/N each read by finding an earlier similar incident if it doesn’t F/N in the first place. <br />
Do not use to get the TA down. <br />
<br />
1. <br />
ENVIRONMENT _______________________________________________ <br />
2. <br />
ARC Break Find any ARC Breaks. <br />
Run them: (a) Date ___________________ <br />
(b) Identify what it was ________________________________ <br />
300 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
(c) Find if it was a break in: <br />
i. Affinity ____________________ <br />
ii. Reality ____________________ <br />
iii. Communication ______________ <br />
iv. Understanding _______________ <br />
v. Incomplete action cycle ________ <br />
vi. Overrun of an action __________ <br />
3. Ignored originations ________________________________________________ <br />
4. Missed withold ___________________________________________________ <br />
Who _____________________When ____________________How _____________ <br />
<br />
5. Motivator _______________________________________________________ <br />
6. Overt ___________________________________________________________ <br />
7. Present time problem ______________________________________________ <br />
8. Problem _________________________________________________________ <br />
9. Evaluation _______________________________________________________ <br />
10. Invalidation ______________________________________________________ <br />
11. False meter read __________________________________________________ <br />
12. Qn overrun ______________________________________________________ <br />
13. Self overrun _____________________________________________________ <br />
<br />
14. Grade unflat -Whose?_______________________________________________ <br />
15. Cluster __________________________________________________________ <br />
16. Switched Qns ____________________________________________________ <br />
17. Out of valence ____________________________________________________ <br />
18. Wrong date _______________________________________________________ <br />
19. Wrong item _____________________________________________________ <br />
20. Assertion ________________________________________________________ <br />
21. Suppress ________________________________________________________ <br />
22. Invalidate ________________________________________________________ <br />
23. Improperly Audited ________________________________________________ <br />
24. Quit ____________________________________________________________ <br />
25. Didn’t leave ______________________________________________________ <br />
26. Left _____________________________________________________________ <br />
27. Came back _______________________________________________________ <br />
302 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
28. New one ________________________________________________________ <br />
29. Nervous _________________________________________________________ <br />
30. Not you _________________________________________________________ <br />
31. Abused __________________________________________________________ <br />
32. Not - ised _________________________________________________________ <br />
33. Suppressed out of existence __________________________________________ <br />
34. Thinks he’s you ____________________________________________________ <br />
35. You think you’re another ____________________________________________ <br />
36. R3R Incomplete ___________________________________________________ <br />
37. Run too many times ________________________________________________ <br />
38. Protesting ________________________________________________________ <br />
39. Helping __________________________________________________________ <br />
40. Dead ____________________________________________________________ <br />
<br />
41. Animal ___________________________________________________________ <br />
42. Bird _____________________________________________________________ <br />
43 Insect ____________________________________________________________ <br />
<br />
44. Putting them there to run ____________________________________________ <br />
45. Still more left _____________________________________________________ <br />
46. Trying not to be ___________________________________________________ <br />
47. Stopped __________________________________________________________ <br />
48. Getting too many restimulated ________________________________________ <br />
49. An earlier Inc 1. ___________________________________________________ <br />
50. (A.) An earlier Inc. 2 ______________________________________________ <br />
50. (B) Earlier mutual cluster-forming incident. ____________________________ <br />
51. Too late on the track ________________________________________________ <br />
52. Needs dating _____________________________________________________ <br />
304 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
53. Needs locating ____________________________________________________ <br />
54. Part done then abandoned ___________________________________________ <br />
55. Too many incomplete cycles _________________________________________ <br />
56. Misunderstood word ________________________________________________ <br />
57. Pretending _______________________________________________________ <br />
58. Lying ___________________________________________________________ <br />
59. Suppressed hate ___________________________________________________ <br />
60. Love ____________________________________________________________ <br />
61. Promised never to leave _____________________________________________ <br />
62. Something else wrong _______________________________________________ <br />
63. It was all ok ______________________________________________________ <br />
Time TA ________________________________________________ <br />
<br />
Compiled from LRH <br />
<br />
writings <br />
<br />
by Advance Courses <br />
LRH: PS:ne:fmg Supervisor <br />
Copyright (c) 1972 for<br />
<br />
by L. RON HUBBARD L. RON HUBBARD <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED FOUNDER <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 12 OCTOBER 1969RB <br />
<br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
Class IV, OT <br />
III Auditors <br />
AO Review <br />
Auditors <br />
AO C/Ses <br />
Class X-XII <br />
REVISED 25 AUGUST 1975 <br />
RE-REVISED 20 SEPTEMBER 1978(Revised 25 August 1975 and <br />
renumbered to delete Question <br />
21 which was not written <br />
by me.) <br />
(Re-revised 20 September 1978 <br />
and renumbered to delete any <br />
Dianetic handling - as Diane-<br />
tics, R3R, or R3RA is forbidden <br />
on any Clear or above.) <br />
(Revisions not in script.) <br />
SECRET <br />
LDN OT III RB <br />
<br />
This list is for use on a pc who is OT III or above. <br />
When an impasse occurs or the pc gets upset, the auditor (who must be an OT III <br />
<br />
<br />
or above) assesses this list and works out from what is found to read, what has gone wrong. <br />
<br />
DO NOT RUN ANY R3R, R3RA OR ANY DIANETICS <br />
<br />
LlC can be used on a BT. <br />
<br />
L7 can be used on a BT. <br />
<br />
GRADES <br />
You can also run Grades O-IV on a BT. <br />
<br />
OUT INT <br />
<br />
A BT can be having trouble with Out Int, requiring the End of Endless Int Repair <br />
RECALL process (but no R3R). <br />
<br />
EARLIER INC I, EARLIER UNIVERSE <br />
<br />
The most common difficulty you get into with a BT that doesn’t blow is there was <br />
an earlier Inc I , some have several earlier Inc I’s, and when you get down to the first Inc <br />
I you’re liable to jump from one BT to another, if you keep asking for an earlier. <br />
<br />
And if earlier Inc I doesn’t work, then it’s “earlier universe?” - the BT recognizes <br />
there was an earlier universe - the BT will spot this and blow. <br />
<br />
(Caution: There is an implant which miscounts the number of earlier universes, <br />
making it seem there were far more than there were.) <br />
<br />
306 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
LDN OT III RB <br />
<br />
<br />
PreOT’s Name_________________ Auditor_________________________ <br />
<br />
Date______________________<br />
<br />
1. <br />
WAS THERE AN EARLIER INC I? _________ <br />
(Some BTs have several earlier Inc I’s, the <br />
earliest for that BT will run through and <br />
blow.) <br />
2. <br />
WAS THERE AN EARLIER UNIVERSE? _________ <br />
(Get BT to recognize it and it will blow.) <br />
3. <br />
JUMPED FROM ONE BT TO ANOTHER BT? _________ <br />
(Indicate and handle each BT restimulated. <br />
Usually happens when auditor asks for an <br />
“earlier” when there was none, or when <br />
overrun past an erasure.) <br />
4. <br />
IS THIS BEING MOCKED UP AGAIN SO IT CAN <br />
BE RUN? _________ <br />
(Indicate, if no F/N, D/L when it was <br />
mocked up.) <br />
5. <br />
ONE INDIVIDUAL WHO THINKS HE IS A CLUSTER? _________ <br />
(Handle as an individual.) <br />
6. <br />
A CLUSTER WHO THINKS IT IS AN INDIVIDUAL? <br />
(Handle as a cluster, D/L, Inc II, Inc I.) _________ <br />
7. <br />
THE DATE WAS ACTUALLY FROM A DATE GIVEN IN <br />
AN IMPLANT? _________ <br />
(Indicate. Find the actual date to blow. <br />
Locate to blow.) <br />
8. <br />
WRONG DATE FOR INCIDENT? _________ <br />
(Correct the date to blow. Locate to blow.) <br />
9. <br />
NO DATE WAS FOUND FOR INCIDENT? _________ <br />
(Date to blow. Locate to blow.) <br />
10. <br />
WRONG LOCATION WAS GIVEN FOR INCIDENT? _________ <br />
Correct the location to blow, handle individuals.) <br />
11. <br />
NO LOCATION WAS FOUND FOR INCIDENT? _________ <br />
(Locate the incident to blow, handle individuals.) <br />
12. <br />
INCIDENT Is GOT INTO RESTIMULATION? _________ <br />
(Handle the Inc Is.) <br />
<br />
13. <br />
EARLIER BEGINNING UNDETECTED? _________ <br />
(Find the correct beginning and it will blow.) <br />
14. <br />
BYPASSED BASIC ON A CHAIN? _________ <br />
(Indicate, if no F/N, D/L.) <br />
15. <br />
STIRRED UP INCIDENTS EARLIER THAN BASIC? _________ <br />
(Indicate.) <br />
16. <br />
MORE THAN ONE CLUSTER IN A CLUSTER? _________ <br />
(Handle as a cumulative cluster.) <br />
17. <br />
SOMEBODY COPYING WHAT WAS JUST ERASED? _________ <br />
(Indicate, if no blow, find out who was copying.) <br />
18. <br />
RANDOM PICTURES COMING IN INDICATING A CLUSTER? <br />
(D/L the cluster. Inc II, Inc Is.) _________ <br />
19. <br />
FAILURE TO IDENTIFY AND DATE A CLUSTER-MAKING <br />
INCIDENT? _________ <br />
(Identify the incident and handle as a cluster.) <br />
20. <br />
JUMPED FROM ONE CHAIN TO ANOTHER? _________ <br />
(Indicate. Handle individual BTs.) <br />
21. <br />
JUMPED FROM ONE BT TO ANOTHER? _________ <br />
(Indicate. Handle both BTs.) <br />
22. <br />
ANOTHER BT RESTIMULATED? _________ <br />
(Handle the BT.) <br />
23. <br />
FALSE TRACK THAT WAS REALLY PART OF AN IMPLANT? <br />
(Indicate, if necessary D/L the implant.) _________ <br />
24. <br />
BASIC KEEPS REAPPEARING BECAUSE IT IS A <br />
CLUSTER? _________ <br />
(Handle as a cluster by D/L.) <br />
25. <br />
AN EARLIER ERROR MADE? _________ <br />
(Find and correct the error.) <br />
26. <br />
FAILURE TO COMPLETE THE ACTION BEGUN? _________ <br />
(Find what action and complete it, but no R3R or R3RA.) <br />
27. <br />
LOCATION OF INCIDENT NEEDS ATTENTION? _________ <br />
(Locate the incident to blow.) <br />
28. <br />
A BT IS PROTESTING? _________ <br />
(Handle the protest.) <br />
29. <br />
YOU WERE PROTESTING? _________ <br />
(Handle the protest.) <br />
308 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
30. <br />
LEANING ON A WALL? _________ <br />
(Indicate-find what the Pre-OT is leaning on.) <br />
31. <br />
SEQUENCE OF EVENTS INCORRECT? _________ <br />
(Correct the sequence.) <br />
32. <br />
INCORRECT OWNERSHIP OF INCIDENT? _________ <br />
(Indicate.) <br />
33. <br />
RUDIMENTS WERE OUT? _________ <br />
(Fly the out Ruds.) <br />
34. <br />
A THETAN HAS BEEN INVALIDATED? _________ <br />
(Handle the invalidation.) <br />
35. <br />
A BT HAS BEEN OVERRUN? _________ <br />
(Indicate it to correct BT.) <br />
36. <br />
YOU ARE COPYING A BANK YOU USED TO HAVE? _________ <br />
(Indicate.) <br />
37. <br />
YOU ARE JUST MOCKING UP BTs? _________ <br />
(Indicate.) <br />
38. <br />
THESE ARE PICTURES OF PAST CLUSTERS? _________ <br />
(Indicate.) <br />
39. <br />
THERE ARE NO BTs LEFT? _________ <br />
(Indicate.) <br />
40. <br />
YOU ARE JUST AUDITING COPIES OF BT PICTURES? _________ <br />
(Handle copies ) <br />
41. <br />
THESE ARE YOUR OWN PICTURES? _________ <br />
(Find whose pictures, and blow the BT. If <br />
they really were the pc’s pictures it would <br />
mean s/he wasn’t Clear. These will usually <br />
turn out to be a BT’s pictures misowned.) <br />
42. <br />
AUDITING ITSELF IS MAKING A CLUSTER? _________ <br />
(D/L the session.) <br />
43. <br />
A BT IS HAVING CASE TROUBLE? _________ <br />
(Indicate. Handle the BT.) <br />
44. <br />
YOU ARE CREATING THE INCIDENT I’S AND BLOWING THEM? <br />
(Indicate.) _________ <br />
45. <br />
YOU FAILED TO QUIT ON A WIN? _________ <br />
(Indicate. Rehab by D/L.) <br />
<br />
46. <br />
USED TOO WIDE AN INTENTION SPAN? _________ <br />
(Indicate. Pick out individuals and handle.) <br />
47. <br />
RESTIMULATED MORE THAN WERE BLOWN? _________ <br />
(Indicate. Handle restimulated individuals.) <br />
48. <br />
ARC BROKE A BT? _________ <br />
(Assess BT’s ARC Break and handle.) <br />
49. <br />
GOT MISEMOTIONAL TOWARD A BT? _________ <br />
(Indicate. Find the BT, and handle to blow.) <br />
50. <br />
AUDITOR CODE BREAKS ON BTs? _________ <br />
(Repair the Code breaks and handle each to blow.) <br />
51. <br />
DIDN’T ACKNOWLEDGE A BT? _________ <br />
(Indicate. Acknowledge the BT and handle to blow.) <br />
52. <br />
DIDN’T BELIEVE A BT OR CLUSTER? _________ <br />
(Get off the disbelief, handle the BT or cluster.) <br />
53. <br />
A BT WHO HAS AN ARC BREAK? _________ <br />
(Handle the ARC Break.) <br />
54. <br />
A BT WHO HAS A PTP? _________ <br />
(Handle the PTP.) <br />
55. <br />
A BT WHO HAS A WITHHOLD? _________ <br />
(Pull the withhold.) <br />
56. <br />
A BT WHO HAS AN OVERT? _________ <br />
(Pull the overt.) <br />
57. <br />
OVER-REPAIR? _________ <br />
(Indicate.) <br />
58. <br />
YOU WEREN’T ALLOWED TO ATTEST? _________ <br />
(Indicate. Get off the non-acceptance and any Invalidation.) <br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright © 1969 1975, 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
310 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
312 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ORIGINAL <br />
OT 4 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
314 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
CLASS VIII <br />
<br />
OT IV RUNDOWN <br />
<br />
Symptoms <br />
Has completed OT III <br />
OT IV Warning <br />
This is in fact a Grade. Therefore to run it with out first setting the case up fully is <br />
to waste it. <br />
Often the case has to: <br />
<br />
(1) <br />
Be discharged with lots of corrective actions and <br />
(2) <br />
OT III must be run on the Pre OT by the auditor or at least cleaned up. It might <br />
not be uncommon to have to do half or more of the C/S’s in the book before <br />
doing the OT IV rundown. <br />
If one holds off and really flys the case, then the person ends up at OT Exterior very <br />
nicely when one does OT IV. <br />
<br />
If you do OT IV and he is still in his head, all is not lost. You have other actions you <br />
can take eg: Clusters, Prepchecks , failed to exteriorise directions. <br />
<br />
OT V and VI are designed for someone all ready exterior. <br />
<br />
If a person doesn’t go exterior after OT IV Rundown, you set him up for OT V by <br />
seeing he jolly well does go exterior before going on to V. <br />
<br />
OT IV RUNDOWN <br />
Done only by an auditor on a case fully set up by various directions. <br />
<br />
<br />
1. <br />
Ruds or GF to F/N. <br />
2. <br />
Rehab drugs. <br />
3. <br />
Valence shifter “What valence would be safe ?” <br />
4. <br />
Rehab ARC Straightwire to Grade IV. <br />
5. <br />
Rehab R6EW to OT II. <br />
6. <br />
Prepcheck OT III. <br />
7. <br />
Rehab OT V and VI. <br />
8. <br />
Run “What has been overrun ?” <br />
9. <br />
Run “What can you confront ?” <br />
IF THE PRE OT DOESN’T EXTERIORISE, WE WILL DO 7 CASES NEXT <br />
SESSION UNTILL HE DOES GO EXTERIOR which is really the end - phenomena of <br />
OT IV audited only by a class VIII. <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex. <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 OCTOBER 1968 <br />
<br />
<br />
CLASS VIII <br />
<br />
<br />
Pre-OTs who have been audited for a long time over out Ruds will not respond to the OT IV <br />
Rundown unless every RUD is gotten in. <br />
<br />
When putting in the Ruds on such pcs, you put in suppress and False Reads on each one, each to <br />
<br />
F/N. <br />
LRH: L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1968 Founder <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex. <br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 SEPTEMBER 1968 <br />
( Amended 20 Sept 68 ) <br />
Class VIII <br />
<br />
VALENCE SHIFTER <br />
<br />
The List question, “What valence ( identity ) would be safe” is based on tech theory and is used <br />
for Pre OTs with high OT sections that do not change non-optimum behaviour. <br />
<br />
It is also ( rarely ) used on a lower grade case who is detached which is to say chronically out of <br />
valence to the point of no case gain. <br />
<br />
It is very dynamite - be exact in listing it. <br />
<br />
LRH: jp: de L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1968 Founder <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex. <br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 SEPTEMBER 1968 <br />
<br />
CLASS VIII <br />
<br />
When you run a Valence Shifter on a case that has had low T/A, he’g going to get into a valence <br />
he can’t confront and fall on his head. <br />
<br />
Cure for it, is to rehab him on Grades and Sections. <br />
<br />
Specifically Prep-check III. <br />
<br />
LRH:jp L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1968 Founder <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
316 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
OT IV SOLO <br />
<br />
<br />
The end phenomenon of OT IV is “Certainty of Self as a Being.” OT IV Solo is <br />
designed to “proof up a being” against any possibility of being reimplanted in the future. <br />
<br />
Part One <br />
<br />
The main idea on OT IV Solo is to mock up (create) and unmock (blow) each line <br />
of the Clearing Course GPM (7’s, The Basic End Words, The Confusion GPM, Objects-<br />
Hollow, and Objects-Solid) with all the perceptics of force, effort, heat, impact and <br />
unconsciousness of the original implant (as much as you are able). Put sufficient <br />
significance on to it to cause the TA to rise. Then spot it (unmock it, blow it) until the TA <br />
falls and the mass erases. Then mock it up again and erase it, each line to a floating needle. <br />
The TA should rise on the mock up part and blow down on the unmocking of the charge. <br />
Do this repetitively with each line of the GPM (including the lights) to a floating needle <br />
on each line and until you feel you can create and dissipate that line. Continue until you <br />
feel totally free with and at cause over this implant sequence; you may not need to <br />
complete all 5 parts. Do it until you can freely and easily mock up and blow this implant <br />
GPM. <br />
<br />
Part Two <br />
<br />
Mock up heat until body feels warm. <br />
<br />
Part Three <br />
<br />
Postulating mass, with the use of the E-meter and the command “I have mass,” <br />
create a reactive mind. Put sufficient significance on to it to cause the TA to rise. Then <br />
spot it until the TA falls and the mass erases. Then mock it up again and erase it each <br />
timeto a floating needle. This procedure is repeated until the PreOT is certain he can <br />
create and dissipate a reactive mind. <br />
<br />
Part Four <br />
<br />
Mock up a non-atomic light and unmock it repetitively to EP. <br />
<br />
Part Five <br />
<br />
Move the body and notice who is doing it. Run to a cognition. <br />
<br />
Part Six <br />
<br />
Run ARC Breaks, Problems and Witholds of Long Duration on Matter, Energy, <br />
Space and Time (each separately). <br />
<br />
<br />
Part Seven <br />
Run ARC Breaks, Problems and Withholds of Long Duration on Self. <br />
<br />
Part Eight <br />
Run general O/W (What have you done?/What have you withheld?) on track. <br />
<br />
Part Nine <br />
<br />
Scan out, lightly, all of your auditing early to late, adding up all the hours in session <br />
as you go along. Come up with a total number of auditing hours for yourself. <br />
<br />
Part Ten <br />
Run your favorite havingness process. If you don’t have one, run “spot an object” <br />
to F/N. <br />
Part Eleven <br />
Go to a park or beach (for cold weather areas, an indoor shopping mall will do) and <br />
<br />
spot the following list of things, each repetitively to EP. <br />
<br />
Spot/Look at Matter <br />
<br />
Spot/Look at Energy <br />
<br />
Spot/Look at Space <br />
<br />
Spot/Look at Time <br />
<br />
Spot/Look at MEST combined <br />
<br />
Spot/Look at an animal <br />
<br />
Spot/Look at a person <br />
<br />
Spot/Look at an object <br />
<br />
Spot/Look at self <br />
<br />
Spot/Look at another’s universe <br />
<br />
Spot/Look at what you are doing <br />
<br />
Spot/Look at what another is doing<br />
<br />
ATTEST OT IV <br />
<br />
318 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
320 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
NEW <br />
OT 4 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
322 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 JANUARY 1980 <br />
<br />
<br />
Limited <br />
<br />
Distribution <br />
OT III & above<br />
<br />
ONLY. <br />
(NOT for issue<br />
<br />
to Solo Auditors.) <br />
AO Auditors & C/Ses<br />
<br />
(OT III). <br />
NOTs Auditors & C/Ses. <br />
Class XII Auditors<br />
<br />
& C/Ses. <br />
<br />
C O N F I D E N T I A L <br />
<br />
THE OT DRUG RUNDOWN <br />
<br />
(THE TECHNIQUES GIVEN HEREIN ARE ONLY FOR <br />
USE BY AUDITORS AND C/Ses WHO HAVE BEEN <br />
TRAINED ON THIS RD, AND IS TO BE DELIVERED AS A <br />
WHOLE RD, NOT BIT AND PIECE NOR MIXED IN WITH <br />
OTHER RDs, NOR AS “HOURS” OF ANOTHER SERVICE. <br />
IT IS ITS OWN RD AND PACKAGE.) <br />
<br />
( References: <br />
<br />
HCOB 15 Nov 78 DATING AND LOCATING <br />
HCOB 25 Oct 69R CLUSTER FORMATION, CUMULATIVE <br />
HCOB 6 Feb 78RA THE PURIFICATION RUNDOWN <br />
HCOB 8 Jan 69 DRUGS AND “INSANITY”, NONCOMPLIANCE <br />
AND ALTER-IS <br />
HCOB 17 Oct 69RA DRUGS, ASPIRIN AND TRANQUILIZERS <br />
BOOK: ALL ABOUT RADIATION <br />
BOOK: SCIENCE OF SURVIVAL <br />
HCOB 15 Jul 71RB C/S Series 48RC DRUG HANDLING <br />
Issue III <br />
The OT III Pack) <br />
BTs, CLUSTERS & DRUGS <br />
<br />
BTs and clusters are affected by drugs. They mock up the biochemistry and they mock up <br />
the drug and drug incidents. Drug taking in this lifetime restimulates earlier incidents of drug <br />
taking on the track. When the case is viewed as a composite of BTs and clusters, you will see that <br />
drug taking in this lifetime causes a highly multiple restim. A drug incident can be a cluster <br />
making incident. <br />
<br />
Earlier drug cultures on the track were much worse than this drug culture. In some cultures <br />
the psychiatrist, priest and medico were all one and the same person and frequently used drugs. <br />
Some implanters used drugs, either as part of the implant incident or to keep a population <br />
enslaved thereafter. When BTs and clusters who have whole track drug incidents are restimulated <br />
by a this lifetime drug incident, there is a multiple restim, and if severe enough can form a new <br />
cluster composed of the BTs and clusters thrown into restimulation by the drug. <br />
<br />
<br />
The residual drug remaining in the body tends to keep these BTs and clusters in <br />
restimulation, and they by mocking it up, tend to hold onto the drug and keep the drug pictures <br />
in restim. <br />
<br />
There are two factors regarding drugs: (1) There is the factor of residual drugs in the body, <br />
and (2) There are BTs and clusters who are stuck in whole track drug incidents which they are <br />
mocking up. These two factors are interactive. <br />
<br />
The residual drug deposit in the body causes a drug effect and tends to keep BTs and <br />
clusters in restimulation. It is this residual drug deposit that is gotten rid of by sweat out on the <br />
Purification Rundown. <br />
<br />
BTs and clusters who are stuck in whole track drug incidents continue to mock it up. They <br />
actually mock up the drug as well as the incident. This can give the apparency that the drug is in <br />
the body. After all a thetan can create MEST, and because they are mocking up the drug, and <br />
because they are stuck in it totally, you can get the apparency that there is a residual drug <br />
remaining in the body. <br />
<br />
Where you have both factors present, (the residual drug deposit in the body and BTs/ <br />
clusters stuck in drug incidents), it’s absolutely deadly. The drug deposit in the body tends to hold <br />
onto BTs and clusters and to keep them in restimulation. And BTs and clusters who are stuck in <br />
whole track drugs mock up the drug and the drug incident giving the apparency of drugs in the <br />
body. These two factors are interactive both ways, the actual residual drug in the body affects the <br />
body and keeps BTs and clusters in restim, who, because they are mocking up drugs that they are <br />
stuck in, are creating the apparency of more drugs in the body, and so it goes. <br />
<br />
The Purification Rundown will handle a lot of this by getting rid of the residual drugs in <br />
the body, and this in itself not only improves the person physically, but also will allow much of <br />
the BT and cluster pictures to drop out of restimulation, or at least to drop out of chronic <br />
restimulation. <br />
<br />
There is another process pretty well forgotten about called freewheeling. This was <br />
discovered in earlier research, and is described in Science of Survival, II, p. 260, where it is <br />
pointed out that Guk (see All About Radiation) can cause the somatic strip to freewheel. The <br />
active ingredients of Guk being Vitamin B1 and Niacin, and these cause BTs and clusters to <br />
freewheel through engrams they are stuck in on the track, they don’t get down to a basic or <br />
anything, they unstick from the stuck point in a track engram. This permits that engram to drop <br />
out of chronic restimulation. So we have another phenomenon going on the Purification <br />
Rundown that persons below OT III case level would not be aware of. The B1 and Niacin by <br />
moving BTs and clusters out of the engram they are chronically stuck in, permits these BTs and <br />
clusters to drop out of restimulation, and thus cease mocking it up. This too brings about an <br />
improvement in the case condition of the person. <br />
<br />
You should also know that when the BT or cluster is Free-wheeling through such a drug <br />
incident it can turn on the apparency of that drug in the body. This could be puzzling if you didn’t <br />
know this datum. Maybe the guy has never taken LSD or Pheno-barbitol in this lifetime and <br />
doesn’t have any of that drug actually in his body, But the BT or cluster freewheeling through <br />
an incident containing the drug mocks up the apparency of that drug in the body, making the guy <br />
feel that he is on that drug. And there have been other drugs on the whole track quite different <br />
from any drugs in existence today. So during the Purification Rundown you can have a BT or <br />
cluster freewheel through and out of a stuck drug engram, and while he’s going through it there <br />
can be an apparency of that drug in the body even though he’s never taken it in this lifetime, but <br />
when the BT or cluster freewheels on out of that stuck point, it ceases to mock up the apparency <br />
of that drug in the body. Hence get a two way result on the Purification Rundown by getting rid <br />
of both the residual drug in the body and the apparency of the drug in the body mocked up by a <br />
BT or cluster. <br />
<br />
324 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
How many of these BTs and clusters actually blow during the Purification Rundown is <br />
unknown, but there definitely will be less of them present when he’s through the Rundown, and <br />
the case will be a lot better off, though not completely and entirely handled on the subject of drugs. <br />
<br />
(Caution: The attention of auditors and C/Ses is called to the OT III data, that a person can <br />
also freewheel straight through Inc II - this is different from freewheeling out of a drug incident <br />
as described above in this issue - but should someone start freewheeling through Inc II, and we <br />
know of no instances of this having occurred, the possibility is that it can occur. The description <br />
of a freewheel through Inc II is given in the OT III materials and the handling is given in HCOB <br />
2 Oct 68 OT III and 3RD NOTE, RUNNING INCIDENT II of 28 Oct 68 both of which are in <br />
the OT III pack.) <br />
<br />
Normally we would run Objectives and a NED Drug Rundown after the Purification <br />
Rundown, and these actions, particularly running out drug incidents, would handle much of these <br />
BT/cluster drug pictures - without the case ever being aware of it at that level. But there are also <br />
cases who are Dianetic Clears who are in a body stuffed up with drugs (in fact there is probably <br />
a high incidence of Clears who are now doing the Purification Rundown), and these cases cannot <br />
be run on R3R or R3RA as they are Clears. This poses a problem of how to handle these Clears <br />
after their Purification Rundown. <br />
<br />
Clears can be run on Objectives (though you must not re-run an Objective process that has <br />
already been run to EP); Clears can be run on recall or straightwire processes and thus can be run <br />
on Recall processes on Drugs and the L3RF and End of Endless Drug Rundown can be done on <br />
Clears (provided you handle reading lines by indication and do not attempt any R3R or R3RA). <br />
These actions will handle a lot of the mental aspect of drugs and drug taking and will enable you <br />
to then get the case up the Grade Chart to OT III. <br />
<br />
On OT III the Solo auditor will handle and blow many of these BTs and clusters without <br />
necessarily ever being aware of, nor having to address drug pictures. But some BTs and clusters <br />
can be so held down by drugs, or hung up in drug cluster- making incidents that the Solo auditor <br />
is unlikely to be able to audit or handle these, and will need auditing by an OT III Drug RD <br />
Auditor. <br />
<br />
LIABILITY OF HANDLING DRUGS AT OT III <br />
<br />
As drugs and drug incidents have been so common on the whole track, to simply generally <br />
ask for drugs or drug incidents when dealing with BTs and clusters, could cause a total restim. <br />
It would be likely to throw a large number of BTs and clusters (each of whom individually have <br />
different incidents), into restim on drugs. The liability then is that of throwing the whole case into <br />
restim on the subject of drugs. <br />
<br />
HOW TO HANDLE DRUGS AT OT III <br />
<br />
By adding “Drugs” into an existing list or prepared assessment, the subject of drugs is then <br />
only mentioned in relation to a specific area and the liability of over-restimulation is avoided. <br />
This makes it possible to handle drugs at the level of OT III. <br />
<br />
1. Having found the position of a cluster or pressure area in relation to the body, the auditor <br />
has the Pre-OT limit his attention to that area (so as not to restim other areas). <br />
2. Find the type of incident that made it into a cluster by assessment of: “Accident, Impact, <br />
Injury, Illness, a drug, shock, Implant, heat, freezing, electrical, explosion, implosion, psychiatric <br />
incident, lightning, burning, vacuum, radiation.” (Usually the read will occur early on the <br />
assessment; don’t go on assessing after you have got the read.) The auditor indicates the type of <br />
incident that read on the assessment and confirms the read. Sometimes you will get a BD and a <br />
break up or blow on this step alone. <br />
<br />
3. Date the incident to blow. <br />
4. Locate the incident to blow. <br />
5. Handling any remaining single BTs to blow. <br />
6. Check for and handle any copy. <br />
(It is essential that the auditor have the Pre-OT limit his attention to the specific area of the <br />
body found, so as not to stir up other BT or cluster masses. And it is essential not to overrun this <br />
action and start in on other BTs who were not part of this incident and to whom this does not <br />
apply.) <br />
<br />
One can ask for a drug or a drug incident on a specific BT or cluster, provided it is limited <br />
to that area, and not asked generally. <br />
<br />
On a prepared list such as a C/S 53 being done on an OT III or above, if you get a read on <br />
any of the lines in the Drug section of the C/S 53, be sure to find the position of the BT or cluster <br />
that the read is coming from (per HCOB 4 Jul 79 HANDLING CORRECTION LISTS ON OTs). <br />
<br />
Heavy this lifetime mutual drug incidents (or drug trips) can be Dated and Located, but <br />
realize that a this lifetime incident is late on the track, and that there could be an earlier (whole <br />
track) mutual incident (ref: Cumulatlve clusters). <br />
<br />
There was a case who refused to do a Purification RD, who was handled by the techniques <br />
given above, and then became willing to do the Purification RD, as he now realized that he had <br />
been the effect of drugs and now wanted to get it handled. <br />
<br />
Prior Assessment: There is a way to use the Prior Assessment to taking drugs at this level. <br />
By taking up the somatics and misemotions the person experienced prior to taking drugs (as is <br />
done in a Drug RD), you can then find the BT or cluster and blow it. Instead of running the Prior <br />
Assessment item by R3RA as one would do on a Drug RD, (and you must be very careful not to <br />
run any R3R or R3RA), you simply take up a reading somatic or misemotion from the list of <br />
somatics Prior to taking drugs, have the Pre-OT locate where the BT or cluster is by position in <br />
relation to the body, and blow the BT or cluster by usual techniques. This technique has proven <br />
very effective in handling two somatic-shut-off cases. <br />
<br />
SOMATIC SHUT-OFF CASES <br />
<br />
You can find a BT with misemotion on drugs, and especially with an absence of emotion, <br />
absence of sensation, absence of perception, absence of feeling. The “lack of_____” or the <br />
“absence of_____”, (the blank being any emotion, feeling or perception), is just as common on <br />
drugs and drug items as the somatic item connected with the drug. (Hence somatic shut- offs <br />
caused by drugs and medicines, etc.) These have in earlier materials been called “negative items” <br />
due to the absence or lack of an expected emotion, feeling or perception. Whether this “negative <br />
item” is the result of a somatic being suppressed by a drug or anesthetic, or whether it is an <br />
inability to feel or perceive due to a drug in the body or an accumulation of drugs in the body, <br />
such “negative items” are equally important to ask for and to handle in the handling of drugs, as <br />
are somatics and misemotions induced by drugs. As these “negative items” are an omitted (a notthereness <br />
of something), they may not be noticed or volunteered by a pc unless asked for them, <br />
and sometimes pcs come up to an awareness of a numb area of the body. <br />
<br />
CASE HISTORIES <br />
<br />
The following case histories (reported by FSO C/Ses), of case handlings piloted on <br />
<br />
326 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
the subject of drugs on OT III Pre-OTs show what can be done: <br />
Case 1: <br />
<br />
“LSD case. Ran BTs and clusters stuck in drug experiences. Date/Located bad drug <br />
experiences. <br />
<br />
“He experienced relief and stopped complaining that the auditing was having no effect on <br />
<br />
him. Case had a tendency to blow out quickly without big wins, unable to continue session. Was <br />
able to run longer sessions after handling drugs as above.” <br />
Case 2: <br />
<br />
<br />
“LSD Constant roller-coaster. Critical. Felt crazy, lots of restim. <br />
<br />
“An R/Sing cluster went to basic incident of an LSD trip. Said grief charge persisting from <br />
acid trips. LSD came up frequently in her auditing. (The grief was handled.)” <br />
Case 3: <br />
<br />
“LSD. Had many drug trips that created clusters on LSD and LSD mixed with other drugs. <br />
A C/S 53 handled per HCOB 4 Jul 79 HANDLING CORRECTION LISTS ON OTs, was done <br />
and drugs read a lot. Each read was handled and each cluster connected blown. Also handled BTs <br />
stuck in drugs. <br />
<br />
“He got relaxed in the environment, felt there was hope and destimulated. It was the first <br />
significant gain he had made.” <br />
Case 4: <br />
<br />
“LSD and other heavy drugs. She was also ‘over-restimulated’. Was put on GF 40 <br />
Expanded and drugs read. She blew many clusters made during LSD and speed. She finished the <br />
GF 40 Expanded and later would find masses that were related to LSD and say: ‘that was made <br />
on acid’, and it would BD, and was handled to blow. <br />
<br />
“She then ran smoother and her comm line was better and the over-restimulation ended.” <br />
Case 5: <br />
<br />
“Heavy drug history. No somatic case. Was 2WCed to find what he was like prior to drugs <br />
which revealed back somatics and misemotions. BTs connected with the misemotions and back <br />
somatics were handled, as well as BTs stuck in drugs. <br />
<br />
“He ran much better after this and it ended the somatic shut-off. <br />
Case 6: <br />
<br />
“Very similar to Case #5 above. BTs stuck in drugs and prior somatics to drugs were <br />
handled and he came around and ran properly.” <br />
Case 7: <br />
<br />
“Heavy druggie. Case opened up dramatically on the handling of a drug cluster-making <br />
incident which had been the major point of case deterioration this lifetime.(became psychotic in <br />
the incident). The handling of this incident changed his life. <br />
<br />
Case 8: <br />
<br />
<br />
“Slow resistive case. Had been bumping into BTs and clusters stuck in anesthetics this <br />
lifetime. Still needs to be directly addressed. Not gotten to as he had wins and completed current <br />
auditing hours paid for.” <br />
<br />
Case 9: <br />
<br />
“Heavy drugs and alcohol. Run on BTs and clusters stuck in drugs, restimulated by drugs, <br />
stuck in alcohol, restimulated by alcohol. Had C/S 53 and GF 40 Expanded reads on drugs <br />
handled. <br />
<br />
“Case running better after the above. Still has more to be handled.” <br />
<br />
Case 10: <br />
<br />
“LSD and alcohol. <br />
<br />
“Drugs often came up as a cluster-making incident. <br />
<br />
“Was stuck in a drug ‘exteriorization’, was actually a flashing drug picture. <br />
<br />
“Had a good win on handling BT/cluster influenced by drugs. On handling BT/cluster <br />
restimulated by taking drugs a number of old drug pictures and sensations turned on and blew. <br />
On handling BT/clusters stuck in drugs a reasonableness he still had on drugs was handled. <br />
<br />
“These handlings were a ‘win point’, he had felt paranoid about drugs up until now. He also <br />
felt lighter. <br />
<br />
“Later on a C/S 53, LSD read and on handling, turned on and blew an electric shock type <br />
somatic. <br />
<br />
“Case had a lot of gain from the above handlings.” <br />
<br />
PROGRAM FOR THE OT DRUG RD <br />
<br />
A. SET-UP: <br />
The case must be set-up for the OT Drug RD by doing the Purification RD, and this is <br />
essential. (Obviously there would be no point in trying to handle BTs/clusters hung up in drugs <br />
while there is still a residue of drugs remaining in the body.) The only apparent exception to this <br />
rule would be as described in this issue, where some drug handling might have to be done in order <br />
to get the Purification RD done, but this would be rare and would be followed by the Purification <br />
RD, then the full steps of the OT Drug RD. Not only is the Purification RD a required set-up, but <br />
there is a very great deal to be gained from doing it as the reader of this issue will understand. <br />
<br />
B. THE OT DRUG RD: <br />
1. Based on folder study and as deemed necessary by the C/S a case can be prepared for the <br />
RD by assessing and handling a C/S 53 (in accordance with HCOB 4 Jul 79 HANDLING <br />
CORRECTION LISTS ON OTs), or even a GF 40 Expanded. (Ref: C/S Series 1 - 10, C/S Series <br />
17.) This step would at least include getting the Ruds in, and may contain other specific needed <br />
repair actions if the case has had a rough time in previous auditing or on Advanced Courses. This <br />
step requires some C/S skill so as not to over-do nor under-do the Repair, as covered in C/S Series <br />
17. <br />
2. Date/Locate reading (charged) cluster-making drug incidents (i.e. heavy trips, anesthetic <br />
operations, severe medicinal drugs or medication), in this lifetime. These having happened to the <br />
Pre-OT’s current body, tend to be held in common as mutual incidents. <br />
328 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Use the procedure for handling clusters (or cumulative clusters). <br />
<br />
3. Handle any pressure areas and any numb (lacking sensation) areas of the body by locating <br />
where the area is, assessing for the mutual incident, Date/Locating it, IIs and Is, copies. <br />
4. Take any previously given Drug somatic items, or newly list any additional items <br />
connected with reading drugs, medicines, etc., and assess for reading somatic item. (DO NOT <br />
RUN ANY R3R OR R3RA) If the BT or cluster that had that item is still there, it will read on <br />
the meter. Locate the BT or cluster that the somatic item belongs to by meter read on the position <br />
in relation to the body. Blow the BT or cluster by usual OT III actions, (i.e. Inc II, Inc I, or cluster <br />
handling or cumulative cluster handling). <br />
(Caution: It can occur that the BT or cluster who had that item has already blown, but some <br />
other BT or cluster is copying it, giving a false apparency that the item still exists. This is <br />
described and the handling for it is given in Section III OT, ADDITIONAL SHEET, NOTES ON <br />
RUNNING, page 2.) <br />
<br />
Be sure to include here any “negative items” previously given, or to list for these, and <br />
handle these too, as above. <br />
<br />
On this step one exhausts all reading drug somatic items and all reading drugs. <br />
<br />
(Caution: Never run anything that does not read. Buttons may be checked on unreading <br />
items, but if it doesn’t read, do not take it up.) <br />
<br />
(Note: If you run into an item that was badly messed up in earlier auditing on R3R or R3RA, <br />
you may have to repair it by assessing an L3RF using the item as the prefix, with the Pre-OT <br />
holding his attention on that specific BT. Indicate only, do not attempt any engram running, when <br />
repaired, blow the BT or cluster with usual OT III techniques, if not already blown on the L3RF.) <br />
<br />
5. Prior Assessment. Take up any previously listed, now reading, misemotion or somatic <br />
item, or “negative item” given on a Prior Assessment to drugs or alcohol or medicine, and handle <br />
with the same procedure given in #4 above. Find out when the person started taking drugs or <br />
medicine, and 2WC for any prior somatics (and “negative items”) and handle any of these that <br />
read, as in #9 above. <br />
6. LDN OT III RB. Assess and handle an LDN OT III RB to clean the case up. This will either <br />
go to an F/Ning list rather easily, or the case will return to Solo. (As some cases who have attested <br />
previously, may find more to run after the OT Drug RD, but this will not always be so.) <br />
WARNING:Although it is stated in earlier materials that an item once having read, even though <br />
it does not currently read, should be run, that does not apply to the OT Drug RD. If the BT or <br />
cluster whose item it is is still present the item will read. If the item no longer reads the BT or <br />
cluster has already blown or it is Suppressed or Invalidated. One must not run any unreading item <br />
as doing so risks giving other BTs and clusters on the case (to whom this item does not apply) <br />
a wrong item, which can be very upsetting to the case. It can also result in other BTs obsessively <br />
copying the item and making it more solid. Refer to the section on Misownership in HCOB 22 <br />
Dec 79. False reads will have the same effect, so the auditor must know how to read a meter, and <br />
should only use a serviced meter, preferably a Mark VI. Flows of an item are not taken up, only <br />
the item, for obvious reasons. <br />
<br />
COMPLETION AND NEXT STEP <br />
<br />
When the Pre-OT has completed the above Steps 1 - 6, the OT Drug RD is complete and <br />
the Pre-OT is sent to declare. He or she would then be advised of the next step, either next OT <br />
level, NED for OTs, (sometimes a return to Solo III materials). The Pre-OT will be in <br />
<br />
<br />
very good shape and if the OT Drug RD has been well audited and C/Sed, will probably make <br />
faster case gain on subsequent actions, and will probably have a faster learning rate, in addition <br />
to case gains made on this RD. Although these should not be promised, their absence should result <br />
in an immediate FES and repair of the RD. <br />
<br />
While it is possible that the Solo auditor will blow a lot of these BTs and clusters that were <br />
affected by drugs during Solo auditing on OT III or OT III Expanded, and while some cases might <br />
not have to have the OT Drug RD, it is probable that the majority of cases will need this RD to <br />
handle the effects of drugs, medicines, etc., especially those who have had heavy drugs. <br />
<br />
Each of the methods given herein have been tested and proven workable. Sometimes there <br />
have been dramatic results from these handlings of drugs given herein on cases who hung fire or <br />
were resistive. <br />
<br />
Provided you do not make the error of broadly asking for drugs on cases at this level (which <br />
would cause over-restimulation), you now have the means for handling drugs at the level of OT <br />
III and OT III Expanded. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
As assisted by <br />
Senior C/S Int <br />
for the <br />
<br />
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS <br />
of the <br />
CHURCHES OF SCIENTOLOGY <br />
<br />
BDCS: LRH: DM: kjm <br />
Copyright © 1980 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
330 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
332 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ORIGINAL <br />
OT 5 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
334 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
OT V <br />
<br />
Cause Over MEST <br />
Gain Freedom from Fixated <br />
Introversion into MEST <br />
<br />
<br />
For eons, man has speculated and guessed about the nature of the physical universe. <br />
There have been many opinions and much discussion. Even the modern physicist, with <br />
his many names and labels, is still in the dark when it comes to how it got here and why. <br />
Before Scientology, the exact truth about the MEST universe was lost, and the way out <br />
of the trap unknown. Lies and misinformation had taken the place of the truth. <br />
<br />
In 1967, L. Ron Hubbard released Section V of the Operating Thetan Course, the <br />
most powerful level released up to that time. On OT V you learn the truth about the <br />
physical universe, not the laws of physical scientists, but the basic considerations about <br />
Matter, Energy, Space and Time. <br />
<br />
The tremendous power that this universe seems to have over thetans resulting in <br />
entrapment, degradation and death, is traced to its source. <br />
<br />
As you exteriorize from the physical universe at Section V, you discover exactly <br />
what MEST is, and become free of its laws. <br />
<br />
At OT V, a being is refamiliarized as a thetan exterior with the physical universe. <br />
OT drills are done to remarkably increase a being’s ability to communicate with his <br />
environment. He is now able to do so, totally free of the mind and body, and free from a <br />
fixated introversion into MEST. <br />
<br />
Solo auditing on this level serves as an introduction to the rehabilitation of his total <br />
abilities as a thetan. He learns to use his new abilities as a thetan with wisdom and <br />
judgment. <br />
<br />
OT 5-1 <br />
<br />
A) Fly Ruds if needed. <br />
<br />
B) Pre OT is to lie down in a comfortable popsition with eyes shut. <br />
<br />
1) Spot a spot in the room <br />
<br />
2) Spot a spot in your body <br />
<br />
Alternate command 1 and 2 until process is flat (Cognition, VGIs, No more change), <br />
then <br />
<br />
3) Spot two spots in your body <br />
<br />
4) Spot two spots outside <br />
<br />
Alternate until flat, then <br />
<br />
<br />
5) Spot a spot outside <br />
<br />
6) Spot a spot on the sun <br />
<br />
(Notice the difference between). Alternate until flat, then <br />
<br />
7) Spot two spots outside <br />
<br />
8) Spot two spots on the sun <br />
<br />
(Notice what happens). Alternate until flat. <br />
<br />
You may exteriorize or be exterior during these drills but don’t have to. <br />
<br />
C) With your eyes still shut in a comfortable position indoors do the following <br />
commands and write down any major cognitions.<br />
<br />
9) Spot an object in the room <br />
10) Spot an object outside <br />
11) Locate a moving object <br />
12) Locate a spot in your body <br />
13) Spot a motion <br />
14) Locate a space <br />
15) Spot a Being <br />
<br />
<br />
Continue the above steps in sequence until major cognition with very good <br />
indicators, or until exteriorization occurs. <br />
<br />
OT 5-2 <br />
Pre OT is to lie down in a comfortable position with eyes shut. <br />
A) Create an illusion ( condition, energy or object ) <br />
Then <br />
B) Conserve it <br />
Protect it <br />
Control it <br />
Hide it <br />
Change it <br />
Age it <br />
<br />
336 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Make it go backwards on a cycle of action <br />
Perceive it with all perceptions <br />
Shift it in time at will <br />
Rearrange it <br />
Duplicate it <br />
Turn it upside down <br />
Turn it on its’ side <br />
Make it obey MEST laws at will <br />
Be it <br />
Not be it <br />
Destroy it <br />
Mock it up and un-mock it at will <br />
<br />
<br />
C) <br />
Repeat steps (A) and (B) to a major cognition. <br />
<br />
OT 5-3 <br />
(done outside) <br />
<br />
<br />
A) <br />
Put your attention on an object that is ahead of you - like a parked car, lamp post, <br />
etc and walk towards it, noticing the distance between you and it. Continue to do this <br />
until cognition. <br />
<br />
B) <br />
Pick out an object ahead of you and wrap an energy beam around it and yourself and <br />
pull yourself toward the object by shortening the beam. <br />
Notice what happens. <br />
<br />
C) Locate an object, draw energy from it into you. Repeat at least ten times. <br />
Note any cognitions. <br />
D) Locate an object as above and walk toward it. Notice what is holding you to it. <br />
E) Locate a cloud and notice the space between you and it. <br />
F) Notice your body <br />
G) Walk and notice the change in viewpoint <br />
H) Notice the motion of the earth and your relationship to it <br />
I) Notice something about 10 people <br />
Repeat the above steps to a major cognition. <br />
ATTEST TO OT 5 <br />
<br />
<br />
338 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
NEW <br />
OT 5 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
340 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 NOVEMBER 1978R <br />
ISSUE I <br />
REVISED 2 MARCH 1979 <br />
<br />
<br />
(Revisions not in Script) <br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 26R <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
NED FOR OTs -CHECKLIST -PRE-OT ADVANCE PGM <br />
<br />
(Put on left inside cover of folder and <br />
keep it up to date.) <br />
<br />
(Pre-OT’s Name) (Date Started) (Org) <br />
<br />
The auditor checks off each step when done. The number after each step is the <br />
relevant NED for OTs HCOB Series number. <br />
<br />
PREREQUISITES <br />
Pre-OT is OT III (or above) _____ <br />
Pre-OT is not in the middle of another major action _____ <br />
Pre-OT is not on a TRs Course _____ <br />
Pre-OT has security clearance _____ <br />
<br />
SET-UPs <br />
D of P interview to get data on Pre-OT’s conditon. _____ <br />
Remedy any Vit B1 or Calcium deficiency (NOTs 18, 31) _____ <br />
Assess C/S 53 Section A, if valid read on Out-Int do <br />
<br />
End of Endless Int Repair Rundown _____ <br />
If Pre-OT has had a recent bad session, repair it _____ <br />
If ill or injured handle with an Assist (NOTs 3) _____ <br />
Handle any life enturbulation with Ruds or 2WC to F/N _____ <br />
<br />
CAUTION <br />
<br />
Do not be surprised if these steps go out of order, and dont’ force the Pre-OT to <br />
follow this exact order because his case may not be stacked up this way, although in <br />
general it will be found to be this order: <br />
<br />
<br />
ADVANCE PGM <br />
<br />
1. <br />
Indoctrination Step & clearing words (NOTs 4, 27 #2) _____ <br />
2. <br />
Perception Step. (Optional) (NOTs 27 #3) _____ <br />
3. <br />
D/L point when Pre-OT went Clear (NOTs 11, 12, 17 #4A,43) _____ <br />
4. <br />
Handle misownership of pictures by Pre-OT (NOTs 11, 12, <br />
27 #4A, 43) _____ * <br />
5. <br />
Handle BTs who went Clear (NOTs 11, 12, 27 #4A, 43) _____ <br />
6. <br />
Handle BTs who went Exterior (NOTs 11, 27, 43) _____ <br />
7. <br />
Handle BTs audited past erasure (NOTs 11, 12, 27, 43) _____ <br />
8. <br />
Handle BTs who were overrun, & Copies (NOTs 11, 12, 27, <br />
43) _____ * <br />
9. <br />
Repair BTs run on uncharged items (NOTs 11, 12, 39, 43) _____ <br />
10. <br />
L3RF on messed up Dn chains (NOTs 39) _____ * <br />
11. <br />
Repair any goofed D/L on a cluster (NOTs 9, 12, 27 #4G) _____ * <br />
12. <br />
Repair of Past Auditing by Name of Auditor (Optional, <br />
only if interested). (NOTs 11, 12, 13, 27 #4F,43) _____ * <br />
13. <br />
LDN OT III RB (NOTs 41) _____ <br />
14. <br />
Repair List for Errors in Running OT III (NOTs 41, 42) _____ * <br />
15. <br />
Handle PTSness, if pplicable (NOTs 35) _____ * <br />
16. <br />
Handle R/Ses (if Pre-OT has R/Sed) (NOTs 36) _____ * <br />
17. <br />
Handle Mass Mistaken for Mass of Body (NOTs 15, 27 #5) _____ * <br />
18. <br />
Handle BTs/clusters Being Body Parts (NOTs 27 #6) _____ * <br />
19. <br />
Handle BTs On or Around the Body (NOTs 14, 27 #7) _____ * <br />
20. <br />
Generally Spotting and Blowing BTs/clusters <br />
(NOTs 27 #8) _____ * <br />
21. <br />
Remnant Ridges (& partial blows) (NOTs 23, 27 #9, 45) _____ * <br />
22. <br />
Flow Assessment Recall Process (NOTs 27 #10, 28) _____ * <br />
23. <br />
Generally Addressing the Body (NOTs 27 #11) _____ * <br />
24. <br />
Specifically Addressing Chronic Somatics (NOTs 27 #12, <br />
32) _____ * <br />
25. <br />
Mass That Kicks in when Pre-OT Looks into Body <br />
(NOTs 27 #13) _____ * <br />
26. <br />
Perimeter Masses (NOTs 33) _____ * <br />
27. <br />
BTs with Mis-U words Rundown (NOTs 46) _____ * <br />
28. <br />
Cleaning the Body of BT/cluster Masses (NOTs 27 #14) _____ * <br />
29. <br />
Verify whether Pre-OT has achieved the full EP of <br />
NED for OTs as described in NOTs 27, pages 8 & 11. <br />
If so Declare. _____ <br />
If not, locate the unflat/incomplete Pgm step(s) <br />
and handle. (The NOTs Repair List - NOTs 24 - can be <br />
used here, or any point on Pgm when there are unresolved <br />
BTs or PBC.) <br />
DO NOT DECLARE UNTIL PRE-OT HAS THE FULL EP. <br />
* <br />
Shows where on Pgm Rest Points may be taken (ref: NOTS 29). <br />
LRH:dm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1978, 1979 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
342 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
344 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ORIGINAL <br />
OT 6 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
346 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
OT 6 <br />
<br />
Familiarisation as a Thetan Exterior <br />
with the Physical Universe. <br />
<br />
Reference: Creation of Human Ability Route One. <br />
<br />
Before doing the following solo processes, listen to the tape recorded lectures called <br />
“Route One of Intensive Procedure”. <br />
<br />
Note - If you have a feeling of reduced havingness during any one of these processes, <br />
mock up eight anchor points and push them into your body. <br />
<br />
NEVER DO THESE PROCESSES OVER OUT-RUDS. <br />
<br />
The following processes are run to <br />
<br />
1) floating needle, <br />
2) major cognition, <br />
3) regained ability <br />
<br />
<br />
STEP ONE <br />
<br />
1. <br />
Be three feet in back of your head. If you have any trouble with this command, use <br />
“Try NOT to be three feet back of your head”. <br />
2. <br />
Whatever you are looking at, copy it a dozen times ( copy means to make another <br />
one just like it ). Now dispose of these copies in some way. eg. You can push them <br />
all together and pull them in on yourself to suppliment havingness. In any event DO <br />
NOT leave yourself with these copies. Dispose of them in some way. Locate a <br />
nothingness around you and make a copy of it. Repeat a dozen times. Dispose of <br />
these like you did above. <br />
3. <br />
Find two back corners of the room and hold onto them for two minutes. <br />
4. <br />
Find two locations or positions on Earth and hold onto them for two minutes. <br />
5. <br />
Find some places where you are not. (Repeat) <br />
6. <br />
Spot three spots in your body and Spot three spots in the room. (Repeat) <br />
7. <br />
Be in the following places: The room, the sky, the moon, the sun. <br />
The above steps should be done to a Major Cognition or ability regained. Repeat <br />
until this occurs. Write it down. <br />
STEP TWO <br />
<br />
<br />
The following steps are done in your auditing room lying down with your eyes <br />
closed. <br />
<br />
<br />
8. <br />
Mock up your own body until you slip out of it. <br />
9. <br />
Locate an animal. Postulate it moving from one spot to another. Observe it doing <br />
this. <br />
10. <br />
Find a walking man — postulate his walking faster. Repeat this with 20 people. <br />
11. <br />
Find a walking person — postulate that he will stop, then continue walking. Do this <br />
20 times. <br />
10. <br />
Find a person in a distant land. notice the time of day. Notice the terrain. Notice the <br />
general environment. Smell the air. Locate a thought that is his. Locate a thought <br />
that is yours. Continue until flat. <br />
11. <br />
Notice differences between you and your body. <br />
The above should be done to a major cognition or abilty regained. You can repeat <br />
the above steps until this occurs. Write it down. <br />
<br />
STEP THREE <br />
<br />
12. <br />
Create in your body a feeling of calmness; create in your body sexual desire and turn <br />
it off. Continue that step until you feel you have control over the sexual drives. <br />
Create in your body a feeling of pain. <br />
Create in the body a feeling of serenity. <br />
Do the above until flat. <br />
Create in the body a feeling of hunger and turn it off. Continue this step until you <br />
are in control of hunger drives. <br />
<br />
<br />
Create in your body a flow of admiration particles and turn them off. Repeat until <br />
<br />
<br />
you can do this easily. <br />
The end result of these particular drills is the regained ability to control the body and <br />
its sensations. You may have to cycle through the steps more than once. <br />
<br />
<br />
The Operating Thetan must be able to manufacture and experience to his complete <br />
satisfaction, all sensations including pain in mock-up form, and all energies such as <br />
admiration and force. <br />
<br />
STEP FOUR <br />
<br />
14. <br />
Postulate anger, boredom, grief, cheerfulness and serenity — in that order. This is <br />
continued until you are sure that you can create any emotion. <br />
15. <br />
Finally, exteriorized visit a friend who lives in another state. Greet him and flow <br />
affinity to him. Ask him to communicate to you by letter. <br />
ATTEST TO OT VI <br />
<br />
348 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
350 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
NEW <br />
OT 6 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
352 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 NOVEMBER 1978R-1 <br />
ADDITION OF 15 OCTOBER 1981 <br />
<br />
<br />
Confidential <br />
Flag Only <br />
ACS Students <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
NED FOR OTs <br />
PART B <br />
CHECKSHEET <br />
<br />
<br />
NAME: ________________________________ DATE STARTED: _____________ <br />
<br />
DATE COMPLETED: _____________ <br />
<br />
NED FOR OTs SECTION <br />
<br />
A. NED FOR OTs RUNDOWN -BASIC THEORY AND TECHNIQUE: <br />
STARM4 <br />
RATE <br />
1A. HCOB 30 JULY 80 THE NATURE OF A <br />
BEING ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
1B. HCOB 25 JAN 88 WHY BEINGS <br />
MOCK UP ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
1. HCOB 15 Sep 78 I NED for OTs <br />
Series 1 NED <br />
FOR OTs RUNDOWN, <br />
THEORY OF ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
1A. <br />
DEMO: Demo what happens with a pc <br />
on R3RA when you ask for an earlier <br />
incident when he doesn’t have one. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
1B. <br />
DEMO: Demo the mechanics of <br />
dub-in as relates to a Pre-OT ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
<br />
1C. DEMO: Demo the difference between <br />
what’s handled on OT III as <br />
compared to NOTs. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
2. HCOB 15 Sep 78 II NED for OTs <br />
Series 2 WHY <br />
YOU CAN’T RUN <br />
ENGRAMS AFTER <br />
CLEAR ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
2A. DEMO: Demo what happens with <br />
a Clear if you run him on R3RA <br />
(including misownership and <br />
misidentification). ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
3. HCOB 16 Sep 78 IV NED for OTs <br />
Series 10 OT <br />
III AND DORMANT <br />
BTs ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
3A. DEMO: Demo the EP of OT III. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
3B. DEMO: Demo a dormant BT. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
4. HCOB 22 Sep 78 II NED for OTs <br />
Series 5 <br />
MISCONCEPTIONS ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
4A. DEMO: Demo BTs/Clusters <br />
having misconceptions of: <br />
(a) Identity ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(b) Time ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(c) Place ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(d) Form ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(e) Event ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
5. HCOB 30 Sep 78 I NED for OTs <br />
Series 8 BASIC <br />
PRINCIPLES UPON <br />
WHICH THE NED FOR <br />
OTs RUNDOWN IS <br />
BASED ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
5A. DEMO: Demo what the NOTs Rundown <br />
is structured on. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
6. HCOB 26 Sep 78 I NED for OTs <br />
Series 4 WORD <br />
CLEARING AND <br />
<br />
354 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
INFORMATION FOR <br />
PRE OTs ON NED <br />
FOR OTs <br />
<br />
6A. <br />
DEMO: Demo each definition in NOTs <br />
4 attachment #1 with your twin. <br />
<br />
6B. <br />
PRACTICAL: In a word clearing <br />
session on the meter: <br />
<br />
(a) Get word cleared by another ACS <br />
Student on each of the terms on HCOB <br />
26 Sep 78, I, Attachment #1. <br />
(b) Word clear another ACS Student <br />
on HCOB 26 Sep 78, I, Attachment #1. <br />
This is done by having the student <br />
read the definition given, telling <br />
what it means in his own words, <br />
using it in sentences or giving <br />
examples until he understands it <br />
and F/Ns (as in the Dianetics or <br />
<br />
<br />
Scn CS-1). <br />
<br />
7. TAPE: 6108C17 <br />
8. TAPE: 6110C18 <br />
9. HCOB 17 Sep 78 I <br />
RUDIMENTS-VALENCES <br />
SH Spec-41 <br />
<br />
VALENCES-CIRCUITS <br />
SH Spec-68 <br />
<br />
NED for OTs <br />
Series 7 VALENCES <br />
<br />
9A. <br />
DRILL: Drill fully the commands and <br />
procedure of the Valence Technique on <br />
a doll. The student drills the following <br />
steps on a doll (who is the “Pre-<br />
OT”). The coach, sitting off to the <br />
side of the student, supplies the doll’s <br />
answers using words (NULL SUBJECTS) <br />
from prepared assessment lists in the <br />
back of the Book of E-Meter Drills for <br />
answer to the “What” and “Who” question <br />
until he gets to “me” as an answer, <br />
he verbally gives the reads and <br />
F/Ns, where applicable for the items <br />
and answers. The coach must also say <br />
where the BT or Cluster is located<br />
<br />
and when it is blown. The coach is to <br />
keep the drill very simple as given <br />
below. <br />
<br />
<br />
(a) The student starts the drill with <br />
the following command to the doll: <br />
“Locate a BT or Cluster” and acknowledges <br />
the doll when the doll says <br />
he has located a BT/Cluster. <br />
(b) Student then asks “Where is it <br />
located in relation to the body” or <br />
“Where is it located?” or “Where is <br />
it?”. (This is not a rotely worded <br />
question, but the location of the <br />
BT or Cluster or mass must be found <br />
and communicated by the doll acting <br />
as the Pre-OT.) <br />
(c) The student then tells the doll: <br />
“With your attention on that exact <br />
spot (as found in (b)) ask it ‘What <br />
are you?’ “. Coach supplies an answer. <br />
(Note: “With your attention on that <br />
exact spot” is not a rote command and <br />
wouldn’t necessarily be used all the <br />
time. You want the Pre-OT to focus his <br />
attention on one BT or Cluster at a <br />
time. <br />
(d) The student acknowledges the doll <br />
and tells the doll to acknowledge the <br />
BT/Cluster’s answer. <br />
(e) After the doll has acknowledged the <br />
BT/Cluster’s answer, the student tells <br />
the doll to ask it “Who are you?”. <br />
(f) The doll (coach supplies answer) <br />
relays the answer “me” to the student. <br />
(g) The student tells the doll to acknowledge <br />
the BT/Cluster’s answer. Coach <br />
would then signify it’s blown and an F/N. <br />
The student does this drill with admin., <br />
writing down the questions, answers, <br />
the location of the BT/Cluster, reads, <br />
F/Ns and blows. This drill is done until <br />
the student is totally confident and <br />
can do it rapidly and easily with clear <br />
admin. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
<br />
The following drills are all done <br />
with a doll being the Pre-OT, the <br />
<br />
<br />
356 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
coach supplying the answers, and <br />
admin kept, as in Drill 9A. <br />
9B. DRILL: Using the Valence Technique, <br />
as in Drill 9A, drill handling: <br />
(a) A BT or Cluster who gives some <br />
answers other than “me” to the “Who <br />
are you?” question. <br />
(b) A BT or Cluster who gives a repeating <br />
answer to the “Who are you?” <br />
question. <br />
9C. DRILL: Using the Valence Technique, <br />
drill handling a mass that doesn’t <br />
give any answer: <br />
(a) By running Hello’s and OK’s <br />
(Ref. PAB 123, Vol III, page 136-7), <br />
followed through with Valence <br />
Technique. <br />
(b) By jolting it a bit earlier <br />
followed through with Valence <br />
Technique if it hasn’t blown. <br />
9D. DRILL: Using Valence Technique, <br />
drill handling: <br />
(a) A ridge. <br />
(b) A dead energy mass, being put <br />
there by some BT or Cluster. <br />
(c) A “Shell BT” (NOTs Series 1 and <br />
the Definitions). <br />
9E. DRILL: Using the Valence Technique, <br />
drill all of the above at random <br />
until the student auditor feels confident <br />
in knowing how and when to do <br />
these handlings. <br />
10. HCOB 14 Feb 80 NED for OTs Series <br />
54 CLARIFICATION ON <br />
<br />
ACKNOWLEDGING IN THE <br />
<br />
<br />
VALENCE TECHNIQUE ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
10A. DRILL: Using the Valence Technique, <br />
with a doll and coach providing answers <br />
(NULL SUBJECTS AS IN 9A) and <br />
reads, drill handling: <br />
(a) When the answer to the “What are <br />
you?” question gives an LFBD F/N. <br />
(b) When you’ve got a “me” answer <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
<br />
to the “Who are you?” question with <br />
an LFBD F/N (and Pre-OT has not said <br />
it’s blown or gone or some such.) ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
(c) When you got an F/N after the <br />
acknowledgement of the “me” answer <br />
on “Who are you?” but Pre-OT has <br />
not signified any blow or that it’s <br />
gone. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(d) When you got an LFBD F.N after <br />
acknowledgement of the “me”answer. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(e) A series of blows. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
10B. DRILL” Drill all the above at ran<br />
<br />
<br />
dom until the student is proficient <br />
<br />
with handling correctly. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
11. <br />
HCOB 31 Jan 80 NED for OTs Series <br />
51 AUDIT BTs <br />
CONCEPTUALLY ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
11A. <br />
DEMO: Demo the difference between <br />
auditing verbally and conceptually. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
11B. DEMO: Demo how you would handle <br />
<br />
a Pre-OT who says he got a picture <br />
<br />
and indicates to you that must be <br />
<br />
the answer to the “What are you?” <br />
<br />
question. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
12. <br />
HCOB 16 Sep 78 III NED for OTs <br />
Series 31 <br />
THE “THETAN <br />
HAND” <br />
TECHNIQUE ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
12A. DEMO: Demo using Thetan Hand Technique: <br />
<br />
<br />
(a) To sever a string or beam or <br />
line, etc. which is connecting a mass <br />
to the body. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(b) To separate ridges, masses, <br />
composite masses, or layers of <br />
clusters. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(c) In the “Yo-heave” technique. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
13. <br />
HCOB 17 sep 78 V NED for OTs <br />
Series 6 <br />
BLOWING BTs <br />
AND CLUSTERS ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
13A. DEMO: Demo why an awakened BT <br />
mocks up mass. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
358 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
13B. DEMO: Demo a BT stuck down the <br />
time track. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
13C. DRILL: Drill handling a BT holding <br />
other BTs there and also how you <br />
would find out if this was so. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
13D. DRILL: Drill handling a “ghost”. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
14. HCOB 15 Sep 78 IV NED for OTs <br />
Rev. 13.2.81 Series 9R <br />
CLUSTER,CUMULATIVE, <br />
HANDLING <br />
AND DATE/ <br />
LOCATING ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
14A. DEMO: <br />
(a) Demo how a right date for one <br />
can act as a wrong date for another. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(b) Demo how a right location for <br />
one can act as a wrong location for <br />
another. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
14B. DRILL: <br />
(a) Drill checking for and handling <br />
remaining BTs with Valence Technique <br />
after the Cluster (or Cum. Cluster) <br />
has broken up. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(b) Drill checking if the date has <br />
acted as a wrong date for others and <br />
indicating it as such, after the <br />
Cluster’s blown. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(c) Drill checking if the location <br />
has acted as a wrong location for <br />
others and indicating it as such, <br />
after the Cluster’s blown. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
15. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
16. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
17. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
B. NED FOR OTs RUNDOWN -RUDS, REPAIR OF PAST AUDITING AND <br />
SESSION FACTORS <br />
1. <br />
HCOB 22 Dec 79 FLYING RUDMENTS <br />
AT OT III AND <br />
ABOVE ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
1A. <br />
DRILL: Drill the 6 Rudiment Questions <br />
(not the handling) on a doll <br />
until known perfectly. <br />
<br />
1B. <br />
DEMO: Demo identifying whose <br />
charge it is on a rudiment question. <br />
<br />
1C. <br />
DEMO: Demo when you wouldn’t need <br />
to identify whose charge it is on <br />
Rudiments. <br />
<br />
1D. <br />
DEMO: Demo why you handle an outrud <br />
on a BT or Cluster to F/N using <br />
earlier similar, if necessary. <br />
<br />
1E. <br />
DEMO: What you do with the Bt or <br />
cluster if it is still around after <br />
you’ve F/Ned the rudiment. <br />
<br />
1F. <br />
DRILL: Full handling of rudiments <br />
per HCOB 22 Dec 79 FLYING RUDIMENTS <br />
AT OT III AND ABOVE on a doll with <br />
a coach supplying data using null <br />
subjects and saying what the reads <br />
are. <br />
<br />
2. <br />
HCOB 4 Jul 79 HANDLING CORRECTION <br />
LISTS ON OTs <br />
2A. <br />
DRILL: Handling a WCCL on a doll <br />
with coach supplying data as per <br />
above drills and demos. <br />
<br />
3. <br />
HCOB 17 Sep 78 III NED for OTs <br />
Series 14 OUT INT, <br />
WENT IN, WENT ON <br />
3A. <br />
DEMO: Demo handling a BT or Cluster <br />
with Out-Int. <br />
<br />
3B. <br />
DRILL: Drill handling a BT or Cluster <br />
with Out-Int. <br />
<br />
4. HCOB 30 Sep 78 II NED for OTs <br />
Series 11 THE <br />
FIRST STEP OF <br />
NED FOR OTs <br />
NOTE: The following 4 HCOBs with the<br />
<br />
parts specified only are to be read <br />
through, then restudied as they corelate, <br />
then the practical is to be <br />
done, and then the M4. <br />
<br />
360 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
5. HCOB 16 Sep 78 II <br />
6. HCOB 1 Nov 78 I <br />
7. HCOB 1 Nov 78 II <br />
8. HCOB 31 Jan 79 II <br />
9. HCOB 29 Oct 78 I <br />
NED for OTs <br />
Series 12 REPAIRING <br />
AND BLOWING <br />
BTs AND CLUSTERS <br />
FROM PAST AUDITING <br />
OR MIS-AUDITING <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series <br />
26R NED FOR <br />
OTs CHECKLIST PRE-<br />
OT PGM, Steps <br />
3 through 12 <br />
only. <br />
<br />
NED for OTs <br />
Series 27 NED <br />
FOR OTs-CHECKLIST, <br />
Step 4 <br />
only. <br />
<br />
NED for OTs <br />
Series 43 (Additional <br />
Action) <br />
<br />
NED for OTs <br />
Series 39 MORE <br />
ON DIANETIC <br />
CHAIN ERRORS <br />
<br />
9A. <br />
DRILL: On a doll, with the coach <br />
using fruits & null subjects for <br />
chains, items, dates, etc., drill <br />
handling the following Pgm Steps <br />
of NOTs Series 26R in conjunction <br />
with the referred-to portions of <br />
NOTs 27, and NOTs 43 and NOTs 39. <br />
<br />
(a) Pgm Step 3. D/L point when <br />
Pre-OT went Clear (NOTs 11, 12, 27 <br />
#4A, 43) <br />
(b) Pgm Step 4. Handle misownership <br />
of pictures by Pre-OT (NOTs 11, 12, <br />
27 #4A, 43) <br />
(c) Pgm Step 5. Handle BTs who went <br />
Clear (NOTs 11, 12, 27 #4A, 43) <br />
(d) Pgm Step 6. Handle BTs who went <br />
Exterior (NOTs 11, 27, 43) <br />
(e) Pgm Step 7. Handle BTs audited <br />
past erasure (NOTs 11, 12, 27, 43) <br />
(f) Pgm Step 8. Handle BTs who were <br />
overrun, & Copies (NOTs 11, 12, 27 <br />
#4E, 43) <br />
<br />
(g) Pgm Step 9. Repair BTs run on <br />
uncharged items (NOTs 11,12,39,43) ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(h) Pgm Step 10.L3RG on messed up <br />
Dn Chains (NOTs 39) ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(i) Pgm Step 11. Repair any goofed <br />
D/L on a cluster (NOTs 9,12,27 #4G) ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(j) Pgm Step 12. Repair of Past <br />
Auditing by Name of Auditor (Optional, <br />
only if interested).(NOTs 11, 12, 13, <br />
27 #4F, 43) ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
9B. <br />
DRILL: Handling a stuck picture <br />
(NOTs 12). ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
10. <br />
HCOB 20 Sep 78 IV NED for OTs <br />
Series 18 SESSION <br />
FACTORS ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
10A. DEMO: Demo over-restimulation. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
10B. DEMO: Demo the EP for a session. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
11. <br />
HCOB 15 Nov 78 NED for OTs <br />
Series 40 <br />
AUDITOR ROLE ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
11A. DEMO: Demo what will happen if you <br />
let the Pre-OT on NOTs try <br />
to answer an unreading question <br />
or look for a BT or <br />
Cluster that isn’t reading. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
12. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
13. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
NOTE: AT THIS POINT ON THE CHECKSHEET <br />
THE ACS STUDENT IS TO START AUDITING NED <br />
FOR OTs ON ANOTHER STUDENT, AND COMMENCE <br />
BEING AUDITED ON NED FOR OTs HIMSELF, ONE <br />
SESSION PER DAY. THIS AUDITING CONTINUES <br />
THROUGHOUT THE COURSE. <br />
<br />
<br />
C. <br />
NED FOR OTs RUNDOWN -DATA AND TECHNIQUES: <br />
1. <br />
HCOB 30 Sep 78 III NED for OTs <br />
Series 13 <br />
FESING OF <br />
FOLDERS AND <br />
FULL FLOW <br />
TABLES ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
362 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1A. PRACTICAL: <br />
(a) Make up a (or fill in an existing) <br />
Full Flow Table on an ACS student’s <br />
folder per the above HCOB. <br />
(b) Make up a full list of all the <br />
auditors from an ACS Student’s Full <br />
Flow Table. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
2. HCOB 11 Dec 78 NED for OTs <br />
Series 41 HANDLING <br />
BTs MESSED <br />
UP ON OT III ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
2A. DEMO: Demo why a BT or cluster <br />
messed up in running OT III needs <br />
correction with finding the OT <br />
III error and running the correct <br />
OT III action. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
3. HCOB 11 Dec 78 NED for OTs <br />
Series 42 NED for <br />
OTs:REPAIR LIST <br />
FOR ERRORS IN <br />
RUNNING OT III ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
3A. DEMO: Demo the instructions A-F. <br />
NOTE: Do not drill this list(due to <br />
the possibility of restimulation). ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
4. HCOB 21 Sep 78 NED for OTs <br />
Series 15 THE <br />
“SOLIDITY” OF THE <br />
BODY ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
4A. DEMO: Demo mass mistaken for the <br />
mass of the body. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
4B. DEMO: Demo how the body magnifies <br />
perceptions. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
5. HCOB 17 Sep 78 II NED for OTs <br />
Series 16 “EXTERIOR <br />
VISIO”, BT <br />
PERCEPTION ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
5A. DEMO: Demo how the Pre-OT might <br />
confuse a BT’s exterior visio with <br />
his own. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
6. HCOB 10 Feb 79 NED for OTs <br />
Series 45 PARTIALLY <br />
BLOWN BTs ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
<br />
6A. <br />
DRILL: Drill handling a partially <br />
blown BT. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
6B. <br />
DRILL: Drill handling when you’re <br />
getting exterior visio from a BT. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
7. <br />
HCOB 9 Feb 79 II NED for OTs <br />
Series 44 <br />
WRONG ITEMS ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
8. <br />
HCOB 29 Feb 78 NED for OTs <br />
Series 25 <br />
RESISTANCE TO <br />
CHANGE ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
8A. <br />
DEMO: Demo how the handling of <br />
resistance to change works. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
9. <br />
HCOB 29 Oct 78 III NED for OTs <br />
Series 35 NOTES <br />
ON PTS ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
9A. <br />
DRILL: On a doll with a coach using <br />
<br />
null subjects, drill handling PTS BTs <br />
<br />
and clusters. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
10. <br />
HCOB 27 Sep 78 I NED for OTs <br />
Series 24 <br />
NED for OTs <br />
REPAIR LIST ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
10A. PRACTICAL: <br />
<br />
Work out how you would handle each <br />
<br />
line of the NOTs Repair List. Do not <br />
<br />
take this up with another student. <br />
<br />
Refer to your course materials only. <br />
<br />
Do not drill this list (due to pos<br />
<br />
<br />
sibility of restimulation). <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
11. <br />
HCOB 20 Dec 79 NED for OTs <br />
Series 48 <br />
AUDITING SOMEBODY <br />
UNDER CONSTANT <br />
AND CONTINUOUS <br />
PT <br />
STRESS ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
11A. DEMO: Demo why you don’t run major <br />
<br />
actions or anything heavy on a Pre-<br />
<br />
OT who is under continuous PT stress <br />
<br />
or is ill. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
364 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
11B. DEMO: Demo when you’d end session <br />
on such a pc and why. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
11C. DEMO: (a) Demo Routine A. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(b) Demo Routine B. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(c) Demo Routine C. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
12. HCOB 26 Sep 78 IV NED for OTs <br />
Series 22 <br />
ANATEN ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
12A. DEMO: Demo what’s occurring in a <br />
NOTs session when you run into anaten <br />
and how you would handle. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
12B. DEMO: Demo what produces a somatic ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
13. PRACTICAL: <br />
(a) Demo handling End of Endless Int <br />
on a Pre-OT on NOTs. (Ref: HCOB 24 <br />
Sep 78RA,Rev. 21 Feb 79 Int RD Series <br />
4RA and HCOB 25 Sep 78, I, Int RD <br />
Series 5.) ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(b) DRILL: Handling End of Endless <br />
Int on a Pre-OT on NOTs. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
14. HCOB 15 Sep 78 III NED for OTs <br />
Series 3 <br />
ASSISTS ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
14A. DEMO: Demo handling an assist with <br />
NOTs (including earlier mutual incidents). <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
15. HCOB 26 Sep 78 III NED of OTs <br />
Series 21 <br />
REVIVIFICATION ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
15A. DEMO: <br />
(a) Revivification in an incident. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(b) Revivification in a past <br />
location. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(c) How Date/Locate works. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
16. HCOB 26 Sep 78 II NED for OTs <br />
Series 30 <br />
PROGRAM DEPARTURES <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
16A. DEMO: Demo what is a mass and what <br />
is a category in relation to NOTs. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
<br />
17. <br />
HCOB 5 Oct 78 NED for OTs <br />
Series 29 <br />
REST POINTS ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
18. <br />
HCOB 23 Sep 78 I NED for OTs <br />
Series 17 <br />
PREDICTION <br />
FACTORS ON <br />
LENGTH AND <br />
PROGRESS <br />
THROUGH THE <br />
RUNDOWN ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
18A. DEMO: Demo the difference of the <br />
<br />
mass and solidity of the Pre-OTs BTs <br />
<br />
and clusters near the beginning of the <br />
<br />
Rundown as compared to near the end. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
18B. DEMO: Demo the EP of the Rundown. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
19. <br />
HCOB 23 Sep 78 NED for OTs <br />
Series 19 <br />
TA AND NEEDLE <br />
BEHAVIOR ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
19A. DEMO: Demo why, during a NOTs <br />
<br />
session, the TA works up into a <br />
<br />
higher range and pumps back down to <br />
<br />
a lower range. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
19B. DEMO: Demo why you may have to operate <br />
with a higher sensitivity setting. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
20. <br />
HCOB 28 Sep 78 II NED FOR OTs <br />
Series 20 <br />
HOW YOU <br />
OPERATE A <br />
METER ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(NOTE: This was issued when a Mark V <br />
was being used instead of a Mark VI.) <br />
<br />
<br />
21. <br />
HCOB 7 Nov 78 NED for OTs <br />
Series 38 <br />
BASIC FEAR ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
22. <br />
HCOB 27 OCT 78 NED for OTs <br />
Series 37 <br />
COLLECTIVE <br />
IDENTITIES ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
22A. DEMO: Demo handling a collective <br />
identity. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
366 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
22B. DEMO: Demo the 2 methods of handling <br />
a repeating answer. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
23. HCOB 1 Nov 74RA ROCK SLAMS <br />
Rev. 1.9.78 AND ROCK <br />
SLAMMERS ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
23A. DEMO: Why it is important that an <br />
R/S is handled. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
24. HCOB 10 Aug 76R R/Ses, WHAT <br />
Rev. 5.9.78 THEY MEAN ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
24A. PRACTICAL: On the E-Meter, show <br />
what an R/S looks like. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
24B. DEMO: Demo what an R/S means. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
25. HCOB 22 Sep 78 I NED for OTs <br />
Series 36 <br />
ROCKSLAMS ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
25A. DRILL: On a doll with the coach <br />
using null subjects, drill handling <br />
a rockslam statement or phrase. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
26. DRILL: Work out the questions you <br />
would use and drill on a doll, with <br />
the coach using null answers, the <br />
following steps of NOTs pgm 26R in <br />
conjunction with NOTs 27. <br />
(a) Pgm Step 17. Mass mistaken for <br />
the Mass of the Body(NOTs 15,27 #5) ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(b) Pgm Step 18. BTs/clusters being <br />
Body parts (NOTs 27 #6) ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(c) Pgm Step 19. BTs on or around <br />
the Body (NOTs 14,27 #7) ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(d) Pgm Step 20. Spotting and Blowing <br />
BTs/Clusters (NOTs 27 #8) ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
27. HCOB 27 Sep 78 I NED for OTs <br />
Series 23 <br />
REMNANT <br />
RIDGES ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
27A. DEMO: Demo a ridge, showing the BT <br />
or cluster mocking it up and those <br />
stuck to it and in it. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
27B. DRILL: Flow Assessment Recall Process <br />
(on a doll). (See NOTs 27 #9) ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
<br />
28. <br />
HCOB 4 Oct 78 NED for OTs <br />
Series 28 <br />
STUCK FLOWS, <br />
THE GENUS OF <br />
A BT ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
28A. DEMO: Demo a stuck flow. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
28B. DEMO: Demo an overrun stuck flow <br />
reversion. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
28C. DRILL: Flow Assessment Recall Process <br />
(on a doll).(See NOTs 27 #10) ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
29. <br />
DRILL: As in Drill No 26, drill <br />
NOTs 26R Pgm Step 23, Generally <br />
Addressing the Body (NOTs 27 #11) ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
30. <br />
HCOB 29 Oct 78 II NED for OTs <br />
Series 32 <br />
CHRONIC <br />
SOMATICS, <br />
MISSED BTs ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
30A. DEMO: Demo the handling of chronic <br />
somatics. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
30B. DRILL: Handling chronic somatics <br />
<br />
on a doll with a coach using null <br />
<br />
subjects (See NOTs 27 #12) <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
31. <br />
DRILL: As in Drill 26, drill NOTs <br />
26R Pgm Step 25, Mass that kicks in <br />
when Pre-OT looks into Body Parts. <br />
(NOTs 27 #13) ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
32. <br />
HCOB 11 Nov 78 NED for OTs <br />
Series 33 <br />
PERIMETER <br />
MASSES ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
32A. DEMO: Demo the handling of putting <br />
<br />
the Pre-OT’s attention out to the <br />
<br />
perimeter and how you’d get the BTs <br />
<br />
or clusters made available by doing <br />
<br />
this. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
32B. DRILL: Handling perimeter masses on <br />
<br />
a doll with a coach, using null <br />
<br />
subjects. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
368 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
33. <br />
HCOB 22 Feb 79 NED for OTs <br />
Series 46 <br />
BTs WITH MISUNDERSTOOD <br />
WORDS ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
33A. DRILL: The sequence for handling <br />
<br />
BTs with MU words on a doll with a <br />
<br />
coach. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
34. <br />
DRILL: As in drill 26, drill NOTs <br />
26R Pgm Step 28 Cleaning the Body of <br />
BT/Cluster Masses. (NOTs 27 #14) ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
35. <br />
WORD CLEARING M4: <br />
Read over and get M4: <br />
(a) NOTs 26R <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
(b) NOTs 27 <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
36. <br />
HCOB 14 Nov 78 NED for OTs <br />
Series 34 <br />
THE SEQUENCE <br />
FOR HANDLING <br />
A PHYSICAL <br />
CONDITION ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
37. <br />
HCOB 11 Jan 80 QUAL CORRECIVE <br />
ACTIONS <br />
ON OTs ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
37A. DEMO: Demo the definition of <br />
“subjective”. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
37B. DEMO: Demo the definition of <br />
“objective”. ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
37C. DEMO: Demo why subjective ques<br />
<br />
<br />
tions are not to be asked of Pre-OTs <br />
<br />
in non-auditing situations such as <br />
<br />
in cramming. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
38. <br />
HCOB 26 May 80 NED for OTs <br />
Series 53 <br />
ERRORS ON <br />
NOTs ____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
38A. PRACTICAL: <br />
<br />
Give 3 examples of incorrect audit<br />
<br />
<br />
ing questions that would be hard or <br />
<br />
impossible to answer and show why <br />
<br />
that is so. <br />
____ ____ ____ ____ <br />
<br />
<br />
SECTION SEVEN <br />
STUDENT THEORY COMPLETION <br />
<br />
<br />
A. STUDENT ATTEST: <br />
The following attest is to be signed off, item by item, before the student graduates <br />
from the Advanced Courses Specialist Course. <br />
<br />
If the student has any question or reservation about attesting to any of the points <br />
below, he should retread himself on the area. <br />
<br />
Only when the student has acquired these skills without question will he or she be <br />
able to achieve the excellent results demanded by the NED for OTs Rundown. <br />
<br />
I attest that: <br />
<br />
a) I have applied the Study Tech of the Student <br />
Hat “fully” while on this Course. _______________ <br />
b) I am fully familiar with the meter, have <br />
done all of the meter drills on this <br />
Course, am certain of my ability to operate <br />
and read the meter flublessly, and <br />
know how to handle the TA, sensitivity <br />
and needle. _______________ <br />
c) I am able to repair a wrong date and a <br />
wrong location. _______________ <br />
d) I have, without reservation, a full <br />
understanding of the OT III materials. _______________ <br />
e) I am able to accurately assess the LDN <br />
and can successfully carry out each of <br />
the LDN handlings on a pc. _______________ <br />
f) I understand and can use the Valence <br />
Technique. _______________ <br />
g) I understand and can use the technique <br />
of jolting BT/cluster a bit earlier in <br />
time (to handle stuck points) _______________ <br />
h) I understand and can run the Hellos <br />
and OKs process to get a Null into <br />
communication. _______________ <br />
j) I understand and am able to handle <br />
out-Int competently. _______________ <br />
<br />
370 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
k) <br />
I understand and am able to handle <br />
R/Ses competently. <br />
<br />
l) <br />
I understand and know how to do an <br />
Assist. <br />
<br />
m) <br />
I understand over-restimulation and <br />
know what causes it. <br />
<br />
n) <br />
I am able to handle the NED for OTs <br />
Repair List competently. <br />
<br />
o) <br />
I am able to competently handle an <br />
L3RG on NED for OTs. <br />
<br />
p) <br />
I understand and know how to follow <br />
the Sequence for Handling Physical <br />
Condition. <br />
<br />
q) <br />
I understand the term “Q and A” and <br />
the importance of not Q and A-ing on <br />
this level. <br />
<br />
r) <br />
I know the importance of completing <br />
cycles and flattening actions started <br />
on this level. <br />
<br />
s) <br />
I understand and know how to handle <br />
“On-ness”. <br />
<br />
t) <br />
I understand the principle of misconception <br />
on NED for OTs. <br />
<br />
u) <br />
I attest that I am a NED for OTs <br />
Auditor. <br />
<br />
SECTION EIGHT <br />
<br />
STUDENT AUDITING COMPLETION <br />
<br />
A. <br />
STUDENT AUDITING SECTION: PRACTICAL: <br />
1. <br />
I have successfully audited NED for <br />
OTs on another student with excellent <br />
results. <br />
2. <br />
I have been audited on NED for OTs <br />
by another student with excellent <br />
results. <br />
<br />
STUDENT COURSE COMPLETION <br />
<br />
<br />
A. STUDENT COMPLETION: <br />
I have completed the requirements of this checksheet and I know and can apply the <br />
materials. <br />
<br />
STUDENT ATTEST:____________________________DATE:______________ <br />
<br />
I have trained this student to the best of my ability and he/she has completed the <br />
requirements of this checksheet and knows and can apply the checksheet data. <br />
<br />
SUPERVISOR ATTEST:_________________________DATE:______________<br />
<br />
This student is auditing NED for OTs well and has produced excellent results. <br />
C/S ATTEST:__________________________________ DATE:______________ <br />
<br />
B. STUDENT ATTEST AT C & A: <br />
I attest (a) I have enrolled on the course, (b) I have been properly invoiced for the <br />
course as a contracted staff member, (c) I have studied and understand all the materials <br />
on this checksheet, (d) I have done all the drills on this checksheet, and (e) I can produce <br />
the result required in the materials of this course. <br />
<br />
STUDENT ATTEST:____________________________ DATE:______________ <br />
<br />
C & A :_______________________________________ DATE:______________ <br />
<br />
(Route this form to Course Admin for Filing in Student’s folder.) <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
Assisted by <br />
Senior C/S Assistant <br />
Accepted by the <br />
BDCS:LRH:MM:kjm BOARD OF DIRECTORS <br />
Copyright © 1978, 1981 of the <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OF CALIFORNIA <br />
<br />
372 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
<br />
<br />
ISSUE I <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 1 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
NED FOR OTs RD <br />
<br />
THEORY OF <br />
<br />
As has been announced, there is a special handling for OTs who have been run on <br />
Dianetics since Clear. It is called “NED for OTs”. This RD is a prerequisite for OT VIII. <br />
Its EP is CAUSE OVER LIFE. The RD steps are covered in separate issues. This issue <br />
covers the theory behind the action and also includes OT III data which has never before <br />
been released. <br />
<br />
The reason Dianetic auditing messes up Clears and OTs is that when an auditor asks <br />
for an earlier similar which doesn’t exit, you’ll probably go over into a cluster or BT where <br />
it does exist. You see the Clear or OT doesn’t have pictures of his own so the Dianetic <br />
chain is being run on a BT or cluster and it really caves in somebody when asked for an <br />
earlier similar that doesn’t exist, on that BT or anywhere else. And it’ll jump the guy <br />
straight into another BT or cluster. And you get chaos. <br />
<br />
BTs are easily monitored by the think of the pc, and they can actually respond to <br />
anything he thinks. They’re totally at effect. Their banks are controlled by exactly what <br />
the person thinks at them. Just like an auditor can control the time track of a pc. Same <br />
phenomena.<br />
<br />
A person can see the pictures of a BT or cluster because there is an intimate tactile <br />
connection between the person and the BT. A person can “think” at a BT or cluster, a <br />
picture will turn on in the BT or cluster representing that think and the person will see it <br />
as a picture and erroneously suppose it is his own if he doesn’t know this phenomenon. <br />
<br />
SOMATICS <br />
<br />
A BT or cluster has three choices - it can run its own life or run yours or run nothing. <br />
The things you run into with somatics are not likely to be of the category of your life, <br />
they’re more likely to be in the category of the BT’s life. So it gets to be a dizzy scene. <br />
<br />
<br />
There’s a way you can detect that a person is not really running his own incident. <br />
Let’s say the listed somatic is “a pain in the ear”. Well, great. When he runs the thing heay <br />
even get a little twitch in the ear. But he will get something “having” a pain in the ear. It <br />
would be uncommon for him to actually get a pain in the ear. In other words he doesn’t <br />
get the somatic where it is supposed to be on the body. That’s because the BT isn’t in that <br />
position. He’s liable to get a pain in the kidney, do you see? Or a pain in the eye. This <br />
isn’t inevitable. Once in a while the guy gets a pain in the forehead. Let’s say this somatic <br />
was “a pain in the forehead”. He actually runs an incident and there’s a slight somatic in <br />
the forehead but it’s kind of weird because it doesn’t actually run out on his own forehead. <br />
It might disappear but it didn’t disappear on his own forehead. <br />
<br />
MENTAL TRANSMISSION <br />
<br />
When you talk about telepathy, there is a proximity factor. When a thetan is pressed <br />
straight up against another thetan very tight, total tactile communication, you get this type <br />
of mental transmission. You can achieve it by reaching, when there is no tactile. You have <br />
to reach your attention a considerable distance. You can do it. An example of this is where <br />
two guys who are in relatively good shape start putting postulates at the same point on a <br />
wall that’s maybe twenty feet away in front of them when they’re sitting side by side. And <br />
they start putting postulates at a certain preconceived spot on the wall. Both of them will <br />
perceive a bzbzbzbzzzzz of sort of little energy explosions. Not small - maybe 3 or 4 feet <br />
wide and a couple of feet high. It’s when they both did it simultaneously. Two postulates <br />
will collide in the same exact place in the mest universe and go bzzzzzzt. It will happen; <br />
that’s at a distance. But apparently there’s such a thing as a tactile. After all you realize <br />
the amount of mass that is connected with a BT - he’s massed up. You put an impulse into <br />
that mass and the mass is up against the body - you put an impulse into the body it goes <br />
into that mass. The BT can respond. Unwittingly, unknowingly, totally at effect. Makes <br />
him hard to handle, by the way. That’s how you can make them run an Incident I and an <br />
Incident II. They just run it willy nilly. They can’t help themselves. And it as-ises in the <br />
bank and that normal phenomena takes place and they go bzzzzzt, unless you yourself <br />
have put up a ridge with anger or emotion or something of the sort. I know some guys try <br />
to do it vocally or something stupid. What’s interesting is the number of BTs that have <br />
strings into the body. You think they blow and they still have a connection - beams. <br />
<br />
VALENCES AND “SHELL BT” <br />
<br />
The sizes of incidents are very often wrong, and an out of valence phenomena <br />
occurs. The bulk of BTs and clusters are out of valence and often the pictures seen are <br />
very small. Now on the other hand a Pre-OT (who thinks he is running his own incident <br />
but is actually running a BT or cluster) can seem to be totally in valence at one point of <br />
a chain. Just one point. The rest of it, no. And what the Pre-OT should suspect at that <br />
time is that he has a BT that surrounds his whole body. This would be a “Shell BT”. A <br />
Clear can go into the valence of and see the pictures of this BT or cluster. All these things <br />
confuse a person trying to run this because he’ll take this one point of valence and it sort <br />
of “proves” it to him that it must be his incident. <br />
<br />
The Shell BT is a composite body entity which is a mock-up that thinks (mistakenly) <br />
that it is holding the body together. You can collide with that. I suppose that’s really <br />
probably what they think is the astral body, a collection of BTs and clusters molded into <br />
a semblance of a body structure. As this “astral body” is highly electronic. BTs and <br />
clusters can easily get stuck in it even though they themselves are creating it. <br />
<br />
374 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
DATA ON MIS-RUN DIANETICS <br />
<br />
<br />
There’s another interesting phenomena which occurs on any pc that is mis-run on <br />
Dianetics. If an auditor asks for an earlier similar which doesn’t exist, the pc will look <br />
over into a cluster or BT where it does exist. So therefore you mustn’t ever pressure a pc <br />
for earlier incidents which don’t exist in the same being or beings. A guy can find it easily <br />
or it isn’t there because it’s a different kind of jumped chain. The pc isn’t jumping from <br />
one of his chains to another one of his, he’s jumping from one of his chains to a BT or <br />
cluster’s chain. (A Clear or above would be jumping from one BT chain to another.) Let’s <br />
say the guy is running his own chain. And then all of a sudden the auditor goofs and insists <br />
there must be an earlier incident. He’s got an erasure going and instead of paying any <br />
attention to this erasure he demands an earlier incident. He’ll jump the pc over into a BT <br />
that’s probably been stone dead for god knows how long. The auditor jams up the case. <br />
And the way he prevents this from happening is to never run past the postulate, just as it <br />
says in R3RA. <br />
<br />
DUB-IN <br />
<br />
As the Pre-OT increases in power and has more thetan power, the BTs and clusters <br />
will mock up what the Pre-OT thinks and become totally the subject of the Pre-OT’s <br />
control. The Pre-OT doesn’t realize that he’s getting suckered into believing that they are <br />
his pictures. It seems to prove itself: The Pre-OT thinks “can of beans” and he is instantly <br />
presented with a picture of a can of beans. That is the actual liability mechanism. But <br />
you’re not running them out of you, you see. So it can look like the fellow is running out <br />
his own incident. That’s why a Clear or Dianetic Clear can get suckered into believing <br />
that his pictures have come back. That’s the exact mechanism. He’s gone up in <br />
horsepower. Any BT or cluster he has anywhere around him will respond exactly and <br />
totally subordinated. They go into almost instant control. He thinks a thought in their <br />
direction and they can actually mock up a picture which isn’t their picture or anything else. <br />
You get dub-in. They didn’t know anything about it but they mocked up the picture. And <br />
that’s the explanation of dub-in! <br />
<br />
MEMORY <br />
<br />
The dub-in phenomena also affects a Clear or above’s memory. You say “Well, I <br />
was Aloysius George Smith in 1862”. And you get a picture of Aloysius George Smith <br />
in 1862 gratuitously furnished you by a BT - and it will be"his"version of 1862. Now, it <br />
will be correct that you were Aloysius George Smith in 1862 but the truth of the matter <br />
is that you (as a Pre-OT) don’t have any pictures of it. It’s interesting because you won’t <br />
find you have a consecutive life in pictures. It’ll be kind of like a very poor slide show <br />
subtituted for a movie. You can say you were in Flanders in 1803 or you were at Oxford, <br />
and you will notice if you watch closely you may still have some very active BTs that you <br />
will get a gradually dawning picture of Oxford from. But they may think that Oxford is <br />
the same thing as Arcturus so god knows the accuracy of the pictures that you get. When <br />
a person is Clear he does have an accurate memory but because this other phenomenon <br />
occurs and somebody furnishes him with a picture of Oxford, then he says “I’d better look <br />
at the pictures of Oxford” and instead of remembering it straight he gets all fouled up. <br />
<br />
DORMANT BTs AND CLUSTERS <br />
<br />
In NED for OTs you are actually handling, in the main, dormant BTs and clusters. <br />
<br />
<br />
These are not really alive enough to run Incident IIs and Incident Is on. They have <br />
different considerations, these dormant BTs and clusters, but they add up to being dead <br />
or below being dead. They’re in the state that FBI agents and government officials <br />
eventually wind up in when they aren’t already simply an animated dormant cluster. If <br />
people who are busy trying to smash up Scientology realized what they themselves were <br />
heading for, they would have a couple of other thinks, as the state of these dormant BTs <br />
and clusters is pretty grim. They are not really dead, they just hope they are. And it’s a <br />
pretty poor view looking forward to the next trillion years in that state. These aren’t <br />
normally touched in basic OT III auditing but one can become aware of them because they <br />
can produce somatics and out body conditions. <br />
<br />
Now when you audit Dianetics on Pre-OTs, you possibly wake up very dormant <br />
BTs and clusters that actually have never been hit on OT III - never dreamed they existed. <br />
These will be uncovered especially when a Pre-OT is run on “never happened”, “wasn’t <br />
there” type chains. These are denyer type chains and running them will open up some BT <br />
channels that had been completely dormant. There’s mention of this back in the early <br />
50’s. “You will sometimes get into parts of the bank which had better be left closed.” This <br />
is actually the phenomena that was discovered at that particular time. I just knew it existed. <br />
It was a dormant something, in a totally dormant condition. They can’t be awakened with <br />
a hand grenade normally. They also won’t assess. So you get into these when the auditor <br />
has taken up a non-reading item. They are usually not live on a meter. They practically <br />
run on, being dormant, to the end of the universe unless somebody disturbs them. They <br />
don’t usually activate when you just put your attention on them, they’re really dead. You <br />
have to actually put some life into them to activate them. They’re like pebbles on a beach. <br />
Anyway, the EP of OT III gives only an apparency that all BTs and clusters are gone. <br />
There’s an axiom that says absolutes are unobtainable. If you don’t ever want to run into <br />
any more BTs or clusters, well you’d better go find some universe where they don’t exist. <br />
But actually, there are fewer of them hitting people and bouncing around than one would <br />
think. They light less often than one would suppose. But listen, you’re living in a universe <br />
which is crawling with this type of stuff. And planet Earth was a dumping ground to end <br />
all dumping grounds. Actually, the end of OT III is when those BTs and clusters that are <br />
easily put into communication are gone. It’s not when all BTs in the whole universe that <br />
ever will be, are gone. <br />
<br />
NED for OTs handles those BTs and clusters which, while they could still affect the <br />
body, are not readily responsive to OT III handling. As NED for OTs is run these cats <br />
wake up and get handled. This relieves the Pre-OT of a lot of phenomena which puzzles <br />
him and can hold him down. As you go along in running it you will find that the material <br />
to which NED for OTs is addressed seldom considers itself live beings. It thinks it is <br />
MEST, body parts, significances, conditions - anything but a live being. Because a thetan <br />
can’t do anything but survive, the states he can get into exceed what we normally think <br />
of as living beings. Even though you will occasionally find “live” BTs and clusters in <br />
running NED for OTs the bulk of the material you are handling considers itself outside <br />
that category. While it responds to all the laws of life it requires a special address to get <br />
it into the realm of awareness that it is alive. <br />
<br />
You’ve never had any pcs like that unless you’ve worked in an institution and have <br />
seen some inmate living in a totally lifeless state, unaware of anything. NED for OTs <br />
handles this condition on BTs and clusters which existed without being suspected except <br />
for the occasional clue of a strange picture or a wild somatic. <br />
<br />
LRH:mm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright © 1978 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
376 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
<br />
ISSUE II <br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 2 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
WHY YOU CAN’T RUN ENGRAMS AFTER CLEAR <br />
<br />
A Dianetic or Scientology Clear has erased his own bank and has no pictures. Any <br />
attempt to run a Dn or Scn Clear on Dianetics, NED, XDN or any R3R, causes <br />
restimulation of BTs and clusters, and it is their pictures he sees and tries to run as his own, <br />
which is a “misownership” of the incident/picture. As he thinks it’s his picture he <br />
"misidentifies" himself with the BT or cluster whose picture it is. Now if this is <br />
compounded by a wrong or misassessed item (uncharged), these BTs and clusters have <br />
a wrong item resulting in further restimulation. If a BT incident is overrun, or the auditor <br />
asks for an earlier incident than basic, the pc jumps to another BT or cluster, pulling more <br />
and more BTs and clusters into restimulation. Their pictures are copied and cross-copied <br />
by other BTs and clusters, making a mess. <br />
<br />
A Clear can go into the valence of, and see pictures of BTs and clusters; makes the <br />
mistake of thinking they’re his incidents and pictures, and down he goes. This doesn’t <br />
necessarily affect the person himself, but it does affect the body - severely. Most of these <br />
BTs are dormant, dead, way below unconsciousness. There are lower states of nonexistence <br />
that these BTs are in. Their mass and density are great, and they are packed in <br />
on the body. When activated these impinge on the body as they are physically attached <br />
to it, and via the body are connected to the being, resulting in illness, possibly worse - the <br />
pc can be severely incapacitated. If he’s a Dn or Scn Clear and not up to OT III, he’s at <br />
risk. All you can do is get him up to OT III so it can be handled. Clears should be told <br />
they’re at risk until OT III, and shouldn’t stay in the Non-Interference Zone. After OT <br />
III they can be handled on NED for OTs. And you don’t run Power, R6EW or the Clearing <br />
Course on a Dianetic Clear. They go straight onto OT I, then OT II, then OT III. (They’ll <br />
need to learn to solo audit on the Solo Auditor Course first of course.) <br />
<br />
So we have the firm rule: <br />
<br />
NO ENGRAM RUNNING, NO POWER PROCESSING, NO R6EW, NO <br />
<br />
C.C., NO DIANETICS OF ANY KIND, ON A DIANETIC OR <br />
<br />
SCIENTOLOGY CLEAR. <br />
<br />
LRH:dm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
<br />
<br />
ISSUE III <br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
AO Review Auditors <br />
AO C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 3 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
ASSISTS <br />
<br />
You never run a secondary, engram, Dianetic Assist or narrative on Clears or OTs. <br />
(And this applies to Dianetic Clears.) If an OT III gets an engram (injury) you can run <br />
a Contact Assist, Touch Assist, Date/Locate the injury and run Incident IIs and Is, but not <br />
a Dianetic Assist. On secondaries you can Date/Locate - get the earliest beginning and <br />
it will blow. But no secondary running. That’s what you can do for assists. If a guy has <br />
a bad secondary, or a bad injury, you handle that with Date/Locate. You’ll find who <br />
recorded it , but don’t run it as an engram or by R3R or R3RA. And remember that a recent <br />
secondary or engram is a restimulation of clusters with earlier mutual incidents, and must <br />
be handled as such. Then you handle any individual BTs and copies. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
378 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE I <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
NED for OTs Series 4 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
WORD CLEARING AND INFORMATION <br />
<br />
FOR PRE-OTs ON NED FOR OTs; <br />
<br />
After the first step of the RD, the Advanced Courses Specialist clears the words and <br />
terms and has the Pre-OT read and demo the following: <br />
<br />
1. Attachment #1 DEFINITIONS <br />
2. HCOB 15 Sep 78, I, NED FOR OTs, THEORY OF <br />
3. HCOB 15 Sep 78, II, WHY YOU CAN’T RUN ENGRAMS AFTER CLEAR <br />
4. HCOB 22 Sep 78, II, MISCONCEPTIONS <br />
5. HCOB 17 Sep 78, IV, BLOWING BTs AND CLUSTERS <br />
6. HCOB 17 Sep 78, I, VALENCES <br />
7. Attachment # 2 INFORMATION FOR PRE-OTs ON NED FOR OTs <br />
This action is done in session, with English Dictionary, Tech Dictionary and the <br />
issues listed above to hand. It counts as part of the auditing time. <br />
<br />
As these issues are highly confidential and the auditor is responsible for their <br />
security the auditor keeps them after the session (not the Pre-OT). <br />
<br />
LRH:dm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HCOB 26.9.78 I <br />
Confidential <br />
Attachment #1 <br />
<br />
DEFINITIONS <br />
<br />
ATTENTION: TECH DICTIONARY <br />
ATTENTION UNIT: TECH DICTIONARY <br />
THETAN (0n): TECH DICTIONARY <br />
BODY THETAN (BT): By BT is meant a thetan who <br />
is stuck to another thetan or <br />
body but is not in control <br />
(HCOB 5.2.70, Iss. II.) BTs <br />
stick to pictures, other BTs <br />
and clusters. A BT can go into <br />
a valence of anything - BTs can <br />
be being anything at all. <br />
CLUSTER; A cluster is a group of body <br />
thetans (BTs) crushed or held <br />
together by some mutual bad <br />
experience. (HCOB 5.2.70, Iss. <br />
II.) The mutual incident is a heavy <br />
engram which happened to all the <br />
thetans in the cluster and is the <br />
exact point in time and space where <br />
they “became one”. <br />
MUTUAL INCIDENT: A severe engram which happened to <br />
a number of thetans, the picture <br />
(which they have in common), keeps <br />
them stuck together in that incident. <br />
It has a precise date down to the <br />
second and fractions of a second and <br />
a precise location in space. <br />
<br />
CUMULATIVE CLUSTER: A cumulative cluster is made up of <br />
other earlier clusters (see HCOB <br />
29.10.69R for illustration). It is <br />
a cluster to which other BTs and <br />
clusters have been added by later <br />
mutual incidents, all stuck together. <br />
<br />
COMPOSITE (MASS): <br />
(See English Dictionary.) Used on <br />
this RD to describe masses or heavy <br />
somatics made up of a number of BTs, <br />
clusters, pictures, ridges. <br />
<br />
380 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
LAYERED CLUSTER: <br />
Several clusters (and/or BTs) in <br />
layers, as one layer comes off another <br />
layer comes to view. <br />
<br />
SHELL BT: <br />
A BT or cluster that surrounds the <br />
Pre-OT’s body like a shell. A Clear <br />
can go into the valence of, and see <br />
the pictures of, this BT or cluster <br />
and mistake these as his own, as he <br />
seems to be in valence in the picture. <br />
<br />
DORMANT BT: <br />
A BT or cluster in a totally dormant <br />
condition, they’re really dead, in <br />
states of exitence below unconsciousness. <br />
They are out of PT <br />
(stuck on the track) and are stuck <br />
in the past location. They are in <br />
a perpetual reviv in that time and <br />
that location. They can be activated <br />
or awoken by the Pre-OT. <br />
<br />
COPY: <br />
Thetans in the body (BTs) may <br />
obsessively copy the pictures of <br />
other thetans. Therefore you can <br />
find it seems that the thetan who <br />
just left is still there because <br />
there is a picture left. Spot the <br />
fact that someone else copied it and <br />
it usually goes. (Add. sheet, Sect. <br />
III OT.) <br />
<br />
CROSS-COPYING: <br />
When a number of BTs and clusters <br />
are restimulated or awoken, each <br />
can start making copies of each <br />
other’s pictures and copies of the <br />
copies - called cross-copying. <br />
<br />
CROSS-RESTIMULATION: One BT or cluster restimulating <br />
another BT or cluster, who then <br />
restimulates another BT or cluster. <br />
<br />
MISCONCEPTION: <br />
(See English Dictionary) and <br />
Axiom 38. The basic misconceptions <br />
are of identity, time, <br />
place, form and event; e.g. a <br />
misconception of place would <br />
be a thetan thinking something <br />
that happened in one place, <br />
happened in another place. <br />
<br />
A misconception of event would <br />
be a thetan thinking something <br />
<br />
<br />
happened to him, which didn’t <br />
happen to him or happened to <br />
someone else (Flow 2 or 3). <br />
MISOWNERSHIP: A basic misconception of one <br />
thetan making the mistake of <br />
thinking another thetan’s picture <br />
or incident or mock-up is his own. <br />
MISIDENTIFICATION: A basic misconception of one <br />
thetan thinking he is another <br />
thetan. It’s a mistake in <br />
identity. Thetan “A” thinks <br />
it is thetan “B”. Or one thetan <br />
thinks he is more than one thetan, <br />
etc. <br />
VALENCE: TECH DICTIONARY <br />
BEINGNESS: TECH DICTIONARY <br />
IDENTITY: See English Dictionary and Tech <br />
Dictionary under “valence” and <br />
“beingness”. It is that by which <br />
a thetan identifies himself. <br />
OUT OF VALENCE: TECH DICTIONARY <br />
BLOW: See Tech Dictionary. In this RD <br />
it is used in the sense of a BT <br />
or cluster departing after being <br />
unstuck from other BTs and clusters. <br />
PARTIAL BLOW: A BT or cluster not fully blown. <br />
Sometimes one will leave from <br />
inside the body and stick or hang <br />
up on the outer surface of the body. <br />
Or one will go as far as the wall or <br />
to some distance and hang around. <br />
<br />
BLOWING BY INSPECTION: You don’t have to do anything, you <br />
just look and it blows. <br />
<br />
PICTURE: <br />
See Tech Dictionary under “Mental <br />
Image Picture”. <br />
<br />
MOCK UP: <br />
TECH DICTIONARY <br />
<br />
SOMATIC: <br />
TECH DICTIONARY <br />
<br />
RIDGE: <br />
TECH DICTIONARY <br />
<br />
382 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
TIME TRACK: <br />
TECH DICTIONARY <br />
<br />
REVIV (REVIVIFICATION): The bringing back to life of an <br />
engram in which a pc is stuck. <br />
The engram or some portion <br />
there of is being acted out in <br />
present time by the preclear. <br />
It is called a revivification <br />
because the engram is suddenly <br />
more real to the preclear than <br />
present time has ever been. He <br />
relives that moment briefly. He <br />
does not merely recall or remember <br />
it. (HCOB 11.5.65) During research <br />
on NED for OTs I discovered that <br />
Dormant BTs are stuck in a reviv, <br />
<br />
i.e. they are stuck down the track <br />
in an incident which is present time <br />
to that BT. I also discovered that <br />
these BTs are reviv’d in a location, <br />
meaning that they are stuck in a past <br />
location. They are chronically stuck <br />
in a past time and place, which for <br />
them is still going on. It is <br />
“PT” and is where they are, as far <br />
as they are concerned. <br />
INSECT: <br />
ON OT III “insect” means a thetan <br />
who is an insect, without a body. <br />
These stick to other BTs and <br />
clusters. Sometimes you can run <br />
into a whole swarm of them. <br />
<br />
BIRD: <br />
Similar to above - a thetan who <br />
is a bird, without a body, and <br />
sticking to other BTs and clusters. <br />
<br />
ANIMAL: <br />
Similar to above - a thetan who <br />
is an animal, without a body, <br />
sticking to other BTs and clusters. <br />
<br />
<br />
HCOB 26.9.78 I <br />
Confidential <br />
Attachment #2 <br />
<br />
INFORMATION FOR PRE-OTs <br />
<br />
ON NED FOR OTs <br />
<br />
AUDITING ATTITUDE; <br />
<br />
The best way to audit BTs and clusters is highly impersonal. Not impolite. Not rough, savage, no <br />
blame, shame, regret, nothing. Just dead calm. No unfriendliness, no friendliness. A zero attitude. The <br />
best way to handle it is just zero everything. If you engage in chatter or conversation with them it just stirs <br />
them up more. Getting rid of them angrily, they don’t get rid of. <br />
<br />
And of course you audit them telepathically, not verbal comm. <br />
<br />
AN AUDITED, NOT SOLO ACTION <br />
<br />
One of the reasons NED for OTs is an audited action, and not Solo, is because two cans give a greater <br />
depth of read than a Solo can. On a Solo can you get to a point where all of the more available charge has <br />
been removed and the needle doesn’t read and just F/Ns. However on two cans you can get reads on BTs <br />
and clusters that didn’t read on a Solo can. This is because you are now dealing with BTs and clusters in <br />
states below unconscioiusness and stuck down the track. <br />
<br />
ODDITY <br />
<br />
A Pre-OT on NED for OTs may feel invalidated by the fact that he still sees pictures even though <br />
he is not making pictures. The reason for this is because all BTs are picturemakers. A being can go below <br />
making pictures and when it comes alive it starts making pictures again. This is the condition of most BTs. <br />
<br />
Hence, the phenomenon of the Pre-OT still seeing pictures even though he isn’t making pictures. <br />
The Pre-OT could be mystified unless this mechanism is understood. <br />
<br />
“EXTERIOR” PERCEPTION <br />
<br />
During this RD, or even while running OT III, a Pre-OT will sometimes get what is apparently <br />
“exterior perception”. As a BT is blowing, and while the Pre-OT has an attention unit on the BT, there <br />
can be a feedback of the BT’s perception to the Pre-OT. You may get the BT’s visio of the room or <br />
environment as the BT is leaving. This BT perception folds up quickly and ceases when the BT has blown. <br />
It is usually very brief and is quite different from OT perceptions (actual exterior perception). In fact to <br />
begin with objects tend to look rather thin and flimsy to an OT when exterior, as the body acts as a sort <br />
of collector and magnifier of perceptions and sensations. Some Pre-OTs tend to invalidate their own <br />
exterior perception because of this. But OT perception improves further up he line. It is necessary to <br />
handle all BTs and clusters first though. <br />
<br />
BENIGN AND HELPFUL BTs <br />
<br />
Most BTs and clusters aren’t vicious or vengeful, they’re mostly benign, though misguided. They <br />
are not in fact of use or value to you, they only hold one back. Some are convinced that they are necessary <br />
to the body or to the functioning of some part of te body, this is not so. Some think they are helpful or being <br />
helpful. Many are quite confused. Most are dormant and below unconsciousness, ad as these are awoken <br />
or activated you may feel anaten from them. <br />
<br />
As you progress through the RD your own abilities will increase. <br />
<br />
And the fewer BTs and clusters there are attached to your body the better off and more OT you will <br />
become. <br />
<br />
LRH:dm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
384 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 22 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE II <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 5 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
MISCONCEPTIONS <br />
<br />
Misconceptions of identity, time, place, form and event hang a thetan up. The only <br />
reason why a cluster hangs together is such misconception. <br />
<br />
A thetan can have a misconception of time, by having a wrong date for an incident. <br />
Or he can conceive that a past picture is “now”. Or he can have two incidents switched <br />
in time, and think the earlier incident is later, and think the later incident is earlier. Such <br />
a misconception of time hangs it up and prevents a blow. And you can get a blow by <br />
straightening out the time misconception. <br />
<br />
A misconception of place occurs when a thetan thinks something happened in <br />
location A, when it happened in location B. You can get a misconception of both time <br />
and place. E.g. a cluster gets a recent heavy restimulation. They think the incident was <br />
the restim, they made a picture of the restim and think that’s where it occurred originally <br />
<br />
-think the cluster was formed at the time and place of the restimulation. So they have both <br />
the time and place in error. This misconception of both time and place confuses them and <br />
hangs the cluster up. <br />
Misconception of identity. Thetan X thinks he was implanted in “Woof” (place) but <br />
actually he’s copying the picture of somebody who was implanted in “Woof”. He <br />
hangs up on the misconcption of identity (thinks he’s the other thetan), and misconception <br />
of event (thinks he was implanted when he wasn’t). <br />
<br />
The whole reason why a cluster stays one, is misconception of identity, time, place, <br />
form and event - which is why Date/Locate works. The cluster is hanging in a time and <br />
space disorientation. <br />
<br />
That’s what louses a BT up, some sort of misconception of time, space, form and <br />
event or beingness. That ties them up and they are hard to untangle and blow. <br />
<br />
<br />
They can switch all over the place with identity: he thinks he’s thetan “A”, but he’s <br />
really thetan “B” mocking up “A”, and that will cause a stress - that’s probably the <br />
anatomy of stress. <br />
<br />
From earlier research I found it takes two viewpoints to make a somatic. You don’t <br />
get a somatic on a primary concept - it has to be a secondary concept. That’s why <br />
objectives work, it gets the guy back to the primary viewpoint/primary concept, and the <br />
somatic blows. Something is formed originally, then taking another viewpoint of it, it gets <br />
more solid. You do objectives and the guy comes around to the original viewpoint and <br />
the somatic as-ises. This is from earlier research and is expressed in terms of different <br />
viewpoints, rather than different beings or different BTs. <br />
<br />
You can have a BT thinking he’s two beings. There’s an implant on the track that <br />
did this (“All is one.” “One is all.”) A BT can think he’s a cluster or can think he’s several <br />
BTs. A cluster can think it’s an individual. All you have to do is weed the misconception <br />
out of it and it goes -BONGO! With misconceptions of identity, time, place, form and <br />
event you get ridges because you can’t occupy the correct viewpoint to blow it. And when <br />
you do straighten out the misconception it blows. Obviously if it wasn’t a misconception <br />
it would blow. <br />
<br />
This is why wrong dates and wrong locates hang up, and why getting correct date, <br />
correct location, blows them. <br />
<br />
If you get several misconceptions it gets really tangled up. One we handled had <br />
more than one cluster, the earlier cluster thought it was the later cluster, and the later <br />
cluster thought it was the earlier cluster. The earlier cluster was from C.C. Implant around <br />
I Quad in the universe before this one (which is now in the Dark Horse nebula in Orion) <br />
so they thought their universe (location) had disappeared, they were lost in time and place. <br />
On top of that was some Power Processing and a wrong item from an out-list. It was pretty <br />
tangled up. But they untangle on straightening out the misconceptions, and blow. <br />
<br />
“Only the truth will set you free”, but you have to know what is the truth of identity, <br />
time, place, form and event. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
386 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
<br />
<br />
ISSUE V<br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED<br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 6 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
BLOWING BTs AND CLUSTERS <br />
<br />
Per the OT III materials, you can run Grades 0-IV on a BT, but it has to be addressed <br />
to that BT, and it rolls rather fast - may only take 4 - 5 minutes. <br />
<br />
You can Date/Locate clusters and run Inc. II, Inc Is. <br />
<br />
You can Date/Locate clusters and blow them off, but the auditor who does this has <br />
got to be a shark at D/Ling. It’s the moment the cluster was formed that you date, not when <br />
the cluster hits the individual. And Date/Locate is not always recommended on NED for <br />
OTs. <br />
<br />
COPIES <br />
<br />
You’ve always got to handle copies. BTs will copy. Obsessive duplication is a BT <br />
characteristic. Maybe all that engrams are is excessive copying. <br />
<br />
The 3 - 10 days to destimulate rule; it’s not the incident that was restimulated that <br />
takes 3 - 10 days to destimulate, it takes 3 - 10 days for all the copies and copying to fade <br />
out. <br />
<br />
“Stress” is also a heavy button. You get a lot of copying of stress. So you handle <br />
the original, then copies - somebody copying what was run. <br />
<br />
NEW TECHNIQUES <br />
<br />
The fastest and best way of blowing BTs and clusters is by inspection. <br />
<br />
Acknowledgement is very effective. A lot can be blown with pure acknowledgement. <br />
<br />
<br />
Another way of blowing them is simply to sort of jolt them a bit earlier in time, and <br />
<br />
<br />
then they run on forward and blow. You use a sort of impulse to move them a bit earlier <br />
in time. It blows them off a stuck point on the track. <br />
<br />
BLOWING BY INSPECTION <br />
<br />
There’s a trick in this - don’t look at the picture - look at and find the shape and mass <br />
of the BT. If you see the picture, shift your attention to the shape and mass of the BT. You <br />
don’t have to see their pictures. They use pictures as a sort of misdirection. So you <br />
concentrate on masses , not pictures. The technique is, you see a picture, trace it back to <br />
the BT, i.e. “Whose picture?” and find the BT this way and it blows. <br />
<br />
A Pre-OT may have a somatic in one body part, being put there by a BT in another <br />
body part. Say he has a somatic in his leg and you find the BT putting it there is in the <br />
head and when you find the BT doing this, it blows. A BT can also be being a somatic <br />
<br />
-he is “pain in the arm”. <br />
BT PATTERN <br />
<br />
BTs do a “crush in, pull back” - it’s almost an attitude. It’s a sort of tense heavy <br />
physical pull back. The basis is fear - they’ve been hit hard by something - causes their <br />
timidity - they pull back into solidity. It’s a “hide” phenomena and a “pull back in” <br />
pattern. This causes pressure, the pressure is caused by them pulling back in on <br />
themselves, sort of like a thetan trying to duck. And when a BT is awakened it <br />
immediately mocks up mass. Mass is produced by “out-of-valenceness”. He’s out of <br />
valence into the valence of an object or other things. <br />
<br />
MECHANISM <br />
<br />
There is a mechanism of somebody being a body, who has valences of past bodies <br />
superimposed on the body. BTs and clusters go into valences of pictures and things too. <br />
These guys have been parked in time and gone into a total reviv, you can look down the <br />
track and wake them up. <br />
<br />
They do a lot of “on-ness” - stuck on things, as different from in things. They went <br />
on and couldn’t get off. <br />
<br />
The NED time track (i.e. time track of Dianetic auditing on a Clear or above) is <br />
composed of BTs parked on the time track - not in PT - you look down the time track and <br />
wake them up. They are stuck on the track and they also have pictures of themselves stuck <br />
on the track. <br />
<br />
It is actually possible for a BT or cluster to be totally out of PT, by which is meant, <br />
it is physically parked in past time. A BT or cluster can also be in PT while thinking it <br />
is in the past and mock up a picture of the past and consider that that is PT. A BT or cluster <br />
can be parked in the past so thoroughly that its only concept of a future is a future from <br />
that past which is already long gone by - this is the phenomenon of future pictures; it is <br />
also the cause of worry about the future, terror stomachs & fortune telling (visions and <br />
dreams). <br />
<br />
Another mechanism that frees some is the realization that some other BT is holding <br />
them in - and it’s the truth, BTs and clusters stick to other BTs and clusters. <br />
<br />
388 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
BLACK BTs <br />
<br />
Sometimes a BT will put other BTs in front of him as a sort of protection. You get <br />
a black area covered by a white area in front of it. A BT in the black area is holding some <br />
other BTs in place in front of it as a sort of protection or shield. The way to handle this <br />
is to blow the black BT who is holding the others in place, then the others come off easily. <br />
Otherwise if you try to blow the front ones first, nothing happens. If you encounter BTs <br />
not blowing, suspect and check for a BT or cluster holding the others , and handle it first, <br />
then the others blow easily. <br />
<br />
You can get partial blows where the BT or cluster comes off the Pre-OT’s body but <br />
stays in the room, plastered on a wall or outside the room. These can push TA up until <br />
blown fully. When they hang up it is because they still have a connecting string to the body <br />
or because they conceive some barrier they have hit is impenetrable. The handling is to <br />
cut the beam or push them through the barrier or simply repeat the process. What has <br />
actually happened is that the mass of BTs contain amongst them one or more BTs, to <br />
which they are stuck, which have not been handled. <br />
<br />
A BT or cluster can go into the valence of a person - a cluster can go into the valence <br />
of a single beingness e.g. a person known to the Pre-OT in PT and there could be a “stuck <br />
picture” of this person. It actually isn’t a picture as such, it is a complete mocked up <br />
identity plus a mock up of the identity’s surroundings. This is very puzzling to the Pre-<br />
OT as it doesn’t blow as a picture. He is really looking at the copied beingness and <br />
characteristics of the person who isn’t there, but which is some BTs and clusters thinking <br />
they are the person and being the person. (This is discussed under the heading of “Ghosts” <br />
in the lst American ACC in Camden.) The Pre-OT feels haunted, seeing his ex-girlfriend <br />
in front of him or even hearing his mother talking to him with brand new dialogue. (Nearly <br />
everybody has a ghost if he looks.) It blows like any other BT or cluster but the Pre-OT <br />
will be puzzled when looking around for who’s mocking it up when nobody is, except the <br />
ghost itself. The way to handle is to move the cluster down the time track to a moment <br />
before it knew the person and it blows. <br />
<br />
The ideal method of blowing BTs and clusters is by inspection, you get into <br />
difficulty blowing BTs and clusters when the session has gone too long, pc getting tired, <br />
or over-restimulation. <br />
<br />
Usually the further through the RD you get, the faster and easier they blow. <br />
However, you can hit what appears to be a bog point particularly if the Pre-OT is tired or <br />
you overrun for several sessions; at such a point just keep on giving sessions and soon <br />
you’ll get a session of massive blows and after that they will blow faster and easier than <br />
ever. At such a bog point you may have to resort to the “Thetan Hand” technique until <br />
it’s handled, after which you can return to blowing by inspection or “What are you?”, <br />
“Who are you?”. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE I <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 7 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
VALENCES <br />
<br />
BTs and clusters go out of valence. They can go into the valence of a person or <br />
animal, some BTs go into the valence of molecules, minerals as well as cells. Some go <br />
into the valence of objects. There’s a trick of getting them to shift valence. You find out <br />
what it is out of valence into and indicate it - this is done by simply asking them what they <br />
are. Having found out what he or they have gone into the valence of, you acknowledge <br />
it and ask them who they are and they generally blow off. <br />
<br />
———————— <br />
<br />
Psychologists have an operation going of: <br />
<br />
(a) convincing people they are a brain (because they think), <br />
(b) convincing people they’re an animal (meaning they have no soul). <br />
This sticks BTs and clusters into the head (brain), and into the body, and invalidates <br />
that they are a being. So it pins the BTs and clusters in, into the body. (And if you ran <br />
on a psychologist, “you’re a brain”, “you’re an animal”, it would cave the psychologist <br />
in, because he has so many overts of doing this to others.) <br />
<br />
———————— <br />
<br />
On the time track BTs were lied to and told they were being built into a body - they <br />
have nothing to do with the body track at all, except to sit in or on the body. They had <br />
<br />
390 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
“model forms” and BTs were made to assume “model forms”. It’s another valence trick <br />
<br />
-they’re in the valence of a body, or part of a body, such as “torso”, “brain”, “arm”, etc. <br />
These aren’t vicious in attitude, they are benign but misguided. They feel they are <br />
necessary to the body. They are sometimes stuck on the external perimeter of the body, <br />
2 - 3 feet out from the body, surrounding it. <br />
They are in the valence of something. They consider these safe valences or safe <br />
beingnesses. What does a BT consider safe to be in? It is one of the systems of “being <br />
in”, protected and defended - be in the valence of something. <br />
<br />
There’s also a scarcity of forms, and a being becomes a form. They can also be a <br />
significance, and try to be in a form. <br />
<br />
They can be a picture, or an unsafe picture - to remind one that “nothing is safe, <br />
because one might forget”. So a BT can be a picture, or part of a picture, or he can be being <br />
a ridge, or being a problem, etc. A BT can be in the valence of anything at all. <br />
<br />
There are actually five steps to shifting valence - you find out what valence the BT <br />
is being and acknowledge it and ask “who he is?” - he will usually cognite “I’m me”, and <br />
blow. <br />
<br />
BTs think they are pictures, things, beings, body parts, objects, significances, <br />
somatics - they can be anything at all. If that is realized, they will tell the Pre-OT what <br />
they are and blow. The basic misconception when handled, flips them into own valence, <br />
and they blow - sometimes disintegrating explosively - with a succession of “I’m me”, <br />
“I’m me”, “I’m me”....sometimes they go out several hundred feet and explode violently. <br />
<br />
If the Pre-OT asks “What are you?” they’ll answer up “I’m (valence)”, and then <br />
realize they’re not (valence). There’s another action of acknowledgement - maybe <br />
nobody has ever acked these beingnesses - because they’re so bizarre, so far out. You <br />
must acknowledge what the BT or cluster tells you they are. You’re flipping them out of <br />
obsessive beingness or a misconceived area. <br />
<br />
The full steps of shifting their valence: <br />
<br />
(1) Pre-OT asks “What are you?” <br />
(2) BT or cluster answers “I’m (valence)” . <br />
(3) Pre-OT acknowledges BT or cluster. <br />
(4) BT or cluster realizes they’re not (valence), and blows, or <br />
(5) Pre-OT asks “Who are you?” and BT or cluster realizes and normally says “I’m <br />
me” and blows and sometimes it’s a highly multiple blow. <br />
(6) If they repeat what they just said ask “What were you before you became that?”, <br />
they say “me” and blow. <br />
(If you don’t acknowledge BT’s answer after “What are you?”, the second question <br />
<br />
-“Who are you?” - tends to be invalidative.) <br />
If they don’t answer, you’re talking to an energy mass and not a BT or they’re really <br />
<br />
<br />
dead; there’s one trick - tell them to go earlier, and if it’s a ridge, go behind the ridge and <br />
you’ll get them. <br />
<br />
If they don’t answer what they are - persist, say “Good” and ask “Well, who are <br />
you?” and they won’t persist in their chatter, they’ll go silent and probably answer “I’m <br />
me” and blow. <br />
<br />
Most of the time you don’t have to do anything though, just look-and they blow. <br />
<br />
DIFFERENT RESPONSES <br />
<br />
Blowing BTs and clusters by this Valence Technique is almost the basic rundown <br />
<br />
-it is the hottest technique there is. There are only three situations under which it does <br />
not work at once. These are: <br />
(A) When you don’t get an answer. <br />
(B) They give you a significance or identity in answer to the Who are you? question. <br />
(C) The criminal type. <br />
(A) When you don’t get an answer: <br />
If you don’t get an answer, you may be talking to simply an energy mass put out by <br />
some other BT or cluster, or they are really dead, then tell it to go a little bit earlier, jolt <br />
it a little bit earlier with an intention or impulse and then it will run on through and blow. <br />
<br />
But if it’s a ridge, being put out by some other BT or cluster, just look behind the <br />
ridge and address your actions to the BT or cluster behind the ridge and then you’ll get <br />
an answer. <br />
<br />
(B) They give you a significance or identity answer: <br />
If you ask “Who are you?” and get an answer which is an identity such as: “George <br />
Smith”, or “Willy the Red”; you simply acknowledge that answer and ask “Who are you?” <br />
again. Sometimes you may have to run back down the track through a whole chain of past <br />
identities, but if you persist the BT or cluster will eventually realize and say “I’m me” and <br />
blow. <br />
<br />
(C) The Criminal type: <br />
These may give a criminal response: “Yah, yah, I’m your nemesis, I’m going to eat <br />
you up, that’s what I am” - it can get very confused because your next question is “Who <br />
are you?” and they’re kind of telling you who they are. They haven’t answered the <br />
auditing question of what they are, they can’t conceive of it - they’re “a demon” or <br />
something, whatever they think they are. However if you persist, “Good” you say, “Who <br />
are you?” You don’t persist in asking them “What they are?”, ignore the chatter, just say <br />
“Good” and ask “Who are you?” and they quite commonly don’t go on with that <br />
performance - they simply go silent and they say “I’m me” and they blow. <br />
<br />
392 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
NULLS <br />
<br />
<br />
BTs and clusters who are so dead and unresponsive that you can’t get any response <br />
from them at all, no response, can be woken up by having the Pre-OT run “Hellos and <br />
OKs” on them. This will put them into communication and they can then be handled with <br />
the Valence questions. <br />
<br />
Generally they’re very fluent and quite easy to handle, though. Probably what <br />
makes a preclear as a whole hard to audit at lower levels, is that you’re auditing all of these <br />
misconceptions simultaneously. But on NED for OTs you will find the majority of BTs <br />
and clusters easy to handle and blow. Many of them simply blow on inspection, and the <br />
basic usual technique for blowing the rest of them is the Valence Technique. <br />
<br />
VALENCE TECHNIQUE <br />
<br />
1. “What are you?” <br />
2. (answer) <br />
3. Acknowledge <br />
4. Realizes it isn’t ( ________ ), and blows, or <br />
5. “Who are you?” - “I’m me”, and blows. <br />
6. If they repeat what they just said ask “What were you before you became that?”, <br />
they say “me” and blow. <br />
Those steps above are the basic and most workable technique. If the Pre-OT realizes <br />
that a BT or cluster can be being anything - anything at all - and accepts the BT’s or <br />
cluster’s answer and acknowledges that answer, this technique will work very smoothly <br />
and well. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE I <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 8 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
BASIC PRINCIPLES UPON WHICH THE <br />
<br />
NED FOR OTs RUNDOWN IS BASED <br />
<br />
What you are really handling is a cross-influence of life, and the idea that “A” can <br />
assume the characteristics of “B”. So now in trying to audit “A”, you’re auditing “B”, but <br />
he’s not there. It’s the general cross-influence - somebody copies a picture, somebody <br />
copies a copy. It’s all on the basis of the misconception that “All is one” and they can’t <br />
tell whose picture is whose, or whose somatic is whose. You’re basically trying to <br />
untangle this mish-mash. And what’s amazing is that there are as many life beings as there <br />
are - there are lots of them. <br />
<br />
In this RD, you’re handling for the main part, Dormant BTs, so it’s different that OT <br />
<br />
III. These are beings that wouldn’t even run on OT III. On OT III or OT III Expanded <br />
you run those beings that can be run on the track. Because they do have some incidents <br />
in common, if you run the wrong one, it doesn’t matter too much, you’ll run the right one <br />
anyhow. <br />
NED for OTs untangles the mish-mash and the cross-influences. You see them all <br />
the time on people in a behaviour or life basis. The old time faith healers themselves pick <br />
up the somatics from the patient. One time I did an emergency assist - I asked a pc - her <br />
feet were killing her and there was nothing wrong with her shoes - I asked “Whose feet <br />
are they?” - she said “My sister’s” and that was the end of the sore feet! <br />
<br />
Because of the number of beings it can get quite complex. It all starts out originally <br />
with a thetan obsessively copying the physical universe around him. And when he starts <br />
doing that, he sets himself up for copying other beings’ universes and then he gets pretty <br />
confused. And the basis of it all is"misconception". First and foremost is"misconception <br />
of identity". That’s actually what the RD is structured on (it’s not structured on “he’s got <br />
<br />
394 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
BTs, so blow off the BTs”) it’s structured on the disentanglement of confusions. This RD <br />
handles the entanglement of the BTs. <br />
<br />
This RD runs best short sessioned, because the restim then has a chance to key out <br />
between sessions. And you’ve always got the 3 - 10 days key-out on your side. <br />
<br />
You could call it the “Misconception RD” or the “I-am-you RD” or the “All-are-one <br />
RD”! This RD proves very conclusively that all beings are separate individuals, because <br />
the only thing that gets them into trouble, is a loss of their own identity - misownership <br />
of identity. They are definitely individual and separate beings. The Greeks got into a lot <br />
of trouble believing they were all part of Zeus. There must be other implants on the track <br />
too that give them this idea. But it is now proven by this RD that people are individuals, <br />
so are BTs. <br />
<br />
The only thing that forms a cluster, is a misapprehension, agreement and shared <br />
experience. They are under the misapprehension that they are one being. What hangs it <br />
together is similarity of identity. This is the A = A that forms a cluster. Because they have <br />
got the same picture, they must be the same person! <br />
<br />
Those are the basic philosophical concepts back of the RD, and they have never been <br />
tackled head on before! <br />
<br />
For example, a misconception - “I am Mamie Glutz”. How many crazy people in <br />
an institution think they are Napoleon? - some misconception! Sanity is the ability to <br />
recognize differences, similarities and identities - so misconception adds up to insanity.<br />
<br />
“Misconception” is the key to any trouble a being gets into. This can be any error <br />
of matter, energy, space, time, form, identity or idea, believed by the individual to be fact. <br />
<br />
By untangling this, NED for OTs produces some astonishing results. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE IV <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 10 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
OT III AND DORMANT BTs <br />
<br />
OT III ATTEST <br />
<br />
The actual fact of the case is those that have been with the guy for quite a while and those that plunged <br />
in on a guy and those that are real tough and real tight and so forth, when you get rid of those, that’s it. That’s <br />
the end of III. <br />
<br />
But Planet Earth was a dumping ground to end all dumping grounds. Actually the end of OT III is <br />
when those BTs and clusters which can be gotten into communication easily and can be made to run Incident <br />
IIs and Incident Is are gone. It’s not when all BTs in the whole universe that ever will be are gone. <br />
<br />
DORMANT BTs <br />
<br />
You can wake up very dormant BTs and clusters that actually you’ve never hit on OT III - never <br />
dreamed they existed. <br />
<br />
Many are not visible in PT. These dormant ones are not squarely in the time stream, they’re down <br />
the track a bit. You shift your attention and pull them into PT, or your attention goes a bit out of PT and <br />
there they are. They are not precisely in the time stream. This solves the mystery of how an OT III can see <br />
none, get run on some NED and it kicks them in. <br />
<br />
It is like a whole being reviv. Dormant BTs and clusters are stuck down the track in an incident. <br />
Dormant BTs are out of PT in denyer chains (like “not there”, “can’t be there”), so they “don’t exist”, yet <br />
they do exist. If you look down the track, there they are, and if you ball them up with engram running or <br />
bad auditing, you get real trouble, as they recoil against the body. <br />
<br />
PRE-OT’S PERCEPTION <br />
<br />
Some Pre-OT’s perception is not up to perceiving BTs and clusters and masses. Unless you raised <br />
their perception you would miss on this Rundown. The preliminary action of “NED for OTs” is designed <br />
to raise the Pre-OT’s perception to a point where he can perceive BTs and clusters and other beings’ <br />
pictures, and this step is vital to this RD. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
<br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
396 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
<br />
<br />
ISSUE II <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 11 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
THE FIRST STEP OF NED FOR OTs <br />
<br />
The first step of NED for OTs consists of repairing past mis-auditing. You check <br />
“Past auditing” first, and if it’s not reading, no pc interest, you skip it. But if later in the <br />
Rundown you run into a bog, TA goes high, or any kind of grind or mess up, you recheck <br />
past auditing, and handle. Repair of engram running is limited to simply indication. You <br />
mustn’t get into continuing to run the engram or you’ll be running engrams on a Clear, <br />
as you aren’t running them on a Clear and aren’t repairing them on a Clear, you are <br />
repairing them on a BT. <br />
<br />
THE BUG ON NED FOR OTs <br />
<br />
If you get a wrong item on somebody they will now have that item - it persists; e.g. <br />
you run “sore toe” on somebody who doesn’t have one, they’ll end up with a sore toe! If <br />
you now try to handle sore toe with auditing it will worsen. Because it was a wrong item <br />
in the first place. You have to repair the wrong item. A BT could be run on a non-existent <br />
somatic, and to be obliging mocked it up. They can get run on imaginary incidents and <br />
on things that are not their track so what was run could have been false. <br />
<br />
If the pc was run on an unreading item, BTs will be activated, but they don’t have <br />
that item either. It’s a false assumption there was something there to run - that’s their <br />
misconception foisted off on them by being given the belief that the item existed or read. <br />
When called on to run something, they will furnish copies, misowned and manufactured <br />
items. You need to check for BTs run on wrong items, unreading items and sort it out. <br />
<br />
Some BTs went exterior and were audited past it. Some BTs had already gone Clear <br />
<br />
-not just oin the Clearing Course - some went Clear on Objectives. So you don’t just have <br />
Dianetic auditing on somebody after Clear. You also have Dianetic auditing on BTs after <br />
they went Clear! Resulting in invalidation of he State of Clear, the mistake of misowning <br />
others’ pictures, and then misidentification of identity. NED auditing after Clear applies <br />
to BTs as well as Pre-OTs. So there are residual BTs with invalidated erasure, invalidated <br />
Clearing. And the originally overrun thetan may have blown and left copies of the <br />
overrun. <br />
<br />
Grinding an incident on Dianetics or NED will result in some BTs run past erasure, <br />
so they have to mock it up again to run. Or they never got to basic and erasure because <br />
the auditor never asked for E/Beg or E/Sim, and were left hanging incomplete on the <br />
chain. And other BTs will copy all this obsessively. <br />
<br />
Out L & N lists and wrong items will do the same thing, and also can be repaired. <br />
<br />
Auditor command flubs, lack of acknowledgement, couldn’t hear the auditor, <br />
session distractions - all these will hand up BTs. Even false dates could be copied - they <br />
can be twice removed from reality. In trying to date something now you could wind up <br />
dating the wrong date, or dating the date that the wrong date was given. And it might not <br />
have been that BT’s or cluster’s incident that was being dated in the first place - the <br />
incident may have been misowned - not their incident. <br />
<br />
YOU CAN’T RUN NED FOR OTs ON SOMEBODY WHO HAS BEEN RUN ON <br />
WRONG OR UNREADING ITEMS WITHOUT REPAIRING THEM. <br />
<br />
Also beware of getting into over-correction, because what you are correcting on one <br />
BT, can start uncorrecting on another BT. <br />
<br />
So you check ”past auditing” for read and "interes" "as the first step. If it reads and <br />
Pre-OT is interested you handle it. If not, skip it, but be alert and if Pre-OT hits a bog you <br />
recheck past auditing. Remember not to run anything, just indicate it. <br />
<br />
This doesn’t mean that all previous auditing was bad - far from it! But some auditors <br />
due to poor training, bad metering, or nasty habits will be found to have messed up cases. <br />
So you repair past auditing by auditors - by auditor’s name. (And also see that such <br />
auditors are handled too.) <br />
<br />
That’s the bug on NED for OTs - you can collide with BTs and Clusters messed up <br />
in past auditing, and this can recoil heavily and physically upset the Pre-OT. So you keep <br />
the Repair List andy and if you run into a bog, use the Repair List and next session C/S <br />
to take up past auditing, remembering not to continue to run engrams but only indicate. <br />
<br />
REPAIRING PAST AUDITING BY AUDITOR’S NAME <br />
<br />
Make a list of names of auditors and test these for read. Include self-auditing and <br />
solo auditing too. Those that read, you repair the items run by that auditor, or in self-<br />
auditing. And make provision for occluded auditing. You may think you’ve got it all, <br />
only to find an occluded session or sessions spring to view later. <br />
<br />
This is why you must teach FESers to FES and make up FFTs, that include the <br />
auditor’s name. <br />
<br />
And that’s why the Advanced Courses Specialist Auditor must know what he’s <br />
doing in training to deliver this Rundown. It’s not a piece of cake. <br />
<br />
Do it flawlessly and produce the spectacular results the Rundown is capable of. <br />
<br />
LRH:dm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
398 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE II <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 12 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
REPAIRING AND BLOWING BTs AND CLUSTERS <br />
<br />
FROM PAST AUDITING OR MISAUDITING <br />
<br />
STEPS <br />
<br />
1. <br />
What was being run? <br />
2. <br />
What was the error in running? <br />
3. <br />
Indicate. <br />
4. <br />
Who was it run on? <br />
(Find BT or cluster by position in the body.) <br />
5. <br />
Blow BT or cluster. <br />
6. <br />
Copies. <br />
HANDLING PAST DIANETICS, NED, OR R3R <br />
<br />
Prior to auditing have the folders and a Full Flow Table (FFT) made up which <br />
contains all Dianetic, NED, XDN, or any other R3R items that have been run, in date <br />
order, including the name of the auditor who ran these. (This includes any somatic or <br />
narrative item that was audited Dianetically.) Dianetic lists as well as L & N lists should <br />
also be available. (N.B. Some old timers may have been audited on secondaries and <br />
engrams prior to folder records having been kept, and there is always the possibility of <br />
false reports and unrecorded items having been run.) This repair action is done by name <br />
<br />
<br />
of auditor, and those auditors who audited the case on engram running after Clear, or who <br />
most grossly misaudited the case, will be found to be charged (reading) and it is their <br />
auditing which most likely will need to be repaired. Auditors whose names come up as <br />
aving grossly misaudited the case in the past should be Crammed or Retreaded or <br />
Retrained or subject of an Ethics action in order to safeguard any other pc in future. <br />
<br />
Make up a list of names of auditors from the Full Flow Table and include “Selfauditing” <br />
and “Solo Auditing”. Allow for the possibility of occluded auditing showing <br />
up later as charge is taken off during this repair. <br />
<br />
Assess the list of auditor names, including self-auditing and Solo auditing, for read <br />
and note size of read. Start with the largest reading, and repair the items run by that auditor <br />
as follows: <br />
<br />
1. Take the Dianetic item that was run, e.g. “Pain in the Zorch”, and test it for read. <br />
(If no read, skip it.). <br />
2. Find the error in running. Such as: “Unreading item”, “Wrong item”, “No such <br />
item ever existed”, “Run past erasure”, etc. (Usually the Pre-OT will be able to get this. <br />
If not the auditor can find out quickly by meter.). <br />
3. Indicate the BPC found. (ONLY indicate, do not start running anything.) <br />
4. “Is the BT or cluster this was run on still around?” (And note whether this reads, <br />
it won’t read if the BT or cluster has already blown.) <br />
Have the Pre-OT find the BT or cluster by position on the body - sometimes the BT <br />
or cluster will blow on inspection on this step alone; if it doesn’t, <br />
<br />
5. Blow the BT or cluster. <br />
6. Copies. The auditor asks “Copy?” and if reading has any copies spotted and <br />
blown. Often the BT or cluster who originally ran the item will have blown, leaving BTs <br />
or clusters who copied the auditing or copied the overrun, etc. And don’t nag the Pre-OT <br />
for copies or you’ll start some other BT copying now. <br />
As with any Repair auditing this can very quickly repaired, and the auditor must be <br />
alert for this and not get into overcorrection. You must also be alert for what you are <br />
correctingononeBTorclusteruncorrectingonanotherBTorcluster; e.g. “Overrun” may <br />
be correct for one, but not correct for another. You can check for this and if so, indicate <br />
that “Overrun” did not apply to the rest. <br />
<br />
Step 2 above - Finding the error - may go earlier similar, the same BT or cluster may <br />
ave been mis-audited in an even earlier session or sessions, and these too may need to be <br />
repaired. But only if earlier auditing BPC exists on the BT or cluster you started with or <br />
you’ll jump from one BT or cluster to another. <br />
<br />
Handle each reading item run by the assessed (reading) auditor in the sequence these <br />
items were run. Then take next best reading auditor by name or reassess the list of <br />
auditors. Be very alert for this whole repair action EPing well before all auditors or items <br />
have been addressed and when that occurs end it off. <br />
<br />
400 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
STUCK PICTURE REMEDY <br />
<br />
<br />
1. The stuck picture. <br />
2. What was the error in running? <br />
3. Indicate. <br />
4. Who was it run on, or whose stuck picture is it? <br />
5. Blow BT or cluster. <br />
6. Copies. <br />
AUDITING ITSELF MAKING A CLUSTER <br />
<br />
Seriously bad or rough auditing, Code Breaks, overruns, demanding something that <br />
isn’t there, asking for an earlier similar that didn’t exist, continuing to run an incident that <br />
has already erased, grinding incidents, running unreading/uncharged items or wrong <br />
items, will mess up BTs and clusters that were not in restimulation or who were dormant. <br />
When very bad such a session can itself have been a cluster making incident and is the <br />
latest mutual incident for those BTs and clusters stirred up in that session. There will have <br />
been considerable cross-copying. Do not attempt to R3R or R3RA such a session. Handle <br />
it as described above under Repairing Past Auditing. Repeat those steps until all BTs and <br />
clusters have been blown off that session. <br />
<br />
PAST MIS-METERING, MIS-DATING OR LOCATING <br />
<br />
If the Pre-OT has been mis-metered in the past this may need to be repaired. <br />
<br />
Meter evaluation by which is meant the auditor keeps telling the pc that this or that <br />
didn’t read, etc., can be highly evaluative and invalidative, especially when that auditor <br />
was mis-reading the meter. The pc was left hung up in things that did read, but weren’t <br />
taken up, and when things that didn’t read are taken up, it will stir up dormant BTs and <br />
clusters, and misownership and misidentification occurs. Add to that cross-copying of <br />
BT pictures and you get a mess that can recoil very heavily against the Pre-OT’s body, <br />
dangerously so. <br />
<br />
Meter evaluation can be repaired by getting off when the pc or Pre-OT was told <br />
something read when it didn’t,and vice versa. And handling “Evaluation?” E/Sim to F/ <br />
<br />
N. <br />
Mis-dating and partial locating is similarly corrected by getting off any wrong <br />
locations that were given or locations that were wrong for other BTs or clusters. <br />
<br />
Note that on Dating and Locating you can get a build up of mass and pressure, even <br />
a protest ridge, due to the date for one BT or cluster being the wrong date for some other <br />
BT or cluster. The mass and pressure will blow on indication that it was a wrong date or <br />
wrong location for them. A technique as powerful as Dating and Locating which will <br />
blow clusters and cumulative clusters when done right, can also mess them up badly when <br />
done wrong. <br />
<br />
<br />
MESSED UP INT RUNDOWNS AND INT REPAIRS <br />
<br />
<br />
Handle any BT or cluster with out-Int before doing any other action. These are <br />
handled per HCOB 17 Sept 78 OUT-INT, WENT IN, WENT ON. <br />
<br />
If a Pre-OT has too much or recurring Int trouble, do the “End of Endless Int Repair” <br />
process (by Recall only). As it is only recall, it will run on and handle BTs or clusters. <br />
<br />
LIST ERRORS ON L & N AND WRONG ITEMS <br />
<br />
Mis-done L & N lists, especially over-listed lists and wrong items mess up BTs and <br />
cluster. The right item for one BT is wrong item for for another. When overlisted, several <br />
BTs and clusters can be pulled in. The handling is as described in the Steps for Repairing <br />
Past Auditing. <br />
<br />
STATE OF CLEAR <br />
<br />
IfthePre-OThaschargeonhavingbeenaudited on engrams after he/she went Clear, <br />
you can Date/Locate the point when the Pre-OT went Clear. Then clean up misownership <br />
by asking the Pre-OT “Have you misowned any BT’s or cluster’s pictures as your own?” <br />
<br />
As well as the Pre-OT having been audited on engrams after Clear, you may also <br />
encounter BTs who went Clear and were audited on engrams subsequently. Locate and <br />
indicate their BPC of having been audited on engrams after Clear, any misownership, any <br />
invalidation of the State of Clear, and copies of this by other BTs and Clusters. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
402 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
<br />
<br />
ISSUE III <br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
NED for OTs Series 13 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
FESING OF FOLDERS <br />
<br />
AND FULL FLOW TABLES <br />
<br />
An FES should contain the name of the auditor and name of the C/S, per existing issues. <br />
<br />
It now becomes imperative that the name of the auditor be clearly noted on the FFT (Full Flow Table) <br />
as well as the FES. In making up FFTs on any Dianetic or NED auditing clearly note the auditor’s name, <br />
as well as the date and item run by that auditor. Existing FFTs do not need to be re-done - just print in the <br />
name of the auditor, in different coloured ink (to make it very visible) against the items run by that auditor. <br />
<br />
On new FFTs add a column on left side of sheet for auditor’s name.<br />
<br />
_____________________________ <br />
PC’s name <br />
<br />
FULL FLOW TABLE <br />
<br />
Auditor Date Item Run Fl F2 F3 F4 <br />
(name) <br />
<br />
<br />
Some cases have had unreading items, wrong items, run on them; sometimes the auditor changed <br />
the pc’s item or even just decided what to run on a pc. These are grave and can have serious consequences <br />
on a case. <br />
<br />
In order to fully handle such a situation it is imperative that all the data above is available to a C/S <br />
or auditor. <br />
<br />
LRH:dm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
<br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE III <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 14 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
OUT-INT, “WENT IN”, “WENT ON” <br />
<br />
If a Pre-OT can put his attention on a BT and blow it off, without even working too <br />
hard at it, BTs, with their attention must be sort of blindly in-drawn. <br />
<br />
“Went in” and “Went on” are two different characteristics of Int. Some think they <br />
can’t go in - because they think they can’t go through solids - so they “Went on”, plastered <br />
on (to something). <br />
<br />
Another way to blow them is to scan them back to when they went in - and they blow <br />
out. Like a plus/minus reaction, “Went in” - blow out. <br />
<br />
A BT with Out-Int affects its ability to blow - not the Pre-OT’s ability to blow them <br />
off - the BT’s ability to blow. You scan them downachainof“Wentins”tothefirst“Went <br />
in” and it will blow. <br />
<br />
You could handle a very difficult one by recalling “times they went in” - for very <br />
difficult ones. A fast way to blow them would be to get them to scan back through “Went <br />
ins” - “When did you go in?” - and they blow. <br />
<br />
ON-NESS <br />
<br />
There’s also “Went on”, “Went onto something”, and a lot are stuck on something. <br />
You scan them back through times when they “Went on”. They went onto something and <br />
couldn’t get off. <br />
<br />
Sometimes a BT will blow from inside the body and catch on the outside of the body, <br />
or within 2 - 3 feet of the body. You can get too many restimulated on the surface of the <br />
<br />
404 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
body. You have to blow off these surface ones. <br />
<br />
Being stuck on the surface of something would have something to do with the button <br />
“Can’t go in” for a BT, and that button produces blows. BTs who “can’t go in” to <br />
something, “Went on”, and stuck. <br />
<br />
“On-ness” is different from Out-Int. They are stuck on, not in. <br />
<br />
“On-ness” is handled in the same way as Out-Int but with “Went on” or “Got on”. <br />
The “earlier than” phenomenon applies to “ON”, as one has to first get on something <br />
before he gets off. Trying to persuade a stuck “Went on” BT or mass to get off,can run <br />
into the same phenomenon as Out-Int and he won’t blow. Handle it the same way as <br />
“Went in” but with the difference of “Went on”. One could in theory find a thetan who <br />
was “stuck on”, handle that and then find that the same being had Out-Int. <br />
<br />
OUT-INT <br />
<br />
Sometimes BTs have Out-Int because they can’tgetout or couldn’tgetout.They are <br />
in the valence of something that can’t be out, even fatal to be out, e.g. “the inside of body” <br />
or an internal organ. They consider these safe beingnesses, and it’s safe to be in. So you <br />
ask “What couldn’t get out?” and they blow. <br />
<br />
If you ask them to point which way is in, they can’t. Getting them to point which <br />
way was in works, and produces blows. Use the past tense,”Which way was in?” and they <br />
will blow. <br />
<br />
RECURRING INT TROUBLE <br />
<br />
If a Pre-OT on NED for OTs has recurring Int trouble or continues to run into Out-<br />
Int, and you can’t solve it easily, do the End of Endless Int Repair Rundown (assessing <br />
and handling Int buttons by Recall, not R3RA). This Recall technique will run and solve <br />
any Int troubles. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 21 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses NED for OTs Series 15 <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors C O N F I D E N T I A L <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
THE “SOLIDITY” OF THE BODY <br />
<br />
BTs think they’re pinned to the body, when they’re pinned into other BTs, they think they’re <br />
interiorized into the body, when they’re pinned into BTs. How could a being get stuck to a body? There’s <br />
some kind of central core in the body that the being mistakes for the body. The central core sticks to the <br />
body and the thetan sticks to it. Some BTs think they are a body. There are clusters that think they’re a <br />
body and other BTs stick to the cluster and wind up thinking they’re a body. They would have to be stuck <br />
by a postulate: “I am a body”, or “I am a head”, or “I am the brain”, etc. <br />
<br />
Someone on OT III can think he’s complete on OT III because he thinks the solidity he perceives <br />
as the body is the body. It is a mistaken apparency of solidity of the body. This apparent solidity of the <br />
body is composed of BTs and clusters and may be the same size and shape as the body when first contacted. <br />
So someone on OT III perceives this and assumes it’s the body and thinks he’s done on OT III. This <br />
“solidity” he perceives as the body is composed of BTs and clusters. The body becomes transparent to <br />
an OT to the degree he clears this up. It is a “body” built of thetans - you have to learn you’re not looking <br />
at the body, but a false body composed of BTs and clusters. A Pre-OT on “NED for OTs” will become <br />
aware of this during the RD (it is not drawn to his attention by the auditor). It’s not the solidity of the body <br />
but the solidity of BTs and clusters formed as a body. <br />
<br />
The body acts as a magnifier of perceptions - it collects and magnifies perceptions - some thetans <br />
think they can’t perceive well exterior, as the actual body and objects and walls look pretty flimsy and <br />
transparent to an OT. <br />
<br />
The guy gets fooled - he thinks he’s looking at this body and he’s not. He’s looking at a solid mass <br />
of BTs and clusters. The actual body looks transparent to an OT. Unless you get the guy’s perception up, <br />
he won’t be able to perceive this and if he can’t perceive them, he won’t be able to run them. The <br />
preliminary step of “NED for OTs” is to get the Pre-OT’s perception up enough so it can be run. This false <br />
“body” composed of BTs and clusters is blown off piece by piece on the RD. <br />
<br />
COMPOSITE MASSES <br />
<br />
A composite mass such as the false “body” composed of BTs and clusters needs to be handled or <br />
blown off in pieces. You could make the mistake of trying to blow it all at once instead of piecemeal. You <br />
may also encounter “layered clusters”, which is layers of clusters on top of each other. <br />
<br />
Use the “thetan hand” technique to separate ridges and masses, (you can split ridges apart and <br />
separate masses and clusters by passing a “thetan hand” between them). Then blow off the BTs and <br />
clusters spearately. You can look up and down inside a mass, rather than outside it and it starts to go. <br />
<br />
There are so many BTs and clusters that the Pre-OT can wonder if he’s pulling in any that weren’t <br />
there before or wonder if all space is full of them-that isn’t so, it only seems that way. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
LRH:dm:kjm FOUNDER <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
406 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
<br />
ISSUE II <br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 16 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
“EXTERIOR” VISION, BT PERCEPTION <br />
<br />
You can get a sort of exterior view as they blow - it’s not an actual exterior view, but an <br />
apparency of an exterior view. It’s the BT’s visio feeding back to you while the BT is blowing. <br />
This visio folds up when the BT has blown and your attention is off it. It’s not your own exterior <br />
view, it’s their exterior view as they’re blowing and it fades as they blow and your attention comes <br />
off them. <br />
<br />
It’s to do with viewpoints and attention - if you get one of your viewpoints (attention unit) <br />
in one (a BT or cluster), it will carry it and you sort of see through their perception - it’s how you <br />
see their pictures and why you get some of their visio as they blow. <br />
<br />
It has also been noted that when you do get a feedback visio from a “BT” as it blows, that <br />
it is actually not a single BT, but two or three and the feedback is coming from another or other <br />
BTs who have not cognited that he is himself. In other words it is an uncleared BT or cluster who <br />
is carrying this visio anchor point away. <br />
<br />
Not all exterior perception comes from BTs though. The Pre-OT can also get an exterior <br />
view which is his own actual exterior perception. If the Pre-OT gets a stuck or fixed exterior view, <br />
it is easily handled by having the Pre-OT look the other way, i.e. look in the opposite direction, <br />
and the fixed direction of view, will unfix. It is easy to differentiate between actual exterior <br />
perception of Pre-OT and the phenoomena of the Exterior view of a BT during a blow, by <br />
checking on the meter. If it is the view of a BT partially blown, it will read as such. Partially blown <br />
BTs should be handled to complete blow at which point the relayed BT visio will cease. <br />
<br />
There is a positive way to handle this if it hangs up. This is for the Pre-OT to extend his <br />
attention out to the point to which the BT or cluster has blown and ask it again what it is, give <br />
it an ack, and then ask who it is. The untouched or uncleared BT or cluster that is being carried <br />
away goes “poof” and the exterior visio ceases instantly. <br />
<br />
There’s also perception by tactile contact, when the BT is attached to the body. <br />
<br />
LRH:dm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE I <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 17 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
PREDICTION FACTORS ON LENGTH AND PROGRESS <br />
<br />
THROUGH THE RUNDOWN <br />
<br />
The first phenomenon you will encounter is the Pre-OT getting apparent exterior <br />
perception, picking up the BT’s exterior visio as the BT blows. <br />
<br />
The second prediction factor is that the amount of restim and pressure remaining at <br />
session end becomes less from one session end to another session end. <br />
<br />
During the Rundown, the Pre-OT may wonder if he’s pulling in BTs and clusters <br />
to run, whether all space is filled with BTs, etc. This isn’t so, but may seem this way. The <br />
Pre-OT will get a realization similar to the Straightwire EP that he/she won’t get any <br />
worse”. This isn’t the EP of the Rundown but shows progress is being made. <br />
<br />
During the Rundown the Pre-OT will become aware that what has been mistakenly <br />
assumed to be the body, is not the actual body, but the solidity of BTs and clusters in shape <br />
of the body. The Pre-OT may comment that his actual body or walls or objects look flimsy <br />
or transparent and this is actual OT or exterior perception, and become aware that he is <br />
perceiving BTs and clusters where the body looks or feels solid. He is perceiving the <br />
difference between the false “solidity of the body” and the actual body. As this false <br />
“body” is audited out the clusters and masses remaining will swell to greater size, with <br />
less mass and solidity. <br />
<br />
Further through the Rundown, there are fewer BTs and clusters remaining, and the <br />
mass expands and gets softer; it’s not under so much pressure. There’s less mass, and what <br />
is left is less dense. And they blow easier and faster, with decreasing TA action. <br />
<br />
Toward the end of the Rundown there are less and less BTs and clusters to trap his <br />
attention into the body and his attention goes out onto the physical environment. An OT’s <br />
<br />
408 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
attention can get so exteriorized, that it is very difficult to get his attention onto the body; <br />
his attention is on the walls, room, building, area or planet. The meter will read on “wall” <br />
or “room”, etc., wherever his attention is. You can get a similar phenomenon of the OT <br />
getting perception of a wall or environment, via a blowing BT. Or the BTs can get <br />
perception of physical environment via the OT’s body. This phenomenon is different, the <br />
OT is in direct communication and perception of the physical environment. (Meter read <br />
will establish which it is.) <br />
<br />
In earlier research I discovered what we call “leaning on a wall”. The OT “leans” <br />
against an object in PT and feels it, and it can put a TA high; e.g. the being is leaning <br />
against a milk carton and gets a waxy cardboard feeling. Realization of what is going on <br />
handles it. But the phenomenon encountered toward the end of NED for OTs is different. <br />
The OT’s attention becomes so exteriorized that he goes into direct comm with the <br />
environment and finds it hard to put his attention on the body. About this time BTs and <br />
clusters do not read well and the sensitivity has to be turned up high to get reads on BTs, <br />
and you have a pretty constantly F/Ning needle. The auditor needs to be sharp on TA and <br />
needle handling to keep the needle on the dial and detect small reads on a very loose <br />
needle. F/Ning TA becomes more frequent. <br />
<br />
Don’t try to push a session past a big win or marked case change; several of these <br />
will occur during the Rundown. It’s the EP for that session - not for the Rundown. <br />
<br />
It is possible for the Pre-OT later in the Rundown to blow a distant BT stuck to <br />
somebody else. If the Pre-OT’s attention is drawn to something outside the session <br />
environment, check for a BT or cluster in the area where his attention fixes, and have the <br />
Pre-OT blow it off. This action is effective and permanent. <br />
<br />
There are two changes going on during the Rundown: <br />
<br />
(a) Pre-OT as a thetan is getting “bigger” and stronger; <br />
(b) There are less BTs and clusters left. <br />
The Pre-OT will get more and more relaxed, less mass, less tension in the body. At <br />
first on the Rundown these masses are very tense and hard, they feel like a tensed muscle, <br />
later the mass gets less and lighter and the body more relaxed. <br />
<br />
Toward the end of the Rundown the amount of mass left is so slight that after a fairly <br />
short session it can become unprofitable to audit as there’s so little left, and what can be <br />
found blows so fast and easily. <br />
<br />
These last few will blow by inspection and when there are none at all in the Pre-OT <br />
or his environment, then you’ve reached the end of the Rundown. The EP of the Rundown <br />
is when: the Pre-OT has a transparent body and a clear area around it to some distance <br />
(barring perception of other people’s difficulties) and when he realizes he is alive and very <br />
much himself. <br />
<br />
LRH:dm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 20 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE IV <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors NED for OTs Series 18 <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
C O N F I D E N T I A L <br />
SESSION FACTORS <br />
<br />
The probable session planning should be short and frequent, based on the general <br />
datum that early in the session the Pre-OT quite often can blow BTs and clusters by <br />
inspection, while later in the session, restimulation of other BTs and clusters, or possibly <br />
tiredness of the Pre-OT, makes it difficult to blow them. <br />
<br />
There is a session factor of cross-restimualation. If the session goes on too long you <br />
can get some too restimulated to blow easily. This can build up pressure and push the TA <br />
up. It relieves on indication of cross-restimulation. BTs go into restim on other BTs’ <br />
pictures. <br />
<br />
As the sessions are generally short, Tech Services and Tech Pages will have to be <br />
very well organized and effective, so that no auditor time is lost waiting for next pc, or <br />
folder. C/Ses and auditors will have to ensure that Executives in and above Tech Services <br />
know and follow C/S Series 56 and BFO 46 VALUE OF SERVICES DELIVERED, <br />
HOW TO RAISE and cram them on these issues whenever lines or terminals drop out. <br />
<br />
The sessions are generally short and frequent. You must not continue a session past <br />
the session EP, usually an F/Ning TA, or a win. You must not go on past the session EP <br />
or get into grinding due to over-restimulation. Show this to your D of P if he tries to push <br />
you. <br />
<br />
There’s also a factor of “incomplete blows”. You can meter check for this, but don’t <br />
nag the Pre-OT on it, or you’ll stir more up because all the BTs remaining are sort of <br />
incomplete blows! <br />
<br />
As you run “NED for OTs” there’s a certain amount of pressure or somatic <br />
remaining at session end. This becomes less from one session end to another. <br />
<br />
You can restimulate more in a session than you blow. This can be checked for on <br />
the meter and handle those restimulated in the session but not blown. <br />
<br />
The session is usually started by 2WCing to F/N, or flying Ruds. But the auditor <br />
must realize that charge in restim comes from restimulated BTs and clusters. Shocks or <br />
stress in life restimulate BTs and clusters who then copy the restimulation, and this <br />
<br />
410 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
restimulation is a wrong incident for them as it is only a lock on whatever they are stuck <br />
in. You handle any out-Rud BTs or restimulated BTs at the beginning of session. If the <br />
TA is high, do not try to 2WC it down, or go off Pgm onto a C/S 53, check for and handle <br />
BTs or clusters in restimulation, or if there is evidence of Out-Int, check for and handle <br />
any BT or cluster with Out-Int first. Care must be taken at beginning of session not to ask <br />
for Earlier Similars that don’t exist, nor to restimulate more than is in restim. You’re only <br />
trying to get any out-Ruds or restim out of the way so you can get onto the Body of the <br />
Session. <br />
<br />
The Pre-OT probably shouldn’t watch movies or TV during this Rundown, as BTs <br />
tend to make pictures of the movie and hang up in them, requiring handling at beginning <br />
of session. If too much restim occurs due to watching movies or TV, get the Pre-OT to <br />
stop watching them during the Rundown. <br />
<br />
I had earlier found that Vitamin Bl would turn off dreams or nightmares and that a <br />
lack of Vitamin Bl would make a pc more susceptible to having dreams or nightmares. <br />
Apparently lack of Bl makes BTs stick to bone structure, more susceptible to restimulation, <br />
and harder to blow. A session done on a Pre-OT who had a Bl deficiency ran very slowly <br />
with great difficulty blowing BTs and clusters. The session was very “gluey”. Taking <br />
Vitamin Bl resolved this and BTs and clusters became easy to blow again. Pre-OTs on <br />
NED for OTs should take 500 Milligrams of Vitamin Bl (Thiamine Hydrochloride) daily, <br />
and if they experience dreams, nightmares, or difficulties blowing BTs and clusters, then <br />
the dosage should be increased. <br />
<br />
A right date or location for one BT or cluster can act as a “wrong date” or “wrong <br />
location” for another BT or cluster, as it isn’t correct for their incident, and pressure and <br />
mass can build up on this during a session where Date/Locating is done. Meter check for <br />
“wrong date?”, “wrong location?”. Indication of this when it has occurred will relieve the <br />
pressure and blow the TA down. BTs can also build up a protest ridge on this. <br />
<br />
Generally the TA will move in a pumping action, BDing as BTs and clusters blow. <br />
The general session pattern is for the TA range to get higher and higher and then pump <br />
on down to lower range, which is the ideal point for ending session. A session continued <br />
past this resulted in cross-restimulation and difficulty in blowing BTs. <br />
<br />
The session must be well ended, as you are ending the session for others (BTs and <br />
clusters) - not just for the Pre-OT. “END OF SESSION” given Tone 40, may have to be <br />
repeated to ensure the session is in fact ended. You will also sometimes encounter “last <br />
call” BTs and clusters. Just as you are about to end the session, some BT or cluster may <br />
pop up to be handled - this will often occur on “Say or ask?” - let the Pre-OT handle any <br />
such “last call” BT or cluster. To handle restimulation accumulated in the session, you <br />
can tell BTs to “Come to present Time” before ending the session. Then end the session <br />
well and thoroughly. <br />
<br />
A usual session EP is an F/Ning TA. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
LRH:dm:kjm FOUNDER <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 23 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE II <br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 19 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
TA AND NEEDLE BEHAVIOUR <br />
<br />
A reason why “NED for OTs” is an audited action, rather than Solo is because two electrodes (one <br />
can in each hand) gives a greater depth of read than a one hand Solo can. A Pre-OT can run out of reads <br />
on a Solo can to a point where the needle just F/Ns, but on 2 cans reads will show. This is because you <br />
are dealing with dormant BTs and clusters, that are dead - even below unconsciousness and out of PT. <br />
They have to be activated, by Pre-OT’s attention. <br />
<br />
During the Rundown the sensitivity may have to be raised as there is getting to be less and less there <br />
to impinge and read on the meter. This does not reflect the Pre-OT’s case state, just the amount left to run. <br />
F/Ns will become more and more frequent. <br />
<br />
During a session, the TA works up into a higher range and pumps back down to lower range again <br />
(the usual ending point for a session); e.g. TA at start of sesson = 2.5. During session TA works up to 3.7, <br />
then pumps back down to 2.5 and the session is ended off. Continuing past this point results in overrestimulation <br />
of remaining BTs and clusters. <br />
<br />
The TA moves with a “pumping” action, BDing on blows. The BD on a blow is not the impulse <br />
of the BT or cluster leaving, it’s the sudden decrease of resistance as the mass blows. The size of BD is <br />
relative to the size of mass of the BT or cluster. When you put attention on them and start waking them <br />
up, there’s a sudden increase of mass. When they blow, there’s a sudden decrease of mass. This is what <br />
registers on TA and makes the TA pump up and down. <br />
<br />
The TA is an indicator of progress through the rundown - you will start getting a floating TA, at <br />
some point, which will become more frequent. Do not continue a session past a sudden large BD to F/Ning <br />
TA, just end off the session. <br />
<br />
Sometimes the Pre-OT will experience a continuous blow or continuous flow phenomena. This <br />
happens after the Pre-OT has blown a BT or cluster who was holding others in, then the rest will blow <br />
easily, often in a continuous blow. This shows on the meter as continuous fall or slowly BDing TA. Later <br />
it will show as a “BDing F/N” - the needle F/Ns while the TA falls, and this may go into an F/Ning TA <br />
and that is the EP for that session. <br />
<br />
A later prediction factor which shows progress through the RD, is a change of needle pattern. The <br />
LFBD on a blow gets much faster, than before. This is not a bigger BD it is a faster fall and BD. The rises <br />
are faster too, so you have a needle moving at about two or three times the speed it was moving previously, <br />
and this speeding up of the needle can happen quite suddenly in the session, and is very noticeable. <br />
<br />
LRH:dm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
412 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 28 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
NED for OTs Series 20 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
HOW YOU OPERATE A METER <br />
<br />
On NED for OTs you have a situation where the F/Ns are getting wider and wider <br />
and often going into an F/Ning TA. <br />
<br />
You also have less and less mass or charge left on the case the further through the <br />
Rundown you go. <br />
<br />
Therefore the auditor must be an expert at handling the TA, Sensitivity knob and <br />
keeping the needle on the dial when asking a question or assessing. Initial reads are often <br />
small (due to small amount of charge remaining), and the Sensitivity has to be cranked <br />
way up to catch these reads. The way you do this is by handling the TA with index and <br />
second finger, and the Sensitivity knob with the thumb. <br />
<br />
Drill operating the TA and Sensitivity knob with E-Meter Drill #11 “Superlative TA <br />
handling”, until you have mastered it. <br />
<br />
The total amount of TA action per session at this level is low. Usually around 1.0 <br />
<br />
-2.0 divisiions, rarely as high as 6.0 divisions. <br />
It does not compare with TA action at lower levels at all. <br />
<br />
An F/Ning TA is often the signal to end the session so how do you handle an F/Ning <br />
TA? You get expert in the two finger and thumb TA technique. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH;dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE III <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 21 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
REVIVIFICATION <br />
<br />
During NED for OTs research I discovered that beings do not just reviv in time. <br />
They also reviv in location. You can have a guy totally reviv’d in time, he’s stuck down <br />
the track in an incident which is PT for him. Anything which he views, is viewed from <br />
this point in time. It is when he is. <br />
<br />
A being can also be in a reviv in place or location. That is where he is. Everything <br />
he views is viewed from that location, that viewpoint in space. They’re “buttered all over <br />
the universe”. A BT can think of himself as up there, looking down at himself. A total <br />
wrong viewpoint. He’s in a reviv and everything he does is from a stuck viewpoint, so <br />
he’s operating with a stuck spacial point of view. Say the guy is reviv’d in Flanders, <br />
everything he does is from the viewpoint in Flanders - even tries to look at himself (now) <br />
from Flanders. He’s operating in PT from some place down the track. <br />
<br />
THOUGHT DISASSOCIATION <br />
<br />
Thought disassociation follows a point of view pattern. In a reviv, they’re talking <br />
to you from an altered point of view, so you get disassociated thought. Say he’s in a reviv <br />
of lcoation, in a radar station in space. You ask him “Where are the books?” - he looks <br />
at a radar screen and says “They’re going away”. <br />
<br />
I know a case who had an accident. She thought she left the body and went to a <br />
between lives implant and returned to the body. But there has been no between lives <br />
implant in that place for eons! What happened is, she was reviv’d in a between lives <br />
implant. She had the accident and went exterior, she thought she went to this between <br />
lives implant because that’s the location she was reviv’d in. <br />
<br />
This is a matter of old fixed viewpoints in spacial locations. You can often cure a <br />
case with the process “Where would you be safe?” He might go through a heavy reviv <br />
<br />
414 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
on the process and he might “do a bunk” - going back to his last point of view, location-<br />
wise. That point of view is still out there. That’s why D/L works. You blow that point <br />
on Locate step. It’s when and where they are, as they’re not in PT. <br />
<br />
That is where he is “safe”, that’s Thought Disassociation, and that’s small pictures <br />
<br />
-because he’s in a picture, looking at a picture. <br />
These are the mechanics of the Bright Think Rundown (Disassociation process) <br />
which can be run on anybody. Running it is not part of NED for OTs as it is a separate <br />
RD. <br />
<br />
OBJECTIVE DUB-IN <br />
<br />
This is a different phenomenon from Thought Disassociation and spacial reviv. <br />
<br />
He looks at that wall, and because it’s not safe to look at the wall, he makes a picture <br />
of the wall and brings the picture back to him and looks at the picture of the wall. He’s <br />
so far south he can’t confront anything that’s in front of him. You tell him to look at the <br />
window, he sort of reaches out to the window with a beam or something, makes a picture <br />
of it, and pulls the picture back up to him, looks at it and tells you the window has bars <br />
on it. This case requires objectives until it’s safe to look at something and perceive it. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE IV <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 22 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
ANATEN <br />
<br />
When a dormant BT wakes up it acquires mass. He’s “not there”, and then when <br />
attention is put on him he acquires mass. He’s in some artificial valence (which produces <br />
mass). When some recognition is granted him, he goes in valence and blows. There’s a <br />
ridge when a thetan feels under attack, or maybe unacked - first reaction is to stop, so he <br />
mocks up mass. <br />
<br />
A BT sitting around or on a nerve channel, who is awakened and suddenly mocks <br />
up mass or a ridge, will shut down the nerve and knock the guy anaten - knocks the body <br />
anaten - not the pc. In the head especially, when a cluster suddenly mocks up mass, it shuts <br />
off nerve channels. <br />
<br />
Some people who are deaf or blind might simply have a cluster sitting on a nerve, <br />
and it’s gone on so many years the nerve atrophies. Catatonics may be suffering from this <br />
sort of knockout. This explains why a tactile process works - you run tactile on the bed, <br />
etc, after an accident and the guy comes out of it. <br />
<br />
Another source of anaten is a being exuding anaten - he can be a piece of anaten and <br />
he also exudes anaten, and beings around him go anaten. It is a feeling - an <br />
unconsciousness feeling. <br />
<br />
Cluster A going into anaten, then influences cluster B, and then cluster B comes up <br />
tone into unconsciousness, and you get anaten. These clusters exist as solidities way <br />
below unconsciousness, and on III don’t respond at all. Both phenomena above produce <br />
anaten. <br />
<br />
“SOMETHING THAT ISN’T THERE” <br />
<br />
It’s also possible to run into a BT thinking he is “negative mass” and cutting off <br />
perception or sensation in an area. <br />
<br />
416 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Occasionally you may run into some BTs hanging together in a mocked up vacuum. <br />
<br />
Some BTs have a “something that isn’t there”. They were withdrawing from <br />
something, but there was nothing there. It’s either suppressed out of existence or it <br />
happened once and they stuck in the pattern of withdrawing; they can even justify and <br />
think ther’s something they’re withdrawing from. They put something there to withdraw <br />
from - a negative mockup. Or they think another BT is putting something there, that isn’t <br />
there. <br />
<br />
SOMATICS <br />
<br />
Sometimes they blow and a somatic turns on - two beings crunched together and at <br />
the point of “crunch”, they get a somatic. <br />
<br />
It takes a multiple mass to create a somatic. Whether it’s a number of BTs or <br />
clusters, the somatic mechanism is mass versus mass, not cluster versus body, but cluster <br />
vs. cluster, or BT vs. BT, or BTs and clusters vs. BTs and clusters, or cluster vs. cluster <br />
with a BT squashed in the middle. The cluster vs. cluster somatic is more severe than a <br />
somatic in a picture (incident) - unless he were totally revivified in the incident. You can <br />
also postulate a somatic, but that’s different. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE II <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 23 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
REMNANT RIDGES <br />
<br />
A BT can blow and leave behind a ridge of energy. There are BTs in the energy ridge <br />
left behind by another BT. <br />
<br />
There’s a basic mechanism, some BTs make ridges and masses and other BTs come <br />
and cling to that and get stuck and they think they’re part of it and they maintain it - after <br />
the original BT has blown. You have to look through the ridge and find who’s in it - after <br />
you’ve blown the BT who made the ridge. You not only look for the BTs that made the <br />
ridge, but also the BTs stuck in it, and keeping it there, and the ridge doesn’t fully blow <br />
until both mechanisms are handled. <br />
<br />
A BT could mock up a pole trap and another BT come along and stick to it. You <br />
blow the 1st BT and still have the pole trap, which is being kept there by the BT who stuck <br />
in it. So you ask “What are you?”, Ack, “Who are you?” and blow BT who was stuck to <br />
it. The whole body is a trap because it’s BTs getting stuck to BTs. <br />
<br />
You blow the thetan mocking it up first and it tends to evaporate, but you then have <br />
to handle the others. <br />
<br />
They will actually create anything in sight - low havingness - obsessive havingness <br />
or holding on to the familiar. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
418 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE I <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 24 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
NED FOR OTs -REPAIR LIST <br />
<br />
This list is to be assessed Method 3 and handled by the auditor if he runs into a bog <br />
in session. Don’t continue this list past the point where the BPC has been repaired as it <br />
is a repair list. <br />
<br />
Any line reading on this list could be wrong with many BTs or clusters. That is why <br />
it must be done Method 3, and each reading line must be fully handled before proceeding <br />
on down the list. (E.g. on Q1 “BT or cluster with Out-Int?” - there may be one or many, <br />
and each would have to be handled.) When the line being handled doesn’t read, continue <br />
the list. <br />
<br />
1. A BT OR CLUSTER WITH <br />
(a) OUT-INT? <br />
_____ <br />
(b) A WRONG ITEM? <br />
_____ <br />
(c) <br />
AN OUT-LIST? _____ <br />
(d) <br />
A WRONG INDICATION? _____ <br />
(e) <br />
AN OVERRUN? _____ <br />
(f) <br />
WHAT WAS CORRECT FOR ONE WAS INCORRECT <br />
FOR THE REST? _____ <br />
2. RESTIMULATED MORE THAN WERE BLOWN? <br />
_____ <br />
3. OVER-RESTIMULATION? <br />
_____ <br />
<br />
4. <br />
COPY? _____ <br />
5. <br />
AUDITED WHILE HUNGRY? _____ <br />
6. <br />
AUDITED WHILE TIRED? _____ <br />
7. <br />
AUDITED OVER PT STRESS? _____ <br />
8. <br />
PTS CONDITON? _____ <br />
9. <br />
SESSON WAS TOO LONG? _____ <br />
10. <br />
AUDITING CONTINUED PAST A MAJOR WIN? _____ <br />
11. <br />
A BT OR CLUSTER HUNG UP IN A PAST SESSION? _____ <br />
12. <br />
A BT OR CLUSTER MESSED UP IN AUDITING? _____ <br />
13. <br />
YOU THOUGHT IT WAS YOUR CHARGE? _____ <br />
14. <br />
DATING BEING DONE WHILE OTHER BTs WERE <br />
IN RESTIM? _____ <br />
15. <br />
STARTED DATING A BT OR CLUSTER WHILE <br />
ANOTHER WAS INCOMPLETE? _____ <br />
16. <br />
TRYING TO DATE A COMPOSITE MASS? _____ <br />
17. <br />
LEFT ONE BT OR CLUSTER INCOMPLETE AND <br />
STARTEDACTIVATING ANOTHER? _____ <br />
18. <br />
LEFT AN ACTION INCOMPLETE? _____ <br />
19. <br />
A CUMULATIVE CLUSTER LEFT INCOMPLETE? _____ <br />
20. <br />
JAMMED SEVERAL BTs AND CLUSTERS TOGETHER? _____ <br />
21. <br />
JUMPED FROM ONE BT OR CLUSTER TO ANOTHER? _____ <br />
22. <br />
FAILED TO IDENTIFY A MASS BEFORE HANDLING IT? _____ <br />
23. <br />
TOLD SOMETHING READ WHEN IT COULDN’T HAVE? _____ <br />
24. <br />
TOLD SOMETHING DIDN’T READ WHEN IT SHOULD <br />
HAVE READ? _____ <br />
25. <br />
CROSS-COPYING? _____ <br />
26. <br />
WAS BPC MISOWNED? _____ <br />
27. <br />
A BT OR CLUSTER WHO HAS <br />
AN ARC BREAK? _____ <br />
420 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
A PTP? _____ <br />
A W/H? _____ <br />
AN OVERT? _____ <br />
<br />
28. <br />
TRYING TO HANDLE SEVERAL BTs OR CLUSTERS <br />
AS ONE INDIVIDUAL? _____ <br />
29. <br />
A SINGLE BT THINKS HE’S A CLUSTER? _____ <br />
30. <br />
A CLUSTER THAT THINKS HE’S A SINGLE BT? _____ <br />
31. <br />
A BT AUDITED PAST CLEAR? _____ <br />
33. <br />
AN INVALIDATION OF STATE OF CLEAR? _____ <br />
34. <br />
CROSS-RESTIMULATION? _____ <br />
35. <br />
BTs RESTIMULATED BUT NOT BLOWN? _____ <br />
36. <br />
A BT OR CLUSTER PREVENTING OTHERS FROM BLOWING? _____ <br />
37. <br />
ONE PRINCIPAL CLUSTER? _____ <br />
38. <br />
PULLING IN BTs? _____ <br />
39. <br />
RESTIMULATION BETWEEN SESSIONS? _____ <br />
40. <br />
RESTIMULATION IN SESSION? _____ <br />
41. <br />
RESISTING CHANGE? _____ <br />
42. <br />
A BT OR CLUSTER ON SUCCUMB? _____ <br />
43. <br />
PULLING IN BANK TO EXPLAIN A PHYSIOLOGICAL <br />
CONDITION? _____ <br />
44. <br />
SOME OTHER MISCONCEPTION? _____ <br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE II <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 25 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
RESISTANCE TO CHANGE <br />
<br />
Some BTs are stuck; they are resisting change. You’re asking them to change <br />
position by trying to blow them. They go more solid because they resist change. Like a <br />
Reactionary. Maybe the only message they receive comm on is an order to change. <br />
Therefore one has the option of as-ising their resistance to change, by getting “not to <br />
change” off. <br />
<br />
Ask: <br />
<br />
“When did you decide not to change?” <br />
<br />
“What began that?” <br />
<br />
This way you get off the decision not to change, and the earlier beginning that <br />
preceded it. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
422 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 NOVEMBER 1978R <br />
ISSUE I <br />
REVISED 2 MARCH 1979 <br />
<br />
<br />
(Revisions not in Script) <br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
NED for OTs Series 26R <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
NED FOR OTs -CHECKLIST -PRE-OT ADVANCE PGM <br />
<br />
(Put on left inside cover of folder and <br />
keep it up to date.) <br />
<br />
(Pre-OT’s Name) (Date Started) (Org) <br />
<br />
The auditor checks off each step when done. The number after each step is the <br />
relevant NED for OTs HCOB Series number. <br />
<br />
PREREQUISITES <br />
Pre-OT is OT III (or above) _____ <br />
Pre-OT is not in the middle of another major action _____ <br />
Pre-OT is not on a TRs Course _____ <br />
Pre-OT has security clearance _____ <br />
SET-UPs <br />
D of P interview to get data on Pre-OT’s conditon. _____ <br />
Remedy any Vit Bl or Calcium deficiency (NOTs 18, 31) _____ <br />
Assess C/S 53 Section A, if valid read on Out-Int do <br />
End of Endless Int Repair Rundown _____ <br />
If Pre-OT has had a recent bad session, repair it _____ <br />
If ill or injured handle ith an Assist (NOTs 3) _____ <br />
Handle any life enturbulation with Ruds or 2WC to F/N _____ <br />
<br />
CAUTION <br />
<br />
Do not be surprised if these steps go out of order, and dont’ force the Pre-OT to <br />
follow this exact order because his case may not be stacked up this way, although in <br />
general it will be found to be this order: <br />
<br />
<br />
ADVANCE PGM <br />
<br />
1. <br />
Indoctrination Step & clearing words (NOTs 4, 27 #2) _____ <br />
2. <br />
Perception Step. (Optional) (NOTs 27 #3) _____ <br />
3. <br />
D/L point when Pre-OT went Clear (NOTs 11, 12, 17 #4A, <br />
43) _____ <br />
4. <br />
Handle misownership of pictures by Pre-OT (NOTs 11, 12, <br />
27 #4A, 43) _____ * <br />
5. <br />
Handle BTs who went Clear (NOTs 11, 12, 27 #4A, 43) _____ <br />
6. <br />
Handle BTs who went Exterior (NOTs 11, 27, 43) _____ <br />
7. <br />
Handle BTs audited past erasure (NOTs 11, 12, 27, 43) _____ <br />
8. <br />
Handle BTs who were overrun, & Copies (NOTs 11, 12, 27, <br />
43) _____ * <br />
9. <br />
Repair BTs run on uncharged items (NOTs 11, 12, 39, 43) _____ <br />
10. <br />
L3RF on messed up Dn chains (NOTs 39) _____ * <br />
11. <br />
Repair any goofed D/L on a cluster (NOTs 9, 12, 27 #4G) _____ * <br />
12. <br />
Repair of Past Auditing by Name of Auditor (Optional, <br />
only if interested). (NOTs 11, 12, 13, 27 #4F,43) _____ * <br />
13. <br />
LDN OT III RB (NOTs 41) _____ <br />
14. <br />
Repair List for Errors in Running OT III (NOTs 41, 42) _____ * <br />
15. <br />
Handle PTSness, if pplicable (NOTs 35) _____ * <br />
16. <br />
Handle R/Ses (if Pre-OT has R/Sed) (NOTs 36) _____ * <br />
17. <br />
Handle Mass Mistaken for Mass of Body (NOTs 15, 27 #5) _____ * <br />
18. <br />
Handle BTs/clusters Being Body Parts (NOTs 27 #6) _____ * <br />
19. <br />
Handle BTs On or Around the Body (NOTs 14, 27 #7) _____ * <br />
20. <br />
Generally Spotting and Blowing BTs/clusters <br />
(NOTs 27 #8) _____ * <br />
21. <br />
Remnant Ridges (& partial blows) (NOTs 23, 27 #9, 45) _____ * <br />
22. <br />
Flow Assessment Recall Process (NOTs 27 #10, 28) _____ * <br />
23. <br />
Generally Addressing the Body (NOTs 27 #11) _____ * <br />
24. <br />
Specifically Addressing Chronic Somatics (NOTs 27 #12, <br />
32) _____ * <br />
25. <br />
Mass That Kicks in when Pre-OT Looks into Body <br />
(NOTs 27 #13) _____ * <br />
26. <br />
Perimeter Masses (NOTs 33) _____ * <br />
27. <br />
BTs with Mis-U words Rundown (NOTs 46) _____ * <br />
28. <br />
Cleaning the Body of BT/cluster Masses (NOTs 27 #14) _____ * <br />
29. <br />
Verify whether Pre-OT has achieved the full EP of <br />
NED for OTs as described in NOTs 27, pages 8 & 11. <br />
If so Declare. _____ <br />
If not, locate the unflat/incomplete Pgm step(s) <br />
and handle. (The NOTs Repair List - NOTs 24 - can be <br />
used here, or any point on Pgm when there are unresolved <br />
BTs or PBC.) <br />
DO NOT DECLARE UNTIL PRE-OT HAS THE FULL EP. <br />
* <br />
Shows where on Pgm Rest Points may be taken (ref: NOTS 29). <br />
LRH:dm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1978, 1979 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
424 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 NOVEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE II <br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 27 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
“NED FOR OTs” -CHECKLIST <br />
<br />
The basic biological structure of the body is transparent to a thetan. The Pre-OT’s <br />
perception hangs up on BTS and clusters. These BTs and clusters have the ability to <br />
change and control a thetan’s perception whereas Mest won’t. BTs and clusters are too <br />
close to a thetan’s wavelength and can therefore exert control. A primary target for NED <br />
for OTs is: “things that are not part of the biological machine (body), but think they are <br />
and get in the way.” This is what you want to handle. The Pre-OT’s sight hangs up on <br />
these BT/cluster masses. The successive steps of the Rundown have to do with the parts <br />
of the body he can see, the phenomena encountered and the processes you handle these <br />
with. The actual criterion the auditor uses is What is the Pre-OT looking at? What can <br />
he see? and Can he blow it? <br />
<br />
The ideal scene: “A transparent body which does not interfere with the sight of the <br />
thetan and is free from unwanted sensations, pains, or pressures.” The primary error a <br />
thetan makes is mistaking these BT/cluster masses for the body or mistaking another’s <br />
pictures as his own. The procedure has a cyclic pattern of getting rid of the obvious ones, <br />
then dead or unresponsive ones, then obvious ones, over and over. You are liable to run <br />
into any of these manifestations at any time and need to know the processes which handle. <br />
<br />
1. HANDLING WHAT THE PRE-OT’S ATTENTION IS ON <br />
(Establish this by folder or by D of P interview or both. You should also check <br />
on what his attention is avoiding.) <br />
1A. Repair using LDN OT IIIRB, if needed. <br />
1B. Repair of any recent bad session. <br />
1C. Any needed Assist. <br />
<br />
<br />
1D. Remedy of any vitamin or mineral deficiency (especially Vitamin Bl or <br />
Calcium). <br />
1E. End of Endless Int Repair, if needed. <br />
(All the above are optional steps, and depend on the current state of the Pre-<br />
OT. Mainly determined by the question, What is the Pre-OT’s attention on? <br />
and, What is his attention avoiding? - care must be used with the later, not to <br />
throw the Pre-OT in over his head.) <br />
2. INDOCTRINATION STEP <br />
This consists of clearing definitions of MisUs in OT III materials, clearing <br />
definitions of terms used in NED for OTs, reading the basic theory issues of <br />
NED for OTs, and indoctrination in the basic technique of the Rundown. It is <br />
a mandatory step. <br />
3. PERCEPTION STEP <br />
This is an optional step, done if the Pre-OT’s perception is not up to perceiving <br />
mental masses, an ability necessary to this Rundown. It could be tested as <br />
simply as asking the Pre-OT to close his eyes and tell you if he can see through <br />
the head or the body. It is only done in order to get him able to perceive mental <br />
masses(BTs and clusters), which is the EP of this step. <br />
4. PAST AUDITING <br />
(This step is done if “Past Auditing” reads and Pre-OT is interested. If not, <br />
don’t take it up. If not taken up at this point be alert for Pre-OT colliding with <br />
BTs and clusters hung up in past auditing at a later point during the Rundown <br />
and if there is a bog check for and handle past auditing.) <br />
4A. D/L the point when Pre-OT went Clear, and handle mis ownership of pictures <br />
by Pre-OT. <br />
4B. Handle BTs who went Clear and were audited on engrams, mistaking other’s <br />
pictures as their own and resulting in invalidation of their State of Clear. <br />
4C. BTs who went Exterior and were prevented from blowing or audited past <br />
Exterior. <br />
4D. BTs audited past erasure resulting in invalidation of erasure. <br />
4E. Copies of any of the above, including the situation where the original BT has <br />
blown leaving behind a BT who copied the overrun, etc. <br />
4F. Repair of Past Auditing by Assessment of Names of Auditors, including Solo <br />
auditing and self-auditing. <br />
<br />
426 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
4G. <br />
Repair of Wrong Dates, Wrong Locations, including any partially or wrongly <br />
dated or located cluster. (Note that a right date or location for one, will be <br />
wrong for those remaining.) <br />
<br />
(NB: Do not overdo this step as auditing is late on the track, and is not the <br />
basic for BTs and clusters. Past Auditing has to be repaired to the degree that <br />
it gets in the way of doing anything else on NED for OTs. If you tried to handle <br />
all the auditing there had ever been on the case you could go on forever. You <br />
may run into some BT who’s been misaudited when doing later steps, but <br />
Repair of Past Auditing is done to a point where Pre-OT is happy with it, and <br />
it isn’t getting in the road of NED for OTs. The danger of handling too much <br />
past auditing is cross-restimulation.) <br />
<br />
Phenomena you are likely to encounter on Past Auditing step: <br />
<br />
* <br />
Dormant BTs woken up by Dianetic or NED auditing. <br />
* <br />
A Shell BT. <br />
* <br />
Body itself being a “magnet” for BTs/clusters due to a dietary or <br />
mineral or vitamin deficiency. <br />
* <br />
Misownership of pictures and of incidents. <br />
* <br />
BTs in valences. <br />
* <br />
Copying of current or recent stress or shocks,between session <br />
restimulation. <br />
* <br />
BTs with Out-Int. <br />
* <br />
BTs who are stuck ON <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters stuck down the track or out of PT. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters jammed together by rough auditing or misdating <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters with an intention or goal opposed to auditing. <br />
* <br />
Over-correction, i.e. what is being corrected on one is “uncorrecting” <br />
on another. <br />
Cognitions or EPs encountered on Past Auditing step: <br />
<br />
* <br />
Realization that pictures are BTs’ or clusters’ and not the Pre-OT’s, <br />
with a confirmation of Pre-OT’s State of Clear, and the clearing up of <br />
attendant mysteries. <br />
* <br />
Relief from BPC and somatics. <br />
* <br />
Realization like the S/W EP of “I’m not going to get any worse”. <br />
<br />
5. MASS MISTAKEN FOR THE MASS OF THE BODY <br />
(The primary error a Pre-OT makes is in thinking that the mass or solidity or <br />
sensation he/she experiences is the body.) <br />
<br />
The action taken on this step is to have the Pre-OT look at his body and spot <br />
masses that are not the body and blow these either by inspection, or by the <br />
various techniques. <br />
<br />
Phenomena You are Likely to Encounter on this step: <br />
<br />
* <br />
Facsimiles of a body or bodies superimposed over the body. <br />
* <br />
An impaction of pictures. <br />
* <br />
A BT with an overt on other BTs or cluster, e.g. having made them into <br />
a cluster. <br />
* <br />
Getting misdirected by the picture or mass the BT puts up - the Pre-OT <br />
needs to be taught to shift attention from the picture or mass to the BT <br />
or cluster. <br />
* <br />
BTs or clusters stuck on the surface, i.e. BTs who WENT ON. <br />
* <br />
BTs who think they are a body or think they are necessary to the running <br />
of a body. <br />
* <br />
Central core of BTs/clusters that other BTs and clusters are sticking to. <br />
Cognitions or EPs Encountered on “False” Body step: <br />
* <br />
Realization that the body is transparent or translucent to an OT and that <br />
the mass perceived is not the body. <br />
* <br />
Somatic relief and lessening mass. <br />
* <br />
False exterior perception caused by the Pre-OT’s attention being pulled <br />
out by BTs as they aredeparting. <br />
* <br />
Realization that BTs think they are pinned to the body, but are actually <br />
pinned to other BTs and clusters. <br />
* <br />
Body getting less tense and mass expanding and getting less rigid. <br />
6. <br />
BTs/CLUSTERS BEING BODY PARTS <br />
This step directly addresses BTs or clusters who are being body parts such as <br />
“a hand”, “a foot”, etc. The Pre-OT should be asked to look at a part of his <br />
body and see if it is solid and then blow the solidity by inspection or by various <br />
techniques. Body parts can be called off by the auditor and, those that read, <br />
handled. <br />
<br />
428 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Phenomena You are Likely to Encounter on this step: <br />
<br />
* <br />
BTs and clusters being “a hand”, “a brain”, etc. <br />
* <br />
BTs and clusters who think they can’t leave as they think they are <br />
indispensible to the functioning of the body. <br />
* <br />
BTs and clusters being “negative” mass, invisible,being “model forms”, <br />
in the valence of body parts (i.e. terminals) and BTs/clusters being body <br />
conditions (i.e. unconsciousness, or a “broken leg”). <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters sitting on a nerve channel and shutting off perception or <br />
causing anaten, and BTs/clusters exuding anaten. <br />
* <br />
Composite masses that need to be split up by using the “thetan hand” <br />
technique and then blown piece by piece. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters being “a no hand” or “a no leg”. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters holding other BTs and clusters in. <br />
* <br />
Somatics caused by BTs and clusters locked together i.e. BT vs BT or <br />
cluster vs cluster. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters being in the valence of anything. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters going into the valence of a person in PT. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters holding other BTs/clusters in front as a shield. <br />
* <br />
PTS BTs who have had one SP in common - over several lifetimes. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters transferred from another person to Pre-OT’s body, e.g. <br />
BTs from his grandmother, etc. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters being an illness or aberration or an accident (Pneumonia, <br />
wound, car wreck, etc. - they are also in the valence of a picture of it). <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters being significances (tired, anemesis, etc.). <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters being ideas or identities that are ideas (a Christian Scientist, <br />
insanity, “go to town”, etc.). <br />
* <br />
Plural identity (an “us”). <br />
* One that thinks it’s many, and many who think they’re one. <br />
Cognitions or EPs Encountered on “Body Parts” step: <br />
* <br />
Less pressure and restimulation, becoming more noticeable at session <br />
end and from one session end to another. <br />
* <br />
Blows getting easier and faster. <br />
<br />
* <br />
Looks like the number is infinite and you’ll never get rid of them as they <br />
just keep popping up but realizing that it isn’t really this way and that <br />
progress is being made. <br />
* <br />
A case change of Extroverted Attention, i.e. Pre-OT’s attention extroverted <br />
and on the environment. <br />
7. <br />
BTs/CLUSTERS ON OR AROUND THE BODY <br />
This step is run generally with the Pre-OT finding and blowing BTs and <br />
clusters as he encounters them. This includes BTs and clusters that are on the <br />
body, inches from the body, feet from the body, yards from the body, or way <br />
off - all of these in which the auditor is interested are connected to and are <br />
influencing the body. One is not interested in other people’s BTs or clusters <br />
but only those directly influencing the Pre-OT’s body. Because the Pre-OT’s <br />
“attention distance” has increased by the time you get to this step, this is <br />
relatively easy to do. The auditor of course is not interested in using this one <br />
Pre-OT to clear the planet but should not object too strenuously if the Pre-OT <br />
engages in some side actions that do not directly concern him, but realize that <br />
this is not this step or any other step. Care must be taken to ensure that only <br />
one mass or area or category is restimulated and fully handled before <br />
activating another. The caution from OT III pack about not using too wide <br />
an attention span applies here. <br />
<br />
Phenomena You are Likely to Encounter on this step: <br />
<br />
* <br />
Misidentified BTs and clusters who have copied each others’ incidents <br />
and implants. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters switched in time (misconception). <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters switched in location (misconception). <br />
* <br />
Remote BTs, i.e. stuck on another person or in another location where <br />
Pre-OT’s attention is fixed or drawn to. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters with “something that isn’t there”. <br />
* <br />
Multiple masses creating somatics. <br />
* <br />
Invisible, Secret, and Hiding BTs and clusters. <br />
* <br />
Hypnotized BTs and somnolent BTs and clusters. <br />
* <br />
BTs mocking up things they think they area. <br />
* <br />
Old Between Lives areas, remote implant stations of the past. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters who, being stuck in the past and look-forward, think they <br />
are looking at the future. <br />
Cognitions or EPs Encountered on this step: <br />
<br />
430 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
* <br />
Body getting lighter, more relaxed and more in control. Much less mass <br />
around. <br />
* <br />
Realization that BTs/clusters were causing body shape distortions and <br />
that body is “moving back into position”. <br />
8. <br />
GENERALLY SPOTTING AND BLOWING BTs AND CLUSTERS <br />
This step consists of having Pre-OT locate and blow any BT or clusters that <br />
are visible or perceivable, including handling any BTs or clusters restimulated. <br />
<br />
This is based on the old maxim that “If you get enough charge off . . . or if you <br />
keep on getting charge off, you will make case gain and an entrance to the case <br />
will show up”. <br />
<br />
You are likely to encounter any of the phenomena or manifestations of BTs <br />
and clusters. There is a general cyclic pattern of encountering BTs/clusters <br />
that are hard to blow or that are holding other BTs/clusters,followed by a <br />
series of easy blows, then the same pattern repeats over and over. <br />
<br />
9. <br />
REMNANT RIDGES (PARTIALLY BLOWN RIDGES, CLUSTERS) <br />
There is a mechanism of a BT or cluster making a ridge,then another BT or <br />
cluster comes along and sticks to the ridge. You blow the BT or cluster who <br />
made the ridge first, then a remnant of the ridge remains containing BTs who <br />
stuck in it and are now keeping it there and you have to blow these off too they <br />
generally blow easily. Another example of this is a BT being a pole trap. <br />
Another BT comes along and sticks to the pole trap. You first blow the BT <br />
being the pole trap and then you have to blow the BT who stuck to it. <br />
<br />
The auditor has the Pre-OT look for old ridges, remnants of ridges and <br />
masses, and completes handling these to fully blown. <br />
<br />
Phenomena You are Likely to Encounter on this Step: <br />
<br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters left stuck in the ridge or picture that was mocked up by <br />
another BT or cluster. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters being objects in another BT’s or cluster’s pictures. Such <br />
a picture is hard to blow unless you recognize that the picture is <br />
composed of BTs being the parts of the picture. <br />
* <br />
“Hard core” BTs and clusters that are very hard to blow. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters with Out-Int. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters with stuck flows. <br />
* <br />
BTs stuck on the inside of a ridge who tried to blow but get caught by <br />
the ridge. When you blow the ridge you find a lot of BTs blowing out <br />
from under the ridge. <br />
<br />
* BTs and clusters being ridges. <br />
* <br />
Apparent inert masses that behave like ridges and have to be brought <br />
to life with a “Hello - OK” technique. <br />
* <br />
Two BTs pushing so hard against each other that each one thinks that <br />
it’s blocked by a ridge and to blow the ridge you have to blow the two <br />
BTs. <br />
Cognitions or EPs Encountered on this step: <br />
<br />
* <br />
Body distortions clearing up. <br />
* <br />
Cognition of “I am well”. <br />
10. <br />
FLOW ASSESSMENT RECALL PROCESS <br />
This process handles BTs and clusters with very stuck flows. It is run per the <br />
HCOB on it, to its EP. <br />
Phenomena You are Likely to Encounter on this step: <br />
<br />
<br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters unable to move on the time track because time itself <br />
becomes a stuck flow forward to them. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters who dive down the time track on a time stuck flow basis. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters who suddenly pop into view as they were in Revivs down <br />
the time track and weren’t even in sight (which is what gives the Pre-<br />
OT theidea that it’s endless). <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters (masses) who appear to be in PT (whose pressures are in <br />
PT) but who are really way down the track and who need only a small <br />
jerk, given by the Pre-OT, to unstick them from the track. <br />
* <br />
The erroneous idea of the Pre-OT that he is in the past because he is <br />
being influenced by BTs and clusters that actually are in the past. <br />
* <br />
Fear of the future which is really a protest bringing about the apparency <br />
of being stuck on he time track and that the time flow can actually stick <br />
someone. <br />
11. <br />
GENERALLY ADDRESSING THE BODY WITH NED FOR OTs <br />
The auditor now has the Pre-OT look at the body and in particular any somatic <br />
area or area of chronic somatics. <br />
Phenomena You are Likely to Encounter on this step: <br />
<br />
<br />
* <br />
False body parts, i.e. a false leg (BT or cluster being a false leg). <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters transferred from another person who had such a physical <br />
432 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
condition, or BTs or clusters who copied such a condition. <br />
<br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters stuck in drugs or painkillers or anaesthetics used or taken <br />
in the body area. <br />
* <br />
Very small BTs that come up to tremendous size before blowing, some <br />
with concept of “negative” space. <br />
* <br />
Heavy mass, unresponsive or inert BTs/clusters. <br />
* <br />
BTs stuck in body beingnesses, both body parts and body conditions. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters who are “making a body”. <br />
* <br />
Identityless BTs/clusters. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters that are Dead, that think they’re Mest, that think they are <br />
molecules or planets. <br />
* <br />
A cluster causing a dislocated bone or trying to break a bone or spine, <br />
plus, the BTs or clusters being the damaged body part and holding onto <br />
the damage or copying it. <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters who are being broken legs, misformed arms, cancer, <br />
damaged brains, or other non-optimum body parts or conditions. <br />
* <br />
BTs or clusters operating on a refusal to make pictures - the negative <br />
of obsessively mocking up. <br />
Cognitions or EPs Encountered on this step: <br />
<br />
* <br />
Extroversion EP for Session and F/Ning TA. <br />
* <br />
Awareness that anything perceived as mass or somatic in the body is <br />
not the body, but comes from BTs/clusters. <br />
* <br />
Cognition re mocking up pictures due to loss of memory. <br />
* <br />
Actual Exterior perception of Pre-OT increasing. <br />
* <br />
Case change of reaching into body and finding nothing there (i.e. in an <br />
area of body), and it being clean for the first time. <br />
* <br />
A cognition of personal identity - much more intense than previously. <br />
12. <br />
SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSING CHRONIC SOMATIC AREAS OF BODY <br />
This is a more specific address to any area of chronic or recurring somatic. <br />
Some chronic somatics depart very fast and don’t return. These are almost <br />
miracle in nature. Other chronic somatics gradually lessen and can disappear <br />
in the course of the whole Rundown. So don’t despair if you don’t get an <br />
instant alleviation of the chronic somatic but just keep on with the Rundown <br />
and don’t specialize in chronic somatics. Also be very cheered up when you <br />
<br />
<br />
hit an instant disappearance of one. Both conditions can exist in the same Pre-<br />
OT on different chronic somatics. <br />
<br />
Phenomena You are Likely to Encounter on this step: <br />
<br />
* <br />
An Aura - which is a whole package of BTs and clusters formed into the <br />
shape of a body and aura with other BTs and clusters stuck in it. <br />
* <br />
Very heavy anaten holding clusters glued together. <br />
* <br />
BTs and clusters in other parts of the body affecting the somatic area. <br />
* <br />
BTs and clusters in a very suppressed or compressed state that blow up <br />
to huge size and mass and surround and go through the whole body. <br />
** <br />
BTs and clusters behind, or on the other side_of, or inside , bones or <br />
organs, or on the other side of a ridge - these are very likely to be missed <br />
as one wouldn’t think to look there. <br />
<br />
* <br />
Nulls or unresponsive BTs/clusters that are totally out of communication <br />
and need to be put into Comm by running “Hellos and OKs” on <br />
them. <br />
* <br />
A BT or cluster believing he is his own picture - or someone else’s. <br />
* <br />
BTs or clusters being “negatives” - i.e. a “no ___________” like a “no <br />
stomach”, etc., these come about from intentions to obliterate and <br />
probably are the root of sickness. <br />
* <br />
The manifestation of Pre-OT trying to look at or into a body part or area <br />
and a mass or ridge kicking in, between the Pre-OT and the area. <br />
Cognitions or EPs Encountered on this step: <br />
<br />
* <br />
Cognition “I can do anything any other being can do”. <br />
* <br />
Lot of somatic blows, and the first real gain on the somatic area. <br />
13. <br />
MASS THAT KICKS IN WHEN PRE-OT TRIES TO LOOK TOWARD OR <br />
INTO AN AREA OF THE BODY <br />
Such a mass can be quite severe and can knock the Pre-OT anaten. As it is <br />
BT or cluster mass and prevents perception, it must be handled in order for <br />
the Pre-OT to be able to see or reach into the body. The auditor gets the Pre-<br />
OT to look and then handles the mass that kicks in until it is fully cleared up, <br />
then has the Pre-OT look or reach into his body again, and then clears up the <br />
next mass that kicks in, and so on, until he can reach into the area of the body. <br />
<br />
Then you clean up that area of the body fully, and the Pre-OT will be able to <br />
reach further into the body. As each successive area of the body is cleaned <br />
up and becomes transparent his reach is further extended toward the ideal <br />
scene of a body that is transparent to the OT and does not impede his <br />
perception or control. <br />
<br />
434 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Phenomena You are Likely to Encounter on this step: <br />
<br />
* <br />
Any or all of the previous phenomena. <br />
* <br />
BTs outside of and at a distance from the body putting mass on the body. <br />
* <br />
BTs and clusters that are so inert that they have to be thrown off <br />
physically - plus you also have to throw away the “arms” you threw <br />
them off with. <br />
(NB: This difficulty in blowing off BTs has also been caused by a <br />
deficiency of Vit Bl and/or insufficient rest.) <br />
* <br />
BTs/clusters who apparently had Out-Int but didn’t,they had copied <br />
other BTs who had had Out- Int. <br />
* <br />
BTs and clusters who supposed they were being pulled in but weren’t, <br />
they had just concluded that they were. <br />
* <br />
BTs being a damaged body part and because they were being damaged <br />
couldn’t do anything about it. <br />
Cognitions or EPs Encountered on this step: <br />
<br />
* <br />
Ability to look cleanly into areas of the body that couldn’t be reached <br />
into cleanly before. <br />
14. <br />
CLEANING THE BODY OF BT/CLUSTER MASSES <br />
The Pre-OT now works on cleaning up the body of BT/cluster masses, one <br />
area at a time, until each is clean andtransparent to his perception. Each of <br />
the various techniques given in the materials are used as needed to blow these <br />
BT/cluster masses. You may in some instances have to have the Pre-OT <br />
handle BTs Dianetically running them back through a chain of incidents. This <br />
can be complex with 3 or 4 BTs and chains crossed. <br />
<br />
It is very dicey to run engrams on BTs as, although they may have one mutual <br />
one, each one has an earlier chain for it that is different than that of the others <br />
in the cluster, so you limit the action to the mutual incident they have in <br />
common. Scn Grades O-IV can be run on a BT but this would not be usual <br />
as the BTs we’re dealing with in NED for OTs are below that. <br />
<br />
When the Pre-OT has a transparent body and a clear area around it to some <br />
distance (barring perception of other people’s difficulties) and when he <br />
realized he is alive and very much himself the EP of NED for OTs has been <br />
reached. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH: dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 OCTOBER 1978 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 28 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
STUCK FLOWS, THE GENUS OF A BT <br />
<br />
You’ll get a lot of blows early on the Rundown when the Pre-OT realizes it’s not <br />
his body he’s looking at, but ridges composed of BTs and clusters, in the shape of his body. <br />
Then you get into more hard core ones, they’re on such a stuck flow they can’t blow. <br />
<br />
Out-Int could be the genus of a BT and Out-Int would have to precede a cluster. If <br />
Int were out each BT would start identifying into each other’s pictures. When a flow is <br />
run too long in one direction it will jam up and stick, then it can snap back the other way, <br />
<br />
e.g. he gets overrun on “going out of things”, the flow jams and he snaps back “in”, and <br />
stays in. There are actually two stages of Int: <br />
(a) Overrun “get out of”; <br />
(b) The stage of “go in” before “go out”. <br />
Of course this is a misconception too, as how can a thetan be in anyway. <br />
<br />
What forces him to do it is the vector flow line. The flow of “going out” gets overrun, <br />
sticks, then flips back on itself and he “goes in”, (and stays in). It’s the overrun flow <br />
reversing on him that jams him in. His think on it is like “I’m so tired of going out, so I’ll <br />
stay in”. That’s his think, but what sticks him in is the overrun flow of “going out”, the <br />
flow jams and reverses. <br />
<br />
There’s also a misconception of someone being told he’s out when he’s in and being <br />
told he’s in when he’s out. And there’s having pictures of being out when in and pictures <br />
of being in when out. A misconception that they are where their picture is. <br />
<br />
What you have run into is a hard core of BTs with Int so badly out you have a hard <br />
<br />
436 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
time blowing them. Finding the earliest time they “went in” works mechanically, but it <br />
must be based on some postulate or idea that what comes later is made by the earlier. The <br />
mechanism of an overrun flow sticking and then snapping back in reverse is based on <br />
agreement with some set of physical universe laws which are misconceptions. <br />
<br />
HYPNOTISM <br />
<br />
Maybe Out-Int and a hypnotic condition align. An overrun flow eventually winds <br />
up with unconsciousness, and that would wind up to hypnotism. Hypnotism is the state <br />
of being under the duress of another’s command. BTs are so suggestible and mock up <br />
things, they’d have to be hypnotized. It’s an artificial state brought about by drugs, shock <br />
or being under the misconception that they are hypnotized. How do you wake them up? <br />
One way is to count 4, 3, 2, 1 and snap your fingers. A short cut is simply to tell them to <br />
“wake up”. Or you can ask him “How do you wake up?” - BT answers, you do it,and BT <br />
wakes up and blows. One of the techniques from hypnotism is to ask the person how to <br />
wake them up, e.g. “How do you wake up?”, BT says “Snore”, so you make a snoring <br />
noise, BT wakes up. This works on people or BTs in a hypnotic state. They can be <br />
hypnotized by a shock or explosion and then stay in a somnolent state. Part of the anaten <br />
you encounter is their state of unconsciousness. <br />
<br />
STUCK FLOWS <br />
<br />
Out-Int is prior to a cluster. They identify into each other’s pictures and “become <br />
one”. So you have Out-Int as a condition for BTs and clusters. <br />
<br />
The first condition would be making pictures in the first place. The Book One <br />
reason for pictures is that they are a safe way to live without thinking - you don’t have to <br />
think, just act on reaction. It’s putting an ability onto a machine. (Maybe what started <br />
the current wave of disassociation is that these people are living in a TV (stuck flow) and <br />
computer age - even kids at schools have electronic calculators.) Why they make pictures <br />
is basically loss. There are large periods on the track when there was no universe or <br />
environment and pictures are havingness. Some verse or environment and pictures are <br />
havingness. Some thetans think “No pictures” equates to “no memory”. Mocking up <br />
pictures is inability to recall - when they lose memories, they then mock up pictures. <br />
Somebody mocking up pictures is identityless, so they’re more likely to becoming BTs <br />
or becoming part of a cluster. They become identityless and then go into false identities. <br />
Destruction of memory is actually caused by misownership of experience. <br />
<br />
On NED for OTs you get lots of blows, then you run into these hard core BTs that <br />
are hard to blow. They have stuck flows, and it’s a matter of how to unstick a flow. One <br />
way to unstick a flow is to reverse the flow. These BTs are hung up on stuck flows of “out” <br />
and “in”. They think they’re up against another thetan and actually it’s their own stuck <br />
flows that stick them. Flows can stick both ways, you’d only be able to run a process one <br />
direction for a short while before it would stick. <br />
<br />
One way of destimulating is to tell them “Come up to present time!” There’s a stuck <br />
flow of moving along the time track with time. It becomes a stuck flow of moving forward <br />
on the time track and one day they move backwards and stick on the track - the stuck flow <br />
reversed. That might be why NED works - it moves them back down the track, reversing <br />
the stuck flow of time. Moving back on the track is something they haven’t done and it’s <br />
<br />
<br />
undoing the stuck flow. More than anything we are dealing with stuck flow phenomena, <br />
not pictures or anything else. <br />
<br />
Another stuck flow phenomenon is reduced awareness, they go anaten and into a <br />
hypnotic trance state - maybe out-Int and hypnotic condition align. <br />
<br />
A stuck flow is what you’re up against in NED for OTs. And that is the genus of <br />
a BT, and that’s what a BT is, a stuck flow. So any NED for OTs auditor is going to run <br />
into stuck flows. The impact or explosion that forms a cluster is the precipitation - the <br />
stuck flow is the predisposition . These BTs already had stuck flows and are predisposed <br />
to becoming a cluster, the sudden shock or impact precipitates it and they become a <br />
cluster. <br />
<br />
There’s a special trick of blowing BTs by doing an effort-postulate action - go a little <br />
bit earlier and they blow through later. All you have to do is give them a little jerk down <br />
the time track and they will spring up the time track, as you have unlocked the stuck time <br />
flow. A Pre-OT doing this will find it very handy. <br />
<br />
It has now been proven by the Flow Assessment Recall process that Int is stuck <br />
flows, and it is the prior stuck-flow. <br />
<br />
They can try to outflow against an inflow, but that’s what a ridge is. The Flow <br />
Assessment Recall process will tear up ridges that couldn’t blow, it handles BTs that are <br />
so stuck they can’t blow. It is run by outflow, inflow and “no flow” on Quad flows. You <br />
have to run “no flow” as that’s the way a lot of BT’s are. And the past is a no flow - the <br />
past doesn’t flow, and they’re stuck in the past. <br />
<br />
STEPS OF FLOW ASSESSMENT RECALL PROCESS <br />
<br />
1. <br />
Clear the word “flow” and clear each of the Quad flows (F1, F2,F3, F0) and ensure <br />
that Pre-OT understands the direction of each flow. <br />
2. <br />
Clear inflow, outflow and no flow . <br />
3. <br />
Clear the flows on the Assessment Sheet. <br />
4. <br />
This is targetted with the attention directed at one cluster, with a very narrow <br />
attention beam otherwise you will have every BT in the body going batty. It’s very <br />
narrow atten tion at one small part of the body. It doesn’t take very long if your <br />
attention beam is narrow. If the attention beam is too wide he will go mad. For <br />
example, “the face”,”the chest”. This assessment has got to be directed at the same <br />
area and don’t shift the area until you get a BD and F/N. <br />
5. <br />
Assessment. <br />
As you are dealing with BTs, you will get better meter reads if the Pre-OT calls the <br />
assessment lines. The auditor notes the reads. Put the name of the body part being <br />
addressed on the Assessment Sheet. The word “Recall” is not used in the <br />
assessment. Just the flow. <br />
<br />
6. <br />
Take the largest reading line and have the Pre-OT run “Recall ( assessed item ), on <br />
438 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
BTs telepathically. This will produce reads and an sBD or BD and F/N. It is not <br />
run past the first sBD or BD or it will overrun and start jumping into another flow. <br />
At first sBD or BD F/N, you cease running the process and indicate the F/N. <br />
<br />
7. <br />
Reassess the Assessment Sheet and run the next largest reading line by Recall <br />
process. Continue to reassess and run the largest reading line. Over and over and <br />
over. It will eventually go into an F/Ning assessment. <br />
NOTES ON PROCESS <br />
<br />
If you get an sBD or BD during the assessment take that line and run it by “Recall <br />
<br />
-do not continue through the assessment as you have a BDing item. <br />
If you get a BD F/N on assessment, don’t run that line by “Recall____________” <br />
as it will just overrun. There was a blow on that line. Indicate the F/N, then continue <br />
assessing for next line to run. <br />
<br />
Later in the assessment the Sensitivity will have to be raised way up to pick up reads. <br />
And you run any slightest read even if only a Tick or Stop. <br />
<br />
If during assessment or during the process the TA suddenly drops (BDs) into an F/ <br />
Ning TA, you don’t continue that session. Don’t continue to assess, or ask another <br />
auditing question. Just simply indicate the F/Ning TA and end off the session. Take up <br />
the assessment tomorrow - it may just F/N, or you may get further reads to run. But do <br />
not continue the assessment or process past a sudden BD to F/Ning TA. <br />
<br />
The EP is when you can’t get any more reads with Sensitivity cranked up and you <br />
just get an F/Ning assessment. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HCOB 4.10.78 <br />
Attachment <br />
<br />
FLOW ASSESSMENT SHEET <br />
<br />
(Body Part) <br />
<br />
(Pre-OT name) (Date) <br />
<br />
F0 INFLOW <br />
F0 OUTFLOW <br />
F1 OUTFLOW <br />
F1 INFLOW <br />
F2 INFLOW <br />
F2 OUTFLOW <br />
F3 INFLOW <br />
F3 OUTFLOW <br />
NO FLOW ON F0 <br />
NO FLOW ON F1 <br />
NO FLOW ON F2 <br />
NO FLOW ON F3 <br />
NO FLOW ON F2 <br />
NO FLOW ON F3 <br />
<br />
440 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 5 OCTOBER 1978 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 29 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
REST POINTS <br />
<br />
While it is not desirable to end off any major RD or pgm before it is completed, for <br />
practical purposes when public are getting audited at an AO or Flag, they may not be able <br />
to complete the whole of NED for OTs RD due to economic reasons or time available. In <br />
such an instance their auditing can be safely ended on any rest point on the Pgm or <br />
Checklist; such as one of the minor EPs of the RD, on any major win for the Pre-OT, or <br />
on completion of a Checklist (Pgm) Step. <br />
<br />
Such a Pre-OT must be told that the full NED for OTs RD is not complete, and told <br />
not to receive other auditing. And a return date set up for when the Pre-OT will return to <br />
the Org to complete the RD. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE II <br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors NED for OTs Series 30 <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
C O N F I D E N T I A L <br />
<br />
PROGRAM DEPARTURES <br />
<br />
As with any major grade or RD, there should not be any departures from the Pgm. This <br />
is especially true on any powerful RD such as this one. It would be completely forbidden to go <br />
off Pgm on NED for OTs and run something else. By something else is meant grades, or part of <br />
another RD, or some other type of auditing. This hasn’t been done but the consequences would <br />
be disastrous. This is mentioned to ensure that no one ever does this. There is the exception of <br />
a Touch Assist or a Contact Assist but never a Dianetic Assist for sure. <br />
<br />
Q AND A <br />
<br />
You can start handling a somatic and make the mistake of leaving it incomplete. You can <br />
also make a mistake on mass One and it goes over into mass Two. This gives a general rule: <br />
<br />
NEVER GET MORE THAN ONE MASS OR CATEGORY ACTIVE, AND ALWAYS <br />
COMPLETE TO AN EP THE MASS OR CATEGORY STARTED BEFORE GOING ON TO <br />
ANOTHER MASS OR CATEGORY. <br />
<br />
HAVINGNESS <br />
<br />
Don’t run Havingness during the RD, it beefs BTs up and makes them tougher to blow. <br />
<br />
BTs and clusters are packed in tight in a total non-confront. What a guy can’t confront, <br />
he is either obsessivelyhaving, or the opposite - he has aCan’tHave on it. BTs are in Can’t Have, <br />
Waste, or below, they don’t respond to HAVE, they mostly respond to BE. <br />
<br />
Allergies are based on Can’t Have and Waste, and BTs are in a total Can’t Have, so NED <br />
for OTs properly run will probably cure some allergies. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
442 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE III <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 31 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
THE THETAN HAND TECHNIQUE <br />
<br />
There’s another process of getting rid of BTs and clusters. It is not always that magnificient but <br />
it is sometimes functional. <br />
<br />
What you do is mock up a “thetan hand” and using the edge of it as a sort of knife, you pass it <br />
between the body and black masses and sever them off. These masses are attached to the body by strings <br />
or lines or suction cups or beams. You sever the line or string holding them to the body. Sometimes <br />
the mocked up hand departs with them, because after all it was mocked up and it would of course vanish. <br />
<br />
COMPOSITE MASSES AND LAYERED CLUSTERS <br />
<br />
You use this technique - the “thetan hand” - to separate ridges and masses, or to split up opposite <br />
masses. Two or more ridges may be jammed together into a mass, sometimes there are layers upon layers <br />
of clusters. Pass the “thetan hand” between them, between two ridges, or masses or layer of clusters to <br />
sever the connection and split them up into separate pieces, which can then be blown, one piece at a time. <br />
<br />
COMPLETELY UNRESPONSIVE MASSES <br />
<br />
Sometimes you will encounter a mass that is so inert that it won’t even come into communication <br />
with “Hello and OK”. Such masses may have to be thrown off physically, using a mocked up hand. The <br />
Pre-OT simply takes the mass and physically throws it off. And then throws away the mocked up hand <br />
too - so there is no connection or line back to the body. This has been referred to as the “yo-heave” <br />
technique, and while it isn’t particularly of benefit to BTs and clusters, it is a way of getting rid of a <br />
completely unresponsive mass when all else fails. Such unresponsive masses are not that common. <br />
Most commonly, any difficulties in blowing BTs and clusters come from (a) over-restimulaton due to <br />
too long a session, (b) overrun session EP (F/N TA), (c) lack of sleep or tiredness of the Pre-OT, or (d) <br />
a deficiency of Calcium or Vitamin B1. Those are the most common reasons for difficulty and are easily <br />
remedied. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
<br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 OCTOBER 1978 <br />
<br />
<br />
ISSUE II <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 32 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
CHRONIC SOMATICS, MISSED BTs <br />
<br />
If a chronic somatic doesn’t resolve there are missed BTs and clusters causing it. There <br />
are several ways in which BTs and clusters can be missed or overlooked. First of all is by the <br />
Pre-OT thinking that the mass he perceives is the body when it actually is the mass of BTs and <br />
clusters. <br />
<br />
Next there is the BT or cluster producing a somatic in another part of the body, or <br />
influencing another part of the body. Have the Pre-OT trace back from the picture or somatic to <br />
the BT or cluster. The Pre-OT can do this even though the BTs and clusters are generally <br />
confused about whose picture is whose. As the Pre-OT looks for where the BT or cluster is the <br />
meter will read and the auditor can steer the Pre-OT and help him find the position in the body <br />
of that BT or cluster. <br />
<br />
Some BTs and clusters are hiding, secretive, being invisible, hidden or withdrawn. Ask <br />
the Pre-OT to look for BTs and clusters in each of these categories and blow them. Be sure to <br />
complete handling one category before taking up another category or you’ll get over-restimulation <br />
and a beef up. <br />
<br />
Then there is the BT or cluster holding other BTs and clusters in or one BT or cluster <br />
holding other BTs or clusters compressed or suppressed. Handle the BT or cluster doing this first, <br />
then the others will blow off easily. When a very small mass is activated it will increase insize <br />
before blowing - there can be a thousand or two BTs in such a mass and sometimes these explode <br />
apart as they blow. Although the mass becomes very heavy when it is activated, it’s not a big BT, <br />
it’s a lot of little BTs, under suppression. <br />
<br />
You can run into a cluster causing damage to the body, and after blowing this cluster, you <br />
then look for and handle other BTs and clusters who were copying it, or stuck in pictures of the <br />
damaged area and held in it or holding onto it. <br />
<br />
There are BTs and clusters who are refusing to make pictures, as well as BTs and clusters <br />
obsessively making pictures. These need to be looked for and handled. <br />
<br />
Some BTs and clusters are being inert masses and don’t seem to respond until put into <br />
communication and could be missed unless the Pre-OT were asked to look for BTs and clusters <br />
being inert masses; BTs and clusters being dead or who think they are dead; being MEST; being <br />
molecules. <br />
<br />
The Pre-OT may think he/she has an aura. An aura actually is a collection of BTs and <br />
<br />
444 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
clusters mocking up the aura - and sticking in it - as it is a highly electronic mock up. It is being <br />
mocked up by BTs and clusters and has BTs and clusters sticking in it. You may encounter <br />
something like a whole person - body and BTs and clusters that were suppressed down to nothing <br />
<br />
-you contact it as a very small mass and it increases in size to a whole body and aura, complete <br />
with BTs and clusters mocking it up and sticking in it. But that’s what an aura is - a collection <br />
of BTs and clusters and that’s all it is. <br />
Very small dense masses. These when activated can increase to huge size and mass <br />
knocking the Pre-OT anaten, sometimes for quite a long period of time. As the anaten comes off, <br />
the mass will start to disintegrate. The anaten is the “glue” that holds them together and when <br />
the anaten runs out, the BTs and clusters will blow off easily. <br />
<br />
The Pre-OT can work on cleaning out a body part or area of BTs and clusters and get the <br />
area looking clean. Then you have the Pre-OT look inside orbehind or on the otherside of bones <br />
or organs or ridges in the area to find BTs and clusters. Unless you have the Pre-OT look inside <br />
or behind or on the other side ,these would be missed or overlooked. In one instance a somatic <br />
didn’t start to resolve until this action was done. <br />
<br />
BTs and clusters can be conditions (as different from being a terminal) - conditions that <br />
they associate with the body -whatever the body can do, e.g. a being who was being <br />
“unconsciousness”. So have the Pre-OT look for BTs or clusters being body conditions. <br />
<br />
A BT or cluster can believe that he is his own picture - or somebody else’s picture for that <br />
matter. A picture that is hard to blow is probably composed of BTs and clusters being the objects <br />
in the picture, e.g. a picture of a field with a tree and a cow in it. The tree is a being being a tree, <br />
there’s a being being a cow and a being being a field. Together these beings compose the picture. <br />
Or you could have one being being a pole trap and another thetan who came along and stuck to <br />
the pole trap. So if a picture is hard to blow, check for BTs and clusters being the objects of which <br />
the picture is composed. And when you have blown the original beings also blow off any who <br />
stuck to it. <br />
<br />
Phrases such as “a man of my kidney”, “got no spine”, “got to have spine”, “no stomach <br />
for it”, confuse BTs and clusters in those body parts and play a role in pinning them in. You may <br />
run into such phrases or cliches when asking the What? Who? questions. Just acknowledge and <br />
repeat the What? Who? question. <br />
<br />
Probably the root of sickness or psychosomatics is in negative beingnesses. BTs and <br />
clusters being the negative of a body part, such as “a no hand” or “a no stomach”, “a no body”, <br />
etc. When you ask the What? Who? questions you’ll run into answers such as “no hand”, then <br />
it will flip to the positive “hand”, before blowing. These negatives come about from intentions <br />
to obliterate - so they become a “no ________”. They tend to act as a negative terminal to a <br />
positive terminal and thus keep things pinned down. After you’ve cleaned up a somatic area of <br />
all BTs and clusters in it and being it and hidden “behind”, have the Pre-OT look for these <br />
negative beingnesses. <br />
<br />
Some chronic somatics depart very fast and don’t return. These are almost miracle in <br />
nature. Other chronic somatics gradually lessen and can disappear in the course of the whole <br />
Rundown. So don’t despair if you don’t get an instant alleviation of the chronic somatic but just <br />
keep on with the Rundown and don’t specialize in chronic somatics. Also be very cheered up <br />
when you hit an instant disappearance of one. Both conditions can exist in the same Pre-OT on <br />
different chronic somatics. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
LRH:dm:kjm FOUNDER <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 NOVEMBER 1978 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 33 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
PERIMETER MASSES <br />
<br />
Later on the NED for OTs Rundown you will run into a phenomenon where the Pre-<br />
OT has been limiting his attention to masses on or in the body, and not putting his attention <br />
out on the perimeter. <br />
<br />
The Pre-OT in shifting his wavelength of attention down to the wavelength of BTs <br />
and clusters, will end up getting a wavelength shift down to theirs. <br />
<br />
ATTRACTION OF ATTENTION <br />
<br />
By putting attention on them, you activate them. But this will wind up with the Pre-<br />
OT being pulled down to their wavelength. The trick is to put your attention on the outer <br />
perimeter, and find something inside it, not put your attention on the something. You try <br />
to put your attention on the perimeter and your attention gets pulled into a somatic area <br />
<br />
-it’s BTs and clusters pulling your attention into them. <br />
They are invisible and are trying to get attention. They have an impossible problem <br />
of trying to get attention, but can’t get attention. Only their mass, or their creating a <br />
somatic would get attention. It’s almost as if pictures are a trick to get attention. This <br />
factor of trying to get attention is why a thetan goes into mass. This is an explanation for <br />
life, and why a thetan picks up a body. The reason why acknowledgement works is <br />
because an acknowledgement is attention. <br />
<br />
This is attraction of attention. You try to put your attention on Point A - it is pulled <br />
back to a BT or cluster. It’s a contest of trying to put your attention on the actual body, <br />
and their magnetic pull of attention onto themselves. <br />
<br />
There is also a factor of “negative attention” - they don’t want attention on them and <br />
knock you unconscious if you put attention on them. <br />
<br />
446 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
A way to handle is to move such BTs and cluster back to the first time they wanted <br />
attention and they blow. <br />
<br />
PUTTING ATTENTION OUT TO PERIMETER <br />
<br />
Have the Pre-OT put his attention outward to the perimeter, or “look” toward the <br />
outer perimeter and the Pre-OT will find something inside the perimeter and you have the <br />
Pre-OT blow it off. You will by doing this encounter black mass and you can start quite <br />
a mass commotion. Have the Pre-OT look further than the perimeter of the body and he <br />
will find masses out there pushing in on the body. Handle these masses with the “What <br />
are you?”, ack, “Who are you?” technique and they blow. <br />
<br />
Practically all somatics respond this way - the BT or cluster out there is keeping a <br />
bone or the body in a state of distortion. <br />
<br />
BTs or clusters can turn on a kind of “fluid” which is painful when it touches the <br />
body, it’s not that they are in an incident that has that somatic, they exude this “fluid” and <br />
when it hits the body it’s painful. <br />
<br />
If you lift your attention beam and put it out, they’ll tend to follow your attention <br />
beam, and sometimes come halfway out. If the Pre-OT’s body is up against a solid object, <br />
the BTs and clusters can get stuck in the object (suck as a chair). <br />
<br />
The idea is to have the Pre-OT look out to the perimeter, or past the perimeter and <br />
contact masses out there, that are pushing in on the body. blow these off with the “What <br />
are you?”, ack, “Who are you?” technique. <br />
<br />
It is really remarkable how well this works! <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 14 NOVEMBER 1978 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 34 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
THE SEQUENCE FOR HANDLING A PHYSICAL CONDITION <br />
<br />
There is a definite sequence for handling a physical condition. All steps must be <br />
done in this sequence to fully handle the condition: <br />
<br />
1. The item <br />
2. The body part <br />
3. Illness (of the body part) <br />
4. Cures for illness <br />
5. Protest of cures for the illness <br />
6. The body part(again) <br />
7. The item(again) <br />
8. The period of illness on it (Cluster-making incident) <br />
Step One -The Item <br />
The item producing the physical condition. This could be “dust” as an irritant. Or <br />
“poison”, “bad food”, “paint fumes”, etc. <br />
The item is handled by finding and blowing off BTs and clusters who are: <br />
<br />
(a) being the item <br />
(b) resisting the item <br />
448 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The item will then cease to read. <br />
<br />
Step Two -The Body Part <br />
<br />
The body part affected by the item. E.g. for the item “dust” the body part was <br />
“lungs”. For “poison” or “bad food” the body part could be “stomach”. <br />
<br />
On this step you handle BTs being the body part, i.e. being “lungs”. This includes <br />
the negative of BTs being “a no body part” such as “no lungs”. And BTs and clusters stuck <br />
in and on the body part, or area of the body, or affecting the body part or area. When all <br />
such BTs and clusters are handled, the body part will no longer read. <br />
<br />
Step Three -Illness <br />
<br />
The next action is to handle illnesses of the body part(i.e. BTs and clusters being <br />
“sick lungs” or being a condition of an illness or disease or the body part.) “Illness of body <br />
part” will cease to read. <br />
<br />
Step Four -Cures for Illness <br />
<br />
You will now find BTs and clusters being cures for illnesses of the body part. Handle <br />
all such BTs and clusters by blowing them off. “Cures for Illness” will then cease to read. <br />
<br />
Step Five -Protest of Cures for the Illness <br />
<br />
You will now find BTs and clusters protesting cures for the illness. Blow all these <br />
off and “Protest of cures for the Illness” will cease to read. <br />
<br />
Step Six -Body Part <br />
<br />
You will find that the original body part will now be reading again. You handle all <br />
BTs and clusters, on or in or being the body part, until they’re all handled and the body <br />
part just F/Ns. <br />
<br />
Step Seven -Item <br />
<br />
Now the original item (from Step One) will be reading again and so you blow off <br />
all BTs and clusters on the item. This includes BTs and clusters with engrams on the item, <br />
BTs and clusters who have been run on the item when they didn’t have that item (i.e. <br />
wrong item for them), and BTs and clusters who copied it. You may even encounter BTs <br />
who went Clear, and thought they had engrams on it when they didn’t. <br />
<br />
Step Eight -Illness On It <br />
<br />
There are periods of time when the person had the physical condition, sometimes <br />
years of illness, (which due to mutual shared experience of the illness), made a cluster. <br />
This is the period of the illness or physical condition as a cluster-making incident. These <br />
are BTs and clusters who were not actually connected with the item, or illness themselves, <br />
but were made into a cluster and added on, due to the period of illness which they <br />
experienced. <br />
<br />
The above are the full steps and sequence for handling a physical condition or <br />
<br />
<br />
illness. If not done fully or omitted, the condition will recur. So all steps must be fully done <br />
in that sequence. <br />
<br />
On each step of this sequence the BTs and clusters are handled with the various <br />
techniques given for blowing them - the Valence Technique is the most usual and <br />
effective method. <br />
<br />
The item for Step One is found by asking the PreOT for what caused or produced <br />
the condition. It will most likely be the first item given by the PreOT. Be alert for getting <br />
into listing or getting an out-list. If so the most likely error is that it was the first item on <br />
the list, and this item was invalidated by going past it, or by over-listing past it, or the item <br />
was found and audited previously but not fully handled resulting in the item being <br />
suppressed or invalidated. <br />
<br />
The steps are repeated here in short form for auditor use: <br />
<br />
1. The item <br />
2. The body part <br />
3. Illness (of the body part) <br />
4. Cures for Illness <br />
5. Protest of cures for the illness <br />
6. The body part (again) <br />
7. The item (again) <br />
8. The period of illness on it (Cluster-making incident) <br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
450 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 OCTOBER 1978 <br />
<br />
ISSUE III <br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 35 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
NOTES ON PTS <br />
<br />
There are BTs who were PTS to successive persons; they went from one person to another, <br />
<br />
e.g. BT went from Pre-OT’s grandfather, to Pre-PT’s mother, to Pre-OT. So the Pre-OT now has <br />
BTs who were PTS to mother and grandfather. And the Pre-OT was in contact with these BTs <br />
when they were on mother, and earlier in the Pre-OT’s life when the BTs were on grandfather. <br />
This transfer of BTs to successive family members causes a genetic misidentification - it <br />
convinces BTs that they are genetic. <br />
There are also BTs who went PTS to a person that they were PTS to in an earlier life or lives. <br />
They run into the same person in this lifetime and go into restim. <br />
<br />
When a person gets sick there is usually a PTS terminal to be found at the bottom of it. But <br />
the PTSness may be that of a BT or cluster which then hits the pc. <br />
<br />
Now if you went on listing this BT or cluster you would find one for sure. But it is not the <br />
PTS terminal for all of the BTs in the custer so when you finish you will have indicated the wrong <br />
PTS terminal and will have hung the remainder of the cluster with a wrong item which they will <br />
then dramatize. So don’t list a BT or cluster by L & N. What you do is ask them who or what <br />
they are PTS to at which time you will probably get a blow of some of them. Then you indicate <br />
to those that didn’t blow that it is a wrong item for the rest of them. You will either get the cluster <br />
blown with these two steps or the rest of them will blow by other NED for OTs processes. <br />
<br />
When running NED for OTs you will sometimes encounter the phenomenon of Pre-OT’s <br />
attention fixed on or drawn to a remote point, and the Pre-OT can blow off the BT or cluster in <br />
that remote location that is drawing his attention. If the remote point is a person the Pre-OT is <br />
PTS to, you could expect an amazing change of the remote person where he or she now tries to <br />
restore communication with the Pre-OT or ends the conflict or problem. This is the phenomenon <br />
of the SP now making things right with the PTS person being handled, and is the same EP as is <br />
encountered on the New Vitality Rundown and on PTS-Problems handling when it is done fully <br />
to EP. It’s not that you are trying to handle PTSness with NED for OTs, but in such an instance <br />
as described above you can expect the same EP to occur. <br />
<br />
LRH:dm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 22 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
<br />
ISSUE I <br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 36 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
ROCKSLAMS <br />
<br />
An R/S means there’s an Ev Purp per HCOB 10 Aug 76 ROCKSLAMS, WHAT <br />
THEY MEAN. On a Clear or above, any R/S comes from an R/Sing BT or cluster, who <br />
has and is dramatizing an Ev Purp. The handling is to locate the BT or cluster and blow <br />
it off. An R/S will probably go right down to the basic of a cumulative cluster. You would <br />
locate the offending cluster and Date/Locate down to the basic and blow the clusters and <br />
BTs off. Clusters can be pretty vicious and you get an R/Ser at the bottom of the cluster. <br />
I’ve even encountered a cluster that made a profession out of killing patients in hospitals <br />
<br />
-the doctors would wonder why a patient was fine and then all of a sudden take a turn for <br />
the worse and die. <br />
Full “NED for OTs” is essential for the terminated handling of R/Ses on a Clear or <br />
above. <br />
<br />
Very few BTs and clusters are vicious or vengeful, most are benign, but an R/S will <br />
go down to the basic incident of a cluster dramatizing or being an Ev Purp. These will <br />
usually be wildly out of valence and have horrendous overts and crimes down the track. <br />
<br />
To handle R/Ses, you take the statement originally reported to be R/Sing and find <br />
the position in the body of the BT or cluster connected with that R/S statement. You’ll turn <br />
it back on again if you locate the position where that thing was - the R/S will come on. <br />
It’s a combination of position (in the body) and the statement. Having found the BT or <br />
cluster or cumulative cluster who R/Sed, you handle it right on down to fully blown. And <br />
handle andy copies. Do this for eadh R/S statement. <br />
<br />
A major case change will occur on blowing off R/Sing BTs and clusters who have <br />
been ruining the Pre-OT’s life and the lives of those around him. <br />
<br />
LRH:dm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
452 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 OCTOBER 1978 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 37 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
COLLECTIVE IDENTITIES <br />
<br />
By Collective Identity is meant an identity as a plural or generality; e.g. “I’m the <br />
army” or “I’m us”. There is no personal identity. <br />
<br />
Christian Science asserts that “All is mind, infinite mind” - that’s a collective <br />
identity and will make a BT or cluster being a Christian Scientist very hard to blow. <br />
<br />
This is the reason a cluster doesn’t blow, a cluster has the wrong item “us”, without <br />
personal identity. So the technique of “What are you?”,”Who are you?” runs into trouble <br />
when you get a totally general zealot identity of “I’m the army”, or “I’m Christian <br />
Scientist”, “I’m us”, and you don’t get a blow. If you keep asking “Who?” you just get <br />
a repeat answer “us”, and these collective identities won’t give a blow. <br />
<br />
There’s an implant on the track on the subject of “We are all one”, “All is one”. <br />
Someone stuck in this actually goes from the generality of “All is one” and then <br />
individuates from that! That’s actually the basic definition of individuation (as different <br />
from individuality). <br />
<br />
A thetan who is “dead” acts like a cluster - there’s nobody running the show - and <br />
his manifestations are those of a cluster. This is the Socialist, everyone belongs to “The <br />
State”, individualism is negated, it’s all “The People”. <br />
<br />
TV, Drugs and Socialism are the factors that are bringing about the current <br />
deterioration of society, and with these three you can predict a super break up. You get <br />
NCG cases, or subtle NCG cases (these make only minor gain), they are a collective mass. <br />
The speed of effect of auditing would go up after an Ethics Repair List and Criminality <br />
Rundown because on the Criminality Rundown you’ll get a “de-mutualization”. If you <br />
have a TV and Drug culture and enter in a Welfare State you’ll get this. In Communism <br />
a peron is severely punished if he shows any individuality. <br />
<br />
<br />
There are crime waves after waves which are due to a super association with Death. <br />
Then guys have seen so much Death, they consider themselves dead. It isn’t that they’re <br />
taught to kill, it’s that by association with Death, they have become “dead” and <br />
irresponsible. <br />
<br />
Therefore as a rule, while engaging in any collective, social or organizational <br />
activity, you have to foster individuality. <br />
<br />
The collective identity as an answer from a BT or cluster will not produce a blow, <br />
because it is a wrong item. <br />
<br />
WRONG ITEMS <br />
<br />
You can always get a read on “Wrong item?” because all items are wrong - any name <br />
or identity (except “me”) is a wrong item. <br />
<br />
When you’ve just corrected a list and you want to make sure you’ve got the right <br />
item, you ask if it’s the correct item and it will be. If you then ask if it’s and incorrect item, <br />
it will read! Because all items (except “me”) will read as wrong items. This explains how <br />
the What? Who? technique works. You ask “What?” and the answer they give you is the <br />
wrong item, you ask “Who?” and they give you the right item (“me”) and blow. They go <br />
Clear on getting the right item! <br />
<br />
REPEATING ANSWER <br />
<br />
When you encounter a repeating answer from a BT or cluster on “What?”, “Who?” <br />
they won’t blow, as they keep giving a wrong item. One way to handle would be using <br />
the “Yo-heave” technique of resorting to throwing them off physically. That is a “when <br />
all else fails”. <br />
<br />
There is a mechanism which works whereby you can handle the repeating answer. <br />
Instead of acking “Who?” again, you ask “What were you before you became that?” - they <br />
say “me” - and blow. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
454 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 7 NOVEMBER 1978 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 38 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
BASIC FEAR <br />
<br />
There are two fundamental things that all beings have in common. <br />
<br />
One is that they are sure they will become worse, go down scale. That is the one <br />
thing thetans are really certain of. <br />
<br />
The other is there are two things they are afraid they will become (and are certain <br />
they will become), cells and molecules. <br />
<br />
You will encounter the above in handling BTs and clusters on NED for OTs. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 29 OCTOBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE I <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 39 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
MORE ON DIANETIC CHAIN ERRORS <br />
<br />
BTs and clusters who have been run on Dianetic chains, may have to be taken apart <br />
by assessing and handling an L3RF. But you only indicate the line that reads, and must <br />
not engage in running engrams. Sometimes there will be three or four different chains all <br />
tangled up and you have to sort these out. You can also get a kind of linear chain or “time <br />
track” composed of a wrong item that was run and jumped from one BT to another and <br />
formed them into a sort of false “linear track”. <br />
<br />
Handle the L3RF Method 3, as you will find there are often more than one BT or <br />
cluster who have what the L3RF line states, wrong with them. <br />
<br />
Another reason for BTs run Dianetically failing to blow, is when they were run on <br />
what appeared to be a motivator chain, it was really an overt chain, and when this is <br />
straightened out and handled as an overt chain, they blow. <br />
<br />
Because you after all are handling several BTs when you handle a cluster, Dianetics <br />
may have operated differently on the different BTs in the cluster. Therefore it may be <br />
necessary to run the L3RF several times on the same auditing session as they will have <br />
different reasons why they got hung up. <br />
<br />
You could also do a C/S 53RL on a BT. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
456 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 NOVEMBER 1978 <br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 40 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
AUDITOR ROLE <br />
<br />
The auditor is there to help the PreOT blow BTs and clusters. On OT III repairs the <br />
PreOT when audited is usually a relay point from the auditor to the BT. On NED for OTs <br />
the PreOT is becoming more and more OT and actually does most of the auditing of BTs <br />
and clusters. The auditor should only act in the session to keep the PreOT working on <br />
blowing BTs and clusters. And should not act in the session when the PreOT is working. <br />
Done right this is the easiest auditing there is. Only if the PreOT runs into a difficult BT <br />
or cluster does the auditor act and then only as needed to get it sorted out. <br />
<br />
The auditor needs to keep a sharp eye on the meter and must be proficient at handling <br />
a very loose needle at high Sensitivity, as he will need to do this to get reads, especially <br />
later in the Rundown. <br />
<br />
During the Rundown F/Ns become more frequent to a point where the needle is F/ <br />
Ning most of the time, reads and BDs to F/N when the PreOT blows a BT or cluster. As <br />
these are often several blows in succession the auditor shouldn’t interrupt the PreOT with <br />
questions or F/N indications. (It would be impossible to indicate all the F/Ns anyway, <br />
especially later in the Rundown.) What’s more important is indicating where the charge <br />
is, sometimes steering the PreOT by meter read to where the BT is located in the body or <br />
sorting out whether it’s a single BT, a cluster, a cumulative cluster, etc. <br />
<br />
The auditor should inform the PreOT of what is reading and use the meter reads to <br />
help PreOT identify and find masses. Never let the PreOT try to answer an unreading <br />
question or to look for a BT or cluster that isn’t reading. Tell him when the TA is F/Ning <br />
or he may overrun. The F/N is unimportant and should not be indicated unless you’re <br />
running ruds. <br />
<br />
LRH:dm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 DECEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE I <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 41 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
HANDLING BTs MESSED UP ON OT III <br />
<br />
On OT III the PreOT is Clear but running engrams, and where he made a mistake <br />
on one of these, he’d get messsed up. In some instances the rule of “no engram running <br />
on a clear” is violated on OT III. <br />
<br />
If BTs and clusters who were messed up on running OT III are not repaired, the <br />
PreOT on NED for OTs can run into despair, mystery and get into an on and on and on <br />
grind on it. This has to be repaired at the beginning of NED for OTs and may have to be <br />
returned to later in the Pgm. <br />
<br />
Unblown BTs or clusters, or BTs and clusters messsed up on OT III, are sometimes <br />
at a distance of 6 - 8 - 10 feet out from the body. This is a perimeter you wouldn’t normally <br />
think to handle. They blew out to this perimeter and stuck there. <br />
<br />
Up until now PreOTs on Solo OT III didn’t have the data on “earlier Incident I”, and <br />
“earlier universe” and you will find misses on this which will be picked up by doing an <br />
LDN OT IIIRB. <br />
<br />
There will also be engram errors made in Solo OT III, which are repaired by <br />
assessing an L3RF on the BT or cluster and indicating the reading line. <br />
<br />
EXAMPLES OF ERRORS <br />
<br />
A BT who had no incident (Inc II or Inc I) and tried to run someone else’s; <br />
<br />
A BT who tried to run someone else’s and didn’t run his own; <br />
<br />
A BT who thinks he is an Inc I; <br />
<br />
A BT who thinks he is an Inc II; <br />
<br />
458 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
A BT who thinks he is a picture; (some BTs will mock up or become whatever is <br />
suggested - hence you get a recurrency of picture due to copying). <br />
<br />
A BT who didn’t have any engram and tried to run someone else’s; <br />
<br />
A BT who went Clear and tried to run other people’s incidents; <br />
<br />
A BT with an earlier Inc I (or Inc Is); <br />
<br />
A BT with an earlier universe(s); <br />
<br />
The incident was erased and was run more, mocked up by those who didn’t have it, <br />
and were told to go earlier, resulting in misownership; <br />
<br />
A later similar incident mistaken for the same incident; <br />
<br />
A wrong indication such as thinking or indicating it’s a cluster when it’s really a BT <br />
<br />
-causing it to go black; <br />
BTs or clusters who tried to blow but hung up against other BTs or clusters or ridges <br />
or bones. <br />
A cumulative cluster for which the original (basic) incident was never found. <br />
<br />
HANDLING <br />
<br />
The above are to be handled in Step 4 of the Rundown (HCOB 1 Nov 78, Issue II, <br />
NED for OTs Series 27) as additional steps, given below, or at any later point in the <br />
Rundown when encountered. A special list has been made up of the above which may <br />
be used. The danger of using the list is that you may get several in restim. So if you get <br />
a read on the list handle it, and handle the right one. <br />
<br />
Addition to Step 4: <br />
<br />
Step 4h) LDN OT IIIRB <br />
<br />
Step 4i) “A BT or cluster messed up in running OT III?” <br />
<br />
If this reads, locate the BT or cluster and assess the NED for OTs “Repair List for <br />
Errors in Running OT III”, and find what the error was. And blow the BT or cluster,if he <br />
doesn’t blow on indication, by completing the OT III action. Also NED for OTs <br />
techniques may be used if this does not seem to resolve it. <br />
<br />
After handling many of these you will get a sudden series of blows as the barrier <br />
holding them has been removed. <br />
<br />
LRH:dm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 DECEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE II <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 42 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
REPAIR LIST FOR ERRORS IN OT III <br />
<br />
This list is used to repair and blow BTs or clusters messed up in running OT III. The <br />
danger of using this list is that you may get several in restim. So if you get a read on the <br />
list handle it, and handle the right one. <br />
<br />
INSTRUCTIONS <br />
<br />
A. <br />
“A BT or cluster messed up in running OT III?” (If this reads do B below. If no read, <br />
check “Suppressed?” and “Invalidated?”) <br />
B. <br />
Pre-OT finds the BT or cluster by position in, on or around (outside) the body. <br />
(Same BT or cluster that read in A above and same meter read.) <br />
C. <br />
Assess down this list with Pre-OT’s attention on that BT or cluster, until you get a <br />
read, and indicate the reading line. <br />
D. <br />
If no blow on indication, complete the OT III action, to blow of the BT or cluster. <br />
E. <br />
If no blow on D above, or you can’t complete the OT III action on that same BT or <br />
cluster, continue to assess down this Repair List to next reading line, as therecould <br />
have been more than one error. Handle per Steps C and D. (NB: You should check <br />
“Suppressed?” and “Invalidated?” on “Earlier Inc I” and “Earlier Universe?” if no <br />
read on either.) <br />
F. <br />
When BT or cluster blown, return to Step A and handle per Steps B - E. Repeat this <br />
sequence A - E until Step A no longer reads and just F/Ns on the question. <br />
460 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
CAUTIONS <br />
<br />
<br />
After handling a BT or cluster do not recheck or repeat the Repair list line, as doing <br />
so would invalidate the fact that you have handled it, and would restimulate others, cause <br />
others to mock up (copy) what was just handled. Only question A is rechecked. <br />
<br />
Be sure to handle fully to blow the same BT or cluster you started with, and do not <br />
restimulate others, or jump from one BT or cluster to another. <br />
<br />
You could use other NED for OTs techniques, (such as “What? Who?’ or “Jolting <br />
the BT a bit earlier”), if the above Steps A - E do not resolve it. You will find that most <br />
blow either on indication of the error or on completing the OT III action. “Earlier Inc I” <br />
(sometimes several earlier) or “Earlier Universe” most commonly are the reason and <br />
produce blows. <br />
<br />
REPAIR LIST FOR ERRORS IN RUNNING OT III<br />
<br />
1. <br />
AN EARLIER INC I? __________ <br />
2. <br />
AN EARLIER UNIVERSE? __________ <br />
3. <br />
A BT WHO HAD NO INCIDENT II AND TRIED TO RUN <br />
SOMEONE ELSE’S? __________ <br />
4. <br />
A BT WHO HAD NO INCIDENT I AND TRIED TO RUN <br />
SOMEONE ELSE’S? __________ <br />
5. <br />
A BT WHO TRIED TO RUN SOMEONE ELSE’S AND <br />
DIDN’T RUN HIS OWN? __________ <br />
6. <br />
A BT WHO THINKS HE IS AN INC I? __________ <br />
7. <br />
A BT WHO THINKS HE IS AN INC II? __________ <br />
8. <br />
A BT WHO THINKS HE IS A PICTURE? __________ <br />
9. <br />
A BT WHO DIDN’T HAVE ANY ENGRAM AND TRIED <br />
TO RUN SOMEONE ELSE’S? __________ <br />
10. <br />
A BT WHO WENT CLEAR AND TRIED TO RUN OTHER <br />
PEOPLE’S INCIDENTS? __________ <br />
11. <br />
THE INCIDENTS WAS ERASED AND WAS RUN MORE <br />
AND MOCKED UP BY THOSE WHO DIDN’T HAVE IT? __________ <br />
12. <br />
THE INCIDENT WAS ERASED AND TOLD TO GO <br />
EARLIER WHEN THERE WAS NONE? __________ <br />
13. <br />
MISOWNERSHIP OF INCIDENT? __________ <br />
14. <br />
A LATER SIMILAR INCIDENT MISTAKEN FOR THE <br />
SAME INCIDENT? __________ <br />
<br />
15. <br />
SOMETHING LATER MISTAKEN FOR SOMETHING <br />
EARLIER __________ <br />
16. <br />
DIDN’T GO BACK FAR ENOUGH AND JUST MOCKED <br />
IT UP TO RUN? __________ <br />
17. <br />
DIDN’T GET THE RIGHT INCIDENT? __________ <br />
18. <br />
STUCK IN AN IMAGINED INCIDENT OR PICTURE? __________ <br />
19. <br />
DELUSION? __________ <br />
20. <br />
SAW SOMEBODY ELSE’S INCIDENT OR PICTURE AND <br />
DIDN’T RUN HIS OWN? __________ <br />
21. <br />
NEVER RAN HIS OWN INC II? __________ <br />
22. <br />
NEVER RAN HIS OWN INC I? __________ <br />
23. <br />
NEVER HAD AN INC II? __________ <br />
24. <br />
NEVER HAD AN INC I? __________ <br />
25. <br />
INTERRUPTED WHILE RUNNING INC II? __________ <br />
26. <br />
INTERRUPTED WHILE RUNNING INC I? __________ <br />
27. <br />
DIDN’T ERASE THE INCIDENT AND STILL TRYING <br />
TO RUN IT? __________ <br />
28. <br />
AN UNRUN INC II THAT WAS IN RESTIM? __________ <br />
29. <br />
AN UNRUN INC I THAT WAS IN RESTIM? __________ <br />
30. <br />
DIDN’T HAVE AN INC I, AND INC II DIDN’T ERASE <br />
BECAUSE INC II HAS AN EARLIER SIMILAR INCIDENT __________ <br />
31. <br />
JUST WATCHED OTHERS RUN INC I AND INC II AND <br />
DIDN’T RUN OWN? __________ <br />
32. <br />
WENT CLEAR AND TRIED TO RUN OTHERS’ <br />
INCIDENTS? __________ <br />
33. <br />
JUMPED BTs? __________ <br />
34. <br />
INCIDENT II WAS LEFT UNFLAT? __________ <br />
35. <br />
INCIDENT I WAS LEFT UNFLAT? __________ <br />
36. <br />
INCIDENT II WASN’T RUN? __________ <br />
37. <br />
INCIDENT I WASN’T RUN? __________ <br />
462 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
38. <br />
A WRONG INDICATION OF THINKING OR INDICATING <br />
IT’S A CLUSTER WHEN IT’S REALLY A BT? __________ <br />
39. <br />
A WRONG INDICATION OF THINKING OR INDICATING <br />
IT’S A BT WHEN IT’S REALLY A CLUSTER? __________ <br />
40. <br />
SOME OTHER WRONG INDICATION? __________ <br />
41. <br />
TOLD SOMETHING DIDN’T READ? __________ <br />
42. <br />
A BT OR CLUSTER WHO TRIED TO BLOW BUT HIT <br />
A BONE AND STUCK? __________ <br />
43. <br />
A BT OR CLUSTER WHO TRIED TO BLOW BUT HIT <br />
A RIDGE AND STUCK? __________ <br />
44. <br />
A BT OR CLUSTER WHO TRIED TO BLOW BUT HIT <br />
AN UNHANDLED BT OR CLUSTER? __________ <br />
45. <br />
NO PLACE TO GO? __________ <br />
46. <br />
CAN’T GO? __________ <br />
47. <br />
MUST GO? __________ <br />
48. <br />
A CUMULATIVE CLUSTER FOR WHICH THE ORIGINAL <br />
(BASIC) INCIDENT WAS NEVER FOUND? __________ <br />
49. <br />
AN EARLIER INC I SUPPRESSED? __________ <br />
50. <br />
AN EARLIER INCIDENT I INVALIDATED __________ <br />
51. <br />
EARLIER UNIVERSE SUPPRESSED? __________ <br />
52. <br />
EARLIER UNIVERSE INVALIDATED? __________ <br />
53. <br />
RAN INTO AN IMPLANT THAT SAID THERE WAS <br />
MORE EARLIER UNIVERSES THAN THERE WERE? __________ <br />
54. <br />
A BT OR CLUSTER WITH A WRONG ITEM OR <br />
OUT-LIST? (L4BRA) __________ <br />
55. <br />
A BT OR CLUSTER WITH SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? <br />
(C/S 53 on that BT or cluster.) __________ <br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 31 JANUARY 1979 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
NED for OTs Series 43 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
(Amends and clarifies <br />
NED for OTs Series 27 <br />
Ref: NED for OTs Series 41,42 <br />
<br />
<br />
Step 4 of the NED for OTs Rundown (Series 27) is subdivided into 9 actions (4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, <br />
4F, 4G, 4H, 4I). The instruction to check interest only applies to Step 4F, (Repair of Past Auditing). All <br />
the other steps, (4A - 4E, 4F - 4I) are done without checking interest. <br />
<br />
The usual rules of not running anything that doesn’t read, and checking for false read or protest if <br />
the pc is not interested or protesty, apply to all steps. <br />
<br />
ADDITIONAL ACTION <br />
<br />
After running or handling any category, one should check whether this acted as a wrong item (or <br />
wrong indication) to other BTs to whom it did not apply, but only if there seems to be trouble. <br />
<br />
Example 1: <br />
Auditor completes handling “BTs who went Clear and were audited on engrams”. <br />
Auditor can then check “Did ‘went Clear and then audited on engrams’, act as a wrong <br />
item for other BTs to whom it did not apply?” and if reading indicates this was a wrong <br />
item to the others. <br />
<br />
Example 2: <br />
Auditor completes handling “BTs audited past erasure”. Then auditor can check “Did <br />
‘audited past erasure’ act as a wrong item to other BTs?” And if reading, indicate. <br />
<br />
If discomfort or lack of GIs seems to indicate trouble has occurred be sure to check if it has acted <br />
as a wrong item, however you can also use the Repair List (NED for OTs Series 24). <br />
<br />
This pheonmenon of other BTs taking on a wrong item by copying what is run on other BTs tends <br />
to happen on any category or button being run. It happens to a far greater degree if an Overrun occurs, <br />
<br />
i.e. one goes on trying to handle the same category or button after it has been handled, and starts in on a <br />
new area of the body or new category using the same category or button that has just been handled. <br />
Sometimes when using a category or button, a series of automatic blows will occur, you will get <br />
a floating TA, and this is the EP for that action and the EP for the session. Hence the rule of short sessioning <br />
on NED for OTs and ending off on a floating TA. <br />
<br />
LRH:dm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
<br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
464 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 9 FEBRUARY 1979 <br />
ISSUE II <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 44 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
WRONG ITEMS <br />
<br />
(Refer HCOB 19 Nov 79) <br />
<br />
The reason why a wrong item (L & N error) produces such a violent reaction is <br />
because it can key-in practically every BT in the body. <br />
<br />
They’re all sitting on a wrong item already - what they are being - and if you find <br />
a wrong item on an L & N list, it can give them all another wrong item on top of the wrong <br />
item each is being. <br />
<br />
The L & N error is a wrong item for a very large number of BTs, hence the very heavy <br />
and violent reaction. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 FEBRUARY 1979 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 45 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
PARTIALLY BLOWN BTs <br />
<br />
(Ref: NED for OTs Series 16) <br />
<br />
In HCOB 17 Sep 78, Issue II, NED for OTs Series 16, the phenomenon of partially <br />
blown BTs causing “Exterior visio” is described and the handling is given. <br />
<br />
In addition to sometimes causing an apparency of exterior perception, partially <br />
blown BTs can cause a physical reaction of discomfort. Not having fully blown they react <br />
back against the body with energy or mass. <br />
<br />
The reason why they only partially blow is because they are still mixed up in a mass <br />
with untouched, unaudited BTs that stick them. By having the Pre-OT reach out in front <br />
of the partially blown BTs with a question “Who are you?”, the uncleared BT or BTs get <br />
handled. This may have to be repeated as the group of BTs may blow further out and hang <br />
up again. Simply keep putting the question “Who are you?” out in front of the BTs each <br />
time they hang up until they blow apart and clear fully and completely. <br />
<br />
It is interesting that the mass sometimes flies apart like sparks way out there. It is <br />
at that moment the Pre-OT experiences a feeling of relaxation. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
466 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 22 FEBRUARY 1979 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 46 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
BTs WITH MISUNDERSTOOD WORDS <br />
<br />
I have discovered that BTs can have misunderstood words too! <br />
<br />
The body’s ear might hear one thing and the BT might hear something else entirely, direct. <br />
This results in Mis-U sounds and oral words. The BTs don’t know what the person is saying, nor <br />
do they know what is being said to the person, due to these Mis-Us. And the person gets caught <br />
in the middle of this flow channel, experiencing the reaction to the BT’s Mis-U. The usual <br />
reaction of the BTs is just to withdraw. <br />
<br />
BTs can get Mis-Us from reading matter, foreign languages, and I have found BTs that <br />
don’t speak English. Where it really goes wild is in auditing, where the BT has a Mis-U on the <br />
auditing command or question. They would then answer the auditing question wrong to <br />
themselves, causing a case hang up right there. <br />
<br />
There is also a basic consideration that the Dead would not understand anything anyway. <br />
<br />
This phenomenon of BT’s Mis-Us explains why some try to communicate with pictures. <br />
<br />
Since this can cause a case to hang fire in auditing you need to know about this and to check <br />
for a Mis-U in the auditing command or question, remembering that it could be a BT’s Mis-U <br />
and not necessarily the Pre-OT’s Mis-U. So auditors and C/Ses are alerted to this as a possible <br />
reason for a case to hang fire. The remedy is to repair the situation, by checking for Mis-Us in <br />
the commands or auditing questions, and handling BTs hung up in these. <br />
<br />
As a rundown you would take these up by categories and fully handle them as follows. But <br />
this as a rundown comes later on in NED for OTs. <br />
<br />
1. <br />
Clear with the Pre-OT the idea of communicating with BTs by concept, not with words. <br />
The Pre-OT may have to learn this trick of communicating conceptually. Clear the words <br />
“concept”, “idea”, “thought”, “spoken words”, “written words”, “picture”. Then clear <br />
theidea of communicating conceptually. You may have to do a little drill with the person <br />
by getting him/her to think a simple thought, such as “It’s a nice day”, without verbalizing <br />
it or thinking in words or pictures. You could have the person think the thought <br />
conceptually, then think it with words, then conceptually, then with words. <br />
<br />
Or even think the thought while saying different words or gobble-dy-gook. Don’t overdo <br />
this, it is just to get the Pre-OT to a point where he can communicate to a BT conceptually. <br />
<br />
2. <br />
Assess through these categories until you get a read: <br />
“A BT with a Mis-U.......... <br />
in auditing commands? <br />
in auditing questions? <br />
in spoken words? <br />
in reading matter? <br />
in entertainment? <br />
in study? <br />
in English? <br />
in foreign languages? <br />
symbol? <br />
sound? <br />
<br />
<br />
3. <br />
Have the Pre-OT locate where the BT is in relationship to the body. <br />
4. <br />
Blow the BT by usual NED for OTs techniques (What? Who?), remembering that the Pre-<br />
OT must ask these questions (and receive the answers to them) conceptually, so as to avoid <br />
Mis-U words in this communication. <br />
5. <br />
Check for any other BT within this category and handle as above, until there are no more <br />
BTs with Mis-Us in this category. <br />
6. <br />
Continue down the assessment in #2 above until you get a read and handle as above, and <br />
so on. <br />
7. <br />
When you have completed the categories given above, make a final check for any other BT <br />
with a Mis-U, and handle before leaving this Rundown. <br />
This discovery shows the importance of clearing words used in auditing questions and <br />
commands, and the importance of clearing Mis-U words in general. And of course the fact that <br />
these Mis-Us may be a BT’s Mis-Us rather than the person’s own Mis-Us, will dispel any mystery <br />
about why one can run into Mis-U word phenomena when one knows the word himself. But don’t <br />
let this make you any less alert for words the Pre-OT may have misunderstood in auditing <br />
questions or commands, and be sure to clear these. <br />
<br />
These BTs with Mis-Us are easily handled by use of the trick of communicating with them <br />
conceptually, rather than with words. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
468 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 27 OCTOBER 1979 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 47 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
VALENCE TECHNIQUE ADDITION <br />
<br />
References: <br />
HCOB 17 SEP 78 I NOTs Series 7, VALENCES <br />
HCOB 19 NOV 78 L & N LISTS - THE ITEM “ME” <br />
HCOB 9 FEB 79 II NOTs Series 44, WRONG ITEMS <br />
HCOB 1 AUG 68 THE LAWS OF LISTING AND NULLING <br />
HCOB 17 MAR 74 TWC, USING WRONG QUESTIONS <br />
HCOB 11 APR 77 LIST ERRORS, CORRECTION OF <br />
<br />
LISTING FOR THE ITEM <br />
<br />
(Warning: All HCOBs and material on Listing Errors <br />
apply to this procedure.) <br />
<br />
Step One of the NOTs Valence Technique, “What are you?”, is a listing question. <br />
It is asked to find the valence the BT or cluster is stuck in (obsessively being), thereby <br />
shifting the BT or cluster out of that valence. <br />
<br />
Sometimes a BT or cluster will answer at first with a wrong item or items. Then there <br />
won’t be any valence shift, nor will there be any blow. Finding the correct item (the <br />
valence the BT or cluster is obsessively being), will shift the BT or cluster out of that <br />
valence, and remaining steps of acknowledging the item, and asking “Who are you?” will <br />
produce the cognition: “I’m me”, and it will blow. <br />
<br />
The correct item in answer to the question: “What are you?” will read. If there is no <br />
read on the first item, one has to list from the BT or cluster to get a reading item. It is often <br />
a 6 or 10 item list (but could be shorter, including the first item on the list). The following <br />
examples are given to show what such a list could look like. The items in these examples <br />
and the size of reads shown, are not for reference but are purely by way of illustration. <br />
<br />
<br />
Example 1: <br />
<br />
“ What are you?” <br />
<br />
A leaf <br />
<br />
A tree <br />
<br />
A tree trunk <br />
<br />
A branch <br />
<br />
A twig <br />
<br />
A broken limb LF - F/N (The item) <br />
<br />
Example 2: <br />
<br />
“ What are you?” <br />
<br />
A sword <br />
<br />
An arena <br />
<br />
A crowd <br />
<br />
A wild animal <br />
<br />
A lion <br />
<br />
Dust <br />
<br />
Blood <br />
<br />
A dying man <br />
<br />
A gladiator F - F/N (The item) <br />
<br />
Example 3: <br />
<br />
“ What are you?” <br />
<br />
A brain LFBD - F/N (The item) <br />
<br />
Example 4: <br />
<br />
“ What are you?” <br />
<br />
There is no answer from the BT <br />
<br />
or cluster. <br />
<br />
The technique used here is to run <br />
<br />
“Hello and Okay” (See HCOB 17 SEP 78 <br />
<br />
Issue I NOTs Series 7, page 4) on the <br />
<br />
BT or cluster. <br />
<br />
When it is answering up, then proceed <br />
<br />
as above in other examples. (Note: <br />
<br />
BTs or clusters occasionally blow on <br />
<br />
“Hello and Okay”.) <br />
<br />
AFTER GETTING THE ITEM, ALWAYS ACKNOWLEDGE IT. <br />
<br />
Sometimes it is necessary to acknowledge the item in order to get an F/N, sometimes the <br />
acknowledgement broadens the F/N, but the acknowledgement step must not be omitted. <br />
<br />
RELAY OF COMMANDS AND ANSWERS <br />
<br />
The auditor has to indoctrinate the PreOT to relay the auditing question to the BT or cluster, <br />
and to relay the answer from the BT or cluster to the auditor. (Otherwise the auditor wouldn’t <br />
know what item the BT gave in answer to”What are you?”, nor would the auditor know whether <br />
it was a reading item.) The auditor is responsible for the communication in the session and for <br />
control of the session. <br />
<br />
470 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
VALENCE LISTING TECHNIQUE STEPS <br />
<br />
<br />
1. “ Where is the BT (or cluster)? “ <br />
The auditor has the PreOT locate where the BT or cluster is by position in relation to the <br />
body. The auditor notes the area named by the PreOT and whether it reads. Do not let the PreOT <br />
go looking for additional new areas until the reading area is fully handled. <br />
<br />
2. “ What are you? “ <br />
The auditor has the PreOT ask the BT or cluster the question, and relay the answer(s) to <br />
the auditor. The auditor writes these down and notes any read. If the first item does not read the <br />
auditor has the PreOT continue to ask the question and relay the items to the auditor, until there <br />
is a reading item, and must not go past it. <br />
<br />
3. Acknowledgement <br />
The PreOT acknowledges it. <br />
<br />
4. “ Whoareyou? “ <br />
The PreOT asks the BT “Who are you?”, it cognites “I’m me” and blows. <br />
<br />
(But if there is no blow, or if there are BTs, at once suspect that a wrong item was found, <br />
and correct it to the right item. Complete the steps to a blow.) <br />
<br />
WARNING <br />
<br />
There is a danger here of finding a wrong item, underlisting or overlisting. Wrong items <br />
and list errors recoil heavily on a case. BTs and clusters in their lowered awareness are very <br />
susceptible to suggestion, and tend to copy obsessively. Thus it is very essential that one does not <br />
leave any BT or cluster with a wrong item or out-list. <br />
<br />
Auditors and C/Ses are alerted to watch for any sudden decline of the case when this listing <br />
action has been done, and to at once suspect and handle any out-list/wrong item. <br />
<br />
Despite the danger of listing errors, it will be necessary to use this technique of listing for <br />
the item, at some point on any case being audited on NED for OTs, since BTs and clusters often <br />
begin by giving wrong items in answer to the question: “What are you?”. However, a good auditor <br />
can be trained to L & N successfully and get the right item. The indicators of a wrong item (see <br />
Laws of L & N) are very obvious, both to the auditor and C/S, and bring about a dramatic case <br />
resurgence when spotted and corrected. <br />
<br />
HANDLING A WRONG ITEM <br />
<br />
Immediately when the PreOTs GIs go out or BIs appear in the session the auditor must <br />
check for”A wrong item?”,”An out-list?”, and handle. Find where the BT or cluster with the <br />
wrong item or out-list is by position in relation to the body, and find and correct the wrong item/ <br />
out-list on that BT or cluster. After locating and indicating the wrong item or list BPC,\always\follow <br />
through and find the right item, and continue the steps of the Valence Technique until the BT or <br />
cluster blows. There may be more than one BT or cluster with a wrong item or out-list, so it is <br />
essential to locate the BT or cluster by position in relation to the body. <br />
<br />
After handling the BT or cluster to a blow, check your original question (“Wrong item?”, <br />
“List error?”) again to ensure there are no more BTs or clusters with a wrong item. Don’t go on <br />
trying to repair wrong items when the question”Wrong item?”ceases to read or F/Ns, or you will <br />
start messing up BTs and clusters who did not have that wrong with them. <br />
<br />
<br />
If difficulty is encountered in repairing a list error, it could be sitting on an earlier out-list <br />
or wrong item on that BT or cluster. <br />
<br />
An L4BRA can be used to repair a wrong item or out-list on a BT or cluster, but if so the <br />
list must be used Method 3, and care used to find the BT or cluster by position, and to handle each <br />
BT or cluster encountered to blow. <br />
<br />
POSSIBLE ERRORS <br />
Errors that could possibly be made and could be anticipated on this technique are: <br />
<br />
(a) <br />
The auditor missing the read on the first item and causing overlisting, <br />
(b) <br />
Listing past the first reading item (overlisting), <br />
(c) <br />
Leaving a BT or cluster with a wrong item, <br />
(d) <br />
Leaving a BT or cluster not blown or only partially blown, <br />
(e) <br />
Going past an F/N on listing (bypassing the item), <br />
(f) <br />
Leaving the list incomplete, <br />
(g) <br />
Jumping from one BT or cluster to another without completing the first one started, <br />
(h) <br />
Overworking the question”Wrong item?”and trying to repair other BTs who didn’t have <br />
that wrong with them. <br />
(Remember that all items are wrong to some degree, as the only really right item is”Me”.) <br />
These possible errors could even be assessed if need be. <br />
<br />
OK TO AUDIT OR C/S <br />
<br />
It is called to attention that the March 66 HCO PLs on High Crime Policy apply to this issue <br />
and its references, which must be High Crimed by any auditor or C/S before using them. <br />
<br />
FLUB, CRAM, RETREAD SYSTEM <br />
<br />
The materials of L & N are covered on Class IV, so there is no excuse for an auditor to flub <br />
L & N, nor to be ignorant of the Laws of L & N. <br />
<br />
The Flub, Cram, Retread System means that on the first auditor flub he goes to Cramming <br />
on the materials flubbed, one more flub on these materials and he goes to Retread. It is a system <br />
put in at Flag to ensure that there were no failures on FCCIs with new internes auditing in the HGC. <br />
It is a proven workable system. It is imperative, mandatory, that the Flub, Cram, Retread System <br />
be used on this listing technique on NED for OTs, and no C/S, Cramming Officer, nor Tech/Qual <br />
executive may get reasonable about this, nor allow any persuasion or pressure to undermine or <br />
counter this system. <br />
<br />
Despite the liability to the pc if flubbed, actions such as L & N, L & N Repair, and Dating/ <br />
Locating, are actually easy to do correctly, produce spectacular results when done right, and are <br />
sometimes necessary auditing techniques. So don’t get reasonable about demanding that these <br />
actions be done correctly. Their success depends on the auditor’s TRs, metering, no misunderstoods <br />
and thorough grasp of the materials. <br />
<br />
472 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
IT IS THEREFORE MADE A COMM EV OFFENCE NOT TO USE THE FLUB, CRAM, <br />
RETREAD SYSTEM ON THIS NOTs LISTING TECHNIQUE, AND IT IS ALSO COMM EVABLE <br />
TO DECRY OR COUNTER THIS SYSTEM.<br />
<br />
Should an auditor flub again after Retread he or she goes to full Retrain from the bottom <br />
up per C/S Series 84. <br />
<br />
Most auditors are keen to audit well, and learn their materials and produce miracles as a <br />
matter of course. If they do not, then their MUs, False Data must be cleaned up, and the materials <br />
thoroughly restudied so that they will get the expected excellent results from standard application <br />
of the Tech. <br />
<br />
Another factor on flubby auditors is that sometimes an auditor (or C/S) will dramatize the <br />
same out-tech on pcs that exists on his/her own case. Therefore the attention of the C/S or Senior <br />
C/S is called to this point, and the case of a flubbing Tech/Qual person should be checked for <br />
out-tech and if there is any get it corrected in addition to the Cramming or Retread action. (Lest <br />
this paragraph be misconstrued it does not change policy in any way, and”case on post”is\not\an <br />
extenuating circumstance in any Justice action, nor may it be used as an excuse for any failure <br />
to know and apply the Tech; besides, to plead”case”as an excuse would be beneath contempt for <br />
any professional auditor, C/S, supervisor, etc.) <br />
<br />
Then in addition to cleaning up any out-tech found on that person’s case, handle the auditor <br />
and C/S who flubbed and didn’t handle it, too. <br />
<br />
If despite the above handlings the same person persists in repeating the same errors, then <br />
you are up against a case situation described in HCOB 8 MAR 62 THE BAD”AUDITOR”, and <br />
HCOB 15 MAR 62 SUPPRESSORS, and such a person must be removed from Tech/Qual lines <br />
for the sake of others. This label should not be assigned lightly, and the supervisors of such a <br />
student and their seniors must be named as Interested Parties to the Comm Ev which would look <br />
into WIAC PL outnesses, graduating an overt product, failure to use Study Tech and Student <br />
Corrective Actions. <br />
<br />
SUMMARY <br />
<br />
Very often, especially early on the NOTs program, BTs and clusters will blow on <br />
inspection, or on finding where the BT or cluster is, or before the steps of the Valence Technique <br />
have been done. One must mot seek to carry on auditing a BT after it has blown, as this would <br />
result in other BTs and clusters copying and misidentifying themselves with the blown BT. <br />
<br />
Many BTs blow very easily. Sometimes after handling one BT or cluster, you will get a <br />
series of easy rapid blows, or even a repetitive or automatic blow. These points are covered in <br />
earlier NED for OTs issues, and are not changed by anything in this issue. <br />
<br />
This refinement in the Valence Technique will enable you to handle and blow BTs and <br />
clusters with more accuracy and rapidity. And there are some BTs that wouldn’t have blown <br />
otherwise, that this listing step will handle. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1979 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 DECEMBER 1980 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 49 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
ACKNOWLEDGING THE “ME” ANSWER <br />
<br />
(Ref: NOTs Series 7, VALENCES <br />
NOTs Series 47, VALENCE TECHNIQUE <br />
ADDITION) <br />
<br />
<br />
The HCOB gives an additional step to the NOTs Valence Technique, and a further <br />
clarification of each of the steps of this technique. <br />
<br />
The new step consists of “acknowledging the “me” answer”. Doing so can <br />
guarantee a blow. <br />
<br />
A lot of the time there is nothing there to acknowledge because it has already blown. <br />
Most of the time this isn’t needed, but when used it does prevent a hang-up when the BT <br />
hasn’t gone. So its actual value is the fact that it can guarantee a blow. <br />
<br />
(By the way, you can call one back and acknowledge it, but don’t get into that. This <br />
is mentioned simply because it is possible to call them back.) <br />
<br />
THE FULL STEPS OF THE VALENCE TECHNIQUE <br />
<br />
0. Identifying what you are going to handle. <br />
Although this is strictly speaking not part of the Valence Technique, one has to start <br />
<br />
474 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
off by finding a BT or cluster that you are going to blow with the NOTs Valence <br />
Technique. This zero step then consists of whatever action one is on, such as Rudiments, <br />
a NOTs Program Step, Repair List or whatever, that uncovers a reading charge that one <br />
identifies as a BT or cluster. Having found a reading charge one has to identify what that <br />
charge is coming from, i.e. a BT or a cluster (and less commonly, “a BT that thinks it’s <br />
a cluster”, or “a cluster that thinks it’s a BT”). <br />
<br />
This step varies depending on what Program step or category you are working on. <br />
<br />
E.g. on Program Step #17, “Mass Mistaken For the Mass of the Body”, you ask the Pre-<br />
OT to “Look over the body and tell me if there is any mass.” or “...any massy body part <br />
or area?”, or “...any area of the body that is solid?”. When you get a reading area of mass, <br />
you then need to identify what this is, i.e. “Is it a BT?”, “Is it a cluster?”. <br />
On Step #18, “BTs Being Body Parts”, you have the Pre-OT look over the various <br />
parts of the body until you get a reading body part. Or, you call off various parts, i.e. <br />
“Head?”, “Face?”, “Neck?”, “Inside?”, “Outside?”, etc. until you get a read. In this <br />
instance you have the position or area of the body where the BT or cluster is, but still need <br />
to identify it by asking: a BT?, a Cluster? (But note that in this instance as in the paragraph <br />
above, you have also found where the BT or Cluster is in relation to the body). <br />
<br />
But if you are flying ruds, or handling a preparesd list, to start with all you have is <br />
a reading question. You then find\whose\charge it is, (per HCOB 20 Dec 79 AUDITING <br />
SOMEBODY UNDER CONSTANT AND CONTINUOUS PT STRESS and HCOB 22 <br />
Dec 79 FLYING RUDS AT OT III AND ABOVE) by asking: “Is it yours?”, “a BT’s?, <br />
“a cluster’s?” or , “Is it also __________’s?”. This action identifies what you have found <br />
and are now going to handle. <br />
<br />
This is really a preliminary step to the Valence Technique in which you are (a) <br />
finding something to run, and (b) identifying what you have found. You are establishing <br />
whether it is “a BT”, “a cluster”, maybe “several BTs”, or even “more than one cluster”, <br />
(in the case of a plural, the Pre-OT would need to be told to limit his attention to one of <br />
these, so you can handle one at a time.) <br />
<br />
Having found a charge and identified what it is, you now can move into the Valence <br />
Technique to blow that BT or cluster (unless it has already blown by this point, which is <br />
quite often so, many blow by inspection, especially if the Pre-OT is running cleanly and <br />
rapidly). <br />
<br />
1. “Where is the BT (or cluster)?” <br />
The auditor has the Pre-OT locate where the BT or cluster is by position in relation <br />
to the body. The auditor notes the area named by the Pre-OT and whether it reads. When <br />
the Pre-OT names the correct place it will read. Do not let the Pre-OT go on looking for <br />
additional new areas until the reading area is fully handled. <br />
<br />
(As noted above under Step 0, you may have already located where the BT is, in <br />
which case you wouldn’t then ask the Pre-OT to find where t is.) <br />
<br />
The location of a BT or cluster is not always in the body, they can also beon the body, <br />
outside the body, even at some distance from the body. <br />
<br />
Steps 0 and 1 are not rote. These steps are done to then enable the Pre-OT to limit <br />
<br />
<br />
his attention span to the specific BT or cluster while asking the auditing question. <br />
Otherwise you could jump from BT to BT, restimulating other areas than that being <br />
worked on. <br />
<br />
2. “What are you?” <br />
(Note that any and all listing done follows the HCOB 1 Aug 68 THE LAWS OF <br />
LISTING AND NULLING. These have not changed just because they are being used in <br />
a different process. An auditor who does not know these should not attempt this step, and <br />
should master this HCOB before attemtping this step.) <br />
<br />
The auditor has the Pre-OT ask the BT or cluster the question, and relay the answer <br />
to the auditor, who writes the answer down and notes whether it read. Only if the first item <br />
does not read, do you list further items. Very often the first answer reads and that is the <br />
item. <br />
<br />
If the first item did not read, you’ve now got to ask him for another answer, and you <br />
have got to make sure that it comes from that exact spot or area. You have got to make <br />
sure that he isn’t shifting his attention all over his “left side”, or you’d get the whole bank <br />
in that area alive. You could say: “Now, from that same spot, is there another answer? <br />
another? another?”. And this is done only to the first reading item. You might have to <br />
verify it: “Is that (answer) from the same spot?”. <br />
<br />
This is why you establish where the BT or cluster is located in Step 1, as you can <br />
then ensure that the Pre-OT limits his attention to, and directs the auditing question to, that <br />
exact spot. E.g. “Put your attention on the top of your left ear and ask “What are you?” <br />
<br />
The auditor indicates the first reading item. (Don’t forget that the PreOT can’t see <br />
the meter, and the auditor must say what read, and must not let the Pre-OT overlist.) You <br />
indicate the item by saying “Pc wording of the first reading item”) is the item”. Don’t get <br />
sloppy and say “That’s the item”, as how does he know what you mean by “that”? If <br />
“catfish” was the item say, “Catfish is the item”. <br />
<br />
Normally, but not always, you will get an F/N on finding and indicating the item, <br />
but if you do not get an F/N here, you will on the next step. <br />
<br />
(Warning: On this step remember that you may have already received the answer <br />
in Step 0 or Step 1. BTs and clusters may not be aware of the fact that they are living beings <br />
and may not release any charge at all on “BT” or “cluster”. But when you ask where they <br />
are, you may have gotten an answer to what they are being, simply by asking for body <br />
locations. This is not common, but not uncommon either: you asked if the BT was on <br />
his foot and you got a big read. In this What step you might have trouble getting a reading <br />
item and might miss the fact that you already had the reading item for his What step in <br />
“foot”. The BT was being a foot and you discovered it by accident without recognizing <br />
it, so if you have any trouble with the What step, one of the first things to check is whether <br />
or not a “What” already read on asking for the “Where” on Step 0 or Step 1. If you suspect <br />
this, put the named body part that read on the list and check it out as part of the list. You <br />
won’t have to do this often, but you better know about it.) <br />
<br />
3. Acknowledgement <br />
The auditor has the Pre-OT acknowledge the item. This is very important (see <br />
<br />
476 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
NOTs Series 7). <br />
<br />
Even if you got an F/N on the previous step, you still acknowledge and you will <br />
broaden the F/N. And if you didn’t get an F/N previously, you will on acknowledging the <br />
item. And you’ll quite often get a blow on this step. <br />
<br />
4. “Who are you?” <br />
Now we have to remember that it is the same spot again and we ask, “Who are you?”, <br />
and we don’t feed them the answer. They sometimes comm lag (don’t get impatient with <br />
the comm lag), sometimes it’s a few seconds comm lag, and then you get the answer. You <br />
may have to repeat the question. The “Me” answer will normally LFBD, and if that LFBD <br />
isn’t very marked, you make sure you do the next step of acknowledging the “Me” answer. <br />
In any event you could still acknowledge, but if the LFBD was pronouned the probability <br />
is that he’s gone. <br />
<br />
Now there is a special condition you can run into on the “Who are you?” question <br />
if the BT answers with a significance or identity answer. This is covered in NOTs Series <br />
<br />
7. But if this continues, suspect that you may have gotten a wrong item on the “What are <br />
you?” question, or that the Pre-OT has used too broad an attention span or let his attention <br />
wander to other areas and he is getting answers from other BTs or Clusters. <br />
5. Acknowledgement <br />
The auditor has the PreOT acknowledge the BT’s “Me”answer. This action can <br />
guarantee a blow. <br />
<br />
Now if this acknowledgement produces another read then we know it guaranteed <br />
a blow. Sometimes you get another LFBD on the acknowledgement step, and sometimes <br />
you get a broadening of the F/N. <br />
<br />
And that completes the steps of the NOTs Valence Technique. <br />
<br />
CAUTIONS <br />
<br />
Sometimes, quite often in fact, this short-circuits. You ask: “What are you?” and <br />
the guy says “Me” and blows. And sometimes you are patiently trying to go through all <br />
these steps and you get a series of blows. A blow or a series of blows can occur at any <br />
time during NOTs. You don’t then continue the steps of this Technique, as that BT or <br />
cluster has gone! Sometimes a series of blows or an automatic blow will go into a <br />
Persistent F/N or a Floating Tone Arm and in either instance you would end off the <br />
session. <br />
<br />
Also you can get repetitive blows if a case is running pretty clean, and you can get <br />
blows without BDs. There isn’t much left on the charge and it isn’t registering on the <br />
meter to amount to anything. <br />
<br />
There is also the case of a “partial blow” and the description and handling for this <br />
is given in NOTs Series 45, HCOB 10 Feb 79 PARTIALLY BLOWN BTS. <br />
<br />
On “Hello and OK” you sometimes get a blow. The BT or cluster doesn’t answer <br />
up and you run “Hellos and OKs” repetitively to get it into comm. Rarely, it will suddenly <br />
<br />
<br />
blow, and it would then be senseless to go on trying to run “Hello and OK” or anything <br />
else, as that one has gone. <br />
<br />
Some auditors have been known to ask a pc if it blew, during the Valence Technique <br />
steps. Even nag the PreOT, “Did it blow?”, “Has it gone?”, “Still around?”. This could <br />
be due to the auditor’s unfamiliarity with his meter, and not recognizing a blow when he <br />
sees it occur on the meter. Or, possibly some may have confused another technique, Date/ <br />
Locate, with this technique. You of course always Date to blow, and Locate to blow, and <br />
the auditor could get the idea that he should carry over Date/Locate technique into the <br />
Valence Technique. <br />
<br />
It is very poor practice to ask the PreOT if it blew during NOTs Valence Technique. <br />
You could cause the BT or cluster to submerge or be suppressed, or you could invalidate <br />
a blow that did occur. <br />
<br />
This doesn’t mean that you can’t ever ask if it blew. You could ask if it is “still <br />
around?” and a read would confirm that it is. But this type of question is asking for a <br />
missingness. It’s no longer there. There’s a large number of pcs that never see the blow, <br />
and it isn’t something to see, because it’s a missingness. This type of question can be <br />
difficult for the PreOT to answer, as there is now nothing there for him to perceive as it <br />
has gone. If the meter BD’d and F/Ned on the “Me” step, it would be idiocy to then ask <br />
if it blew, of course it did! But if your meter didn’t tell you it blew, you could be in a <br />
quandary and have to solve that problem. But you wouldn’t interrupt the Valence <br />
Technique to ask if it blew, and you wouldn’t get into nagging the PreOT. You just follow <br />
on through your steps, and particularly if you had the PreOT ack the “Me” answer, then <br />
you got your blow alright. So this concern about whether the BT blew is misplaced. <br />
<br />
These points are stated so that the auditor will understand what he is doing, why he <br />
is doing it, and what manifestation he can expect to occur, because these manifestations <br />
will occur. This technique is a very positive series of steps, and they go in that sequence. <br />
If these steps are done as given, you will get the result, and if departed from or if there is <br />
an error, you can definitely expect to get that manifestation too, i.e. too broad an attention <br />
span and you will get restim. <br />
<br />
It is necessary that the auditor and C/S understand these points as this is not a <br />
technique that can be done rotely or robotically. <br />
<br />
OT III TECHNIQUES <br />
<br />
Sometimes you will need to use OT III techniques, especially when you run into a <br />
cluster. And it is effective, just like it always was. You sometimes get into a situation <br />
where you have an inert mass. You run some “Hellos and OKs” and it actually becomes <br />
less inert, but it is still a cluster. That condition can exist but it usually isn’t untied with <br />
“Hello & OK”. It’s a cluster and it reads on cluster. Then it’s your assessment for mutual <br />
incident, “Accident?, Illness?, Impact?, Injury?, etc.”, you do the assessment of what is <br />
this thing. You get your mutual incident. Sometimes the cluster will explode apart or <br />
break up on the assessment alone. You found what was holding it together. Then you <br />
wouldn’t try to Date/Locate it. You’d have the PreOT pick off individuals and run them <br />
on the Valence Technique. But if there was no disintegration of the cluster on finding the <br />
mutual incident, you’d carry right on and Date/Locate, Inc II and Inc Is (or NOTs Valence <br />
Technique). <br />
<br />
478 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Now there’s a variation on mutual incidents. You can get a mutual incident that is <br />
current, contemporary, like he went PTS or something. Had a big ARC break or <br />
something. But it isn’t as strenuous as a cluster-making incident. It’s a sort of a lock. It <br />
isn’t a mutual incident like an impact, injury, illness, accident, shock, etc. But a guy can <br />
run into a recent heavy upset or general charge of some kind, heavy stress, and you get <br />
the reaction described in HCOB 20 Dec 79 NOTs Series 48, under “Routine A”. There <br />
you had a general total restim - it is actually a mutual incident as it happened to all of them <br />
<br />
-it’s near PT though and they all copy it, and when you hit it you get a sudden BD and <br />
a relief. But you are not going to blow any BTs to amount to anything as it isn’t a cluster-<br />
making incident. So you have to be able to differentiate between these two types of mutual <br />
incidents, the recent this life lock, and the heavy impact, injury, explosion type of mutual <br />
incident that forms a cluster. The cluster will resolve with the OT III, mutual incident, <br />
Date/Locate, Inc II and Inc Is routine. And that’s why you start off on the NOTs course <br />
with a re-study and clear up any MUs on the OT III materials. I wouldn’t do much date/ <br />
locating on NOTs, and usually the cluster will break up into individuals on finding the <br />
mutual incident pinning them together. Very often you can blow a cluster with the NOTs <br />
Valence Technique, but you still have the assessment for what is holding the cluster <br />
together, and it is very useful. <br />
The one that gives the most trouble is the cluster impacted with a cluster, impacted <br />
with a cluster - a Cumulative Cluster. You also have the handling for that in HCOB 25 <br />
Oct 69R CLUSTER FORMATION, CUMULATIVE. But some of these clusters can be <br />
pretty horrifying in character. I don’t think this would give any trouble in NOTs though, <br />
and I think by the time he’s gotten through OT III, handled all the individuals and available <br />
BTs and clusters he’s got, that he may have blown these by then. <br />
<br />
Regarding the insane, the probability is that a cluster is really dominated by one <br />
thetan who has “contaged” the rest of the cluster with some wild ideas - evil intentions. <br />
That’s when you run into the R/Ser on NOTs. And you may get the intention come off, <br />
if so note it in the worksheets. I wouldn’t do more with it than that. You’re taking the <br />
cluster down to basic mutual incident and blowing it, so then it is gone anyway. But you <br />
may have to get off the evil intention if it doesn’t just come flying off. The cluster could <br />
be held together by a mutual idea or evil intention received during an implant or heavy <br />
engram. In one instance an R/Sing cluster was listed for its evil intention, which <br />
successfully blew the cluster apart, and this could be done, but usually won’t have to be <br />
resorted to. More commonly when handling a cluster, an R/Sing cluster, you can run into <br />
the phenomenon of evil intentions coming off voluntarily, and you will see a list starting <br />
up in the worksheets. This is called to your attention, so that you will recognize it if it <br />
occurs and take the list to its BD F/N item. That can happen, and an auditor should be able <br />
to recognize when a pc is listing and handle it as a list. XDN actually applies. The bulk <br />
of Rock Slammers are probably clusters, and probably it’s one main BT in the cluster <br />
affecting the rest by wishing off his evil intention on them. <br />
<br />
COPIES <br />
<br />
Handling copies can be necessary, especially when you’ve taken apart a cluster. Or <br />
when you don’t get a clean blow and suspect that some other BT is copying what you just <br />
ran or handled. But checking for copies can be easily over-worked, and as BTs are very <br />
suggestible, you could by nagging the PreOT on the subject of copies, start some BT or <br />
BTs copying. You certainly don’t ask for copies after every BT you blow, or as a routine <br />
step in the Valence Technique. Some auditors have tended to do this, probably by <br />
<br />
<br />
carrying Date/Locating technique over into the Valence Technique. In any case you only <br />
handle copies when indicated, and not as a rote every time question. <br />
<br />
SOMATICS <br />
<br />
The original research on somatics was done in the late ‘50’s in Washington, and I <br />
found how a somatic comes about. It’s based on the fact that one being by himself couldn’t <br />
have a somatic. You have to have two beings to have a somatic. A cluster can have a <br />
somatic. You wouldn’t ask a question for a BT with a somatic, that would be a wrong <br />
question and is based on a false datum, and is an out-tech question. You could have two <br />
or more BTs smashed together somehow producing a somatic, but you would have to take <br />
up each of these BTs individually to blow them. <br />
<br />
But usually about the only time you will run into a somatic in NOTs is when there <br />
has been an error. A wrong item, or something of that sort. It may be that a somatic in <br />
NOTs is always an indicator of an error. It seems to be so. And the wise auditor on NOTs <br />
should be alerted to the probability of an error of some kind if the Pre-OT does turn on <br />
a somatic. You can easily and quickly check for an error in what you have just been <br />
running in the session, or use a NOTs Repair List to locate and handle the BPC. <br />
<br />
UNDERSTANDING <br />
<br />
It is very essential that NOTs auditors and C/Ses understand the NOTs materials, <br />
and don’t try to insist on a rote set of questions or steps, as NOTs doesn’t run well as a <br />
rote or robotic rundown. There are very exact steps and manifestations and sequences and <br />
you will get these everytime. Anytime there have been flubbed cases on NOTs these have <br />
traced to MU’s on the part of the auditor and/or C/S. The NOTs course checksheet was <br />
specificially designed to prevent this with Supervisor meter checks for MU words <br />
frequently throughout the checksheet. But there was an instance of a student who <br />
“skipped” the MU word check by the Supervisor, which is a sure route to catastrophe. Any <br />
trouble on NOTs has traced back to failure to clear words misunderstood in either the OT <br />
III materials or in the NOTs materials. This gives the solution to any auditor or C/S <br />
troubles with NOTs. Clear the MU words, and re-study the materials so that you do <br />
understand and can apply them. It will certainly make your life as an auditor or C/S much <br />
easier, and will enable you to get the rave results that NOTs is known for routinely. <br />
<br />
SOCIOLOGICAL IMPACT <br />
<br />
Have you considered the sociological impact that you are having by auditing NOTs? <br />
You are turning free beings loose in torrents. This is bound to have an effect on society, <br />
especially when these start picking up bodies and turn up to join the team at their local org! <br />
You are not just auditing one pc at this level, you are churning out cleared beings in <br />
volume, and we will start seeing the results sooner or later on society in general. Maybe <br />
you have thought about this too, it’s nice to recognize the good effects you are creating! <br />
<br />
LRH:dm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1980 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
480 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 30 JANUARY 1980 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
NOTs Auditors & <br />
C/Ses ONLY <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 50 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
NOTs OT DRUG RUNDOWN <br />
<br />
(Ref: HCOB 29 Jan 80 THE OT DRUG RUNDOWN <br />
WHICH MUST BE STUDIED PRIOR TO STUDYING <br />
THIS HCOB.) <br />
<br />
This issue adds to the OT III HCOB referenced above, and gives additional data and <br />
handlings which are limited to NOTs auditors and C/Ses, and which are for use on cases <br />
being audited on NOTs. (The OT III handlings of drugs can also be used on NOTs cases.) <br />
<br />
As you know from NOTs data, BTs can be being anything. They can be being a <br />
particular drug, or being a drug picture or incident, or even an “acid trip” for example. <br />
<br />
The way you would handle a NOTs case on drugs is similar in that you would first <br />
of all get the person through the Purification Rundown. A case already started on NOTs <br />
can be put onto the Purification RD without having been completed on NOTs, in fact, you <br />
may not be able to complete some cases without it. You do not have to take the case to <br />
a Rest Point. Just ensure that the case is not left incomplete (or messed up) on a specific <br />
action or category before starting the Purification RD. Then do not attempt to combine <br />
NOTs auditing with the Purification RD until it is completed. <br />
<br />
Do not attempt to run Objective processes on a case during NOTs. <br />
<br />
The caution of not asking for Drugs or Drug incidents generally also applies to <br />
NOTs auditing as such a question would result in a total restim. <br />
<br />
What you can do is to add “Drugs” and “a BT being a drug”, “a BT affected by <br />
drugs”, “a BT being a drug trip”, “a BT being a drug picture”, into a prepared assessment <br />
or list. <br />
<br />
You can check for a read on drugs on a specific BT or cluster, and then handle that <br />
<br />
<br />
BT or cluster to a blow. <br />
<br />
All of the data published on the subject of drugs and their effect in preventing case <br />
gain applies to BT’s and cluster’s cases. <br />
<br />
Most commonly drugs have shown up on NOTs cases as either cluster-making <br />
incidents, or on individual BTs being the drug or affected by the drug, or copying other <br />
BT or cluster pictures of drugs. <br />
<br />
Several cases who were stalled on NOTs or who were making minimal gain on <br />
NOTs have been resolved by handling drugs as described in this issue. <br />
<br />
CASE HISTORIES <br />
<br />
The following case histories (reported by FSO C/Ses), of case handlings done on <br />
NOTs Pre-OTs on drugs are limited to this issue as they contain NOTs techniques and <br />
data. These are additional case histories to those given in HCOB 29 Jan 80, THE OT <br />
DRUG RUNDOWN, (those cases were also piloted by NOTs auditors and C/Ses, but do <br />
not contain confidential NOTs data). <br />
<br />
Case 1: <br />
<br />
“Institutional case who had Sodium Pentathol as an anaethetic just prior to ‘going <br />
nuts’ and then being put in an institution”. <br />
<br />
“Running NOTs techniques on this drug, BTs stuck in this drug, BTs being this <br />
drug, BTs affected by this drug, turned the case sane.” <br />
<br />
Case 2: <br />
<br />
“LSD some 200 times. Had so far refused any standard Sweat Out program. Case <br />
gain totally hung fire on his attempts to get the perception he had when he took LSD.” <br />
<br />
“From a GF 40 Expanded, drugs read heavily and his first gains from NOTs were <br />
acheived in handling cluster-making incidents from LSD trips, BTs/clusters stuck in <br />
LSD, being LSD, etc. This was run for approximately one intensive with Pre-OT interest. <br />
It didn’t crack the case but some headway was made.” <br />
<br />
(The next action for this case is to get him onto and through the Purification RD, then <br />
the full NOTs OT Drug RD.) <br />
<br />
Case 3: <br />
<br />
“LSD 220 to 250 times, and alcohol and other heavy street drugs. He was at a point <br />
where he could hardly walk or articulate”. <br />
<br />
“Many cluster-making incidents on drugs, LSD, alcohol, were handled through the <br />
Rundown. Many were Reviv’d in past locations and some stuck there (i.e. physically)”. <br />
<br />
“He cognited and BD’d on disturbing a pocket of acid held down by a BT. BTs/ <br />
clusters restimulated by that were handled, then BTs/clusters stuck in drug trips and <br />
<br />
482 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
copies of drug trips”. <br />
<br />
“He started recovering physically. Articulation handled and walking improved”. <br />
<br />
“On NOTs Series 34 handling of illness, alcohol was the item. His speech went back <br />
to normal after this - Pre-OT felt tremendous”. <br />
<br />
“Lots of charge blown on BTs/clusters stuck in hospital drug (ACTH). Result of less <br />
numb, more sensation”. <br />
<br />
“Later a NOTs Series 43 handling was done on alcohol, plus Date/Locate of a <br />
cumulative cluster on drugs. His responsibility increased and he was off on a persistent <br />
win for almost 2 weeks experiencing automatic/continuous blow phenomena in life”. <br />
<br />
“Lots of ‘stuckness’ on the case was tied up in drugs and alcohol. Case is currently <br />
doing very well on the Purification RD”. <br />
<br />
(Although the Purification RD would normally precede such drug handling in <br />
NOTs, this case was unable to walk or to talk due to paralysis and was considered <br />
incurable by the medicos.) <br />
<br />
“There are also a number of Pre-OTs who have had NOTs Series 12 handlings on <br />
Drug RDs and some on drugs.” <br />
<br />
NOTs OT DRUG RD PGM <br />
<br />
The NOTs OT Drug RD Program is the same program as the OT Drug RD (HCOB <br />
29 Jan 80 THE OT DRUG RUNDOWN). It begins with the Purification RD, it has the <br />
same Steps #1 - 5. But the method of handling is by NOTs Valence Technique, rather than <br />
Inc II, Inc I. Assessment for mutal incident is the same, but individuals from a broken up <br />
cluster would be handled with NOTs Valence Technique. <br />
<br />
The categories of: “a BT or cluster being (reading drug)”, “a BT or cluster affected <br />
by (reading drug)”, “a BT being a drug trip”, “a BT being a drug picture”, “a BT or cluster <br />
being (mis-emotion)”, “a BT or cluster being (negative item)”, should also be checked <br />
for on each reading drug taken up, and these categories may be assessed as part of a <br />
prepared list, and should be so assessed at the end of Step 5. <br />
<br />
Step 6 is different and would consist of a NOTs Series 24 Repair List assessed and <br />
handled, to clean up any loose ends and polish off the case, before returning to the NOTs <br />
Advance Program. <br />
<br />
ADMINISTRATION AND DELIVERY <br />
<br />
The OT Drug Rd may not be audited on Pre-0Ts who have had any NOTs auditing, <br />
<br />
<br />
these may only be run on the NOTs OT Drug RD. <br />
<br />
Although the NOTs OT Drug RD is done by a NOTs auditor and NOTs C/S, these <br />
must be specially trained on the NOTs OT Drug RD and only interested, graduated NOTs <br />
auditors and C/Ses may be so trained. (These issues are not added to the ACS Courses, <br />
nor given to green NOTs auditors or C/Ses.) <br />
<br />
The NOTs OT drug Rundown is not mixed in with the NOTs Advance Program, nor <br />
is it to be bit and pieced with NOTs, nor given as a blur along with NOTs. It is its own <br />
special RD and must be delivered as its own RD, and as its own package. This does not <br />
mean that you cannot use the item “drugs” in an assessment for a mutual incident during <br />
NOTs, nor that you couldn’t handle a BT hung up in a drug during NOTs. But if drugs <br />
or drug items are coming up during NOTs, then the case is on the wrong program and <br />
should be shifted over to the Purification RD, followed by the NOTs OT Drug RD. Then <br />
after these are done, you would resume the NOTs Advance Program. (As well as not <br />
mixing the hours on the NOTs OT Drug RD with NOTs hours, there is an important <br />
Technical reason for only handling one subject at a time and completing each action and <br />
program before starting another. (ref: C/S Series 38, C/S Series 47, & NOTs Series 30.) <br />
<br />
One would not interrupt a Pre-OT who is running well on NOTs with good TA <br />
action and who is getting rapid blows, but would flatten the action before making a change <br />
to the Purification RD and the NOTs OT Drug RD. These Rundowns can be done at any <br />
point during the NOTs Advance Program, but ideally they would be entered after the “Past <br />
Auditing Repair” steps, or after step 14, after step 15, or at any point thereafter. If drugs <br />
are heavily charged and getting in the way, then you would have no choice but to shift <br />
programs to handle. <br />
<br />
Ideally the NOTs OT Drug RD should be delivered by a specialist team of NOTs <br />
auditors and C/S, operating as a unit, who then feed completed cases back to regular and <br />
interning NOTs auditors. <br />
<br />
The NOTs OT Drug Rundown should help you with cases who hung fire or were <br />
resistive previously as well as speeding gains and results on all cases. <br />
<br />
The pilot results are excellent, and show what sort of gains can be attained. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
As assisted by <br />
<br />
Senior C/S Int <br />
<br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1980 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
484 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 31 JANUARY 1980 <br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 51 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
AUDIT BTs CONCEPTUALLY <br />
<br />
(References: <br />
HCOB 26 Sep 78 I <br />
HCOB 12 Jan 80 <br />
HCOB 27 Oct 79 <br />
HCOB 17 Sep 78 I <br />
WORD CLEARING AND INFORMATION <br />
FOR PRE-OTS ON NED FOR OTs <br />
ACKNOWLEDGING THE “ME” ANSWER <br />
VALENCE TECHNIQUE ADDITION <br />
VALENCES.) <br />
<br />
(This HCOB adds to HCOB 26 Sep 78, Issue I, WORD CLEARING AND INFORMATION <br />
FOR PRE-OTs ON NED FOR OTs, and is to be used in the indoctrination of Pre-<br />
OTs on NED for OTs.) <br />
<br />
When a Pre-OT looks at a BT and gets too laggardly,the BT often turns on a picture. <br />
The NOTs Pre-OT could think this picture was the What. It never is. The What BT is <br />
simply making a picture. Answers come through as concepts, not pictures. <br />
<br />
The rule is: THE PRE-OT IGNORES THE PICTURE AND DOES THE ACTION <br />
IN CONCEPTS. <br />
<br />
In NOTs one is not dealing with pictures, one is dealing with the basic of pictures. <br />
Pictures are a red herring - wrong target. <br />
<br />
LRH:dm:kjm L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1980 FOUNDER <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 24 MAY 1980 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
ACS AUDITORS <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 52 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
URGENT -IMPORTANT <br />
<br />
NOTs WHAT/WHO L & N STEP <br />
<br />
(References: <br />
<br />
HCOB 27 Oct 79, NOTs Series 47, VALENCE TECHNIQUE ADDITION <br />
<br />
HCOB 12 Jan 80, NOTs Series 49, ACKNOWLEDGING THE ME ANSWER.) <br />
<br />
(This HCOB contains important revisions and ad<br />
<br />
<br />
ditional instructions regarding the NOTS What/ <br />
<br />
Who L & N Step, and modifies NOTs Series 47 and <br />
<br />
49. It does not otherwise cancel or change the rest <br />
of the NOTs Valence Technique, nor does it change <br />
the rest of the NOTs procedures or Rundown. This <br />
issue must be thoroughly word cleared and star-<br />
rated along with the referenced issues by NOTs <br />
auditors and C/Ses to qualify them to use the NOTs <br />
What/Who L & N Step.) <br />
THE RIGHT ITEM, ON THE WHAT L & N STEP <br />
<br />
In NOTs Series 47 and 49 it is stated that you take “the first reading item” (regardless of <br />
its read). In experience I have found this not always to be true. One can get some small falls on <br />
several items before the real item is hit. Sometimes it requires an ack to get an F/N, but the real <br />
item always F/Ns. <br />
<br />
(E-meter Note: If one were to use other than an operational Mark VI, one could be mislead <br />
by the meter. I have noticed that what is a small fall (sF) on an operational Mark VI, is a fall (F) <br />
on another meter. This is not good, as the auditor seeing a fall (F), could think he has the item, <br />
when it is really a small fall. The exaggerated read makes one think wrong items have read when <br />
these only gave a small fall. Also, the Mark V tends to just F/N, and gives on the problem of trying <br />
to read through an F/N. The Mark V is not sensitive enough. Thus it is essential that an <br />
operational Mark VI is used. The sizes of reads referred to here are at the correct Sensitivity <br />
setting of one third dial drop on can squeeze per EM-5R. <br />
<br />
486 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The Sensitivity must not be higher than this during the What/Who L & N Steps.) <br />
<br />
The statements in NOTs Series 47 and 49 under Step 3 (Acknowledgement) are correct and <br />
the only change here is in the statement that you take “the first reading item”, plus a clarification <br />
of size of read. <br />
<br />
The right What? L & N Step reads are a lot of small falls preceding the right item. THE <br />
REAL ITEM ALWAYS F/Ns (even if it sometimes requires an ack to get it to F/N). <br />
<br />
THE “WHO” STEP <br />
<br />
(Early in the NOTs Rundown, and sometimes later in the Rundown, the being blows easily. <br />
Often before all the Valence Technique steps have been done, frequently blowing on inspection. <br />
There is the phenomenon (described in earlier NOTs issues) of the cyclic aspect of handling more <br />
difficult-to-blow BTs and clusters, followed by a series of easy/rapid blows. Later in the <br />
Rundown, after the more available and easier-to-blow BTs and clusters have gone, those <br />
remaining tend to be in worse shape as beings. You are then more frequently going to encounter <br />
the following phenomenon.) <br />
<br />
The being seldom gets much of a read and seldom a blow on the first right answer to the <br />
Who? question. It gives an answer, the right answer (“Me”), in many cases and there’s no real <br />
read. What one does then is ack encouragingly and asks it to repeat the answer (“Me”). Thus <br />
encouraged, a BD F/N and blow on the repeated answer occurs. <br />
<br />
PIN-POINTING ATTENTION <br />
<br />
It is essential that the NOTs PreOT limits his/her attention to the BT/cluster being <br />
addressed. You can get a mish-mash if their attention goes onto something else. I have developed <br />
TR 8-Q (HCOB 22 Apr 80) which is an exercise in pin-pointing attention as well as asking a <br />
question. Requiring a NOTs PreOT to do TR 8-Q will remedy this. <br />
<br />
REPAIR LISTS FOR L & N <br />
<br />
There are two repair lists for L & N errors that are shorter than the L4BRA, and both of these <br />
can be used in NOTs. They are: HCOB 23 Sep 68 “Violation of the Laws of Listing and Nulling”, <br />
and HCOB 29 Sep 68 “List Correction” (Tech Vol XI, pages 44, 45), and either of these may be <br />
used, resorting to the longer L4BRA when necessary. The usual thing to do though would be to <br />
recognize what was wrong from the reads noted in W/Ss (or lack of F/N on the What? item), and <br />
handle accordingly and as given in earlier NOTs issues. <br />
<br />
FES-ING <br />
<br />
FESers and C/Ses must know the materials given in NOTs Series 47, 49 and this issue and <br />
must inspect worksheets to see whether correct (or wrong) items have been found, and whether <br />
the BT or cluster was blown. C/Ses must do this on every session, and FESers when they are <br />
looking for errors on a case. Any previous instances of failure to get the right item, or failure to <br />
handle a being to a blow can then be taken up in subsequent sessions and properly handled as <br />
described in this issue. If the BT/cluster is still around it will read when the PreOT’s attention <br />
is directed to that position (area) and oriented to the item given in that session. (Remember that <br />
it now may be Suppressed or Invalidated, and that the being probably has a Wrong Item and an <br />
Incomplete List.) If the error can be found and corrected immediately, do so (such as simply <br />
completing the list to correct item, and completing the steps on that being to blow), or, do one <br />
of the L & N Repair assessments to find what is wrong and then correct it and handle the being to blow. <br />
<br />
<br />
AUDITOR AND C/S QUALIFICATIONS <br />
<br />
<br />
The requirements for an auditor or C/S to use this NOTs L & N technique as given in NOTs <br />
Series 47 and 49 are very important and it is a High Crime to violate these. ONLY auditors and <br />
C/Ses who can L & N successfully may be permitted to use this technique, and then only after <br />
they have completed the stated requirements in NOTs 47, 49, the referenced materials and this <br />
issue. Until then, they may only use the other NOTs techniques, but not the L & N Step. <br />
<br />
PROGRAMMING THE WHAT/WHO L & N STEP <br />
<br />
Note that in NOTs Series 47, page 3, under “Warning” it is stated: “...it will be necessary <br />
to use this technique of listing for the item, at some point on any case being audited on NED for <br />
OTs,...”. PreOTs being started on NOTs should not be put onto this technique at the beginning <br />
of the NOTs Advance Program, nor until the PreOT is well advanced through the Program. The <br />
other NOTs techniques are fully adequate and very successful and most of the NOTs 26R <br />
Program can be done before resorting to the NOTs L & N technique. <br />
<br />
Only shift to the L & N procedure when the PreOT is well advanced through the Program <br />
and encounters the phenomenon described in NOTs 47, page 1. Early in the NOTs Program the <br />
case is fat with charge that will slough off easily and with the use of NOTs techniques other than <br />
the listing technique given in NOTs Series 47. On a case that has been prematurely started on <br />
the L & N Step, prefer to use the earlier NOTs techniques and do not overwork the L & N Step <br />
until the case is ready for it, (this doesn’t mean that one would stop the L & N technique altogether <br />
on such a case). <br />
<br />
When the case is ready for the NOTs What/Who L & N Step, and provided the auditor and <br />
C/S are qualified to run it, then the case is indoctrinated on the procedure and begun (per NOTs <br />
47, 49 and this issue). If all the NOTs auditors and C/Ses are not fully qualified, then the PreOT <br />
could be reassigned when ready for the L & N Step. <br />
<br />
In general most cases will follow the steps as laid out on NOTs 26R and 27, as this is the <br />
research/developmental sequence of NOTs and most cases will follow the same sequence and <br />
pattern and phenomena. <br />
<br />
NOTs trainees should also follow this same sequence and only train on the later techniques <br />
after they have had experience and wins on auditing the earlier NOTs Program steps with the <br />
earlier techniques. Those are very easy to do, very rewarding and will enable the new NOTs <br />
auditor to gain familiarity and confidence. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
as assisted by <br />
Senior C/S Int <br />
<br />
Accepted by the <br />
BOARD OF DIRECTORS <br />
of the <br />
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY <br />
OF CALIFORNIA <br />
<br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
488 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 14 FEBRUARY 1981 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 54 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
CLARIFICATION ON ACKNOWLEDGING IN THE <br />
<br />
VALENCE TECHNIQUE <br />
<br />
(Ref: NOTS Series 7, VALENCES) <br />
<br />
It is very important that you have the Pre-OT acknowledge the answer the BT or cluster <br />
gives to the “What are you?” question (see NOTs Series 7). Even if you got an F/N on the <br />
answer, you still acknowledge and you will broaden the F/N. <br />
<br />
We ask “Who are you?” to the same spot and we don’t feed them the answer. They <br />
sometimes comm lag, (don’t get impatient with the comm lag), sometimes it’s a few seconds <br />
comm lag, and then you get the answer. You may have to repeat the question (see NOTs Series <br />
7). The “Me” answer will normally LFBD, and if that LFBD isn’t very marked, you make sure <br />
you do the next step of acknowledging the “Me” answer. In any event you could still <br />
acknowledge, but if the LFBD was pronounced the probability is that he’s gone. The auditor <br />
having the Pre-OT acknowledge the “Me” answer can guarantee a blow. Now is this <br />
acknowledgement produces another read then we know it guaranteed a blow. Sometimes you <br />
get another LFBD on the acknowledgement step, and sometimes you get a broadening of the <br />
F/N. <br />
<br />
CAUTIONS <br />
<br />
Sometimes, quite often in fact, this short-circuits. You ask: “What are you?” and the guy <br />
says “Me” and blows. And sometimes you are patiently trying to go through all these steps and <br />
you get a series of blows. A blow or a series of blows can occur at any ime during NOTs. You <br />
don’t then continue the steps of this Technique, as that BT or cluster has gone! Sometimes a <br />
series of blows or an automatic blow will go into a Persistant F/N or a Floating Tone Arm and <br />
in either instance you would end off the session. <br />
<br />
Also you can get repetitive blows if a case is running pretty clean, and you can get blows <br />
withou BDs. There isn’t much left on the charge and it isn’t registering on the meter to amount <br />
to anything. <br />
<br />
<br />
On “Hello and OK” you sometimes get a blow. The BT or cluster doesn’t answer up and <br />
run “Hellos and OKs” repetitively to get it into comm. Rarely, it will suddenly blow, and it <br />
would then be senseless to go on trying to run “Hello and OK”, or anything else, as that one has <br />
gone. <br />
<br />
Some auditors have been known to ask a pc if it blew, during the Valence Technique steps. <br />
Even nag the Pre-OT, “Did it blow?”, “Has it gone?”, “Still around?”. This could be due to the <br />
auditor’s unfamiliarity with his meter, and not recognizing a blow when he sees it occur on the <br />
meter. Or, possibly some may have confused another technique, Date/Locate, with this <br />
technique. You of course always Date to blow, and Locate to blow, and the auditor could get <br />
the idea that he should carry over Date/Locate technique into Valence Technique. <br />
<br />
It is very poor practice to ask the Pre-OT if it blew during NOTs Valence Technique. You <br />
could cause the BT or cluster to submerge or be suppressed, or you could invalidate a blow that <br />
did occur. <br />
<br />
This doesn’t mean that you can’t ever ask if it blew. You could ask if it is “still around?” <br />
and a read would confirm that it is. But this type of question is asking for a missingness. It is <br />
no longer there. There’s a large percentage of pcs that never see the blow, and it isn’t something <br />
to see, because it’s a missingness. This type of question can be difficult for the Pre-OT to <br />
answer, as there is now nothing there for him to perceive as it has gone. If the meter BD’d and <br />
F/Ned on the “Me” step, it would be idiocy to then ask if it blew, of course it did! But if your <br />
meter didn’t tell you it blew, you could be in a quandary and have to solve that problem. But <br />
you wouldn’t interrupt the Valence Technique to ask if it blew, and you wouldn’t get into <br />
nagging the Pre-OT. You just follow on through with your steps, and particularly if you had <br />
the Pre-OT ack the “Me” answer, then you got your blow alright. So this concern about whether <br />
the BT blew is misplaced.<br />
<br />
These points are stated so that the auditor will understand what he is doing, why he is <br />
doing it, and what manifestations he can expect to occur, because these manifestations will <br />
occur. This technique is a very positive series of steps, and they go in that sequence. If these <br />
steps are done as given, you will get the result, and if departed from or if there is an error, you <br />
can definitely expect to get that manifestation too, i.e. too broad an attention span and you will <br />
get restim. <br />
<br />
It is necessary that the auditor and C/S understand these points as this is not a technique <br />
that can be done rotely or robotically. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
Assisted by <br />
Snr C/S Int Assistant <br />
<br />
Accepted by the <br />
BOARD OF DIRECTORS <br />
of the <br />
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY <br />
OF CALIFORNIA <br />
<br />
BDCS:LRH:MM:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1981 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
490 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 15 JANUARY 1982 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Courses <br />
Specialist <br />
Checksheet <br />
<br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 55 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
VARYING THE AREAS <br />
<br />
Session by session and item by item, when spotting something to list, it is best to work a <br />
different area than the last item. <br />
<br />
This is true when there still seem to be more in the last area worked. <br />
<br />
Example: one session, top of head; next session, even though head is slightly massy <br />
although one has blown, work, let’s say, an area in the back where one is spotted. Then, that listed, <br />
handled and blown, one can go back to the head. <br />
<br />
The operating rule that seems best is not to work the same area twice in succession. <br />
<br />
One also must be sure to work behind as well as in front and from different angles from <br />
in front and behind. By continuing to work from the front only, on and on, builds up an imbalance <br />
that can increase duress. <br />
<br />
One also must remember to not always work close in: from time to time check out areas <br />
that are as much as many feet from the body. <br />
<br />
When one has worked one, two or three areas, one is likely to get a persistent F/N, very <br />
wide, and that is the time to lay off for now, end session and begin again later - in a few hours <br />
or next day. If you keep plugging on after a good win, you are actually overrunning a persistent <br />
F/N and it clears up by simply indicating that. <br />
<br />
Forcing forward past a good win can give you a temporary pack up; so you actually make <br />
less progress than you would have if you short-sessioned as you are supposed to. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:rdk <br />
Copyright (c) 1980 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
ADVANCED NOTs PROCEDURE <br />
<br />
This is a debrief of a revision to the Church of Scientology’s NOTs procedure which <br />
was released in 1985. I have not been able to evaluate the correctness of the procedure as <br />
I have not received any other debriefs at this time. I provide it for purposes of historical <br />
interest. <br />
<br />
1. <br />
To locate the next being to run ask: “Where is the next being?” <br />
You will get a read ( sf, F, LF, LFBD ) and you should get a telepathic “Here!” <br />
If there is NO read ask: <br />
HIDING? <br />
HOLDING ON? <br />
ATTACKING? <br />
AFRAID? <br />
<br />
One of these should read. <br />
<br />
2. <br />
Locate WHERE. <br />
3. <br />
Ask “What are you?” <br />
List to a F, LF, LFBD by asking: “Is there another answer from the same spot?” <br />
Acknowledge answer. <br />
4. <br />
Then say: “When I ask you the question - ‘Who are you?’, what are you going to <br />
say?” <br />
The being may say “George Washington” <br />
Then you say: “That was ONE identity you had. Who are you REALLY?” <br />
If the being says “A blood clot”, you say: “Well that’s a FALSE identity - Who are <br />
you REALLY?” <br />
<br />
<br />
5. <br />
When the being replies “ME” you say: “ME is correct.” <br />
Then you say: “Now when I give you the question again, you give me the same <br />
answer and leave.” <br />
“WHO ARE YOU?” <br />
If he doesn’t go, ask him if he has a problem and handle until he blows. <br />
<br />
<br />
492 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 4 JULY 1979 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
NED for OTs <br />
Auditors <br />
AO Review Auditors,<br />
<br />
OT III <br />
ACS Checksheet <br />
Class XII <br />
<br />
C O N F I D E N T I A L <br />
<br />
HANDLING CORRECTION LISTS ON OTs <br />
<br />
When you get a read on a correction list on an individual who is on OT III or above, <br />
you should find out from what area it is reading; i.e. find the postition in relation to the <br />
body, of the BT or cluster on whom that correction list question read. <br />
<br />
Otherwise, the reading correction list line gets assigned to all areas, when it only <br />
applied to one. This creates BPC as it gives the rest a wrong item or wrong indication, <br />
and it makes the reading queston appear to be a generality, when in fact it only applied <br />
to one BT or cluster. <br />
<br />
By finding the BT or cluster that the read applied to, the auditor then clears the read <br />
on that BT or cluster. And then the auditor takes any additional steps to get it to blow and <br />
blows it. <br />
<br />
The above does not apply to cases below OT III and must never be mentioned to such <br />
a case. <br />
<br />
There is a tendency of an auditor trained on general correction lists to simply clear <br />
the read without finding where it is coming from, and as this omission can jam up a case <br />
who is on OT III or on NOTs; such auditors when doing NOTs or actions on individuals <br />
OT III or above must learn to handle correction lists in this way. It can mean the difference <br />
between failure and success. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:DM:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1979 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 11 JANUARY 1980 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
OT III & above only <br />
NED for OTs Auditors <br />
AO Review Auditors <br />
ACS Checksheet <br />
Class XII <br />
OT III Cramming<br />
<br />
Officers <br />
OT III C/Ses <br />
<br />
Qual Corrective Actions on OTs Series 3 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
QUAL CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ON OTs<br />
<br />
(Ref: C/S Series 107 AUDITOR ASSIGNMENT POLICIES, <br />
CRAMMING ASSIGNMENT POLICIES <br />
HCOB 22 Dec 79 FLYING RUDS AT OT III AND ABOVE) <br />
<br />
<br />
The reason why it is necessary to have OT versions of the various Qual corrective <br />
actions is that an OT’s case can be messed up if mis-audited or mis-crammed, and the purpose <br />
of Qual corrective actions is to improve or correct the staff member. <br />
<br />
The major cause of trouble in seeking to correct OTs has been violations of the auditor <br />
assignment policy, whereby a person of lower case level than the OT was trying to audit or <br />
cram the OT. Not only does this put the OT on a withhold of confidential data, but a person <br />
of lower case level has no reality on the materials of the case level of the OT and can easily <br />
stir up aspects of the case that should have been left alone, or, if taken up handled fully. <br />
Additionally if the OT did get messed up, then he could only be repaired by using Repair <br />
actions appropriate to his case level. A non-OT III Cramming Officer or auditor could not <br />
possibly repair BPC on an OT III. <br />
<br />
Where Cramming Officers have limited their actions to simply word clearing the <br />
materials that the person had gone past misunderstoods on, it has worked out OK. But if the <br />
action being done led into the person’s case then there is a liability of messed up case and <br />
ineffective staff member. <br />
<br />
Some of the Qual corrective actions such as False Data Stripping and some of the <br />
questions on the Product Debug Checklist are not directed toward the person’s post alone but <br />
are directed towards the person’s case by asking about intentions or reactions or considerations <br />
or directing the person to recall past events. The statement: “I’m not auditing you.”, <br />
doesn’t prevent a case action from occurring if one then proceeds to ask auditing questions. <br />
<br />
494 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The worst repercussions of all have stemmed from offline case actions done as some <br />
sort of squirrelly “2WC” which wasn’t a valid part of the cramming action anyway. <br />
<br />
When subjective questions are asked one invariably is into a case action. Definition of <br />
“Subjective”: “Consultation with the preclear’s own universe, with his mock ups, and with <br />
his own thoughts and considerations.” (Book THE CREATION OF HUMAN ABILITY, p. <br />
167.) “Recall, think, remember or return on the time track processes are subjective.” (HCOB <br />
2 Nov 57RA.) <br />
<br />
Subjective actions, especially when metered, lead into the person’s case. If mis-done, <br />
particularly if mis-metered, these can ball the case up. <br />
<br />
OTs when correctly handled with the corrrect tech appropriate to their case level, <br />
handle very quickly and easily. So it is important to know what to do and what not to do. <br />
<br />
The solution to this is in having specialized lists for OTs, and forbidding the use of non-<br />
OT actions on OTs, and forbidding non-OTs from seeking to audit or cram OTs. <br />
<br />
REPAIR OF OTs MESSED UP IN CRAMMING <br />
The most frequent cause of BPC encountered is: <br />
<br />
<br />
(a) <br />
Misownership, <br />
(b) <br />
Mismetering (false reads, missed reads and missed F/Ns), <br />
(c) <br />
Invalidation of state of case. <br />
There are two types of action which are most likely to lead into an OT’s case and cause <br />
BPC: <br />
<br />
(i) <br />
Asking subjective questions, <br />
(ii) <br />
Asking “earlier similar?” (which sends the Pre-OT down the track, or down different <br />
tracks.) <br />
There are ways to detect and isolate what happened in a mis-done cramming: <br />
-The person crammed has “any” BIs about the cramming action; <br />
-The person continues to goof in the same area or subject; <br />
-The person Reg Tags on the cramming or within three days after the cramming action; <br />
-The person gets sick, misemotional on the subject of the cram, or turns on somatics, <br />
within three days after the cramming action; <br />
-The person is introverted on the subject of the cram; <br />
- <br />
The person comes to next session after the cram with TA or needle behavior worsened <br />
from what it was prior to the cram, (such as TA used to be in normal range and now is <br />
high or low, or Sens setting for 1/3rd dial drop on can squeeze is now higher due to <br />
tighter needle, an unusual needle patern has now appeared, etc.). <br />
<br />
<br />
A sharp C/S can usually spot a mis-done cram from the worksheets of the cramming <br />
action and must insist that these are legible and accurate (ref: HCOB C/S Series 98 <br />
AUDITING FOLDERS, OMISSIONS IN COMPLETENESS). <br />
<br />
When encountering any of the above, the C/S should make up a prepared assessment <br />
to cover points of possible error in the cramming action. Here is a sample assessment which <br />
can be used or added to: <br />
<br />
1. <br />
R Factor: “I’m going to assess a list of possible <br />
errors which may have occurred in the <br />
(cramming action), to locate any BPC.” <br />
2. Assess: <br />
“Was there any misownership of charge?” <br />
<br />
“Were significances or reads misowned?” <br />
<br />
“Was there any mismetering?” <br />
<br />
“Was a false read taken up?” <br />
<br />
“Was there any cleaned clean?” <br />
<br />
“Was a read missed?” <br />
<br />
“Was an F/N missed?” <br />
<br />
“Was there any invalidation of state of case?” <br />
<br />
“Were subjective questions asked?” <br />
<br />
“Were earlier similars asked for when these did not exist?” <br />
<br />
“Were there any out-ruds?” <br />
<br />
“Was there no help?” <br />
<br />
(The above is a sample assessment which contains the most common items you are <br />
likely to find on mis-done cramming actions, especially on OTs, and the assessment above <br />
is designed for use on cases who are OT III or above only as it contains “misownership”, but <br />
a similar prepared assessment could be made up for a lower level case.) <br />
<br />
3. Handle reads on the above assessment in accordance with HCOB 4 July 79 HANDLING <br />
CORRECTION LISTS ON OTs and HCOB 22 Dec 79 FLYING RUDS AT OT III <br />
AND ABOVE. This action alone may completely handle all the BPC, sometimes very rapidly <br />
and spectacularly. <br />
4. If not fully handled with the above, assess and handle the appropriate correction list for <br />
the action that was messed up (i.e. WCCL - Word Clearing Correction List, for messed up <br />
word clearing, or L4BRA, etc.), handling the reads in accordance with HCOB 4 Jul 79 <br />
HANDLING CORRECTION LISTS ON OTs and HCOB 22 Dec 79 FLYING RUDS AT OT <br />
III Repair List (or if the person has been audited on NOTs, a NOTs Repair List). <br />
496 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ACTIONS THAT CAN BE DONE <br />
<br />
<br />
There are actions that are OK to do in Cramming and will not get into the person’s case. <br />
These relate to his post or study and are objective. <br />
<br />
Definition of “Objective”: “Of or having to do with a material object as distinguished <br />
from a mental concept, idea or belief” (Dictionary). “Means here and now objects in PT as <br />
opposed to ‘subjective’.” (HCOB 2 Nov 57RA.) <br />
<br />
Questions or actions by the Cramming Officer which are objective and pertain to the <br />
person’s post, the materials which cover his post, the materials he is studying, clearing words <br />
misunderstood, hatting actions and post or product debugs (provided subjective questions are <br />
not asked on OTs) are all OK. <br />
<br />
The most usual and successful cramming action is simply to take the materials or text <br />
that covers the subject of the cramming order and word clear and cram those materials. This <br />
is always safe and OK to do. (The only other caution is not to give verbal data, nor to evaluate <br />
or invalidate or throw the person’s ruds out while doing the cram!) <br />
<br />
Word Clearing Methods 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 are OK to do on OTs (but not Method <br />
One, which asks for “earlier similar?”). <br />
<br />
Finding and clearing Crashing Misunderstood Wrods is OK. <br />
<br />
Demonstrating meanings or words and terms and principles either with a demo kit or <br />
on Clay Table are OK. <br />
<br />
Starrate checkouts on materials are OK. <br />
<br />
Product Debug Tech is OK to do on OTs (provided the subjective questions on the <br />
assessments are omitted). <br />
<br />
All of the actions given in this section can and should be used in Cramming, and these <br />
have no liability. <br />
<br />
OTs when handled correctly in Cramming (or in auditing) are very fast and easy to <br />
handle, and correct very readily. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
As assisted by <br />
Snr C/S Int <br />
<br />
Accepted by the <br />
BOARD OF DIRECTORS <br />
of the <br />
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY <br />
OF CALIFORNIA <br />
<br />
LRH:DM:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1980 <br />
By L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 NOVEMBER 1981 <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
OT III & above<br />
<br />
ONLY <br />
AO C/Ses <br />
AO Solo C/Ses <br />
NOTs C/Ses <br />
AO Review<br />
<br />
Auditors <br />
<br />
C O N F I D E N T I A L <br />
<br />
OT III AND OT III ATTEST <br />
<br />
This issue changes the current handling of OT III and OT III attests and the next step <br />
after OT III. We want to end off “endless IIIs”. Starting now, AO C/Ses are to handle <br />
PreOTs on OT III as follows. <br />
<br />
Let the person audit on OT III as long as he wishes. But at the first slackening or <br />
abandonment or EP or if he is just going on and on into“endless III”, look for a nice win <br />
and tell him that’s it and shunt him over to Audited NOTs. <br />
<br />
An AO Review may be necessary before sending the person to attest. On an“endless <br />
III”or some of these people who have been incomplete on OT III or who have been on and <br />
off OT III for a long time, a Review would be necessary. The Review could be as short <br />
as an LDN OT III and Rehab their best win on OT III or as long as a C/S 53 to F/Ning list <br />
followed by an LDN OT III and then Rehab their best win on OT III. On some you might <br />
only need to find a nice win they had on OT III and indicate that that was it, or get it <br />
rehabbed in session (this would mainly apply to persons currently on OT III). <br />
<br />
Some of this termination of III would depend on auditor availability for Audited <br />
NOTs , but if this is a situation the solution is to train up more NOTs auditors. <br />
<br />
The whole intention here is to take PreOTs who have“completed”OT III per the <br />
above qualification and shunt them over to Audited NOTs. <br />
<br />
Let’s start making OTs in VOLUME. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1981 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
498Anonymous Suppressive Personhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05339702348371749925noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1663917819324239.post-7914538757130132482011-09-20T03:58:00.000-04:002011-09-20T10:38:18.637-04:00Operating Thetan (OT) Levels [Part 3]500 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ORIGINAL <br />
OT 7 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
502 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
OT VII <br />
<br />
The purpose of OT VII is the rehabilitation of ability to project intention. <br />
The Pre OT should be set up for this rundown with all ruds flown or GF to F/N. <br />
<br />
I. Basic Processes Setup <br />
OT7 -1 <br />
What are you willing to cause? <br />
What are you willing to be the effect of? <br />
Run alternately <br />
OT7 -2 <br />
Decide something. <br />
Repeat to Cog, F/N, VGIs. <br />
OT7 -3 <br />
Clear intention. (Very thoroughly) Have client use word in at least six sentences. (if <br />
<br />
needed) <br />
OT7 -4 <br />
<br />
1. What is a clear intention <br />
2. Give me an example <br />
3. What isn’t a clear intention <br />
4. Give me an example. <br />
OT7 -5 <br />
2W/C — the subject of intention. <br />
OT7 -6 <br />
Recall an intention. <br />
OT7 -7 <br />
Invent (mockup) some intentions. <br />
OT7 -8 <br />
F-1. Tell me a thought/intention you would be willing to receive from another. <br />
F-2. Tell me a thought/intention another would be willing to receive from you. <br />
F-3. Tell me a thought/intention others would be willing to receive from others. <br />
F-0. Tell me a thought/intention you’d be willing to receive from yourself. <br />
<br />
<br />
OT7 -9 <br />
F-1. What intention of yours has another helped? <br />
What intention of yours has another not helped? <br />
F-2. What intention of another’s have you helped? <br />
What intention of another’s have you not helped? <br />
F-3. What intention of another’s have others helped? <br />
What intention of another’s have others not helped? <br />
F-0. What intention of yours have you helped? <br />
<br />
What intention of yours have you not helped? <br />
OT7 -10 <br />
F-1. What intention of another’s could you confront? <br />
<br />
What intention of another’s would you rather not confront? <br />
F-2. What intention of yours could another confront? <br />
What intention of yours would another rather not confront? <br />
F-3. What intention of another’s could others confront? <br />
What intention of another’s would others rather not confront? <br />
F-0. What intention of yours could you confront? <br />
<br />
What intention of yours would you rather not confront? <br />
OT7 -11 <br />
F-1. What intention of yours could another be responsible for? <br />
F-2. What intention of another’s could you be responsible for? <br />
F-3. What intention of another’s could others be responsible for? <br />
F-0. What intention of yours could you be responsible for? <br />
OT7 -13 <br />
Give me an unknown datum. <br />
OT7 -14 <br />
Tell me some orders you wouldn’t mind receiving. <br />
<br />
Tell me something that would obey you. <br />
OT7 -15 <br />
Get the idea I can place an intention. <br />
<br />
<br />
Get the idea I cannot place an intention. <br />
<br />
<br />
504 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
II. L&N Intention Process <br />
OT 7-16 <br />
<br />
Has an intention been — <br />
Suppressed <br />
Invalidated <br />
Blunted <br />
Abandoned <br />
Denied <br />
Enforced <br />
Desired <br />
Decided <br />
Forgotten <br />
Hidden <br />
Avoided <br />
Altered <br />
Twisted <br />
Changed <br />
Compteted <br />
Made Wrong <br />
<br />
On biggest reading item L & N — <br />
What intention has been ____________ ? <br />
R-3-R Quad if evil intention. <br />
<br />
<br />
III. Placing thoughts and intentions (inside auditing room) <br />
OT 7 -17 <br />
<br />
A. <br />
Spot an object <br />
B. <br />
Locate an object from which you are separate <br />
Locate an object which is separate from you. <br />
OT 7 -18 <br />
<br />
Think a thought. <br />
Place that thought in/on that. (indicated object) <br />
Get that (indicated object) thinking that thought. <br />
Have that (indicated object) continue thinking that thought. <br />
Have that (indicated object) cease thinking that thought. <br />
<br />
<br />
OT 7 -19 <br />
<br />
<br />
Clear intention. <br />
Mock up (invent) an intention. <br />
Get the idea of placing (or place) that intention in that (indicated object). <br />
<br />
<br />
OT 7 -20 <br />
<br />
<br />
From (indicated point) make a choice between (indicated positions or objects). <br />
<br />
OT 7 -21 <br />
<br />
Putting the decision on (in) that (indicated object) make a decision about it. <br />
<br />
OT 7 -22 <br />
<br />
Decide something. <br />
<br />
<br />
IV. Outside Processes with an Auditor (objects). <br />
OT7 -23 <br />
Spot an object. <br />
OT7 -24 <br />
Locate an object from which you are separate. <br />
<br />
<br />
Locate an object which is separate from you. <br />
OT7 -25 <br />
Think a thought in (on) that (object or position) <br />
<br />
<br />
or <br />
<br />
Do you see that (object)? <br />
<br />
Think a thought in (on) it. <br />
<br />
Did the thought appear where it is? <br />
<br />
OT7 -26 <br />
<br />
From (indicated point) make a choice between (indicated positions or objects) <br />
<br />
506 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
V. Outside Processes with an Auditor (people) <br />
OT7 -28 <br />
Spot an acceptable energy source. <br />
OT7 -29 <br />
Spot a person. <br />
OT7 -30 <br />
Locate a person from whom you are separate. <br />
<br />
<br />
Locate a person who is separate from you. <br />
OT7 -31 <br />
Point out a difference between that persons body and yours. <br />
OT7 -32 <br />
Tell me something you really know about that person. <br />
<br />
<br />
What would you permit that person to know about you? <br />
OT7 -33 <br />
Postulate perfection into that person. <br />
<br />
<br />
Now postulate perfection into that one. <br />
OT7 -34 <br />
Tell me something you wouldn’t mind not-knowing about that person. <br />
<br />
<br />
Tell me something you wouldn’t mind that person not-knowing about you. <br />
OT7 -35 <br />
Think a Thought in (on) that person <br />
<br />
<br />
or <br />
<br />
Do you see that person? <br />
Think a thought in (on) him/her. <br />
Did the thought appear where it is? <br />
<br />
<br />
OT7 -36 <br />
From that person make a choice between (indicated positions or objects). <br />
OT7 -37 <br />
Putting the decision on (in) that person, make a decision about him/her. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
OT 7 Solo Section <br />
<br />
VI. Inside Processes Solo <br />
(on the meter) <br />
OT7 -39 <br />
Spot an object. <br />
OT7 -40 <br />
Mock-up a confusion. Unmock it. <br />
or <br />
What confusion could you create? <br />
OT7 -41 <br />
Mock-up a communication terminal. <br />
Mock-up another communication terminal. <br />
Dispose of these mock-ups <br />
<br />
<br />
OT7 -42 <br />
What wouldn’t you mind communicating with. <br />
OT7 -43 <br />
Mock-up your (father, wife, mother, husband). <br />
<br />
<br />
Mock him (her) up again. <br />
Dispose of these mock-ups. <br />
<br />
<br />
OT7 -44 <br />
Now could you appreciate another as a human being. <br />
Now could another appreciate you as a human being. <br />
Now could you appreciate yourself as a human being. <br />
Now could another appreciate themselves as a human being. <br />
Now could another appreciate another as a human being. <br />
<br />
<br />
OT7 -45 <br />
Find and run a havingness process on yourself. <br />
<br />
<br />
508 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
VIII. Outside Processes Solo <br />
(off the meter) <br />
OT7 -46 <br />
<br />
Spot a person <br />
or <br />
Spot a thetan. <br />
<br />
<br />
OT7 -47 <br />
<br />
1. Go to a place with lots of people <br />
2. Spot them one at a time <br />
3. As you spot each person, do the following: <br />
A. Perceive the individual as a Life Source (Thetan). <br />
B. Know something about that person. <br />
C. Be willing to not-know something about that person. <br />
D. Grant beingness to that person (by cognizing the way they are). <br />
E. Having that person grant beingness to you. <br />
OT 7-48 <br />
<br />
1. <br />
Find some plants, trees, etc., and communicate to them individually until you <br />
know they received your communication. <br />
2. <br />
Go to a zoo or a place with many types of life and communicate with each of <br />
them untit you know the communication is received and, if possible, returned. <br />
OT7 -49 <br />
<br />
Go out to a park, train station or other busy area. Practice placing an intentfon into <br />
individuals until you can successfully and easily place an intention into or on a being <br />
and/or a body. <br />
<br />
ATTEST TO OT 7 <br />
<br />
<br />
510 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
NEW <br />
OT 7 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
512 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
INSTRUCTIONS <br />
<br />
<br />
The Pre-OT now works solo on cleaning up the body of BT/cluster masses, one area <br />
at a time, until each is clean and transparent to his perception. Each of the various <br />
techniques given in the materials are used as needed to blow these BT/cluster masses. <br />
<br />
You may in some instances have to have the Pre-OT handle BTs Dianetically <br />
running them back through a chain of incidents. This can be complex with 3 or 4 BTs and <br />
chains crossed. <br />
<br />
It is very dicey to run engrams on BTs as, although they may have one mutual one, <br />
each one has an earlier chain for it that is different than that of the others in the cluster, <br />
so you limit the action to the mutual incident they have in common. Scn Grades O-IV can <br />
be run on a BT but this would not be usual as the BTs we’re dealing with in NED for OTs <br />
are below that. <br />
<br />
When the Pre-OT has a transparent body and a clear area around it to some distance <br />
(barring perception of other people’s difficulties) and when he realized he is alive and <br />
very much himself the EP of NED for OTs has been reached. <br />
<br />
When this EP is reached then one will have achieved “CAUSE OVER LIFE”. <br />
<br />
<br />
514 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ORIGINAL <br />
OT 8 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
516 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 OCTOBER 1969 <br />
<br />
<br />
OT VIII <br />
<br />
<br />
SECRET <br />
<br />
WHY THETANS MOCK UP <br />
<br />
This question has been the most plaguing one in Dianetics and Scientology. <br />
<br />
This question has been the most plaguing one in history of Clearing. <br />
<br />
The ONLY way a thetan ever gets into trouble, the ONLY way he can get trapped or <br />
become part of a cluster is by mocking up and making pictures of bad experiences. <br />
<br />
And why record all bad experiences? This too is not good sense. <br />
<br />
One can explain it by saying that thetans become bored and have “a yearning for event or <br />
excitement” or that thetans mock up pictures as an aberrated form of “havingness.” Other ways <br />
can be invented to explain why thetans compulsively mock up bad pictures, but these do not <br />
factually lead to a total solution to the compulsion. <br />
<br />
The real reason stems from a basic characteristic of thetans and that is “a thetan never <br />
totally gives up.” <br />
<br />
There is, seemingly, a streak of resistance or resentment that makes a thetan wish to persist <br />
in the same place or location. If he cannot, he will do so covertly. <br />
<br />
The definition of “power” is “the ability to hold a position in space.” All power comes from <br />
the ability to occupy a point. In an electrical generator the base that separates two terminals must <br />
be firm or there will be no exchange of energy or power generated. <br />
<br />
The effort to weaken a thetan is to make him relinquish his point in space. Covertly or <br />
overtly a thetan seeks to assert his position in space. If he cannot do so overtly, he does so covertly <br />
or mentally. <br />
<br />
When a thetan is moved unwillingly from a point or position he even then refuses to give <br />
up that point and begins MOCKS IT UP mentally. He also mocks up the events of his departure <br />
as a part of the action of mocking up the point he is leaving. This, unwittingly, gives him a picture, <br />
an engram. <br />
<br />
Now let us see if this theory holds true in practice. <br />
<br />
A. Just ahead of any engram there must be an effort to retain a position and there must <br />
be a point or location thetan mocked up. <br />
This is true. You can blow an engram without running it by spotting its first point <br />
in space and time. In a secondary, “where did you first hear of the loss?” is a vital question. <br />
<br />
B. In a contact assist getting a person to touch again the point where he was hurt with <br />
what was hurt will blow the engram. <br />
C. Getting a person to locate areas (locations) that are not safe produce blows of <br />
engrams without running them. <br />
<br />
D. Exact and accurate dating sometimes blows an engram. Those times when it does <br />
not, it should blow when the location is exactly spotted. <br />
E. Implants and traps were done mainly to keep Thetans out of an area. The Thetan, <br />
resenting and resisting, mocks up the place anyway and so implants himself. <br />
A thetan too easily substitutes a mental mock up for a point in the real universe. <br />
One could also say that a thetan, by mocking up, warns himself against certain points in <br />
space or areas in the physical universe. <br />
Anxiety is solely not thetan able to be certain places and not thetan able to be where one <br />
is, either. <br />
Making people leave is the most unpopular action unless one also frees them to be <br />
anywhere. <br />
Transferring people is a degrading thing to do to them. <br />
Jail denies a thetan all spaces except where he has been placed; note that thetans are made <br />
very miserable in jail. Jailing is a sure way to make confirmed criminals and also to make them <br />
crazy as well. <br />
<br />
Any thetan, stuck in an engram, is asserting the effort to be at and hold the point where he <br />
was hit at the beginning of that engram. <br />
An engram therefore is a refusal to leave a place at which force was exerted to drive one <br />
away. <br />
Reversely, one can refuse to be held at a place where one does not wish to be but this is a <br />
negation of a place, a not-is of it and its time. <br />
Power of choice over where one is and where one is not is thus a key to engrams. <br />
Finally - a thetan mocks up because he covertly refuses to abandon a location under duress <br />
and not-ises the place where he does not wish to be but must. <br />
Using these facts one can blow engrams without running them. <br />
Some sample questions: <br />
“What point (location) is unsafe?” <br />
“What location could you have held absolutely?” <br />
“Where did you first get an intimation of danger?” <br />
“What place would you rather not be in?” <br />
“What effort would it take to hold (that) (a) location?” <br />
Working with this you will see a door open to a higher level than Dianetic R3R. But realize <br />
that it is only for a high level thetan. <br />
<br />
LRH: rs L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Copyright (c) 1969 FOUNDER <br />
By L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
518 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
520 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
NEW <br />
OT 8 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
522 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
NEW OT VIII <br />
<br />
STUDY AND PROCEDURE<br />
<br />
DEBRIEF <br />
<br />
1991 <br />
<br />
From recall this is a record of the full OT VIII procedure of the Church of <br />
Scientology given on the Free Winds ship as delivered in 1991. Security there is very tight <br />
with detectors at the doors so that no original data can be removed. This debrief is <br />
something the Independent Field/Free Zone Scientology has been waiting many years to <br />
see. It is not the original nor is it a perfect record but it is accurate and will get the result <br />
if followed by a competent solo auditor who is flat on all earlier levels with all overts off. <br />
The wording of the processes are exact to the best of my recall and the procedures are exact <br />
for sure. Any differences are extremely minor (if at all). I spent several weeks reconstructing <br />
all this from memory (needless to say I have an excellent memory as a result of the <br />
rundown). I am breaking security as I disagree that this should only be released to an elite <br />
in Scientology. I do, however, ask it not be released to psyches or “squirrels” or anyone <br />
who will break the Independent Security Network and allow it to get back to the Church <br />
of Scientology. It would be best if they do not find out that we have it. Please treat this <br />
data responsibly. It is the key to the only truth possible. <br />
<br />
The whole secret involves what truly is the relationship of the Supreme Being to <br />
each individual thetan. To simply say it’s “me” is oversimplified to tears but has some <br />
truth to it. The real key is the perception and ability to have full certainty and, therefore, <br />
perception on all confusions and distortions of MEST and form and life units as well as <br />
the ability to perceive exact identity and its full relationship to its true source and history <br />
from its origin as the theta body, the true 8th Dynamic In order to truly view this as a <br />
present time beingness one has to clean up, once and for all, his own confusions regarding <br />
these points. The key is being flat on all earlier levels and being honest with self as to the <br />
truth on each step of the rundown. <br />
<br />
In doing this procedure one has to acknowledge the lie of time and persistance and <br />
the lie of the illusion that MEST is solid and unchangable. Another key given is the fact <br />
that a being can exist independent of time and present time and can choose any point on <br />
the track as his present time. The PT body can confuse this, as attention to some degree <br />
is always hung up on the PT body. This fixes the thetan into one present time and one time <br />
stream when in fact there are many as you will discover. <br />
<br />
Do not attempt this rundown if you are incomplete on any earlier level, incomplete <br />
on or in need of “sec checks,” involved in any out ethics, PTS or involved in any pressing <br />
PT situations that call your attention back to this present time. If you are in need of review <br />
on any point above, get it before starting the rundown or it will miss and be meaningless <br />
or wasted. <br />
<br />
If your attention is in any way governed by OT 7 (NOTS) or earlier materials on OT <br />
levels, this rundown will miss and be wasted. This also goes for out int. If int/ext is a <br />
concern at all, get reviewed and flattened on OT 1 to 7 before attempting this rundown. <br />
<br />
The techniques involve simple spotting techniques as in R2 processes or straightwire <br />
references. <br />
<br />
<br />
Step One: Read and word clear Handbook for Preclears cover to cover. <br />
Step Two: Do all steps and exercises in the above book and note reads on any <br />
terminals or items [presumably these are used in review or higher levels <br />
later]. Keep the ruds in. <br />
Step Three: Listen to the History of Man tapes and star rate M4 the concepts in them <br />
(The Time Track of Theta). <br />
Step Four: Clear the definition of “truth” and clay demo it [Tech Dictionary]. <br />
Step Five: Clay demo the concept of the theta line branching out toward PT from the <br />
“theta body” and how this inhibits exteriorization, ability, power and <br />
perception of truth. Clay demo what will happen if someone did OT VIII <br />
procedure who was not fully completed on OT VII (NOTS). Sort this out <br />
from the above data. <br />
Step Six: Define “know-point” in the Tech Dictionary. <br />
Step Seven: Study the early Dianetic Auditor Bulletin on straightwire in Tech Volume <br />
One. Study Creation of Human Ability references regarding spotting <br />
objectively and subjectively. Demo “recall,” “spotting” and “return” and <br />
how these differ. <br />
Step Eight: This is the processing section which is done solo. Do not fall into running <br />
pictures or incidents. In others words, do not use “recall” or “return,” use <br />
“spot” only. <br />
[1] Fly the ruds. <br />
[2] Clear and false data strip “truth,” “identity,” “time,” “place,” “form” and <br />
“event,” each to EP. Restudy the definitions in the Tech Dictionary. <br />
[3] Clear and False Data Strip the “8th Dynamic,” “God,” “Infinity,” “self,” <br />
anyone you have identified as a god and any other wording you may have <br />
for the 8th dynamic. <br />
[4] Valence split (Similarity/Difference process) each answer on the reading <br />
questions below by alternately spotting differences and similarities between <br />
self and the terminal to a blow accompanied by a small blowdown <br />
F/N or larger. <br />
[A] Spot a person or object in this L/T or on the backtrack you have identified <br />
as or who represented the 8th Dynamic to you. Valence split to EP and then <br />
recheck to an F/Ning question on call or thought. End the session for the <br />
day and recheck to ensure it’s F/Ning the next day before continuing. <br />
[B] Spot a person who looked/looks like you. Handle as above. <br />
[C] Spot a person who looked/looks dissimilar to you. Handle as above. <br />
[D] Spot a person who is how you wanted/want to be. Handle as above. <br />
<br />
524 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[E] Spot a person who is how you didn’t want to be. Handle as above. <br />
[F] Spot a person who you’d never want to be. Handle as above. <br />
[G] Spot a person who you want to be. Handle as above. <br />
[H] Spot a person who you identify as self [me]. Handle as above. <br />
End on major stable win on the subject of identity. <br />
Step Nine: Run as above with Valence Splitting, etc. <br />
[1] Ruds as needed <br />
[2] Spot a being who is close in true identity to you. <br />
[3] Spot a being who has the same experiences as you. <br />
[4] Spot a being who solves things as you have. <br />
[5] Spot a being you are or have been junior or subordinate to as a thetan or <br />
in life. <br />
[6] Spot a being who you are/have been senior to in life or as a thetan. <br />
[7] Spot a person who postulates as you do. <br />
[8] Spot a person who you postulate for. <br />
[9] Spot a person who may have postulated for you. <br />
[10] Spot the situation or problem each of the above beings has solved for you. <br />
Get prior confusion to the first time ever and spot the first moment of the <br />
first prior confusion. <br />
End on major stable win on the subject audited; however, do Step 10 <br />
before proceeding. <br />
Step Ten: Use alternate repetitive straightwire. <br />
End on wins. End section when nothing reads anymore and you have a <br />
major stable win. <br />
[1] Spot a truth in self. <br />
Spot a truth in others. <br />
[2] Have another spot a truth in you. <br />
Have another spot a truth in himself/herself. <br />
[3] Spot a reality you have solved with a lie. <br />
Spot a reality you have not solved with a lie. <br />
[4] Spot a reality you have substituted for a truth. <br />
Spot a reality you have substituted for a lie. <br />
[5] Spot a reality another has substituted for a truth <br />
Spot a reality another has substituted for a lie <br />
<br />
<br />
[6] <br />
Spot a reality you postulated for another. <br />
What did it solve for you ? <br />
What did it solve for him/her ? <br />
[7] <br />
Spot a reality another has postulated for you. <br />
What did it solve for him/her? <br />
What did it solve for you? <br />
[8] <br />
Have another spot a reality another has postulated in himself/herself. <br />
What did it solve for him/her? <br />
What did it solve for you? <br />
[9] <br />
Locate a reality you found safe. <br />
Spot the truth about it. (to a blow, small blowdown F/N or larger) <br />
[10] <br />
Locate a reality another found safe. <br />
Spot the truth about it. (to a blow, small blowdown F/N or larger) <br />
[11] <br />
Locate a reality another found safe for you. <br />
Spot the truth about it. (to a blow, small blow down F/N or larger) <br />
Have the other person spot the truth about it. (to a blow, small blow down <br />
F/N or larger) <br />
[12] <br />
Locate a reality you have found safe for another. <br />
Spot the truth about it. (to a blow small blow down F/N or larger) <br />
Have the other person spot the truth about it. (to a blow, small blow down <br />
F/N or larger) <br />
[13] <br />
Spot a reality you can create for yourself. <br />
Postulate a truth for it. <br />
[14] <br />
Spot a reality you can create for another. <br />
Postulate a truth for it. <br />
Note: <br />
Steps [16] to [19] are a bracket. Each set should blow down on the let go <br />
step. End on a win, cog or big change and then do the next step. <br />
<br />
[16] <br />
Create a future for someone. <br />
Place them in it. <br />
Postulate some truth about it. <br />
Now let go of it <br />
[17] <br />
Create a future for yourself. <br />
Place yourself in it. <br />
Place another in it. <br />
Postulate some truth about it. <br />
Now let go of it. <br />
[18] <br />
Recall a truth you agreed didn’t happen. <br />
Spot the exact truth in it. <br />
Spot any lie in it. <br />
Now let go of it. <br />
526 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[19] Spot present time moving forward. <br />
Notice thetans agreeing with it. <br />
Spot any agreements you have with it. <br />
Now let go of it. <br />
Spot a different present time. <br />
Notice thetans agreeing with it. <br />
Spot any agreements you have with it. <br />
Now let go of it. <br />
Spot a different present time. <br />
Notice thetans agreeing with it. <br />
Spot any agreements you have with it. <br />
Now let go of it. <br />
(Repeat to a small blowdown; F/N, big win)) <br />
Step Eleven: Do all steps to full EP. End on all wins until persistent F/N dies down. <br />
[A] Spot each portion of your theta that was abandoned. <br />
[B] Spot each portion of your theta you asserted was not yours. <br />
[C] Spot each portion of theta you asserted was yours that wasn’t. <br />
[D] Spot your PT creations in this MEST universe. <br />
[E] Spot PT creations that were not yours in this MEST universe. <br />
[F] Spot any old creations that are hung up. <br />
Spot the truth about these to a blow. <br />
Note: Don’t concentrate on the untruths, just the truths. <br />
[G] Spot yourself as a source for various things in this and other universes to <br />
full certainty. <br />
[H] Spot another 8th Dynamic creation as independent from yourself. <br />
Spot where it is. <br />
[I] Spot points where you have experienced joy or ecstacy in creating in this <br />
lifetime and on the back track. <br />
[J] Spot other beings you feel high ARC or love for. <br />
Spot the truths in these beings. (each to a read F/N) <br />
[K] Spot some theta you have created. <br />
[L] Create some theta. Uncreate it. (to a read as it blows off however small it <br />
is) <br />
Redo A to L above until the TA floats or a true unkillable persistent F/N <br />
appears and you have had a revelation regarding truth or 8th Dynamic <br />
creation. This is the end of OT VIII. Note: I wasn’t privy to any C/Singing <br />
or review techniques or other EP data. Beyond this there is no confidential <br />
EP to my knowledge. <br />
<br />
<br />
528 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
S P E C I A L <br />
RUNDOWNS <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
EDITORS NOTE <br />
<br />
<br />
The following materials relate to rundowns which are the exclusive province of <br />
the Church of Scientology’s Flag Land Base. <br />
<br />
To date, the original materials have note been liberated from this institution. What <br />
is presented here are reconstructions of those materials by people who have trained and <br />
delivered them before leaving that organisation. <br />
<br />
In the absense of the original materials, the following are presented on an “as is” <br />
basis and are used at your own discretion. No warranty is conferred or implied. <br />
<br />
If the original materials should become available at a future date, a revision of this <br />
volume will done to include them. <br />
<br />
530 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The “L” Rundowns <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
532 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
INTRODUCTION <br />
<br />
<br />
The L’s were developed as a result of research into the levels above OT VIII. The <br />
success of the L’s is startling. These rundowns can handle things that are handled <br />
nowhere else. <br />
<br />
The breakthrough which exists here technically is so strong that it actually cuts <br />
through the normal protective mechanisms of the mind. It came actually from the OT <br />
Grades. It answers the question - Why does an OT restrain himself and cease to behave <br />
as an OT? <br />
<br />
Each rundown is designed to terminatedly handle a specific area of a person’s case. <br />
The L’s are not grades in themselves but incredible boosters. The basic tech comes from <br />
research into increasing OT powers. They’re a special class of rundown; they increase a <br />
person’s power and effectiveness. <br />
<br />
Part of the discovery was that this tech could be used lower down on the Bridge to <br />
get people up it faster - very much faster. <br />
<br />
The L’s address the basics of a thetan’s case directly. They undercut the reactive <br />
mind and handle those factors which suppress the capacity to actually Do, Be and Have. <br />
They remove those things that can make a person less himself and far less powerful and <br />
causative as a thetan. These rundowns are designed to find and erase the basic counter <br />
intentions along one’s dynamics. They stabilize a case. <br />
<br />
The L’s require an expert to run them. The auditor’s TRs have to be perfect and there <br />
is no room for flubs. So don’t audit these rundowns on a PC or PreOT until your auditing <br />
is flawless. <br />
<br />
SETUP <br />
<br />
In all the “L” Rundowns (L10, L11, and L12) the PC or PreOT is fully set up first <br />
with a C/S 53 and GF40 expanded if needed. <br />
<br />
METHOD 6 <br />
<br />
The L type of assessment is Method 6. <br />
<br />
Method 6 is addressed directly to the thetan, not to the bank. The auditor looks <br />
directly at the pc and says the question or item. That bypasses bank protective mechanisms. <br />
<br />
<br />
A question is asked as a question, going up in the end as in regular assessment TRs. <br />
<br />
However, on most of the L rundowns we are assessing in a declarative manner. <br />
Declarative is when one goes down in pitch rather than up at the end. Going through a list <br />
of possible valences we would declare each one directly to the pc with full intention. We <br />
are not asking, we are looking for a reaction on that item. Earlier M6 was done in an <br />
accusative manner. That was later revised to be a declarative manner. <br />
<br />
<br />
PURPOSE OF THE L’s <br />
<br />
The Ls are intended to handle out-valence and evil purpose cases. We are handling <br />
main areas of resistiveness that are stopping the person from expanding. On L10 we <br />
handle the main valences that make him restrain his havingness. On L11 we handle evil <br />
purposes that keep him from acting. On L12 we stabilize his certainty of being himself. <br />
The 3 Ls roughly divide into Have (L10), Do (L11), and Be (L12). <br />
<br />
Our main targets are past identities and evil purposes. We will gradually make the <br />
person realize that they are not him and thereby free him from them. <br />
<br />
The Ls are tailored to the individual. Every pc might not need all the steps, some pcs <br />
need extra steps. Particularly L10 doesn’t have a fixed program, but contains a number <br />
of different possible ways of getting items. <br />
<br />
534 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
L 10 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 OCTOBER 1971 <br />
<br />
<br />
Flag Only <br />
Class X Only <br />
<br />
Only a full Class X <br />
may type or run off <br />
L-10 lists or materials <br />
<br />
CLASS X CHECKSHEET <br />
<br />
FOR L-10 (EXPORT) <br />
<br />
C O N F I D E N T I A L <br />
<br />
NAME:____________________________DATE STARTED: ____________________ <br />
<br />
ORG: _____________________________DATE COMPLETED:_________________ <br />
<br />
This course ma be taught only in an official Org which is qualified and specifically <br />
authorized to teach it. <br />
<br />
Pre-requisite is successful completion and Internship of all levels up to and <br />
including Class IX. <br />
<br />
Full completion of this checksheet including the auditing requirements entitles the <br />
student to the award of Class X Certificate. <br />
<br />
Note: Students must be twinned in pairs. They remain twins for course study, <br />
Method 2 Word Clearing and for co-audit of the L-10 processes to L10 completion. <br />
<br />
The skills of a Class X Auditor lie in flubbless TRs, Two Way Comm, Metering, <br />
Comm Cycle, understanding and application of the Overt Motivator Sequence, and <br />
perfect assessments. Therefore this checksheet specifically covers these aspects before <br />
the student begin the L-10 section itself. Other actions required in setting up a pc for L10 <br />
are fully covered in precious levels and are not part of this course. <br />
<br />
This checksheet must be done in sequence, star-rated once through except Sections <br />
7 & 8 (the actual L-10 materials) which are zero rated once through both sections and then <br />
word cleared Method 2 then star-rated. <br />
<br />
CLASS X CHECKSHEET -SECTION ONE -GENERAL <br />
<br />
1. HCOPL 15 June 1970 Keeping Scientology Working _________ <br />
2. HCOPL 16 Apr 1965 The Hidden Data Line _________ <br />
3. HCOPL 19 Apr 1965 Ethics Training & Processing Regulations _________ <br />
536 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
4. HCOPL 27 May 1965 <br />
Processing _________ <br />
5. HCOPL 22 Nov 1967 <br />
Out Tech _________ <br />
6. HCOPL 23 July 1969 <br />
Auditor Assignment Policies _________ <br />
7. HCOPL 4 Feb 1970 <br />
PC Application for Major Actions _________ <br />
8. HCOB 4 Feb 1970 <br />
PC Application for Major Actions _________ <br />
9. HCOB 28 Apr 1971 <br />
Okays to Audit in HGCs _________ <br />
10. HCOPL 31 May 1968 <br />
Auditors _________ <br />
11. HCOPL 14 Oct 1968 <br />
The Auditors Code _________ <br />
12. HCOPL 2 Nov 1968 <br />
Additions to Auditors Code _________ <br />
CLASS X CHECKSHEET -SECTION TWO <br />
ETHICS AND LEGAL <br />
<br />
<br />
1. HCOPL 1 July 1965 <br />
Ethics Chits _________ <br />
2. HCOPL 5 Apr 1965 <br />
The Basis of Insanity _________ <br />
3. HCOPL 7 Aug 1965 <br />
Suppressive Person, Main Characteristics of _________ <br />
4. <br />
HCOB 28 Jan 1966 S&D Data, How a Suppressive Becomes <br />
One _________ <br />
5. HCOPL 1 Oct 1967 <br />
Uses of Orgs _________ <br />
6. <br />
HCOPL 27 Oct 1964 Policies on Physical Healing, Insanity and <br />
Potential Trouble Sources _________ <br />
7. <br />
HCOPL 26 Oct 1970 Institutional and Shock Cases <br />
Posting of Bonds _________ <br />
8. <br />
HCOPL 16 May 1970 Institutional and Shock Cases <br />
Petitions from _________ <br />
9. <br />
HCOPL 14 Dec 1970 Institutional and Shock Cases <br />
Petitions from Legal _________ <br />
10. HCOPL 12 July 1971 <br />
Parent or Guardian Assent Forms _________ <br />
CLASS X CHECKSHEET -SECTION THREE <br />
COMM -ITSA -TRs <br />
<br />
<br />
1. HCOB 23 May 1971 The Magic of the Comm Cycle _________ <br />
2. HCOB 23 May 1971 The Two Parts of Auditing <br />
_________ <br />
3. HCOB 23 May 1971 The Three Important Communication Lines _________ <br />
<br />
4. Demonstrate in Clay (a) <br />
Itsa _________ <br />
(b) <br />
The Itsa Maker Line _________ <br />
5. <br />
HCOB 23 May 1971 Comm Cycles Within the Auditing Cycle _________ <br />
6. <br />
HCOB 14 Aug 1963 Lecture Graphs _________ <br />
7. <br />
HCOB 5 Nov 1965 Lecture Graphs _________ <br />
8. <br />
HCOB 23 May 1971 The Communication Cycle in Auditing _________ <br />
9. Demonstrate in Clay (a) <br />
Communication _________ <br />
(b) <br />
The Auditing Comm Cycle _________ <br />
10. HCOB 23 May 1971 Auditor Failure to Understand _________ <br />
11. Demonstrate in Clay (a) <br />
The Mechanisms of Invalidation _________ <br />
(b) <br />
The Mechanics of Evaluation _________ <br />
12. HCOB 23 May 1971 Premature Acknowledgements _________ <br />
13. HCOB 5 Feb 1966 Letting the PC Itsa <br />
_________ <br />
14. Demonstrate in Clay <br />
(a) What happens if the auditor lets <br />
the pc talk on and on _________ <br />
(b) <br />
Premature Acknowledgement and <br />
what causes it _________ <br />
15. HCOB 23 May 1971 Comm Cycle Additives <br />
_________ <br />
16. HCOB 23 May 1971 Recognition of Rightness of the Being _________ <br />
17. HCOB 8 Mar 1962 The Bad Auditor <br />
_________ <br />
18. HCOB 12 Feb 1966 The Dangerous Auditor <br />
_________ <br />
19. HCOB 4 Aug 1963 E-Meter Errors: Comm Cycle Error _________ <br />
20. HCOB 1 Oct 1963 How to Get Tone Arm Action _________ <br />
21. HCOB 8 Oct 1963 How to Get TA, Analysing Auditing _________ <br />
22. HCOB 25 Nov 1963 Dirty Needle <br />
_________ <br />
23. HCOB 3 Aug 1965 Auditing Goofs, Blowdown Interruption _________ <br />
24. Demonstrate in Clay (a) What makes the TA move _________ <br />
(b) What causes a dirty needle _________ <br />
25. HCOB 25 June 1970 Fishing a Realization _________ <br />
<br />
538 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
26. HCOB 10 July 1970 <br />
27. HCOB 3 July 1970 <br />
28. HCOB 6 Nov 1964 <br />
29. HCOB 30 Apr 1969 <br />
TAPES <br />
<br />
1. 27 July 1954 <br />
2. 6 Oct 1954 <br />
3. 22 Oct 1954 <br />
4. 1 Nov 1954 <br />
5. 29 Nov 1954 <br />
6. 14 Aug 1963 <br />
7. 15 Aug 1963 <br />
8. 20 Aug 1963 <br />
9. 21 Aug 1963 <br />
10. 16 Oct 1963 <br />
11. Demonstrate in Clay <br />
TRs <br />
<br />
1. HCOB 17 Apr 1961 <br />
2. HCOB 16 June 1971 <br />
3. HCOB 7 May 1968 <br />
4. HCOB 16 Nov 1965 <br />
5. HCOB 12 Jan 1959 <br />
6. HCOB 26 Apr 1971 <br />
7. HCOB 20 Feb 1970 <br />
2-Way Comm - A Class III Action _________ <br />
C/Sing 2 Way Comm _________ <br />
Styles of Auditing _________ <br />
Auditor Trust _________ <br />
<br />
Two Way Comm and the PTP _________ <br />
Two Way Comm _________ <br />
Two Way Comm _________ <br />
Two Way Comm _________ <br />
Two Way Comm _________ <br />
Auditing Tips _________ <br />
The Tone Arm _________ <br />
The Itsa Line _________ <br />
The Itsa Line _________ <br />
The Itsa Maker Line _________ <br />
<br />
(a) The Mechanics of Two Way Comm _________ <br />
(b) Over restimulation _________ <br />
(c) Under restimulation _________ <br />
Training Drills Modernized _________ <br />
Rapid Tr - 2 _________ <br />
Upper Indoc TRs _________ <br />
Commands for Upper Indoc TRs _________ <br />
Tone of Voice - Acknowledgement _________ <br />
TRs and Cognitions _________ <br />
Floating Needles and End Phenomena _________ <br />
<br />
<br />
TRs -PRACTICAL <br />
TR - 0 _________ TR - 4 _________ <br />
TR - 1 _________ TR - 6 _________ <br />
TR - 2 _________ TR - 7 _________ <br />
TR - 2 RAPID _________ TR - 8 _________ <br />
TR - 3 _________ TR - 9 _________ <br />
<br />
<br />
CLASS X CHECKSHEET -SECTION FOUR <br />
RESPONSIBILITY AND THE O/M SEQUENCE <br />
<br />
<br />
1. HCOB 1 Nov 1968 <br />
Overt - Motivator Definitions _________ <br />
2. Demonstrate in Clay <br />
(a) An Overt _________ <br />
(b) A Motivator <br />
_________ <br />
3. HCOB 18 Dec 1957 <br />
Psychosis, Neurosis, and Psychiatrists _________ <br />
4. HCOB 17 May 1958 <br />
Beingness Again _________ <br />
5. <br />
HCOB 17 Dec 1958 Basic Postulate of Overt Motivator <br />
Sequence _________ <br />
6. HCOB 7 May 1959 <br />
New Process theory _________ <br />
7. HCOB 23 Dec 1959 <br />
Responsibility _________ <br />
8. HCOB 21 Jan 1960 <br />
Justification _________ <br />
9. Demonstrate in Clay <br />
(a) Withhold _________ <br />
(b) The Overt Motivator Sequence _________ <br />
(c) The Mechanics of Justification _________ <br />
10. HCOB 4 Feb 1960 <br />
Theory of Responsibility Processing _________ <br />
11. <br />
HCOB 4 Feb 1960 Overt Manifestations on a Low Toned <br />
Case _________ <br />
12. HCOB 18 Feb 1960 <br />
How to Run O/W and Responsibility _________ <br />
13. Demonstrate in Clay <br />
(a) Responsibility _________ <br />
(b) Why a thetan restrains himself _________ <br />
(c) How O/W works <br />
_________ <br />
14. HCOB 25 Feb 1960 <br />
Scientology Can Have a Group Win _________ <br />
540 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
15. HCOB 9 June 1960 The Basic Assumptions <br />
_________ <br />
16. Demonstrate in Clay (a) The mechanics of Out - of - Valence _________ <br />
17. HCOB 13 Aug 1962 Rockslams and Dirty Needles _________ <br />
18. HCOB 7 Dec 1964 PTPs, Overts and ARC Breaks _________ <br />
19. HCOB 4 Apr 1965 ARC Breaks and Missed Withholds _________ <br />
20. HCOB 29 Sept 1965 The Continuous Overt Act <br />
_________ <br />
21. HCOB 30 June 1967 Evidences of an Aberrated Area _________ <br />
22. HCOB 6 June 1969 Prediction and Consequences _________ <br />
23. HCOB 31 Dec 1959 Blow offs <br />
_________ <br />
24. HCOB 31 Jan 1970 <br />
Withhold, Other Peoples _________ <br />
TAPES <br />
<br />
1. 6001C01 SMC - 1 <br />
Opening Lecture _________ <br />
2. 6001C01 SMC - 2 <br />
Responsibility _________ <br />
3. 6001C01 SMC - 3 <br />
Overts and Withholds _________ <br />
4. 6001C02 SMC - 4 <br />
A 3rd Dynamic in Scientology _________ <br />
5. 6001C02 SMC - 5 <br />
Marriage _________ <br />
6. 6001C02 SMC - 6 <br />
Group Processing _________ <br />
7. 6001C03 SMC - 7 <br />
Zones of Control, Rsponsibility _________ <br />
8. 6001C03 SMC - 8 <br />
Create and Confront _________ <br />
9. 6001C03 SMC - 9 <br />
Your Case _________ <br />
10. 6102C09 <br />
Illness, Insanity and Axiom 2 _________ <br />
11. <br />
6102C10 Procedure, Duplication and What People <br />
Do _________ <br />
12. 6102C16 <br />
Machinery and Games Thetans Play _________ <br />
13. Write and essay on relationship of O/W sequence to Insanity, <br />
Valences and Cause Level _________ <br />
<br />
CLASS X CHECKSHEET -SECTION FIVE <br />
PC OBNOSIS <br />
<br />
<br />
1. HCOB 26 Oct 1970 <br />
Obnosis and the Tone Scale _________ <br />
2. <br />
HCOB 19 June 1970 C/S Series No. 8 <br />
Chart of Human Evaluation _________ <br />
3. Chart <br />
Chart of Human Evaluation _________ <br />
4. HCOB 18 Sept 1971 <br />
Scales _________ <br />
5. HCOB 25 Sept 1971 <br />
Tone Scale in Full _________ <br />
6. HCOB 29 July 1964 <br />
Good Indicators at Lower Levels _________ <br />
7. HCOB 26 Apr 1969 <br />
Bad Indicators _________ <br />
8. HCOB 28 Feb 1959 <br />
Analysis of Cases _________ <br />
9. Demonstrate in Clay <br />
How auditing affects Tone Level _________ <br />
10. <br />
Drill: Walk around the Org. Observe and talk briefly to 10 people individually. <br />
Spot their tone levels and note down their manerisms and characteristics by which <br />
you ascertained their levels. <br />
CLASS X CHECKSHEET -SECTION SIX <br />
METERING <br />
<br />
<br />
1. E - Meter Essentials Section F, The Needle <br />
_________ <br />
2. HCOB 14 Jan 1963 Rings Causing Rock Slams <br />
_________ <br />
3. HCOB 21 Jan 1964 Breath and Body Action <br />
_________ <br />
4. HCOB 5 Oct 1968 ARC Break Needle <br />
_________ <br />
5. HCOB 7 Oct 1968 ARC Break Needle <br />
_________ <br />
6. HCOB 28 Feb 1971 Meter Reading Items <br />
_________ <br />
7. HCOB 14 Mar 1971 F/N Everything <br />
_________ <br />
8. HCOB 23 May 1971 Metering <br />
_________ <br />
9. HCOB 24 Oct 1971 False TA <br />
_________ <br />
10. HCOB 10 Dec 1965 E-Meter Coaching <br />
_________ <br />
11. HCOB 16 June 1971 Advanced E-Meter Drills <br />
_________ <br />
542 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
E-METER DRILLS (per Book of E Meter Drills) <br />
EM Drill 11 ________ EM Drill 12 _________ <br />
EM Drill 13 ________ EM Drill 14 _________ <br />
EM Drill 15 ________ EM Drill 16 _________ <br />
EM Drill 17 ________ EM Drill 18 _________ <br />
EM Drill 19 ________ EM Drill 20 _________ <br />
EM Drill 21 ________ EM Drill 23 _________ <br />
EM Drill 24 ________ EM Drill 27 _________ <br />
Advanced E Meter Drill No. 2 (Per HCOB 16 June 1971 _________ <br />
<br />
<br />
CLASS X CHECKSHEET -SECTION SEVEN <br />
L -10 ITSELF <br />
<br />
<br />
1. HCOB 22 Jan 1971 <br />
The Fabulous L-10 _________ <br />
2. <br />
HCOB 25 Mar 1971 Re: Auditing Requisite of Auditors <br />
Auditing L10 _________ <br />
3. HCOB 13 Aug 1971 <br />
L10 Training Prerequisites _________ <br />
4. HCOB 19 July 1971 <br />
C/S Series 52 Internes _________ <br />
5. <br />
HCOB 25 Mar 1971 L10 Prerequisites. <br />
Setting Up a Pc for L10s _________ <br />
6. HCOB 27 Sept 1966 <br />
The Anti Social Personality _________ <br />
7. HCOB 28 Nov 1970 <br />
Psychosis _________ <br />
8. HCOB 17 Sept 1971 <br />
Data for Class X _________ <br />
9. HCOB 17 July 1971 <br />
C/S Series 51 Out Of Valence _________ <br />
10. Demonstrate in Clay <br />
(a) Psychosis _________ <br />
(b) <br />
The Anti Social Personality _________ <br />
(c) <br />
How an SP Becomes One _________ <br />
11. HCOB 10 May 1971 <br />
F/N Style _________ <br />
12. Demonstrate in Clay <br />
(a) What Stops an F/N _________ <br />
(b) <br />
What Happens if Each Item is Not <br />
Taken to F/N in L10 _________ <br />
13. HCOB 18 Sept 1971 <br />
L10 Style Assessment _________ <br />
<br />
14. Demonstrate in Clay (a) <br />
L10 Style assessment _________ <br />
15. HCOB 11 May 1971 <br />
L10 Slows _________ <br />
16. <br />
Demonstrate in Clay (a) The effect of L10 on an improperly <br />
set up case _________ <br />
(b) The effect of slow TR-2 in L10 _________ <br />
(c) The mechanics of a lie <br />
_________ <br />
(d) The effect of auditing over an evil life _________ <br />
17. HCOB 25 June 1971 <br />
Major L10 Errors _________ <br />
18. HCOB 25 June 1971 <br />
L10 General Notes _________ <br />
19. <br />
HCOB 25 Mar 1971 How to Extract Items for O/Ws <br />
from L10 W/S _________ <br />
20. HCOB 17 Sept 1971 <br />
L10 Repowered O/W Commands _________ <br />
21. HCOB 11 May 1971R <br />
Evil Lives _________ <br />
22. HCOB 22 Sept 1966 <br />
Clear and OT _________ <br />
23. HCOB 2 Aug 1971 <br />
The State of Clear and OT _________ <br />
24. HCOB 22 June 1971 <br />
End Phenomena of L10s _________ <br />
25. <br />
WORD CLEARING Word Clear Method 2 on all HCOBs <br />
in this Section _________ <br />
26. Demonstrate in Clay (a) <br />
What is acheived by L10 _________ <br />
NOTE: The student should have completed his own L10 as a case before proceeding with <br />
section eight. <br />
<br />
CLASS X CHECKSHEET -SECTION EIGHT <br />
L10 RUNDOWN <br />
<br />
<br />
( The materials of this section constitute the “L10 Pack” one of which is issued for each <br />
Pc.) <br />
<br />
1. HCOB 27 June 1971R <br />
L10 Checklist _________ <br />
2. <br />
Important Note _________ <br />
3. <br />
Instruction Sheet _________ <br />
4. <br />
Applicant for L10 Form _________ <br />
544 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
5. <br />
6. HCOB 27 Mar 1971 <br />
7. HCOB 14 Sept 1971 <br />
8. HCOB 26 June 1971R <br />
9. HCOB 14 Sept 1971 <br />
10. HCOB 8 Feb 1971 <br />
11. HCOB 18 Jan 1971 <br />
12. HCOB 19 Jan 1971 <br />
13. HCOB 18 Sept 1971 <br />
14. HCOB 20 Jan 1971 <br />
15. HCOB 30 Nov 1971 <br />
16. HCOB 15 Sept 1971 <br />
17. HCOB 15 Sept 1971 <br />
18. HCOB 15 Sept 1971 <br />
19. HCOB 1 Feb 1971 <br />
20. HCOB 7 Feb 1971 <br />
21. HCOB 27 June 1971 <br />
22. HCOB 27 June 1971 <br />
23. HCOB 28 Dec 1970 <br />
24. HCOB 27 June 1971 <br />
25. HCOB 15 Sept 1971 <br />
26. HCOB 26 June 1971 <br />
27. <br />
Auditor C/S Attest Form _________ <br />
Considerations Rundown _________ <br />
Two Way Comm C/Ses for L10 _________ <br />
Full Lie Rundown _________ <br />
L10 Program Assessment _________ <br />
L10 PA Handling Sheet _________ <br />
L10 1 Motivator List _________ <br />
L10 2 Overt List _________ <br />
E/Purpose General _________ <br />
L10 Others To Others _________ <br />
L10 LTA Omission List _________ <br />
E/Purpose Multiple C/S _________ <br />
Greatest O/M RD C/S _________ <br />
Enemy R/D Multiple C/S _________ <br />
L10 2D 1 and 2 _________ <br />
L10 G Group Approach L10 _________ <br />
MEST RD Lists _________ <br />
MEST RD Lists _________ <br />
L10 Result Assessment _________ <br />
L10 RA Handling Sheet _________ <br />
Special C/S for L10 RA 33 _________ <br />
The Connections List _________ <br />
Final Instructions _________ <br />
<br />
28. Word Clear Method 2 on the materials of this section _________ <br />
<br />
DRILLS: (Per HCOB 23 Oct 1971 L10 Drills) <br />
<br />
1. TR X-1 (a) 2W/C ____ 2. TR X-2 (a) L10 Style Assessment ____ <br />
(b) ____ (b) ____ <br />
3. TR X-3 (a) 6W O/W ____ 4. TR X-4 (a) Consideration R/D ____ <br />
(b) ____ (b) ____ <br />
5. TR X-5 (a) Lie R/D ____ 6. TR X-6 (a) L10 PA ____ <br />
(b) ____ (b) ____ <br />
7. TR X-7 (a) L10 Lists ____ 8. TR X-8 (a) L10 LTA ____ <br />
(b) ____ (b) ____ <br />
9. TR X-9 (a) L10 2D 2 ____ 10. TR X-10 (a) E/Purp ____ <br />
(b) ____ (b) ____ <br />
11. TR X-11 (a) E/Purp Mul ____ 12. TR X-12 (a) Enemy R/D ____ <br />
(b) ____ (b) ____ <br />
13. TR X-13 (a) Great O/M ____ 14. TR X-14 (a) Life R/D ____ <br />
(b) ____ (b) ____ <br />
15. TR X-15 (a) MEST R/D ____ 16. TR X-16 (a) Connections R/D ____ <br />
(b) ____ (b) ____ <br />
17. TR X-17 (a) E/Purp Mul ____ <br />
(b) L10 RA ____ <br />
CLASS X CHECKSHEET -SECTION NINE <br />
C/SING CLASS X <br />
<br />
<br />
A thorough knowledge of all the materials of this course is essential to the C/Sing of <br />
L10. In addition, the following are relevant. <br />
<br />
1. HCOB 23 Aug 1971 Auditors Rights _________ <br />
2. HCOB 16 June 1970 What the C/S is Doing _________ <br />
3. HCOB 19 June 1970 Chart of Human Evaluation _________ <br />
4. HCOB 3 July 1970 C/Sing 2W/C _________ <br />
546 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
5. HCOB 21 Aug 1970 <br />
6. HCOB 26 Aug 1970 <br />
7. HCOB 8 Oct 1970 <br />
8. HCOB 28 Nov 1970 <br />
9. HCOB 28 Feb 1971 <br />
10. HCOB 6 Mar 1971 <br />
11. HCOB 31 Mar 1971 <br />
12. HCOB 26 May 1971 <br />
13. HCOB 21 Oct 1971 <br />
14. HCOB 9 June 1971 <br />
15. HCOB 19 June 1971 <br />
16. HCOB 19 June 1971 <br />
17. HCOB 20 June 1971 <br />
18. HCOB 17 July 1971 <br />
19. HCOB 29 Mar 1970 <br />
Session Grading _________ <br />
Session Grading _________ <br />
Persistent F/N _________ <br />
Psychosis _________ <br />
Metering Reading Items _________ <br />
Long C/Ses _________ <br />
Programming & Misprogramming _________ <br />
Mixing Major Actions _________ <br />
Intensive Programs _________ <br />
Complete Cycles _________ <br />
C/S Rules _________ <br />
Declares _________ <br />
The Supreme Test of a C/S _________ <br />
Out of Valence _________ <br />
Auditing and Ethics _________ <br />
<br />
I attest that I have completed the above checksheet and that I understand and can <br />
apply the materials: <br />
<br />
(Student) <br />
<br />
(Supervisor) <br />
<br />
Student has passed L10 written exam 100% <br />
<br />
(Student Examiner) <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Founder <br />
LRH: ojr; rs <br />
Copyright © 1971 <br />
By L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
L 10 <br />
<br />
<br />
L10 is designed to handle the things a thetan uses to restrain himself. The person <br />
regains his ability and power to do those things he intends to do and as a result he feels <br />
more at cause than ever before. L10 is an action that really releases a person’s power on <br />
the third and fourth dynamic. It takes off the stops that hold a person back on these <br />
dynamics. <br />
<br />
L10 will boost the individual’s confront and responsibility level and consequently <br />
raise his doingness level. <br />
<br />
PREREQUISITES: L10 is not restricted to only those who have completed OT III. <br />
The only prerequisites to L10 are a complete NED Drug R/D and Expanded Grades. It <br />
may not be done in the Non-interference Zone between Grade VI R6EW and OTIII. <br />
<br />
Note - All assessing is done M-6 (the L10 method of assessing a list). You look at <br />
the PC or PreOT and give him directly every item or question on the list. (Tape recording <br />
7106C12) <br />
<br />
L10 EP <br />
<br />
Freedom from self-restraint. His reach (havingness) is increased. <br />
<br />
L10 BASIC APPROACH <br />
<br />
0) Handle any identities the pc is assuming when he goes into session. Any fixed <br />
valences he uses to be audited with. <br />
1) 2WC for areas the pc has difficulty with or terminals he has trouble handling. <br />
2) Get an identity or terminal associated with the area. The way we do that depends on <br />
the pc’s reality. On a higher level pc we can ask for identities that would represent <br />
the area, for lower level pc we might just ask for an identity associated with the area. <br />
Use whatever concept that communicates best: Identity, Valence, Character, <br />
Beingness, etc. If pc lists we would go to a BD F/N item. “Who or What would have <br />
___?” can be used. If pc gives “Me” as an identity: get it translated into a description <br />
of the identity. If it isn’t possible, use “Me” in the steps anyway. <br />
3) O/Ws on item: <br />
1. “What has a ____ done?” <br />
2. “What has a ____ withheld?” <br />
We do this to unburden the item so that we can get to the basic purpose of it. <br />
4) L&N for basic purpose / basic intention of the item: <br />
“What is the basic purpose or intention of _____?” <br />
Date to blow / Locate to blow this purpose if evil. <br />
<br />
548 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
5) If not completely handled / still some attention on the identity, 2wc or L&N: <br />
“What identity would oppose (the item)?” <br />
Same handle: 3)-5). May have to continue opposing each identity until handled. <br />
6) On heavily charged terminals or opposing terminals one can do Quad O/Ws, <br />
Quad Ruds, and Can’t Have, Enforced Have steps - as needed. <br />
7) The 2WC in 1) is taken to F/N and flat. Pc may have many identities in the area <br />
8) Many other methods can be used to get valences. The standard L10 RDs can be <br />
used as well as others, e.g. LX lists. <br />
L10 RUNDOWNS <br />
1) L10 Prior Assessment (P.A.):A list of potentially charged dynamics/areas from <br />
which to tailor and develop or C/S L10 O/W questions/lists <br />
2) M6 assess then 2WC E/S to F/N, find intention behind <br />
L10 M1 List of motivators (general) <br />
M2 List of overts (general) <br />
L10 2D 1) 2nd dynamic motivators <br />
2) 2nd dynamic overts <br />
L10 Group O/W on all flows 0-4 <br />
MEST/LIFE RD: O/Ws on 5+6 dynamics <br />
3) Considerations RD: <br />
4) Connections RD: (Questions designed to get aberrated connections terminals/ <br />
dynamics ... Expanded dynamics list, take reading items 2WC to F/N) <br />
5) Enemy RD: I - L&N “Who do you consider an enemy” (handled all flows) <br />
II - O/W item <br />
III - E/Purp had + Date/Locate to blow. <br />
6) Greatest Overt: L&N “What was the greatest overt you committed on the Whole <br />
Track?” ... D/L + do FL0-4 <br />
7) E/Purp Multiple: (See ExDN pack in Vols.) “What evil purpose have you had <br />
towards another?” <br />
8) Lie RD: L&N “What was your greatest lie on the Whole Track?” <br />
9) L10 RA (Results Assessment): <br />
<br />
<br />
L10 PRIOR ASSESSMENT <br />
<br />
<br />
1. <br />
M6 Assess an expanded dynamics list like the one below. <br />
2. <br />
Get considerations about each reading item. Look for service facs and evil purposes, <br />
ways he is resisting the item. <br />
3. <br />
Date/Locate any evil purposes found. <br />
Expanded Dynamics List (symbiotes & items on dynamics) <br />
<br />
1D, Self: <br />
thetan individuality identity mental machinery <br />
a mind a skill tool clothing <br />
career identification human body parts brain <br />
body cells car house <br />
food meals vehicle decorations <br />
certificates diplomas body organs viewpoints <br />
a habit appetite ego urge to survive as individual <br />
auditing hobby medicine self improvement <br />
study book ornament grooming <br />
personal hygiene self expression health product <br />
GE job paycheck <br />
<br />
2D, Sex & Family: <br />
food preparation duplication child sex <br />
genital penis vagina sperm <br />
ovum semen conception childhood <br />
mother farther matriarch patriarch <br />
son daughter intercourse family <br />
home desire virility impotence <br />
a marriage seduction urge to procreate sexual pleasure <br />
sexual sensation courting feminity masculinity <br />
pregnancy birth babies breasts <br />
contraceptives homosexuality bisexuality sexual practices <br />
rape promiscuity VD relatives <br />
family ties incest mother’s milk abortion <br />
prenatal influence mating nurturing <br />
menstruation infatuation sexual love sibling <br />
<br />
3D, Group: <br />
club flag insignia meeting place <br />
uniform rank the state members <br />
membership law rules corporation <br />
agreement team a race team mates <br />
constitution constituency politics leaders <br />
followers morals commandments policy <br />
admin organization org board orders <br />
school education exchange military <br />
police prison criminal mores <br />
language urge to join war government <br />
democracy tyranny aristocracy collective <br />
<br />
550 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
4D, Mankind: <br />
commerce human species ecology development of space <br />
space travel world travel genocide exploration <br />
human race brotherhood united nations world organization <br />
world trade confederations world citizenship league of nations <br />
esperanto world health world treaties international agreements <br />
human rights world systems world communication urge to act in concert <br />
free trade global contract world government human dignity <br />
common man <br />
<br />
5D, Life Forms: <br />
plant animal primate body <br />
bird reptile fish cell <br />
virus biology embryo egg <br />
organic form seed insect <br />
mollush lichen protozoa organs <br />
tissue bloom chlorofil protein <br />
amino acids RNA DNA genes <br />
garden harvest pets ecology <br />
pollution extraterrestrials aliens urge to survive as life form <br />
life energy fertilizer nutrients urge to improve life forms <br />
photon converter bacteria elan vital <br />
<br />
6D, MEST: <br />
wavelength object mass atom <br />
molecule quanta particle smoke <br />
clouds time space a dimension <br />
form gravity force light <br />
fluids chemicals mineral rock <br />
earth planet star plasma <br />
air galaxy solar system physical universe <br />
shape size elements direction <br />
vector ridge beam explosion <br />
implosion subatomic particles electricity density <br />
compounds vacuum mixtures weather <br />
tendency to persist condense wind fire <br />
water location <br />
<br />
7D, Spirit: <br />
aesthetic wave value ghost spirit <br />
art object beauty the occult magic <br />
voodoo mediums masters symmetry <br />
logic creative urge sublimation ambiguity <br />
poetry theory idea theta <br />
OT virtue architecture literature <br />
essay writing imagination mathematics <br />
evil courage goodness purity <br />
own universe astral body ectoplasm telepathy <br />
telekinesis metaphysics ethics justice <br />
philosophy immortality freedom free will <br />
nobility style urge to create <br />
<br />
<br />
8D, Infinity: <br />
religion worship goddesses profanity <br />
priest guru avatar sacrifice <br />
omnipotence omnipressence gods deity <br />
divinity sublime essence immanence radiance <br />
grace infinite potentiality hymn blasphemy <br />
demon trancendence church prayer <br />
religious practice rites absolute co-existence of static <br />
basic truth as-isness miracles divine healing <br />
faith belief idols sacred texts <br />
gospels sutras parables urge to ultimate truth <br />
self trancendence sacred teachings heaven hell <br />
devil angel paradise wrath of God <br />
godlike states <br />
<br />
Another way of getting items on the dynamics: <br />
L&N for each dynamic: <br />
Who or what (W/W) represents the (Dynamic) ? <br />
or <br />
<br />
W/W would represent the (Dynamic) ? <br />
For example: <br />
<br />
W/W represents the first dynamic? LF <br />
<br />
Item: an engineer LFBD F/N <br />
<br />
Write down PCs answer and note all reads. R-factor to PC that his answer will be <br />
<br />
used to prepare and tailor the next steps in the RD <br />
Repeat for all the other dynamics. <br />
<br />
552 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
8D RUNDOWN <br />
<br />
<br />
a) L10 M1 List of Motivators} done in one session to avoid <br />
<br />
} restim by <br />
M2 List of Overts } unflat O/M sequence. <br />
<br />
<br />
Use prepared lists of motivators * and overts plus Qs constructed from preassessment <br />
(200Qs) <br />
<br />
Handling: M6 assess then 2WC ES to F/N if read. <br />
<br />
On heavily charged Q: ask <br />
<br />
“What would be the intention behind someone who would e.g. punish <br />
someone? L/N then D/L Intention <br />
<br />
OR: <br />
<br />
On heavily charged Overt: L&N for Intention then D/L. <br />
<br />
b) Same as above for dynamics 2-6. Ref: L10 outline. <br />
<br />
* <br />
Use general compilations of various sec check lists (e.g. Whole Track, Children etc <br />
rephrased as O/M) <br />
Possible Questions: <br />
2D: <br />
<br />
1. <br />
Is the 2D something to stay away from? <br />
2. <br />
Have you been made to feel inadequate sexually? <br />
3. <br />
Have you been made wrong for loving someone? <br />
4. <br />
Have you desired someone and not won them over? <br />
5. <br />
Was there someone that insisted you were at fault in the 2D? <br />
6. <br />
Has a 2D partner used anger to get their way? <br />
7. <br />
Have you been stopped on the 2D? <br />
8. <br />
Has a 2D partner forced you into something you don’t want? <br />
9. <br />
Have you gone along with a 2D when you knew it was wrong? <br />
10. <br />
Have you conceded a major point on the 2D when you shouldn’t have? <br />
11. <br />
Have you left a 2D for no good reason? <br />
12. <br />
Have you harmed a 2D? <br />
13. <br />
Have you withheld your true intentions to a 2D? <br />
14. <br />
Does some destructive impulse get in the way of your 2D happiness? <br />
15. <br />
Are you ruled by an evil intention when it comes to the 2D? <br />
16. <br />
Do you have hostility to the opposite sex? <br />
17. <br />
Is there an evil intention that is blunted on the 2D? <br />
18. <br />
Is ther something you want to do and shouldn’t on the 2D? <br />
19. <br />
Has cruelty been a part of your past on the 2D? <br />
<br />
20. Is there a past life 2D partner you have ruined? <br />
21. Is ther a past life partner that you have suppressed? <br />
22. Have you stopped another 2D? <br />
23. Is there some reason for hurting another in the 2D? <br />
24. Does some consideration make what you do on the 2D right no matter what? <br />
25. Have you been afraid to reveal something on the 2D? <br />
26. Do you withhold your real purposes on the 2D? <br />
27. Has the 2D been a source of revenge for you? <br />
28. Are you proud of some overt on the 2D? <br />
29. Is the 2D something to stop? <br />
30. Is the 2D not worth it? <br />
31. Are women better left alone? <br />
32. Has a destructive impulse been missed on the 2D? <br />
3D: <br />
<br />
1. Have you been ousted from a group for no good reason? <br />
2. Have you had a group make you out to be a failure when you weren’t <br />
3. Was a group determined to stop ;you? <br />
4. Was a group threatening to you? <br />
5. Was a group invalidating your initiative? <br />
6. Has any group failed to better you? <br />
7. Have you gone along with the wishes of a group when it was wrong? <br />
8. Have you taken on a group purpose that was destructive? <br />
9. Have you sided with a traitor of a group? <br />
10. Have you been an agent against a group that turned out to be worthwhile? <br />
11. Is there a group that you sided with that did in a lot of people? <br />
12. Have you been a member of a group whose intent was to harm? <br />
13. Have you been in a group that chose to hate some part of mankind? <br />
14. Is there a group you were in that aided only the rich and influential? <br />
15. Is there a group that you have actually worked against? <br />
16. Have you broken up a group through sabotage? <br />
17. Have you played two groups against each other? <br />
18. Have you been a destructive source in a group? <br />
19. Have you had the impulse to do away with any group? <br />
20. Have you let a group die off? <br />
21. Have you spied on a group and ruined it? <br />
22. Is there a hidden distrust of anyone in a group? <br />
23. Do you hide an evil intention while in a group activity? <br />
24. Have you ever failed with a purpose to harm any group? <br />
25. Has a leader been you enemy?28. <br />
554 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
6D: <br />
<br />
<br />
1. Are your possessions your own? <br />
2. Have you been bought off with possessions? <br />
3. Have you let things decay? <br />
4. Has MEST been your enemy? <br />
5. Have you stolen things? <br />
6. Have you been destructive to another’s belongings? <br />
7. Have you intentionally hurt an object? <br />
8. Have you used energy to dictate to others? <br />
9. Have you used MEST to do something evil? <br />
10. Is there an impulse to do something to MEST? <br />
11. Have you grabbed another’s space? <br />
12. Have you destroyed an aesthetic creation? <br />
13. Have you failed to control a harmful intention with energy? <br />
14. Have you let time dictate to you? <br />
15. Have you created something that harmed a lot of people? <br />
16. Has an object of yours been used for destructive purposes? <br />
17. Have you created something with an intent to use it for destruction? <br />
18. Have you had to restrict yourself in your pursuit of possession? <br />
19. Has a destructive impulse gotten in the way of your pursuit for material wealth? <br />
20. Has a destructive impulse towards MEST been missed? <br />
Comm Enforcements <br />
<br />
1. Have you enforced comm on another? <br />
2. Has comm been enforced on you? <br />
3. Has your affinity been inhibited? <br />
4. Have you blunted another’s affinity? <br />
5. Have you enforced your reality on another? <br />
6. Has another enforced reality on you? <br />
7. Have you been indoctrinated into thinking a certain way? <br />
8. Have you insisted another have your views? <br />
9. Have you been made to do things you didn’t want? <br />
10. Have you forced antoher to do something against his own will? <br />
11. Have you been made to be something you didn’t want to be? <br />
12. Have you forced another to act in a certain way? <br />
13. Have you been forced on an object you didn’t want? <br />
14. Have you made someone own something they didn’t want? <br />
15. Have you been made to lie? <br />
16. Have you made another distort the truth? <br />
<br />
17. Have you gotten your own way by force? <br />
18. Have you inhibited another by beingness? <br />
19. Have you had your identity inhibited by someone? <br />
20. Has an identity been enforced on you? <br />
21. Have you made someone be where they didn’t want to be? <br />
22. Have you been put somewhere you didn’t want to be? <br />
23. Have you been made to know something? <br />
24. Have you enforced data on someone else? <br />
25. Has responsibility been forced on you? <br />
26. Have you made another be responsible? <br />
27. Have you had your comm inhibited? <br />
28. Have you inhibited another’s comm? <br />
29. Have you had your comm refused? <br />
30. Have you refused another’s comm? <br />
31. Have you been party to false affinity? <br />
32. Has someone been false with their affinity to yoiu? <br />
33. Have you received false affinity? <br />
34. Have you had your reality inhibited? <br />
35. Have you inhibited another’s reality? <br />
36. Have you refused another’s reality? <br />
37. Has you reality been refused? <br />
38. Has someone falsified your reality? <br />
39. Have you made another’s reality look false? <br />
Another Sec Check <br />
<br />
1. Do you lie about yourself? <br />
2. Do you suppress yourself in some way? <br />
3. Do you suppress life? <br />
4. Do you connect yourself with bad influences? <br />
5. Do you connect up with bad memories? <br />
6. Is there some connection you wont let go of? <br />
7. Do you always act in a certain way? <br />
8. Do you own your loyalty to no one? <br />
9. Are you doing yourself in? <br />
10. Do you ant to or intend to do yourself in? <br />
11. Are you on a succumb? <br />
12. Do you wish to succumb? <br />
13. Do you plan to let yourself go unrestrained? <br />
14. Have you ever sought revenge on your family? <br />
15. Have you ever done a family member in? <br />
556 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
16. Have you made someone in your family guilty? <br />
17. Have you ever brutalized another with sex? <br />
18. Is sex destructive? <br />
19. Is love harmful? <br />
20. Are you best left alone? <br />
21. Is rape justifiable? <br />
22. Do you hold the opposite sex in contempt? <br />
23. Are women stupid? <br />
24. Do you lie about sex? <br />
25. Do you have a secret desire to annihilate the opposite sex? <br />
26. Is violence justifiable on a woman? <br />
27. Are you implanted to feel a certain way about sex? <br />
28. Do you have a dirty mind? <br />
29. Are groups worthwhile? <br />
30. Is there a leader you’ve done in? <br />
31. Do you have a secret hatred towards groups? <br />
32. Are you desirous of a group’s support? <br />
33. Have you let any group die off? <br />
34. Are groups better left to followers? <br />
35. Are you spied on? <br />
36. Is someone after you? <br />
37. Do you have an evil impulse towards any group? <br />
38. How long should any group last? <br />
39. What makes a group fail? <br />
40. Do you plan to seed the growth of unrest in any group? <br />
41. Do you judge people by race? <br />
42. Are certain religions harmful? <br />
43. Is there any race you have it in for? <br />
44. Does it pay to be destructive? <br />
45. How powerful do ;you have to be to be successful? <br />
46. What connection is sacred? <br />
47. What part of mankind is harmful? <br />
48. Have you justified a destruction of a race? <br />
49. ARe other people necessary? <br />
50. Is there some object you are connected with? <br />
51. Is there a certain time period you dwell upon? <br />
52. Is there something your energy is absorbed in? <br />
53. Is there a space you are forbidden in? <br />
54. Are spirits evil? <br />
55. Is your spirituality threatened? <br />
56. Are spirits overpowering? <br />
57. Have you squashed a thetan out of existence? <br />
<br />
58. Has your existence been questioned? <br />
59. Have you lost out to a body? <br />
60. Do you seek revenge against a spirit or thetan? <br />
61. Are you a traitor? <br />
62. Is your cause lost? <br />
63. Do you intend to create havoc? <br />
64. Is life worth living? <br />
65. Are people better off dead? <br />
66. What makes people insane? <br />
67. Why are people suspicious? <br />
68. Is there a past life that was a failure? <br />
69. Is there a past life that was important? <br />
70. Is there a past life that you can’t talk about? <br />
71. Is there a past life that was evil? <br />
72. What past life was critical? <br />
73. What past life was suspicious? <br />
74. Are you facing eternity with lack of hope? <br />
75. Is eternity a dreaded matter? <br />
76. What would move you to violence? <br />
77. What motivates mankind? <br />
78. Are you motivated by any impulse? <br />
79. Why do people hate? <br />
80. Is your survival dependent on an outside source? <br />
81. Is your destiny decided by someone else? <br />
82. Should you be punished forever? <br />
83. Will all be the same? <br />
84. How can you be stopped? <br />
85. How can you be made nothing of? <br />
86. Is there hope for man? <br />
87. Has this all been run on someone else? <br />
88. Are you waiting for something magical to happen? <br />
89. Have you decided it was a waste? <br />
90. Do you intend to make trouble after the auditing? <br />
558 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
OVERTS BY DYNAMICS R/D <br />
<br />
<br />
FIRST DYNAMIC <br />
<br />
<br />
1. Have you ever denied yourself an opportunity? <br />
2. Is there something you haven’t let yourself have? <br />
3. Have you ever deliberately made someone think badly of you? <br />
4. Have you ever made someone punish you? <br />
5. Have you ever distrusted yourself? <br />
6. Have you ever made yourself sick? <br />
7. Have you ever deliberately hurt yourself? <br />
8. What haven’t you let yourself do? <br />
9. Have you ever considered anything to be “Much too good for you”? <br />
10. Have you ever hated yourself? <br />
11. <br />
Have you ever decided you were unworthy of your friends? <br />
family? <br />
job? <br />
12. Have you ever prevented yourself from accomplishing something? <br />
13. What haven’t you let yourself feel? <br />
14. What haven’t you let yourself think? <br />
15. Have you ever restrained yourself from a desired sexual experience? <br />
16. <br />
Is there anything you won’t let yourself eat? <br />
drink? <br />
17. <br />
What won’t you let yourself see? <br />
hear? <br />
touch? <br />
18. What won’t you let yourself understand? <br />
19. Have you ever attempted suicide? <br />
20. Have you ever misused a body part? <br />
21. Have you ever punished yourself? <br />
22. Have you ever lied to yourself? <br />
23. Have you ever failed to care for a body part? <br />
<br />
2ND DYNAMIC (Family) <br />
<br />
1. Have you ever been a disturbing element in a family? <br />
2. Have you ever joined a family out of revenge? <br />
3. Have you ever disowned a member of your family? <br />
4. Have you ever gotten a relative into trouble? <br />
5. Have you ever worked against your family? <br />
6. Have you ever badly raised a child? <br />
7. Have you failed to provide for a child of yours? <br />
8. Have you ever split up a family? <br />
9. Have you ever had a bastard? <br />
10. Have you ever passed off a bastard as legitimate? <br />
11. Have you ever claimed a blood-relationship you didn’t have ? <br />
12. Have you ever forced a child into an unsuitable profession? <br />
13. Have you ever forced a child into a loveless marriage? <br />
14. Have you ever interfered with an inheritance? <br />
15. Have you ever had a member of your family incarcerated? <br />
16. Have you ever had an abortion? <br />
17. Have you ever exposed an infant? <br />
18. Have you ever physically injured a relative? <br />
19. Have you neglected your child’s education? <br />
20. Have you caused hostile factions within a family? <br />
21. Have you ever lived parasitically on your family? <br />
SECOND DYNAMIC (Sex) <br />
<br />
1. Have you ever sexually aroused someone and then not satisfied him (her)? <br />
2. Have you ever been sexually aroused by an object? <br />
3. Have you ever aroused another sexually with an object? <br />
4. Have you ever made love to a person of the wrong age? <br />
5. Have you ever made love to a person of the wrong sex? <br />
6. Have you ever made love to a person of the wrong class? <br />
7. Have you ever made love to a person of the wrong race? <br />
8. Have you ever made love to a creature of the wrong species? <br />
9. Have you ever made love to someone who belonged to another? <br />
10. Have you ever taught another perverted sexual practices? <br />
11. Have you ever invented perverted sexual practices? <br />
12. Have you ever used sex unethically? <br />
13. Have you ever made love to a person you disliked? <br />
14. Have you ever used the wrong body part for intercourse? <br />
15. Have you ever caused someone to be castrated? <br />
16. Have you ever made someone’s body more exciting by warping or distorting it? <br />
17. Have you ever raped anyone? <br />
18. Have you ever failed to have intercourse with someone you should have? <br />
19. Have you ever had sex with a member of your own family? <br />
20. Have you ever made love to a person of your own sex? <br />
21. Is there anything about your sex life that would be unsafe to reveal? <br />
22. Have you ever misused sex? <br />
23. Have you ever withheld sex? <br />
24. Have you ever stood up a date? <br />
560 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THIRD DYNAMIC <br />
<br />
<br />
1. Have you ever joined a group without being qualified? <br />
2. Have you ever given a group less than you received from it? <br />
3. Have you ever split a group into factions? <br />
4. Have you ever perverted the purpose of a group? <br />
5. Have you ever made a group too dependent on you, and then left? <br />
6. Have you ever belonged to a secret society? <br />
7. Have you ever gone over to the other side? <br />
8. Have you ever been an informer? <br />
9. Have you ever brought your group into disrepute? <br />
10. Have you ever weakened your group? <br />
11. Have you ever been a spy? <br />
12. Have you ever been a double agent? <br />
13. Have you ever permitted your group to be wiped out? <br />
14. Have you ever joined a group you considered bad? <br />
15. Have you ever given a group bad leadership? <br />
16. Have you ever given a group bad service? <br />
17. Have you ever provided badly for your group? <br />
18. Have you ever made your side lose? <br />
19. Have you ever injured the survival of a fellow group member? <br />
20. Have you ever enturbulated a group? <br />
21. Have you ever done anything to a group? <br />
22. Have you ever destroyed or reduced the survival of your own group? <br />
FOURTH DYNAMIC <br />
<br />
1. <br />
Have you ever treated a member of your species like an animal? <br />
a machine? <br />
2. Have you ever made territory uninhabitable? <br />
3. Have you ever resigned from the human race? <br />
4. Have you ever pretended to be a human being? <br />
5. Have you ever done anything to keep mankind from uniting? <br />
6. Have you ever tried to exterminate a species? <br />
7. Have you ever pretended to be a member of a different species? <br />
8. Have you ever denied a species a place to live? <br />
9. Have you ever prevented a species form reproducing? <br />
10. Have you ever perverted the purpose of a species? <br />
11. Have you ever kept your own species ignorant? <br />
12. Have you ever eaten a member of your own species? <br />
13. Have you tried to start a war among your own species? <br />
14. Is there anything you’ve done to a species that would be unsafe for you to reveal? <br />
<br />
FIFTH DYNAMIC <br />
<br />
1. <br />
Have you ever treated living creatures like objects? <br />
machines? <br />
2. Have you ever damaged crops? <br />
3. Have you ever used bad breeding stock? <br />
4. Have you ever eliminated good breeding stock? <br />
5. Have you ever crippled or killed living creatures for fun? <br />
6. Have you ever cut down trees without replanting? <br />
7. Have you ever let weeds take over cultivated areas? <br />
8. Have you ever failed to fertilize crops? <br />
9. <br />
Have you failed to provide water for livestock? <br />
crops? <br />
10. Have you ever put life forms to strange uses? <br />
11. Have you ever polluted water sources? <br />
12. Have you ever killed off a useful species faster than it could breed? <br />
13. Have you ever abused a living creature? <br />
14. Have you ever castrated or spayed domestic animals? <br />
15. Have you ever bred warped life forms? <br />
16. What life forms have you eaten? <br />
17. What life forms have you fed to other life forms? <br />
18. Have you ever kept a life form in an unsuitable environment? <br />
19. Have you ever destroyed other life forms? <br />
SIXTH DYNAMIC <br />
<br />
1. Have you ever failed to maintain a machine properly? <br />
2. <br />
Have you ever destroyed a useful object? <br />
beautiful object? <br />
3. Have you ever hid an object? <br />
4. Have you ever made harmful combinations of matter? <br />
5. <br />
Have you ever wasted metals? <br />
chemicals? <br />
inorganic materials? <br />
6. <br />
Have you ever misused a tool? <br />
machine? <br />
7. Have you ever forgotten how to build something? <br />
8. Have you ever perverted the use of a scientific discovery? <br />
9. Have you ever built something destructive? <br />
10. Have you ever built something that didn’t work? <br />
11. Have you ever made an ugly “work of art”? <br />
12. Have you ever put things too far apart? <br />
13. Have you ever put things too close together? <br />
14. Have you ever made a location a mystery? <br />
15. Have you ever misplaced something in time? <br />
16. Have you ever forgotten a place? <br />
17. Have you ever made an object mysterious? <br />
18. Have you ever made something vanish? <br />
19. Have you ever made something imperceptible? <br />
20. Have you ever misapplied energy? <br />
562 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
SEVENTH DYNAMIC <br />
<br />
<br />
1. <br />
Have you ever denied the existence of Beings? <br />
2. <br />
Have you ever made people believe they weren’t Beings? <br />
3. <br />
Have you ever persuaded others some thoughts are bad? <br />
4. <br />
Have you ever made a Being believe he was evil? <br />
5. <br />
Have you ever made another forget? <br />
6. <br />
Have you ever forced a beingness on another? <br />
7. <br />
Have you ever made another believe he was somewhere else? <br />
8. <br />
Have you ever made another believe he was in a different time? <br />
9. <br />
Have you ever made another believe he was someone else? <br />
10. <br />
Have you ever confused another’s memory? <br />
11. <br />
Have you ever persuaded another there were things he must resist? <br />
12. <br />
Have you ever prevented another from perceiving? <br />
13. <br />
Have you ever prevented another from being something? <br />
14. <br />
Have you ever convinced another his postulates didn’t work? <br />
15. <br />
Have you ever made another experience something he didn’t wish to? <br />
16. <br />
Have you ever convinced another that he was weak? <br />
17. <br />
Have you ever convinced another that he was incompetent? <br />
18. <br />
Have you ever convinced another that he was insane? <br />
19. <br />
Have you ever convinced another that he was stupid? <br />
20. <br />
Have you ever convinced another that he was dishonorable? <br />
21. <br />
Have you ever driven another insane? <br />
22. <br />
Have you ever enslaved another? <br />
EIGHTH DYNAMIC <br />
<br />
1. <br />
Have you ever doubted the truth of your religion? <br />
2. <br />
Have you ever desecrated a holy place? <br />
sacred object? <br />
3. <br />
Have you ever disobeyed God’s commandments? <br />
4. <br />
Have you ever failed to perform your religious duties? <br />
5. <br />
Have you ever neglected an opportunity to save a sinner? <br />
6. <br />
Have you ever been disrespectful to a holy person? <br />
7. <br />
Have you ever compromised your religious convictions? <br />
8. <br />
Have you ever attacked a religion? <br />
9. <br />
Have you ever tolerated a bad religion? <br />
10. <br />
Have you ever perverted a religion? <br />
11. <br />
Have you thought evil thoughts? <br />
12. <br />
Have you ever concealed (denied) your religion? <br />
13. <br />
Have you ever changed your religion? <br />
14. <br />
Have you ever committed a sin? <br />
15. <br />
Have you ever convinced others that some things are unknowable? <br />
16. <br />
Have you ever convinced another that there were effects <br />
he couldn’t create? <br />
17. <br />
Have you ever convinced another there were places he couldn’t be? <br />
18. <br />
Have you ever convinced another that there were Beings with whom he couldn’t <br />
communicate? <br />
19. <br />
Have you ever convinced another that some things cannot be communicated? <br />
20. <br />
Have you ever convinced another there were places he couldn’t leave? <br />
21. <br />
Have you ever persuaded another that he never created anything? <br />
<br />
CONSIDERATIONS RD <br />
<br />
<br />
This part of the L10 Rundown consists of 43 L&N actions to be listed per the laws <br />
of listing and nulling to a BD F/N item. They are done in the order listed. On the purpose/ <br />
intention list, if you get VVGIs BD F/N and major case cognition or valence shift, that’s <br />
it on that step. If it goes to BD F/N VGIs, not a real blow out, then run the item R3RA quad <br />
or run recall on it or D/L for a PreOT at OTIII or above. This rundown undercuts OTIII <br />
and NOTS. It breaks up a case in a very subtle fashion. Be sure not to audit over a persistent <br />
F/N. You may only be able to do one list each session. This blows off beings, valences, <br />
overwhelm, confusion and increases reach vastly. <br />
<br />
The basic L&N questions are: <br />
<br />
Who or What (W/W) was (Item from list) ? <br />
<br />
or <br />
<br />
Who or What would have been (Item from list) ? <br />
<br />
or <br />
<br />
What past identity was (Item from list) ? <br />
<br />
or <br />
<br />
What past identity would have been (Item from list) ? <br />
<br />
Use the question which communicates best to the PC or PreOT and gives the biggest <br />
read. <br />
<br />
Item List <br />
<br />
Note - All assessing is done M6 (the L10 method of assessing a list). You look at the PC <br />
or PreOT and ask him directly every item or question on the list. (7106C12) <br />
<br />
<br />
1) L&N for past identities, e.g. “What past identity was critical?” <br />
2) O/W item <br />
3) Ev/purp had? <br />
4) D/L e/purp <br />
<br />
<br />
Run to major win. <br />
<br />
1. Critical 16. Shy 31. Enchanting <br />
2. Unappreciative 17. Venomous 32. Wicked <br />
3. Disliked things 18. Sneaky 33. Fascinating <br />
4. Refused to understand 19. Timid 34. Mysterious <br />
5. Loving 20. Perverted 35. Pretentious <br />
6. Liked things 21. Unwell 36. Helpless <br />
7. Understanding 22. Evil 37. Cowardly <br />
8. Sympathetic 23. Indefinite 38. Dirty <br />
9. Excited 24. Laughable 39. Cunning <br />
10. Enthusiastic 25. Magical 40. Disobedient <br />
11. Griefy 26. Cruel 41. Oppressive <br />
12. Miserly 27. Blood thirsty 42. Overpowering <br />
13. Unable to perceive 28. Drunken 43. Weak <br />
14. Sick 29. Hungry <br />
15. Victimized 30. Treacherous <br />
564 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
CONNECTIONS R/D <br />
<br />
<br />
Use or frame Qs designed to get aberrated (charged) connections to terminals and <br />
dynamics. Find most charged dynamic on X-dynamics list, then find reading item on list. <br />
<br />
2WC * to F/N: <br />
<br />
How are you connected to _____? <br />
or <br />
How does _____ influence you? <br />
<br />
<br />
Run to major cog or win. <br />
<br />
* 2WC: reactions, attitudes, feelings, prompters, considerations, itsa E/S itsa. <br />
ENEMY R/D <br />
1) L&N “Who do you consider an enemy?” <br />
2) O/W on item <br />
3) E/purp had + D/L to blow <br />
(Run on Flows 0-4) <br />
GREATEST OVERT R/D <br />
1) L&N “What was the greatest overt you committed on the Whole Track?” <br />
2) D/L to blow. <br />
3) Flows 0-4 <br />
MULTIPLE EVIL PURPOSE R/D <br />
(See XDN in Volumes) <br />
1) L&N “What evil purpose have you had towards another?” <br />
2) D/L to blow <br />
3) Run Flows 0-4 <br />
LIE RD <br />
1) L&N “What was the greatest lie you told on the Whole Track?” <br />
2) D/L to blow <br />
3) Run Flows 0-4 <br />
<br />
<br />
L10 RESULTS ASSESSMENT <br />
<br />
(for checking EPs on earlier rundowns) <br />
<br />
The following questions are assessed M6 and taken to EP: <br />
<br />
0) Am I here? <br />
1) Are you here? <br />
2) Have we run all this on somebody else? <br />
3) Why should you be punished forever? <br />
4) Are you afraid you’ll just go home and it will all be the same? <br />
5) Are you waiting for something magical to happen? <br />
6) Are you still part of something awful? <br />
7) Are you too hideous to exist? <br />
8) Are you afraid you’ll go on killing people? <br />
9) Have we left some dead energy unhandled? <br />
10) Are there still dead thetans around? <br />
11) Just waiting to put it all back? <br />
12) Escaped and still hidden? <br />
13) Waiting to get loose? <br />
14) What would happen if you changed? <br />
15) Is there hope for man? <br />
16) How can you be stopped? <br />
<br />
<br />
L10 Low TA Assessment may be used at this point if case requires it or if C/Sed. <br />
<br />
<br />
Use list of terminals from folder. <br />
<br />
<br />
Assess on rises (blow ups) handle with itsa E/S itsa + consequences after each. <br />
<br />
<br />
566 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
L’s CORRECTION LIST <br />
<br />
This correction list can be used on any of the L Rundowns to correct any errors, <br />
debug any bogs or repair any of the steps or rundowns. Handling steps are not given with <br />
each line on the list since it is assumed that at this level of auditing the auditor will know <br />
the correct and standard handling of each and every line. The list can assessed method <br />
3 or method 5 depending on the situation. For PreOTs handle per instructions for handling <br />
listing on PreOTs. The auditor can switch to more specialized correction lists such as the <br />
L4BRA, NOTS 24, etc. as needed. <br />
<br />
1. DID YOU GO EXTERIOR? __________ <br />
2. OUT INT? __________ <br />
3. INTERIORIZED INTO SOMETHING? __________ <br />
4. OUT-LIST? __________ <br />
5. IS THERE AN ERROR IN LISTING? __________ <br />
6. HAVE WE FOUND A WRONG ITEM? __________ <br />
7. HAS A LIST BEEN OVERLISTED? __________ <br />
8. HAS THERE BEEN A WRONG INDICATION? __________ <br />
9. HAVE WE FOUND A WRONG OUTPOINT? __________ <br />
10. HAVE WE FOUND A WRONG AREA? __________ <br />
11. HAVE WE FOUND A WRONG LOCATION? __________ <br />
12. HAVE WE FOUND A WRONG DATE? __________ <br />
13. MISOWNERSHIP OF ITEM? __________ <br />
14. OVERRUN AN ITEM? __________ <br />
15. HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED OVER AN ARC BREAK? __________ <br />
16. HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED OVER A PROBLEM? __________ <br />
17. HAVE YOU BEEN AUDITED OVER A WITHHOLD? __________ <br />
18. WAS THERE A WITHHOLD THAT KEPT COMMING UP? __________ <br />
19. IS THERE UNDISCLOSD OVERT? __________ <br />
20. WAS IT NOT YOUR OVERT? __________ <br />
21. DO YOU HAVE A SIMILAR OVERT OF YOUR OWN? __________ <br />
22. HAS A DESTRUCTIVE IMPULSE BEEN MISSED? __________ <br />
23. HAS SOMETHING BEEN OVERRUN? __________ <br />
24. HAVE WE GONE PAST A BIG WIN? __________ <br />
25. HAS SOMETHING BEEN LEFT UNFLAT? __________ <br />
26. HAS ANYTHING BEEN CUT SHORT? __________ <br />
27. WAS THERE A MISUNDERSTOOD? __________ <br />
28. DID SOMETHING DISTRACT YOU? __________ <br />
29. WHERE YOU DISTRACTED BY THE AUDITOR? __________ <br />
30. HAS SOMETHING FLATTENED OUT OF SESSION? __________ <br />
31. WERE THERE AWARENESS CHANGES OUT OF SESSION? __________ <br />
32. DID YOU COGNITE OUT OF SESSION? __________ <br />
33. DID YOU HAVE A LOSS OF GAIN? __________ <br />
34. HAS SOMEONE ENTURBULATED YOU? __________ <br />
35. IS THERE AN INCOMPLETE COGNITION? __________ <br />
36. IS THERE A DIANETIC ERROR? (FOR A PC) __________ <br />
37. IS SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? __________ <br />
<br />
<br />
568 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
L 11 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
L11 <br />
<br />
<br />
L11, The New Life Rundown was developed to give a person a new life. This means <br />
it can handle that part of an individual’s case which stops him from really living. It handles <br />
the major source of aberration upon which attention is fixed, blasting apart that major <br />
personal stumbling block. <br />
<br />
The EP of L11 is a New Life. <br />
<br />
PREREQUISITES: L11 (formerly L9S) is not restricted to only those who have <br />
completed OT III. The only prerequisites to L11 are a complete Drug R/D and Expanded <br />
Grades. It may not be done in the Non-interference Zone between Grade VI, R6EW and <br />
OT III. <br />
<br />
In all the “L” Rundowns (L10, L11, and L12) the PC or PreOT is fully set up first <br />
with a C/S 53 and GF40 expanded if needed. <br />
<br />
L11 PROGRAM STEPS <br />
1) Justifications HCOB <br />
a) M9 W/C bulletin <br />
b) PC writes essay on how it applies to him. <br />
2) Full 37R RD to F/Ning list <br />
3) D/L Implant ‘To Harm’ to blow. <br />
General O/W .. If E/Purp comes off run O/W to blow. <br />
4) L&N “What evil purpose do you have?” <br />
D/L E/Purp to blow <br />
5) L9S <br />
6) Nature of Man <br />
2WC “the character of man” to F/N <br />
<br />
JUSTIFICATION <br />
<br />
1) PC reads the HCOB entitled “Justification”. <br />
2) M9 W/C bulletin <br />
3) PC writes essay on how it applies to him. <br />
<br />
<br />
37R RD <br />
<br />
Do the full 37R Rundown as given in C/S Series 37R. <br />
Items from 37R Rundown L&N lists can be blown by D/L if needed. <br />
End at F/Ning list. <br />
<br />
<br />
HARM IMPLANT <br />
<br />
1) Date/Locate implant “TO HARM” to Blow. <br />
2) General O/W .. If E/Purp comes off run O/W to blow. <br />
<br />
570 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
EVIL PURPOSE <br />
<br />
<br />
1) L&N: “What Evil Purpose do you have?” <br />
2) D/L to Blow <br />
<br />
LIST 9S <br />
<br />
The list of words below is called M6 to the PC; on each the PC gives back a response. <br />
<br />
E.g. PUNISH!! “It would be necessary on a naughty child.” Next, L&N word incorporating <br />
response. <br />
“Who or What would find it necessary to punish a naughty child?” ..... <br />
“A Brave Dog” <br />
<br />
Terminal is then handled to blow per L-type handling. The list is taken to Major Cog <br />
and F/Ning list. <br />
<br />
Punish Degrade Deflower Obliterate Preen <br />
Avenge Pander Prostitute Sodomize Brutalize <br />
Kill Drain Defame Scavenge Propagandize <br />
Torture Secrete Fornicate Execute Incinerate <br />
Pillage Interrogate Slander Begrime Provoke <br />
Annihilate Dissect Deviate Plagiarize Vandalize <br />
Subvert Defoliate Profane Wallow Suborn <br />
Seduce Molest Imprison Immolate Deceive <br />
Exhaust Pervert Charm Indulge Destabilize <br />
Restrain Cannibalize Renege Engorge Conceal <br />
Immobilize Decimate Starve Expunge Pollute <br />
Entrap Hypnotize Sack Confuse Sacrifice <br />
Enthrall Dessert Impoverish Savour Bugger <br />
Extinguish Attack Blind Gloat Flagellate <br />
Ensnare Sting Deface Arrogate Spy <br />
Trick Warp Depose Remove Peep <br />
Envelop Horrify Expel Distrust Demoralize <br />
Benumb Obliterate Desecrate Sympathize Embalm <br />
Tantalize Dismember Exploit Indoctrinate Electrocute <br />
Enslave Cheat Ravage Randomize Abominate <br />
Assassinate Conquer Tear Overwhelm Secrete <br />
Nullify Devastate Impale Supplant Despoil <br />
Explode Implode Distort Negate Revolt <br />
Injure Mutilate Retard Grasp Bully <br />
Infect Undermine Restrain Pillory Manipulate <br />
Feast Hassle Abuse Habituate Leach <br />
Program Torment Belittle Loaf Mutilate <br />
Tyrannize Disgust Lie Inflame Excoriate <br />
Hoard Offend Hunt Cripple Con <br />
Terrorize Vivisect Invade Gobble Prey <br />
Castrate Vanquish Sacrifice Vilify Debunk <br />
<br />
NATURE OF MAN <br />
<br />
<br />
Two Way Comm “the character of Man” to EP. <br />
<br />
<br />
572 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
L 12 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
L 12 <br />
<br />
<br />
The intention behind L12 is to make a fully extroverted and stable thetan. This <br />
rundown aims at handling very basic and specific aspects of a person’s beingness. Here <br />
are those case things which tend to capture part of the person’s attention so he has much <br />
less of it to put on life and doingness. <br />
<br />
The person experiences certainty and unshakability as a being with the ability to <br />
handle his own universe. <br />
<br />
PREREQUISITES: L12 is not restricted to only those who have completed OT III. <br />
The only prerequisites to L12 are a complete Drug R/D and Expanded Grades. It may not <br />
be done in the Non-interference Zone between Grade VI, R6EW and OT III. <br />
<br />
In all the “L” Rundowns (L10, L11, and L12) the PC or PreOT is fully set up first <br />
with a C/S 53 and GF40 expanded if needed. <br />
<br />
L12 PROGRAM STEPS <br />
<br />
1) Cluster Handling <br />
2) 3S&Ds <br />
3) Bqn character list <br />
4) Beams Handling <br />
5) OCA Handling (if needed) <br />
6) Management Words <br />
7) Admin Scale <br />
8) Group Sanity <br />
9) Simon Bolivar Policy <br />
<br />
574 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
CLUSTER HANDLING <br />
<br />
<br />
1) Have PC or PreOT locate a “pressure * area” that reads on the meter. (Vary ‘<br />
In and around’ to ‘Far away’) <br />
2) Get the location of the pressure area relative to the body. <br />
3) Have the PC or PreOT put and hold his/her attention on the pressure area. <br />
4) Assess the “L12 Type of Incident” list to the first reading item and indicate this <br />
to the PC/PreOT. <br />
<br />
Accident Electrical <br />
Impact Explosion <br />
Injury Implosion <br />
Illness Shot <br />
Drug Psychiatric <br />
Shock Lightning <br />
Implant Vacuum <br />
Heat Radiation <br />
Burning Collision <br />
Crash Hit <br />
Freezing Struck <br />
<br />
5) Date to blow / Locate to blow the incident found. <br />
<br />
6) <br />
Find out if completely blown, and if not, repeat 4 and 5 until pressure area is <br />
completely blown. <br />
<br />
Note - If OTIII PreOT, complete any remaining BTs with OTIII procedure. If NOTS <br />
PreOT, complete any remaining BTs with NOTs procedure. <br />
<br />
* Could be also ‘hollow spot’, chronic somatics, ‘emptiness’, any persisting sensation. <br />
CHARACTER LIST <br />
<br />
Assess the subject of the group M6. The word is called or shouted very accusatively <br />
with the auditor looking directly into the PC’s eyes. The meter read is noted. This word <br />
is called to restimulate the group; then the other items of the group are asked as questions <br />
M5. The identities of one group are handled in order of size of read. Then continue on with <br />
the next group, etc. When the whole list is handled, reassess from the beginning and <br />
handle each item as it comes up, reassess from the beginning and handle each item as it <br />
comes up, taking slowed or checked F/Ns as reads. Handle to persistent F/N on the whole <br />
list. Check at the end of each group if any beingness that was restimulated by the <br />
accusative identity was not on the list. <br />
<br />
Handle each reading item “Who or What was a _____?” <br />
L&N, then O/W to blow. <br />
<br />
<br />
HERMIT!!! _____ <br />
Hermit? _____ <br />
Recluse? _____ <br />
Ascetic? _____ <br />
Victim? _____ <br />
Non-conformist? _____ <br />
Martyr? _____ <br />
Puritan? _____ <br />
Human Sacrifice? _____ <br />
Self Immolator? _____ <br />
Outcast? _____ <br />
A HORSE!!! _____ <br />
A Horse? _____ <br />
A Lioness? _____ <br />
A Leprechaun? _____ <br />
A Wild Thing? _____ <br />
A Fire Spirit? _____ <br />
Dragon? _____ <br />
Gremlin? _____ <br />
An Imp? _____ <br />
A Tinker? _____ <br />
A Goat? _____ <br />
UNICORN!!! _____ <br />
Unicorn? _____ <br />
Forest Spirit? _____ <br />
Fairy? _____ <br />
Gnome? _____ <br />
Nymph? _____ <br />
Water Sprite? _____ <br />
Faun? _____ <br />
Sylvan? _____ <br />
Mermaid? _____ <br />
Chimera? _____ <br />
BLOODSUCKER!!! _____ <br />
Bloodsucker? _____ <br />
Vampire? _____ <br />
Ghoul? _____ <br />
Dismemberer? _____ <br />
Predator? _____ <br />
Parasite? _____ <br />
Leech? _____ <br />
Cannibal? _____ <br />
Vulture? _____ <br />
Cut-throat? _____ <br />
<br />
576 <br />
<br />
<br />
ANIMAL!!! _____ <br />
Animal? _____ <br />
Dog? _____ <br />
Cat? _____ <br />
Fish? _____ <br />
Lizard? _____ <br />
Serpent? _____ <br />
Pig? _____ <br />
Elephant? _____ <br />
Cow? _____ <br />
Tiger? _____ <br />
<br />
ROBOT!!! _____ <br />
Robot? _____ <br />
Hypnotic? _____ <br />
Believer? _____ <br />
Follower? _____ <br />
Servant? _____ <br />
Devotee? _____ <br />
Convert? _____ <br />
Worshipper? _____ <br />
Attendant? _____ <br />
Henchman? _____ <br />
<br />
THE ALMIGHTY!!! _____ <br />
The Almighty? _____ <br />
The Ever Present? _____ <br />
A Goddess? _____ <br />
A God? _____ <br />
The Eternal Mother? _____ <br />
The Father of All? _____ <br />
The Horned God? _____ <br />
Pan? _____ <br />
Diana? _____ <br />
The Buddha? _____ <br />
<br />
SORCERER!!! _____ <br />
Sorcerer? _____ <br />
Witch? _____ <br />
Warlock? _____ <br />
Enchanter? _____ <br />
Wizard? _____ <br />
Occultist? _____ <br />
Alchemist? _____ <br />
Clairvoyant? _____ <br />
Weird Sisters? _____ <br />
Astrologer? _____ <br />
<br />
<br />
BLASPHEMER!!! <br />
Blasphemer?<br />
Idolater? <br />
Scoffer? <br />
Desecrator? <br />
Bigot? <br />
Worldling? <br />
Sacrilegist? <br />
Unbeliever? <br />
Infidel? <br />
Heathen? <br />
<br />
<br />
IMPLANTER!!! <br />
Implanter? <br />
Torturer? <br />
Controller? <br />
Psychiatrist?<br />
Brainwasher?<br />
Deprogrammer? <br />
Indoctrinator?<br />
Hypnotist? <br />
Initiator? <br />
Propagandist?<br />
<br />
<br />
THE EVIL ONE!!! <br />
The Evil One?<br />
An Incubus? <br />
The Powers of Darkness <br />
A Succubus? <br />
The Antichrist? <br />
The Beast? <br />
His Satanic Majesty? <br />
The Devil? <br />
An Unclean Spirit? <br />
Shades of the Dead? <br />
<br />
<br />
FOOL!!! <br />
Fool? <br />
Idiot? <br />
Dunce? <br />
Ignoramus? <br />
Subhuman?<br />
Halfwit? <br />
Driveller? <br />
A Newborn Babe? <br />
Moron? <br />
Imbecile? <br />
<br />
<br />
_____ <br />
<br />
_____ <br />
_____ <br />
<br />
_____ <br />
<br />
_____ <br />
<br />
_____ <br />
<br />
_____ <br />
<br />
GENIUS!!! _____ <br />
Genius? _____ <br />
Wonder Worker? _____ <br />
Planet Builder? _____ <br />
Prodigy? _____ <br />
Spirit of the Age? _____ <br />
Master Mind? _____ <br />
Shining Light? _____ <br />
Mentor? _____ <br />
Thaumaturge? _____ <br />
The All Seeing? _____ <br />
<br />
PERVERT!!! _____ <br />
Pervert? _____ <br />
Sadist? _____ <br />
Masochist? _____ <br />
Homosexual? _____ <br />
Bugger? _____ <br />
Pederast? _____ <br />
Exhibitionist? _____ <br />
Voyeur? _____ <br />
Deviant? _____ <br />
Peculiar Boddied? _____ <br />
<br />
CRIPPLE!!! _____ <br />
Cripple? _____ <br />
Invalid? _____ <br />
Paralytic? _____ <br />
Dwarf? _____ <br />
Monster? _____ <br />
Incompetent? _____ <br />
Curiosity? _____ <br />
Cross-breed? _____ <br />
Half Caste? _____ <br />
Hermaphrodite? _____ <br />
<br />
LIAR!!! _____ <br />
Liar? _____ <br />
Fake? _____ <br />
Bragger? _____ <br />
Doubter? _____ <br />
Heretic? _____ <br />
Quack? _____ <br />
Wretch? _____ <br />
Viper? _____ <br />
Defaulter? _____ <br />
Hypocrite? _____ <br />
<br />
<br />
DESTROYER!!! _____ <br />
Destroyer? _____ <br />
Spy? _____ <br />
Executioner? _____ <br />
Embezzler? _____ <br />
Betrayer? _____ <br />
Racketeer? _____ <br />
Extortionist? _____ <br />
Tyrant? _____ <br />
Murderer? _____ <br />
Pyromaniac? _____ <br />
INSECT!!! _____ <br />
Insect? _____ <br />
Parasite? _____ <br />
Invader? _____ <br />
Bee? _____ <br />
Fly? _____ <br />
Caterpillar? _____ <br />
Butterfly? _____ <br />
Spider? _____ <br />
Scorpion? _____ <br />
Hornet? _____ <br />
PHILOSOPHER!!! _____ <br />
Philosopher? _____ <br />
Researcher? _____ <br />
Analyst? _____ <br />
Physicist? _____ <br />
Technician? _____ <br />
Metaphysician? _____ <br />
Healer? _____ <br />
Geometrician? _____ <br />
Arithmetician? _____ <br />
Historian? _____ <br />
PRIEST!!! _____ <br />
Priest? _____ <br />
Holy Father? _____ <br />
Holy Mother? _____ <br />
Temple Virgin? _____ <br />
Choir Boy? _____ <br />
Chaplain? _____ <br />
Temple Prostitute? _____ <br />
Prophet? _____ <br />
Lama? _____ <br />
Confessor? _____ <br />
<br />
578 <br />
<br />
<br />
A BIRD!!! _____ <br />
A Bird? _____ <br />
An Eagle? _____ <br />
A Parrot? _____ <br />
A Wren? _____ <br />
A Hawk? _____ <br />
A Messenger? _____ <br />
A Forerunner? _____ <br />
An Oracle? _____ <br />
A Dove? _____ <br />
A Swallow? _____ <br />
<br />
ARTIST!!! _____ <br />
Artist? _____ <br />
Virtuoso? _____ <br />
Thespian? _____ <br />
Master Musician? _____ <br />
Grand Composer? _____ <br />
Wandering Minstrel? _____ <br />
Chorister? _____ <br />
Dancer? _____ <br />
Entertainer? _____ <br />
Poet? _____ <br />
<br />
HEDONIST!!! _____ <br />
Hedonist? _____ <br />
Fornicator? _____ <br />
Glutton? _____ <br />
Masturbator? _____ <br />
Bigamist? _____ <br />
Adulterer? _____ <br />
Satyr? _____ <br />
Impotent? _____ <br />
A True Love? _____ <br />
Whoremonger? _____ <br />
<br />
PEASANT!!! _____ <br />
Peasant? _____ <br />
Civilian? _____ <br />
Husband? _____ <br />
Wife? _____ <br />
Gentleman? _____ <br />
Layman? _____ <br />
Mortal? _____ <br />
Parishioner? _____ <br />
Serf? _____ <br />
Slave? _____ <br />
<br />
<br />
PTS BEAM HANDLING <br />
<br />
<br />
Method One: <br />
<br />
1) Ask PC/PreOT, “Do you have any beams stuck to yourself or the body?” <br />
(only PT lifetime body) <br />
2) If yes, have him locate a reading beam stuck to himself or the body. Have pOT <br />
‘Smooth out the Beam’. <br />
3) Who has beamed you? L&N to a terminal. <br />
4) Smooth out rough edge of Beam from _(Item)_ X to blow. <br />
5) If a troublesome terminal by folder inspection: <br />
“Has _(terminal)_ beamed you?”. Smooth out beam to blow. <br />
6) D/L the incident when it was put there, if no blow. <br />
7) Repeat until “no more beams”. <br />
<br />
Method Two: <br />
<br />
1) <br />
PC/PreOT is shown the definition of a BEAM: <br />
“A flow of electricity with teeth and rough edges.” <br />
<br />
The definition is illustrated with a picture of a BODY being beamed by another <br />
person, the beam being hooked into the body by teeth like a circular saw blade or <br />
fish hooks. Add R-factor of glands as special targets. <br />
<br />
OCA TRAIT HANDLING <br />
<br />
1) <br />
Go over the PC/PreOT’s OCA. <br />
<br />
2) <br />
Take each negative area trait and make up a listing question. For example: <br />
“critical”. The basic L&N questions are: <br />
<br />
Who or What (W/W) was _(Item from OCA)_? <br />
or <br />
W/W would have been _(Item from OCA)_? <br />
or <br />
What past identity was _(Item from OCA)_? <br />
or <br />
What past identity would have been _(Item from OCA)_? <br />
<br />
<br />
Use the question which communicates best to the PC or PreOT and gives the biggest <br />
read. <br />
<br />
Clear the L&N question with the word to be used such as: <br />
<br />
W/W was critical? LF <br />
<br />
List and Null to one item such as: “a cranky maid” LFBD F/N <br />
<br />
Take the next negative point trait off the OCA list and repeat procedure. End off this <br />
step on a major case change, valence shift and/or ability gained with VVGIs, Floating TA <br />
and Cognition. <br />
<br />
<br />
MANAGEMENT WORDS <br />
<br />
<br />
Clear and False Data Strip the following words from Org Series 15, Management <br />
Series, page 213 and 214. Be sure to get the root meaning of the word. <br />
<br />
A Company A Board of Directors <br />
<br />
Management Policy <br />
<br />
Top Management Programs <br />
<br />
Targets Orders <br />
<br />
Technology Know-How <br />
<br />
Org Board Post <br />
<br />
Hat Cope <br />
<br />
Purposes Organize <br />
<br />
Duties A Checksheet <br />
<br />
A Checklist A Comm Channel <br />
<br />
A Command Channel A Relay Point <br />
<br />
A Stable Terminal Double Hatted <br />
<br />
A Product Aberration <br />
<br />
Viability <br />
<br />
ADMIN SCALE <br />
<br />
Word Clear: <br />
<br />
Administration <br />
<br />
Admin Scale <br />
<br />
Administrator <br />
<br />
Each word on the Admin Scale not already cleared previously. <br />
<br />
2 way comm PC/PreOT in the area of his/her first three dynamics to find some high <br />
interest reading areas. <br />
<br />
2 way comm each reading area up and down the Admin Scale. <br />
<br />
Admin Scale <br />
<br />
Goals <br />
Purposes <br />
Policy <br />
Plans <br />
Programs <br />
Projects <br />
Orders <br />
Ideal Scene <br />
Statistics <br />
Valuable Final Product <br />
<br />
<br />
“The scale is worked up and worked down until it is (each item) in full agreement <br />
with the remaining items” <br />
<br />
580 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
GROUP SANITY <br />
<br />
<br />
Clear each word in the scale from HCOPL 14 December 1970 Org Series 19 <br />
GROUP SANITY. Have PC/PreOT read this HCOPL. <br />
<br />
2 way comm each of the 11 points and how each one applies to his life/relationship(s)/ <br />
business to a major cognition. <br />
<br />
SIMON BOLIVAR POLICY <br />
<br />
Send PC/PreOT to Qual to read and check out on HCOPL 12 February 67 THE <br />
RESPONSIBILITIES OF LEADERS or have him read it in session. <br />
<br />
2 way comm “Supporting the powers you depend on” to a major cognition. <br />
<br />
<br />
582 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
NEW VITALITY R/D <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THEORY OF THE RUNDOWN <br />
<br />
<br />
The NVRD was designed originally to handle long-term out-of-valence or suppressed <br />
preclears. <br />
<br />
It is essentially based on the observation that PTSness is a problem, and that <br />
PTSness comes about through an exchange of valence. <br />
<br />
An individual goes PTS to someone who is a problem to hlm, to the point that the <br />
valence of that individual seems to overwhelm the person’s own beingness. <br />
<br />
There is an effect created here known as the “dumbbell phenomenon”. A dumbbell <br />
is an exercise device with two large weighted ends on a handle. One could perceive the <br />
valence of the PTS (his own valence) and that of his suppressor (the valence he tends to <br />
go into) as opposite ends of a dumbbell. One can perceive a pc flick into his own valence <br />
when the antagonistic valence is blown. This could be described as the dumbbell suddenly <br />
reversing. <br />
<br />
It must be remembered that it is not the actual valence of the suppressor that the <br />
person goes into, but the valence the PTS perceives. Whether this is what the suppressor <br />
is normally like, or is like now, the fact remains that the PTS was overwhelmed by a flow <br />
from that person at some point. <br />
<br />
Oddly enough, the PTS who is out-of-valence will perceive his own personality <br />
traits as being those of the one with whom he has swapped valences — the other end of <br />
the dumbbell. <br />
<br />
A young girl who is essentially being cooperative and accommodating is overwhelmed <br />
by her nasty, irascible, argumentative stepmother. She assumes the characteristics <br />
which seemed to win over her and becomes fractious, irascible, and argumentative. <br />
<br />
If you were to ask her who was the most accommodating, cooperative person she <br />
ever knew she might easily answer, “My stepmother”. After a moment’s reflection she <br />
might then realize, “Wait! My stepmother wasn’t accommodating at all! She was the most <br />
irascible person I ever met!” This would be an example of the dumbbell of own-valence <br />
versus perceived-valence now swinging around to a correct perception from the pc’s own <br />
valence . <br />
<br />
The access to this central point on the case is through using a gradient of 2 Way <br />
Communications, Rudiments, and R3RA. <br />
<br />
584 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
TWO-WAY COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUES <br />
<br />
<br />
The opening 2WC technique used was simply to thoroughly clear the definition of <br />
problem — including beingness-counter beingness — as described in the tech dictionary. <br />
With this whole concept clearly understood, a 2WC Quad on Problems was used to locate <br />
hot terminals. <br />
<br />
“Tell me about people who have caused you problems in life” <br />
<br />
“Tell me about people whom you have caused problems in life” <br />
<br />
“Tell me about people who have caused others problems in life” <br />
<br />
“Tell me about times you caused yourself problems in life” <br />
<br />
Each would be TWC’d to cog FN VGIs, and careful note would be made of <br />
terminals who read, and with what read. <br />
<br />
These terminals would be culled between sessions and put on a hot terminals list in <br />
the front cover of the folder. <br />
<br />
Quad Ruds would be run on hot terminals found and these ruds would uncover hot <br />
incidents. These would be noted with their reads on a separate sheet as hot incidents. <br />
These engrams or secondary engrams would then be run R3RA as narratives. <br />
<br />
TWO-WAY COMMING TRAITS <br />
<br />
A second type of TWC was done in pairs, and was based on characteristics or <br />
personality traits dramatized by the individual. <br />
<br />
These were done as dichotomies, with the negative side of the dichotomy being <br />
2WCd first. For example one has a PC who is constantly showing characteristics of being <br />
hopeless, apathetic, or lethargic. A typical pair of 2WCs might go: <br />
<br />
“Tell me about people you’ve known who were lethargic” <br />
<br />
“Tell me about people you’ve known who were very active” <br />
<br />
followed by this pair: <br />
<br />
“Tell me about people you’ve known who were hopeless and apathetic” <br />
<br />
“Tell me about people who were optimistic and confident” <br />
<br />
The point is that the two-way comms pick up the personality trait the pc is <br />
dramatizing, and two way comms for people who have had that trait. It can be any <br />
characteristic. General doingnesses could also be included as these are traits of a valence <br />
in some degree — e.g., “helped others” vs. “did others in” or “had a high sense of ethics” <br />
versus “had a negative ethics level”. <br />
<br />
The idea here is to use aspects of beingness as a lead to hot terminals. <br />
<br />
Cull the hot terminals and do ruds on them and the pc will drop into hot incidents. <br />
<br />
These are then run and the result of doing this with intelligence and accuracy is a <br />
swing back into own valence. <br />
<br />
<br />
OTHER TWO-WAY COMMS <br />
<br />
<br />
Since you are dealing with the perceived valence of the person versus the perceived <br />
valence of his/her suppressor you can also do TWCs of this sort in order to find material <br />
that leads you into the hot incidents: <br />
<br />
“Tell me some things about yourself you don’t like” <br />
<br />
“Tell me some things about yourself you like best” <br />
<br />
(Note: these are two separate TWCs, not alternate commands.) <br />
<br />
Similar TWCs can be designed which follow the basic principle of taking personality <br />
traits and using them to lead you to hot terminals who might be the basic valence mass <br />
at the other end of the “dumbbell”. <br />
<br />
END PHENOMENA <br />
<br />
The rundown has two major types of cognitions, and both of them should occur <br />
before the rundown is declared complete. <br />
<br />
The first is a realization that the person is himself. Some statement that adds up to <br />
“I’m me!” will occur if the rundown is done correctly. <br />
<br />
The second will be an awareness that the person is here, aware of the present <br />
environment, or “I’m here!”. These two cognitions are natural results of undoing the <br />
dumbbell phenomena. <br />
<br />
NOTES ON PROGRAMMING <br />
<br />
As this is a major action you should have the person’s ruds in and he should not be <br />
in the middle of other major actions. <br />
<br />
Note, too, that in order to apply these principles intelligently you have to understand <br />
the anatomy of valence-counter valence or the problem aspect to suppression. <br />
<br />
A long series of problems with mother may be enough to restimulate a valence shift <br />
even though mother did not beat the pc or knock him/her unconscious. But the constant <br />
locks can restimulate earlier engramic masses which will contain overwhelm. <br />
<br />
These get picked up and run on the earlier similar chains that come up in the actions <br />
described. <br />
<br />
When the hot incidents which keep the pc pinned into the dumbbell are lifted and <br />
erased, the dumbbell will snap around and the pc will be looking at the world through his/ <br />
her own viewpoint again for a change. This brings about the “I’m here” “I’m me” <br />
cognitions which signal the end phenomena of the rundown having occurred. <br />
<br />
There has been no pilot for administering this rundown on Clears or above as far as <br />
I know. The rundown was researched by LRH in 1975, prior to “Dianetics Forbidden on <br />
Clears and OTs”. It is paralleled in some respects by Step 15 of the NED for OTs RD. <br />
<br />
It has had spectacular results on many cases. There have been some cases it did not <br />
have spectacular results on, for various reasons. Usually these were cases being audited <br />
after Clear in error, or cases with other by-passed charge not repaired such as list errors <br />
or PT overts or other our ruds, or were XDN type cases and were not effect as much as <br />
they were contra-survival cause. The NVRD might not resolve this aspect of case (CS <br />
Series 22 cases). <br />
<br />
586 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
588 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
BRIGHT THINK R/D <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
590 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 6 DECEMBER 1978 <br />
<br />
<br />
C/Ses <br />
Tech/Qual <br />
Class IV Grad <br />
Auditors <br />
<br />
REVIVIFICATION <br />
<br />
Revivification is the bringing back to life of an engram in which a preclear is stuck. <br />
The engram or some portion thereof is being acted out in present time by the preclear. It <br />
is called a revivification because the engram is suddenly more real to the preclear than <br />
present time has ever been. He relives that moment briefly. He does not merely recall or <br />
remember it. <br />
<br />
This is not the same thing as the “returning” to an incident or engram that is <br />
employed in Dianetic auditing. Return is the method of retaining the body and the <br />
awareness of the subject in present time while he is told to go back to a certain incident. <br />
Revivification is the reliving of an incident or a portion of it as if it were happening now. <br />
<br />
This phenomenon can occur in a pc during the End of Endless Int Repair Rundown. <br />
(Ref: HCOB 24 Sep 78R, Iss 1. Int RD Series 4R. THE END OF ENDLESS INT REPAIR <br />
RUNDOWN.) <br />
<br />
The pc, being run on Recalls on Int, will often begin by recalling locks but these can trigger <br />
into full play an engram in which he may be stuck and the pc may go into a revivification <br />
of it. He will actually be answering and acting from the point or points, down the track <br />
where he has been stuck. <br />
<br />
Should this happen the auditor simply continues to run the process and get the pc <br />
through it. As the pc revivifies he blows through these stuck points on his track and comes <br />
out of them, newly, and is now truly in present time. <br />
<br />
As revivification is apt to occur on the End of Endless Int Repair, auditors must <br />
understand and be able to recognize the phenomena and handle it routinely with excellent <br />
TRs when it does. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
Founder <br />
LRH:clb <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 26 SEPTEMBER 1978 <br />
ISSUE III <br />
<br />
<br />
LIMITED <br />
<br />
DISTRIBUTION <br />
Advanced Courses<br />
<br />
Specialist<br />
<br />
Checksheet <br />
ACS Auditors <br />
ACS C/Ses <br />
<br />
NED for OTs Series 21 <br />
<br />
CONFIDENTIAL <br />
<br />
REVIVIFICATION <br />
<br />
During NED for OTs research I discovered that beings do not just reviv in time. <br />
They also reviv in location. You can have a guy totally reviv’d in time, he’s stuck down <br />
the track in an incident which is PT for him. Anything which he views, is viewed from <br />
this point in time. It is when he is. <br />
<br />
A being can also be in a reviv in place or location. That is where he is. Everything <br />
he views is viewed from that location, that viewpoint in space. They’re “buttered all over <br />
the universe”. A BT can think of himself as up there, looking down at himself. A totally <br />
wrong viewpoint. He’s in a reviv and everything he does is from a stuck viewpoint, so he’s <br />
operating with a stuck spacial point of view. Say the guy is reviv’d in Flanders, everything <br />
he does is from the viewpoint in Flanders - even tries to look at himself (now) from <br />
Flanders. He’s operating in PT from some place down the track. <br />
<br />
THOUGHT DISASSOCIATION <br />
<br />
Thought disassociation follows a point of view pattern. to you from an altered point <br />
of view, so you get disassociated thought. Say he’s in a reviv of location, in a radar station <br />
in space. You ask him “Where are the books?” - he looks at a radar screen and says <br />
“They’re going away”. <br />
<br />
I know a case who had an accident. She thought she left the body and went to a <br />
between lives implant and returned to the body. But there has been no between lives <br />
implant in that place for eons! What happened is, she was reviv’d in a between lives <br />
implant. She had the accident and went exterior, she thought she went to this between lives <br />
implant because that’s the location she was reviv’d in. <br />
<br />
This is a matter of old fixed viewpoints in spacial locations. You can often cure a <br />
case with the process “Where would you be safe?” He might go through a heavy reviv on <br />
the process and he might “do a bunk” - going back to his last point of view, locationThat’s <br />
why D/L works. You blow that point on Locate step. It’s when and where they are, as <br />
they’re not in PT. <br />
<br />
592<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
That is where he is “safe”, that’s Thought Disassociation, and that’s small pictures <br />
<br />
-because he’s in the picture, looking at the picture. <br />
These are the mechanics of the Bright Think Rundown (Disassociation process)which <br />
can be run on anybody. Running it is not part of NED for OTs as it is a separate RD. <br />
<br />
OBJECTIVE DUB-IN <br />
<br />
This is a different phenomenon from Thought Disassociation and spacial reviv. <br />
<br />
He looks at that wall, and because it’s not safe to look at the wall, he makes a picture <br />
of the wall and brings the picture back to him and looks at the picture of the wall. He’s <br />
so far south he can’t confront anything that’s in front of him. You tell him to look at the <br />
window, he sort of reaches out to the window with a beam or something, makes a picture <br />
of it, and pulls the picture back up to him, looks at it and tells you the window has bars <br />
on it. This case requires objectives until it’s safe to look at something and perceive it. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm:kjm <br />
Copyright (c) 1978 <br />
by L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
<br />
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE <br />
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex <br />
<br />
<br />
HCO BULLETIN OF 1 OCTOBER 1978 <br />
REISSUED 11 OCTOBER 1978 <br />
<br />
<br />
C/Ses <br />
Tech/Qual <br />
Class IV Grad <br />
Auditors <br />
<br />
THE BRIGHT THINK RUNDOWN <br />
<br />
A Process to Handle Disassociation <br />
<br />
Apparently, during the last decade, a new factor has entered into the culture that was <br />
previously only rare, possibly due to lowered educational standards or the declining <br />
nature of the culture itself, but most probably due to one of the common drugs or <br />
medicines or even food deficiencies. A percentage which was only one or two has jumped <br />
up to eighty or ninety. <br />
<br />
This factor is visible in a decline in the ability to tell differences, similarities and <br />
identities. <br />
<br />
In trying to train a person or get him to live a more survival type life, the <br />
establishment officer is encountering this factor. <br />
<br />
There is a similar instance of this when drugs first moved into the scene. Before the <br />
mid-60’s drugs were never much of a factor in processing and such cases were considered <br />
rare and then only as a result of medical treatments. <br />
<br />
Suddenly I has on my hands a case that did not behave like a case. The TA went out <br />
the roof unexpectedly, with no apparent cause and the case wouldn’t EP. I went into a sort <br />
out on what was different on this case from other cases. It was marijuana. Once we had <br />
run out the marijuana the case behaved like a normal case. I was suddenly looking at a <br />
rising percentage of such cases, which to date, through the kindness of psychology and <br />
psychiatry, had risen to a majority of cases in society. <br />
<br />
So here we go again. Some new factor apparently has entered into the society and <br />
has risen in a percent which is so high that it will get in the road of anyone trying to get <br />
the show on the road. <br />
<br />
The factor can be called “Disassociation”. <br />
<br />
We have here a marvellous new process — The Bright Think Rundown. Powerfully <br />
simple, it requires and auditor who is well-steeled against the temptation to Q and A and <br />
who is able to run a process through whatever it turns on. <br />
<br />
It was originally designed as a remedy for Theetie Weetie cases, but has proven <br />
enormously successful as well with cases who disassociate. <br />
<br />
594 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
This is the person who associates not A and B, but A and O. Not apples and bananas <br />
but apples and typewriters. You make a statement and he bends it over to something that <br />
has nothing to do with the price of fish. <br />
<br />
He is very hard to direct because alter-is enters into it. In fact, an alter-is could be <br />
a manifestation of being disassociated. <br />
<br />
Things which are different, he conceives to be identical. Things which are similar <br />
he conceives to be widely different. Things which are identical he conceives to be only <br />
similar. <br />
<br />
This case will mess up or complicate just about any order or communication by <br />
bringing in carloads of data which have absolutley nothing to do with it. This is because <br />
he mis-identifies and cannot evaluate differences in time, location, form, composition, or <br />
importance. He is lost in his own figure-figure and facsimilies, sometimes universes <br />
away. <br />
<br />
The new discovery is that he is back on the time track in locations very remote from <br />
where he is. It is not that he is stuck on the track where he is, but is stuck on the track <br />
elsewhere, often eons ago. <br />
<br />
This is the reason Date/Locate works. It has to be in that order. You have to date <br />
it and then locate it because the location is never in now. <br />
<br />
The auditor who runs it and the C/S who C/S’s it have to have a full command of <br />
the subject of “revivication”. <br />
<br />
Revivication is the bringing back to life of a engram in which a preclear is stuck. The <br />
engram or some portion thereof is being acted out in present time by the preclear. It is <br />
called revivication because the engram is suddenly more real to the preclear than present <br />
time has ever been. He re-live that moment briefly. He does not merely recall or <br />
remember it. <br />
<br />
This means that the person moves into a back point of time totally. He gives certain <br />
manifestations when he does this, these can be various. They always are visible to the <br />
auditor. The trick in processing is to keep running the process until the pc comes out of <br />
it just as though nothing had happened. <br />
<br />
As the process is run expect the pc to answer from points down the track where he <br />
has been stuck. These arethe points he operates from while apparently in PT. Expect <br />
engrams to appear, with revivication occuring as they are contacted and blown. As the <br />
pc re-lives these incidents, he will come out of them, newly, and this time truly in present <br />
time. And with a new viewpoint. <br />
<br />
Anaten, somatics, abrupt shifts of tone level, heat, agitated physical motion are all <br />
quite likely to occur as these points are run off, as the pc is actually revivifying at each <br />
heavy point. You just keep running the process with good TRs and metering. <br />
<br />
The auditor must ensure the pc is fully sessionable before starting the Rundown, and <br />
once started, must get the pc through the phenomena which occur as the pc revivifies and <br />
blows through the stuck points on his track. The pc’s answers will signify to the auditor <br />
precisely what is occurring. It is vital not to Q and A with these “symptoms” as they come <br />
up. <br />
<br />
<br />
THE C/S <br />
<br />
<br />
Here is your C/S for the Bright Think Rundown. <br />
<br />
Run: <br />
<br />
“Where would you be safe?” <br />
<br />
Repetitively to F/N, Cog, VGIs (and pc in PT of course). <br />
<br />
The end phenomena of the process is a realisation by the pc that he’s really in present <br />
time. This EP is normally expressed with some variation of the statement “I’m Here!” <br />
This EP must not be caoxed by the auditor asking “Are you here yet?” and the pc must <br />
not be fed the cognition. <br />
<br />
As the process is run the pc will spot places that are nearby and then places that are <br />
far away. The spots he’d spot are near, then far, then near, then far, sometimes a few near <br />
and then a few far and then a few near. If the pc does not do this then you know he is not <br />
doing the process. <br />
<br />
You will find up to 20% of your pc’s give simply glib answers and experience no <br />
change. This pc is answering the question in some particular and outrageous way. If you <br />
give him a D of P Interview on exacly how he was answering the question, you will find <br />
he was using some oddball system disassociated from the process. (The fourth American <br />
ACC tapes discuss this.) The way to handle this pc is objectives as he is too far out of it <br />
to handle a concept and is basically operating off a system. Before you can spot places <br />
in the universe you have to have a universe, right? <br />
<br />
The main errors an auditor can make are a failure to carry on the process when <br />
something peculiar happens and failure to notice a true EP has been reached. <br />
<br />
On the failed case (the 20% noted above), when objectives have honestly been <br />
completed, you can then run the process with great benefits, but be sure the pc is up to <br />
answering the question. <br />
<br />
You will get some remarkable changes. Some major wins. <br />
<br />
L. RON HUBBARD <br />
FOUNDER <br />
LRH:dm.kjm <br />
Copyright © 1978 <br />
By L. Ron Hubbard <br />
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED <br />
<br />
596 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
598 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
SUPER POWER <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
600 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
INTRODUCTION TO SUPER POWER <br />
<br />
Super Power Rundown Series 0 <br />
<br />
The following is a list of materials which should make up a checksheet for students <br />
learning to apply the Super Power Rundown materials. This background material means <br />
it is vital to understand the full theory of the basics of restoring infinite powers to a being. <br />
<br />
SCIENTOLOGY 8 <br />
SCIENTOLOGY 0 THE BOOK OF BASICS <br />
THE WHY IS GOD POLICY LETTER <br />
THE ORGANIZATION SERIES POLICY LETTERS <br />
THE PHOENIX LECTURES <br />
ETHICS AND JUSTICE POLICY LETTERS <br />
<br />
<br />
THE CONDITION BELOW CONFUSION <br />
<br />
Super Power Rundown Series 1 <br />
<br />
The first action of beingness is to assume a viewpoint. Before one can know he is <br />
below confusion, he usually has to realize that he is in a condition of no-condition. <br />
<br />
Power is the ability to hold a position in space. The first action of creating space is <br />
to assume a point from which to view that space. When a viewpoint has been knocked <br />
around down through the time track by forces he believes have affected him, he tends to <br />
lose his ability to maintain a position in space. <br />
<br />
A being can assume the viewpoint of the first dynamic and attempt to take on all the <br />
other dynamics, which eventually overwhelms him. To get a being rehabilitated into the <br />
position of being able to operate at cause on all the dynamics, it is first necessary to get <br />
him into a condition of being. <br />
<br />
Therefore, the first action one takes in running the Super Power processes is to have <br />
the person find a viewpoint. <br />
<br />
The first command is: <br />
<br />
“Find a viewpoint.” <br />
<br />
This is run to F/N Cog VGIs. <br />
<br />
Then one runs the other flows: <br />
<br />
“Find another’s viewpoint,” <br />
<br />
“Find a viewpoint that others are creating for others.” <br />
<br />
“Find a viewpoint that you have created for yourself.” <br />
<br />
A being can be so socked into the MEST universe that viewpoints have become solid <br />
objects. Viewpoints are points from which one views universes. Solid objects are made <br />
up of matter, energy, space and time. Space is created by a viewpoint; a viewpoint can <br />
think the opposite. <br />
<br />
Many times you will find a person who is inverted on the dynamics to such an extent <br />
that he feel that MEST has created him rather than the other way around. <br />
<br />
This process will get the being into a position of being able to handle the condition <br />
below confusion and set him up for the next steps of the Super Power Rundown. <br />
<br />
602 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
8TH DYNAMIC PROCESSES <br />
<br />
Super Power Rundown Series 2 <br />
<br />
This is an unlimited process. Usually you will find the person to be inverted on the <br />
dynamics. God is not an object. When one labels god with an identity one immediately <br />
degrades the 8th dynamic into MEST terms. The 8th dynamic cannot be defined in terms <br />
of MEST. It can only be defined in terms of infinity which the number 8 symbolizes. <br />
<br />
When running this process start with the 8th dynamic. Then run through the first up <br />
through the seventh and then stop. The purpose is to get the person to assume various <br />
viewpoints on all the dynamics at one level and then bring the person back to the 8th <br />
dynamic viewpoint. <br />
<br />
This process puts responsibility back into the person and sets him up for repair of <br />
all earlier actions which brought about a dwindling spiral away from the 8th dynamic <br />
viewpoint. <br />
<br />
This process is run even if the person goes exterior or has a big win. The only time <br />
you would end off the process is on a floating tone arm because obviously you cannot get <br />
any more reads on the meter. <br />
<br />
While running this process if any upsets, overts, missed withholds occur one simply <br />
cleans them up. On running OTs one deals with any body thetans, clusters, entities and <br />
so forth as they show up. Remember to audit the person in front of you which means if <br />
someone else shows up you must audit them out, set them free before you can set the <br />
person in front of you, in the body, free. <br />
<br />
Here are the commands in order: <br />
<br />
1. <br />
Assume the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
2. <br />
Get the idea of another assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
3. <br />
Get the idea of others assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
4. <br />
Get the idea of you causing yourself to assume the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
5. <br />
Get the idea of your second dynamic assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
6. <br />
Get the idea of another second dynamic assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
7. <br />
Get the idea of other second dynamics assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
8. <br />
Get the idea of you causing all second dynamics to assume the viewpoint of the 8th <br />
dynamic. <br />
9. <br />
Get the idea of your third dynamic assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
10. <br />
Get the idea of another third dynamic assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
11. <br />
Get the idea of other third dynamics assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
<br />
12. <br />
Get the idea of you causing all third dynamics to assume the viewpoint of the 8th <br />
dynamic. <br />
13. <br />
Get the idea of your fourth dynamic assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
14. <br />
Get the idea of another fourth dynamic assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
15. <br />
Get the idea of other fourth dynamics assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
16. <br />
Get the idea of you causing all fourth dynamics to assume the viewpoint of the 8th <br />
dynamic. <br />
17. <br />
Get the idea of your fifth dynamic assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
18. <br />
Get the idea of another fifth dynamic assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
19. <br />
Get the idea of other fifth dynamics assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
20. <br />
Get the idea of you causing all fifth dynamics to assume the viewpoint of the 8th <br />
dynamic. <br />
21. <br />
Get the idea of your sixth dynamic assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
22. <br />
Get the idea of another sixth dynamic assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
23. <br />
Get the idea of other sixth dynamics assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
24. <br />
Get the idea of you causing all sixth dynamics to assume the viewpoint of the 8th <br />
dynamic. <br />
25. <br />
Get the idea of your seventh dynamic assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
26. <br />
Get the idea of another seventh dynamic assuming the viewpoint of the 8th <br />
dynamic. <br />
27. <br />
Get the idea of other seventh dynamics assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
28. <br />
Get the idea of you causing all seventh dynamics to assume the viewpoint of the 8th <br />
dynamic. <br />
29. <br />
Get the idea of your eighth dynamic assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
30. <br />
Get the idea of another eighth dynamic assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
31. <br />
Get the idea of other eighth dynamics assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
32. <br />
Get the idea of you causing all eighth dynamics to assume the viewpoint of the 8th <br />
dynamic. <br />
At this point the person should be in very good shape, enough so that his earlier <br />
<br />
injustices on the track can be easily accessible from the various viewpoints of the <br />
dynamics. <br />
<br />
The next step is to do the Ethics Repair List as per Super Power Rundown Series 3. <br />
<br />
604 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ETHICS REPAIR LIST <br />
<br />
Super Power Rundown Series 3 <br />
<br />
The purpose of the Ethics Repair List is to return full power to a being by proofing <br />
him up against injustices, counter postulates, failed purposes, counter purposes and evil <br />
intentions across the dynamics. <br />
<br />
These questions are asked in an unlimited way. In other words it applies to the whole <br />
track and whatever the person comes up with you simply two way comm it earlier similar <br />
to EP. This repair list is actually designed to set the person up to be able to do the actual <br />
super power process. It cleans up the whole track on the subjects of ethics and justice. <br />
<br />
Do not take up unreading questions. This list of questions is assessed like a regular <br />
repair list except then when you get a read you stop and handle the question and its charge, <br />
then repeat the same question to ensure no further reads or charge and then carry on with <br />
assessing the list. The list does not have to be F/Ning through the whole list. Handle protest <br />
or false reads accordingly. <br />
<br />
1. Have you had a wrong intention? <br />
2. Has another had a wrong intention? <br />
3. Have others had wrong intentions? <br />
4. Have you caused yourself to have wrong intentions? <br />
5. Have you been given a wrong intention? <br />
6. Have you given another a wrong intention? <br />
7. Have others given others a wrong intention? <br />
8. Have you caused yourself to be given a wrong intention? <br />
9. Have you been given a wrong indication? <br />
10. Have you given another a wrong indication? <br />
11. Have others given others a wrong indication? <br />
12. Have you caused yourself to be given a wrong indication? <br />
13. Have you had a wrong postulate? <br />
14. Has another had a wrong postulate? <br />
15. Have others had wrong postulates? <br />
16. Have you caused yourself to have wrong postulates? <br />
17. Have you been given a wrong postulate? <br />
18. Have you given another a wrong postulate? <br />
19. Have others given others a wrong postulate? <br />
20. Have you caused yourself to be given a wrong postulate? <br />
21. Have you ever been in a wrong condition? <br />
22. Has another ever been in a wrong condition? <br />
23. Have others ever been in a wrong condition? <br />
24. Have you ever caused yourself to be in a wrong condition? <br />
25. Have you ever been assigned a wrong condition? <br />
26. Has assigned another a wrong condition? <br />
27. Have another ever assigned another or others a wrong condition? <br />
28. Have you ever assigned yourself a wrong condition? <br />
<br />
29. Have you ever applied a wrong formula for a condition? <br />
30. Have you caused another to apply a wrong condition formula? <br />
31. Have others caused others to apply a wrong condition formula? <br />
32. Have you ever caused yourself to apply a wrong condition formula? <br />
33. Has anyone ever disagreed with you? <br />
34. Have you ever disagreed with someone? <br />
35. Have others disagreed with others? <br />
36. Have you caused yourself to be disagreeable? <br />
37. Has someone ever caused you to disagree with another? <br />
38. Have you ever caused anyone to disagree with someone else? <br />
39. Have others caused others to disagree with others? <br />
40. Have you caused yourself to disagree with yourself? <br />
41. Have you ever been punished for disagreeing with someone? <br />
42. Have you ever caused another to be punished for disagreeing with you? <br />
43. Have others caused others to be punished for disagreeing? <br />
44. Have you caused yourself to be punished for disagreeing? <br />
45. Have you ever been lied about? <br />
46. Have you ever lied about someone else? <br />
47. Have others lied about others? <br />
48. Have you lied to yourself about yourself? <br />
49. Has anyone ever said that you were bad? <br />
50. Have you ever said that anyone else was bad? <br />
51. Have others said bad things about others? <br />
52. Have you ever said bad things about yourself? <br />
53. Have you ever disagreed with society? <br />
54. Has society ever disagreed with you? <br />
55. Have others disagreed with society? <br />
56. Have you disagreed with yourself because of society? <br />
57. Have you ever counter postulated the intentions of a society? <br />
58. Has society ever counter postulated your intentions? <br />
59. Have others ever counter postulated the intentions of a society? <br />
60. Have you counter postulated your intentions because of society? <br />
61. Have you ever disagreed with a spouse <br />
62. Have you ever caused another to disagree with a spouse? <br />
63. Have others caused others spouses to disagree with others? <br />
64. Have you caused yourself to disagree with a spouse? <br />
65. Has anyone ever caused you an injustice? <br />
66. Have you ever caused another an injustice? <br />
67. Have others ever caused others an injustice? <br />
68. Have you ever caused yourself an injustice? <br />
69. Have you ever been lied to? <br />
70. Have you ever lied to another? <br />
71. Have others lied to others? <br />
72. Have you lied to yourself about another? <br />
606 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
73. Have you lied to yourself about others? <br />
74. Have you lied to yourself about family? <br />
75. Have you lied to yourself about groups? <br />
76. Have you lied to yourself about mankind? <br />
77. Have you lied to yourself about the animal kingdom? <br />
78. Have you lied to yourself about the physical universe? <br />
79. Have you lied to yourself about spiritual beings? <br />
80. Have you lied to yourself about the supreme being? <br />
81. Have you ever agreed with someone verbally but disagreed mentally? <br />
82. Have you caused another to agree with someone verbally but disagree mentally? <br />
83. Have others caused others to agree with others verbally but disagree mentally? <br />
84. Have you caused yourself to agree with others verbally but disagree mentally? <br />
85. Have you ever been falsely accused? <br />
86. Have you ever falsely accused another? <br />
87. Have others falsely accused others? <br />
88. Have you ever caused yourself to be falsely accused? <br />
89. Have you ever been falsely imprisoned by another? <br />
90. Have you ever falsely imprisoned another? <br />
91. Have others ever caused others to be falsely imprisoned? <br />
92. Have you caused yourself to be imprisoned because of others? <br />
93. Have you ever been falsely imprisoned? <br />
94. Has another been falsely imprisoned? <br />
95. Have others been falsely imprisoned? <br />
96. Have you caused yourself to be falsely imprisoned? <br />
97. Have you ever been wrong? <br />
98. Has another ever been wrong? <br />
99. Have others ever been wrong? <br />
100. Have you caused yourself to be wrong? <br />
101. Have you ever been forced into something? <br />
102. Have you ever forced another into something? <br />
103. Have others forced others into something? <br />
104. Have you forced yourself into something? <br />
105. Have you ever been forced into a situation? <br />
106. Have you ever forced another into a situation? <br />
107. Have others forced others into a situation? <br />
108. Have you caused yourself to be forced into a situation? <br />
109. Have you ever been deceived? <br />
110. Have you ever deceived another? <br />
111. Have others ever deceived others? <br />
112. Have you caused yourself to be deceived? <br />
113. Have you ever been manipulated? <br />
114. Have you ever manipulated another? <br />
115. Have others ever manipulated others? <br />
116. Have you caused yourself to be manipulated ? <br />
<br />
117. Have you ever been made to stay in a location you didn’t want to be in? <br />
118. Have you ever caused another to stay in a location they didn’t want to be in? <br />
119. Have others ever caused others to stay in a location they didn’t want to be in? <br />
120. Have you ever caused yourself to stay in a location you didn’t want to be in? <br />
121. Have you ever been made to move away from a location you wanted to stay in? <br />
122. Have you ever caused another to move away from a location they wanted to stay in? <br />
123. Have others ever caused others to move away from a location they wanted to stay in? <br />
124. Have you ever caused yourself to move away from a location you wanted to stay in? <br />
125. Have you ever been given a wrong purpose? <br />
126. Have you ever given another a wrong purpose? <br />
127. Have others ever given others a wrong purpose? <br />
128. Have you ever given yourself a wrong purpose? <br />
129. Have you ever had a false purpose <br />
130. Have you ever caused another to have a false purpose? <br />
131. Have others caused others to have a false purpose? <br />
132. Have you ever caused yourself to have a false purpose? <br />
133. Do you have a wrong purpose? <br />
134. Does another have a wrong purpose? <br />
135. Do others have a wrong purposes? <br />
136. Are you causing yourself to have a wrong purpose? <br />
137. Do you have any counter purposes? <br />
138. Does another have any counter purposes? <br />
139. Do others have any counter purposes? <br />
140. Are you causing yourself any counter purposes? <br />
141. Have you ever been told you had a false purpose? <br />
142. Have you ever told another they had a false purpose? <br />
143. Have others told others they have had false purposes? <br />
144. Have you ever told yourself that you had a false purpose? <br />
145. Do you have a failed purpose? <br />
146. Does another have a failed purpose? <br />
147. Do others have a failed purpose? <br />
148. Have you caused yourself to have a failed purpose? <br />
149. Have you ever been told you had a failed purpose? <br />
150. Have you ever told another they had a failed purpose? <br />
151. Have others told others they have had failed purposes? <br />
152. Have you ever told yourself that you had a failed purpose? <br />
153. Are you evil? <br />
154. Is another evil? <br />
155. Are others evil? <br />
156. Are you causing yourself to be evil? <br />
608 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
157. Have you ever been told you are evil? <br />
158. Have you ever told another they were evil? <br />
159. Have others told others they are evil? <br />
160. Have you ever told yourself that you are evil? <br />
161. Has anyone ever made you do anything evil? <br />
162. Have you ever made anyone else do anything evil? <br />
163. Have others ever made others do anything evil? <br />
164. Have you ever made yourself do anything evil? <br />
165. Has anyone ever said that you did anything evil? <br />
166. Have you ever said anyone else did anything evil? <br />
167. Have others ever said others did anything evil? <br />
168. Have you ever made yourself say anything evil? <br />
169. Have you been wronged? <br />
170. Have you wronged another? <br />
171. Have others wronged others? <br />
172. Have you caused yourself to wronged? <br />
173. Have you been given an evil purpose? <br />
174. Have you given another an evil purpose? <br />
175. Have others given others evil purposes? <br />
176. Have you caused yourself to have an evil purpose? <br />
177. Have you ever been told you had an evil purpose? <br />
178. Have you ever told another they had an evil purpose? <br />
179. Have others told others they have had an evil purposes? <br />
180. Have you ever told yourself that you had an evil purpose? <br />
181. Have you ever done anything wrong? <br />
182. Has another ever done anything wrong? <br />
183. Have others ever done anything wrong? <br />
184. Have you ever caused yourself anything wrong? <br />
185. Is it wrong to be wrong? <br />
186. Is it wrong for another to be wrong? <br />
187. Is it wrong for others to be wrong? <br />
188. Is it wrong for you to cause yourself to be wrong? <br />
189. Is it wrong to be right? <br />
190. Is it wrong for another to be right? <br />
191. Is it wrong for others to be right? <br />
192. Is it wrong to cause yourself to be right? <br />
193. Have you ever been expelled from a group? <br />
194. Have you ever expelled another from a group? <br />
195. Have others ever expelled others from a group? <br />
196. Have you ever caused yourself to be expelled from a group? <br />
197. Have you ever been forced to leave a group? <br />
198. Have you ever forced another to leave a group? <br />
199. Have others ever forced others to leave a group? <br />
200. Have you ever forced yourself to leave a group? <br />
<br />
201. Has anything ever happened too fast for you? <br />
202. Have you ever caused anything to happen too fast? <br />
203. Have others caused anything to happen too fast? <br />
204. Have you caused yourself to have something happen too fast? <br />
205. Has anything ever happened too slow for you? <br />
206. Have you ever caused anything to happen too slow? <br />
207. Have others caused anything to happen too slow? <br />
208. Have you caused yourself to have something happen too slow? <br />
209. Have you ever been given an arbitrary? <br />
210. Have you ever given another an arbitrary? <br />
211. Have others ever given others an arbitrary? <br />
212. Have you caused yourself any arbitraries? <br />
213. Have you been given an absolute? <br />
214. Have you ever given another an absolute? <br />
215. Have others ever given others an absolute? <br />
216. Have you caused yourself any absolutes? <br />
217. Have you ever been given a false law? <br />
218. Have you ever given another a false law? <br />
219. Have others ever given others any false laws? <br />
220. Have you caused yourself any false laws? <br />
221. Have you forgotten anything? <br />
222. Have caused another to forget anything? <br />
223. Have others caused others to forget anything? <br />
224. Have caused yourself to forget anything? <br />
610 <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE EIGHTH DYNAMIC VIEWPOINT <br />
<br />
Super Power Rundown Series 4 <br />
<br />
After the person has completed the condition below confusion by finding viewpoints, <br />
the eighth dynamic processes and the Ethics Repair List, one then has the person <br />
go back to the 8th dynamic process with the following commands: <br />
<br />
1. <br />
Get the idea of your 8th dynamic assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
2. <br />
Get the idea of another 8th dynamic assuming the viewpoint of the 8th <br />
dynamic. <br />
3. <br />
Get the idea of other 8th dynamics assuming the viewpoint of the 8th dynamic. <br />
4. <br />
Get the idea of you causing all 8th dynamics to assume the viewpoint of all 8th <br />
dynamics. <br />
This now expands the persons viewpoint immensely and sets the person up for the <br />
final processes on the Super Power Rundown. <br />
<br />
Remember to run each flow to F/N, Cog, VGIs. Only end the session in the event <br />
of a floating TA and for no other reason. <br />
<br />
<br />
THE ACTUAL SUPER POWER PROCESS <br />
<br />
Super Power Rundown Series 5 <br />
<br />
The final step of the Super Power Rundown is to give back to the person his full <br />
potential power as a being. All prior steps on the Super Power Rundown have been <br />
designed to get a person into a state wherein he is set up to regain his ability to handle <br />
infinite power. These processes are run just like any other process with full F/N, Cog VGIs <br />
as the EP. If the person goes exterior continue to run the processes. If there is a dial wide <br />
F/N continue to run the process. The only time you would end off the process or the session <br />
is if the person has a persistent floating TA. <br />
<br />
At some point during the running of this series of processes the person will reach <br />
a state wherein they are speechless. They will laugh with wild abandon. Their TA will be <br />
floating! They will probably also be exterior and will be unable to communicate in words <br />
what they are experiencing. This is the end result of the Super Power Rundown. It is rare <br />
for this to occur prior to the running of the last flow of this series of processes, but if it <br />
occurs then acknowledge the win. <br />
<br />
One thing the auditor must not do is interrupt the person while in the middle of this <br />
major win or during the laughter. Otherwise it will invalidate the win. The auditor simply <br />
maintains his TRs and lets the person have his win. Do not end the session until the <br />
laughter stops as this will also tend to invalidate the person and his win. <br />
<br />
The laughter can go on for some time. Perhaps up to an hour. Be sure and just be there <br />
with the person during this win and not end the session until the laughter has subsided. <br />
<br />
The following is the last series of processes one runs on the Super Power Rundown: <br />
<br />
1. Get the idea that you have infinite power. <br />
2. Get the idea that another has infinite power. <br />
3. Get the idea that others have infinite power. <br />
4. Get the idea that you can cause yourself to have infinite power. <br />
5. Get the idea that you have been given infinite power. <br />
6. Get the idea that another has been given infinite power. <br />
7. Get the idea that others have been given infinite power. <br />
8. Get the idea that you have caused yourself to be given infinite power. <br />
9. Get the idea that you can give another infinite power. <br />
10. Get the idea that another can give you infinite power. <br />
11. Get the idea that others can give others infinite power. <br />
12. Get the idea that you can cause yourself infinite power. <br />
13. Get the idea that you are infinite. <br />
14. Get the idea that another is infinite. <br />
15. Get the idea that others are infinite. <br />
16. Get the idea that you can cause yourself to be infinity. <br />
Make sure to run only the reading process and check for interest. Do not run any <br />
process on the person in which he is not interested. <br />
<br />
612Anonymous Suppressive Personhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05339702348371749925noreply@blogger.com0